"Nasty Christian Hate Mongers" written by Paul on estrip.org

Category: hate

11/05/08 09:57 - 53ºF - ID#46546

Nasty Christian Hate Mongers

I woke up happy about the vote and then I saw this: (e:zobar,46545)

Its so confusing, because first I saw

and then this

I know its not all the christians, especially when most christians consider mormons to not be christian, but its hard to overlook their effect in the yes on prop 8 in California.

I also think the wording was confusing. I mean people probably understand, but the "vote yes on prop8 to protect marriage" would be confusing if you thought you were protecting gay marriage.

California voting yes on prop 8 pretty much makes me lose faith in just about everything related to gay rights and kind of a little bit in America. It actually makes me nervous about one day having to flee the country before I end up in some type of camp.

Why do the christians care if gay people are married in the state. No one is asking for religious recognition of their marriages, just the state rights of a married couple.

I guess we will see how the country changes with the new president but frankly - I am totally over America and really don't believe the democrats will bring anything new to the table on gay rights. I almost would have rather had a McCain president and no on prop 8.

In the mean time I hope all the people that voted yes on prop 8 die of a nasty plague. If I was not an athiest I would pray to satan about this. It really reinforces my hatred of the mormons. I think they are the scaries cult on earth and wish that the days when it was legal to shoot them woud come back.

johnallen writes at 11:35:59 11/05/08 - Comment #41674: The whole thing sucks Paul, and please be paitent. There are many churches that welcome the GBLT community, and many of us are finding that because we have opened our doors to all of God's creations, we are growing.(Like Ascension) I don't ever remember Jesus excluding this or that brand of people and it annoys the shit out of me. When the Mormons, the mega-churches and the like use the Word to spead division, hate, and flat out evil. If these churches would use their size and "pull" to defeat some of the world's worst peoblems, ie, poverty, disease, etc, perhaps then there would be some peace.

paul writes at 10:42:24 11/05/08 - Comment #41671: I still think if you eliminated all the christian, anti-gay voters, there would not be enough anti-gay support to have passed it. I mean it was not a landslide.

tinypliny writes at 07:44:10 11/05/08 - Comment #41650: Just like we had a church-state dissection quite a while back, we need a church-education dissection. We need equal educational standards for all ethnicities.

joshua writes at 07:22:24 11/05/08 - Comment #41645: Ugh, to supplement the entry I just wrote, which disappeared and hopefully (e:paul) will fix -

After the bad news, some good news. I think in the end justice will prevail. I absolutely hate saying "be patient" but gay marriage will be supported in our country in our lifetimes. Our generation is multi-racial, multi-cultural and doesn't give a damn about sexual preference. Our generation is more sensitive to each other's problems and are generally unwilling to watch one group of people be cast aside. I promise you, your day will come and I'll be there to support you, and so will so many of the people our age. Please mark my words - it. will. happen! Our generation is different from that of our fathers. In the meantime, I think within a very short time we'll see people on this very site finally enjoy the right to marry in NYS. That is a huge deal and a blow to bigoted people all over the nation, not just in NYS.

joshua writes at 07:03:56 11/05/08 - Comment #41643: A majority of Americans, and indeed a majority of Californians, do not support gay marriage and this was known prior to Prop 8. 70% of black people voted for Prop 8, which I am shocked that people are shocked about. Generally speaking, African-Americans have never been big fans of the gay agenda, and encouraging African-Americans to get out and vote was only going to increase the number of people voting against Prop 8. Over half of California latinos voted for Prop 8 as well. White people were split more than the minority groups. Certainly there is religious motivation for a lot of people (2/3 of blacks in favor of Prop 8 self-identify as Christians) but blaming it all on religion would be inaccurate. There is much more at play culturally. Scores of people who are not religious also do not support gay marriage.

:::link:::

It wasn't just rural voters that affected the outcome of the vote. 52% of Californian voters voted down the measure... c'mon. Actually, if you take a look at the interactive map the story is more interesting. Southern Cali generally supported Prop 8, and the further down I-5 you drive the more unpopular gay marriage is. Among areas with more than 25% Latino population representation, only two counties voted no on Prop 8. Same for those areas that are more than 75% white. The most stark contrast was among educational lines - the area with the highest concentration of bachelor degrees in Cali is the Bay Area, and thus it was those areas with a higher number of degreed citizens that voted against the measure.

(e:james) - since you brought up the GOP in the NYS Senate. About a week and a half ago the New York Blade had an article about this issue. According to Pride Agenda's own count, 6 of the 30 Democratic Senators oppose marriage equality. :::link::: Penny for your thoughts?

metalpeter writes at 05:32:13 11/05/08 - Comment #41637: I do agree with you that the wording was not the best and or bad. I also think that it is important to not blame the Christians yes some of them did vote for the ban but some didn't and I'm sure they are not the only ones who voted for the ban. In terms of why they don't want gays to be married is because it is wrong in there eyes. In there eyes Homosexuality is unnatural, and a sin and wrong, and on top of that they don't want to hear about it. On top of that if the state says it is ok then the state is saying it is ok to sin. They also think that marriage is between a man and women. I don't agree with them but I do see why they don't agree with gay marriage.

libertad writes at 01:38:37 11/05/08 - Comment #41609: Paul this really does take away from Obama's victory but don't lose heart. These ballot initiatives are ridiculous. I'll say it again, we should not allow these issues to be decided by the people. We are supposed to be a democracy by representation. If we allow a vote for this issue why not other issues? Why don't we put it to vote whether whites and blacks should marry? *hypothetical* This is really not acceptable and neither is anti-gay marriage referendums. By the way, Florida just like I predicted, voted for their own constitutional ban on gay marriages. It is very disheartening but think about how much more devastating this blow would be if there were a McCain/Palin victory. I know Obama hasn't stood up for us yet but it is my hope that he was holding himself back because the issue is so decisive. His victory is an indication that there is still hope for us. It is an indication that extreme right religious values will not always determine the policies and politics of this country. The election of a black man also shows that this country is capable of growing and that social change takes time.

iriesara writes at 11:37:42 11/05/08 - Comment #41604: I voted against Prop 8. That's the only defense I have for California, myself. It is interesting though the by-county map that you linked to, you can see that it's mostly the agricultural interior that supported. Hicks are hicks no matter where they are, Alabama, Olean or even the county right next to San Francisco.

jason writes at 11:24:26 11/05/08 - Comment #41600: James, if I were gay and knew Biden's votes I certainly wouldn't consider him a friend to the cause, or assume his long standing beliefs will go away, although certainly he is friendlier to the cause than Palin ever would be, as the Democratic ticket said the right things over and over that when it comes to basic rights and legal protections.

And, I actually never accused NYS of having the same approach as California. I doubt we will ever get the chance to vote on it. Their court system has done the right thing, ours has not. They have it up to a public vote, we have it up to elected officials. Our law seems to be more vague than theirs. If they recognize out of state gay marriages but won't allow them to be performed in California, then yeah I think you have a moral and legal dilemma too.

Obama has been consistent in that he is against an outright ban, although he doesn't seem to support marriage himself (said as much during the debates). He has insinuated before he is a defer to the state rights kind of guy, although this contradicts his recent statements. I think he was smart in not going one way or the other with it during the election. He is absolutely right that legal protections and benefits shouldn't be subject to discrimination.

This being said, I don't think he is someone that won't come around, although words are cheap. The cynical part of me thinks it is the desire to get elected that made him not outright support marriage, but he will come around once in office. His most recent statement sort of leads in that direction. We'll see.

drew writes at 11:16:59 11/05/08 - Comment #41599: my parents are against gay rights. While I disagree with them, and do not want them to get a plague, nor get shot at.

I think Mormons are absolutely wacky, but hurting them does not help anything. If we applied your actions towards anti-gay marriage folks towards other people who were wrong about important issues, the world would be full of violence.

I know (hope?) that you were using hyperbole, but this kind of exaggeration just isn't helpful.

james writes at 10:46:43 11/05/08 - Comment #41594: Paul, if you watched Obama's victory speech he specifically mentioned gay people. As in, and I am paraphrasing, 'this victory has to do with people, Democrat and Republican, Black and White, Male and Female, Gay and Straight". That is pretty fucking sweet. Right out of the gate he is making us apart of rhetoric in a positive way. Contrast that with Bush who spoke of us in a maligned way. Croaking on about protecting marriage and families and shit.

We are apart of his agenda and I hope the climate in the senate will allow for a major step forward for gay rights.

Jason, do you really think people had a problem voting for Biden for a vote he made in the mid 90's? Cause, damn, McCain/Palin has given us plenty of shit to hate in just the last weeks, not just last decade.
And I am not sure how you can accuse NYS for having this lame approach. Gay marriage legislation passes the assembly, the governor wants to sign it, but it is the GOP controlled senate that ruins it every time.

dragonlady7 writes at 10:38:51 11/05/08 - Comment #41593: Did you know, however, that the Yes on 8 people sent out a mailer featuring Obama's photo targeted to undecided African-American voters, and Obama personally responded by coming out strongly and in no uncertain terms against 8? Four days before the election?
It was the first time his campaign had taken a stand either way on gay rights.
So at least, at least, at least there's that.
Let me find the link, and I'll post it.

jason writes at 10:16:27 11/05/08 - Comment #41591: Oh, cmon, I thought you felt Scientologists were the biggest scariest cult. By the way, California wasn't the only state to do this in this election cycle.

I wonder how bitter it tastes for a gay person to vote for a ticket where the VP choice voted for the Defense of Marriage Act. I mean I guess you have to choose someone.

From what I've seen the donors to the wrong side of the issue come from not just the LDS. You have Catholics and evangelicals to blame as well.

It wasn't that long ago that Cali passed Prop 22 so it shouldn't be so shocking as it is that if left up to a democratic choice Californians were going to do the wrong thing. One interesting poll I heard on TV last night was that when it comes to values, McCain was favored over Obama.

Change of course doesn't come instantly, and an Obama victory doesn't mean that the country is going to have a kumbaya moment. He'll never be able to wiggle his fingers and fix deep social divides. After all, hate goes two ways.

What bothers me also is that NYS takes this mealy mouthed approach where we will accept a gay marriage from out of state, but disallow them from being performed here. That to me is a moral and legal dilemma.

Permalink: Nasty_Christian_Hate_Mongers.html
Words: 309
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: indians

11/04/08 09:37 - 57ºF - ID#46530

Illegal Onondaga Chiefs

I got this message today on the site. Not sure what its about. Did someone write a journal about it that I missed?

The real Onondagas'no longer want these illegal chiefs recognized by any government and many other of these people they have violated the Great Law of Peace now it is time for their punishment! they have all been reported to the Dept.of Justice for all their violations!

Permalink: Illegal_Onondaga_Chiefs.html
Words: 70
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: voting

11/04/08 09:01 - 57ºF - ID#46527

Crazy Voting Experience

I went to Lafayette High School with (e:terry) and (e:matthew) where I normally vote and I wasn't on the books. They both were, none of us had updated our location, despite the fact that our house is directly across from a polling station.

So they told me to check the one near my house and see if I ended up on there. I ran down and they refused to let me vote there. Then it was like 8:30. So I went home and looked online where it shows I am set for Lafayette. Then I called the Erie County Board of Elections who insisted that I vote across from my house. I went down there, with the woman on the phone and she told them to let me vote there. All of a sudden everyone changed their tune and was super nice.

I got to fill out a provisional ballot. I hope they bother counting that. I felt so dumb because I raised my hand to complain that Sam Hoyt wasn't on the paper ballott but he was on the poster on the wall. They laughed and said, you don't live in the village anymore - its a different district. So I voted for Crystal Peoples. She was the only choice. I had no choice.

I wish I could be strong like (e:vincent,46508) and vote for nader but I really don't want to risk McCain winning and honestly I am a little over nader. He seems kind of washed up now.

For some reason I show up inactive on the voter registration site. What does that even mean?

Permalink: Crazy_Voting_Experience.html
Words: 272
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: work

11/03/08 11:39 - 51ºF - ID#46504

Worst Work Day Ever

Well, not ever, but close. I worked so hard all day from the moment I got there at 10:30 till I left 5 minutes ago at 11:30 - a fun 13 hours laters. My brain actually hurts. To make it even more fun I have to be at work at 9:00am to give a presentation I already gave to the same group of people that didn't pay attention the first time. I barely had any time to prepare new material for it because I had lots of other real work to do. I find I have to explain everything like 16 times at work. Even when I use flow charts, graphs, power point presentations, send email, add wiki pages, etc - no one ever goes over it. It is so frustrating.

I also spent a whole bunch more time on IE6 problems again. I hope the programmers of that application die.

The fun sound of my macbook pro santa rosa fan dying. This is really great because I have a ton of work and no way to get to the apple store till friday when I am sure they will be too busy.

::DOWNLOAD SOUND::

Apparently, I am not the only one

Permalink: Worst_Work_Day_Ever.html
Words: 199
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: mobile

11/03/08 10:10 - 53ºF - ID#46489

PDAnet for iphone tethering

Having a jailbroken iphone is great for a lot of reasons. The best of all which is you can tether. All the tethering options until I tried this point sucked. None of them were as good as any of the windows mobile solutions.

This latest one PDAnet is totally awesome. No socks proxy, no messy settings, just ad hoc wifi network and one simple switch for on or off in the application. It even has WEP, and although WEP isn't amazing security, its better than none and seeing as it is just a temp network... its fine. Everything runs lightning fast and you can use your laptop as you normally would if connected in any other way. I can't believe it took this long for something to come along.

Here is a blog with the instructions:

Now if only apple would support this type of solution.

Permalink: PDAnet_for_iphone_tethering.html
Words: 155
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: work

11/03/08 09:19 - 53ºF - ID#46488

Time Change Decisions

I woke up an hour early effortlessly thanks to the time change. Could be a good time to change my work schedule by one hour. Then again, I might just hate it after a week. Maybe I will just go in early today and see.

Permalink: Time_Change_Decisions.html
Words: 45
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: holiday

11/01/08 10:26 - 39ºF - ID#46469

Halloween Party 2008

We started out the day at the Bonton so that (e:hodown) could get pantyhose and some makeup.

We decked out the house with lots of spider webby stuff.

I decided to be the demon farmer. I wanted a costume that was fun, easy, and revealing. I thought this one worked.

By 5am I was pretty much exhausted. This is me trying to make a serious face while posing for (e:hodown). It was the first time I wore contacts in years.

I work up at 9:20am to one messy ass kitchen. (E:flacidness), (e:hodown) and I cleaned till like 11:30. Then we left for the farmer's market. The best part was when TK first woke up he was thirsty and poured a glass of cider to chug. Unfortunately, it was the cider that Robert and James brought which was alcoholic.

Permalink: Halloween_Party_2008.html
Words: 181
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: holiday

10/31/08 08:09 - 58ºF - ID#46455

Costume Time

I had a hard time resisting being (e:lilho)'s boil. I ended up being a farmer again. This time with a devil pitch fork and some mask. (e:hodown) is her girl crush form TV.

Permalink: Costume_Time.html
Words: 37
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: www

10/31/08 12:32 - 58ºF - ID#46446

The creepiest classified ever

I was perousing through

as I find it endlessly entertaining to read about other people sex lives. I have a feeling the Buffalo ones are tame compared to those in SF or NYC. This

is definitely the most creeptastic one I have ever read. It reads like the beginning of a serial killer movie.

I am a middle-aged white man looking for a young(18-20yr old)white guy who wants to be my houseboi in sunny,warm,and wonderful,Tampabay,Florida! NO Snow,lots of sun and fun! You will have to get here on your own! I will provide room and board,No experience needed,will train the right guy. This is a long term relationship,im a dominant type of guy,a top,5'10",7"cut,heavy build,and I can be strict.I want you to do some light housekeeping,take care of my wants and needs,go places and do things with me,all at my expense! You won't need a salary,I will pay for everything!No other job allowed,No outside dating,No one in the house,and No going out with anyone! I like the quiet submissive type of guy,who does what he is told,and likes to serve others.If you are interested,send stats,photos,and contact info to me asap! this position won't last long,christmas is coming!no car wanted or needed,fly down or take the bus!
Tell me what you are into? this is a great location,beats WNY by a mile! CYA! IF THIS ISN'T FOR YOU,KEEP YOUR COMMENTS TO YOURSELF! GET A LIFE! I'M NOT LOOKING FOR A CRITIC,IM LOOKING FOR A HOUSEBOI!

To me this reads as a serial killer looking to cut you off from all communication and rape you continuously. Especially creepy is the "no car wanted or needed,fly down or take the bus!" That just screams, there will be no trace that you ever came here, and you are never leaving.

I started searching for words from the ad and found some other links:

He has either been on the search for a while or he wore the old ones out.

He also didn't post it on Tampa craigslist about it which sounds like he wants a person who has no local connections. Creepy.

Permalink: The_creepiest_classified_ever.html
Words: 410
Location: Buffalo, NY

Category: english

10/31/08 10:55 - 52ºF - ID#46445

Boy, Guy, Man - Girl, Gal?, Woman

I never call a male a boy, but sometime I call a female a girl. I think that seems wrong but often the reason is that I don't want to say woman as it sounds formal and kind of oldish. Just like I almost never refer to a male as a man.

I never say, "I talked to this man at work the other day." I would instead say, "I talked to this guy at work." Somehow, it doesn't even seem to matter what age the male was, I almost never say man. (e:hodown) says she says dude for where I say guy.

The problem is that Gal - what I think is the female equivalent of Guy - seems so colloquial and not very popular, not to mention it kind of comes off as having a sexist tone, even when unintended - like broad. Maybe its because of the generation that would typically use it. "I talked to this girl," sounds demeaning. "I talked to this woman," sounds cold and unfriendly to me.

And Then There Is You Guys
What's worse is that I often find myself saying "you guys" when referring to a group of woman. Approach by a group of female friends: "Oh, I haven't seen you guys in so long." You gals sounds sound ridiculous and y'all is way to southern colloquial. I could always use the more Buffalo based expression. "I have seen yous? in so long" I don't even know how to spelled it, it is pronounced like "use."

So what should I say? I think I might just never refer to females with pronouns again to avoid the embarrassment. But then thats kind of weird too. It almost like the language makes it difficult to refer to females

Gosh just try and look up all these terms on google images and it give you an idea about their usage.

tinypliny writes at 10:30:19 11/01/08 - Comment #41383: Call a spade a spade. To me, if its a woman, its a woman or a lady. If it's someone who I think is definitely in thier teenage years or younger, it's a girl. If its a man, it's a man. I used to say bloke a lot but thankfully it has worn off slowly. I think I hesistate to use guys because a lot of times it sounds out of context.

gardenmama writes at 02:06:00 11/01/08 - Comment #41381: I have a friend who refers to women as "chicks" but generally only when there are a group of women. It's kind of an older term, and some people find it offensive, but somehow it doesn't feel that way when he says it. I don't know, maybe it's something in his tone.

There used to be all kinds of terms: birds, babes, dolls, etc. but none of them seemed to last the way guys has. My vote is ladies over women. And I can't stand "yous" or "yous guys" - but I grew up in a house with an English professor for a mother - we would have been whacked in the head for using either of those.

metalpeter writes at 07:31:37 10/31/08 - Comment #41380: Guys as been turned into the plural for a group of people if it it is women. Gals doesn't sound right and the other problem with gal is that when said it sounds like the name Gail. Ya'll is fine yes it is southern but it is southern that everyone knows. Why not use the term ladies. Yes I know it is kinda not correct because it doesn't mean females it means a certain type of female just like using the term gentlemen isn't really correct either. I say stay with the southern use of Madame or mam and mister but how to say hi to a group of ladies or of men and women I'm not really sure.

heidi writes at 07:03:14 10/31/08 - Comment #41377: I use y'all a lot, but I have the excuse of living in Maryland for nine years. I definitely prefer and use "woman" or "women" in any professional/work/school context.

libertad writes at 06:33:34 10/31/08 - Comment #41375: I prefer to refer to girls as peaches.

theecarey writes at 11:43:15 10/31/08 - Comment #41368: I rarely say, "men" or "woman". I simply dont like the sound of it. It sounds so 'mature' and I feel so immature still, ha. On the other hand, I like to sometimes use "gentleman" and "ladies". A little bit quirky.

Like you, mostly it is the use of "guys", that I prefer. Never "gals" though. I often generalize "guys" to include females. It is more neutral sounding to me than gender specific when used as "hey guys whats up". But obviously gender specific if i hear/say, "I talked to this guy.."

When I use the word "boys", it is slighted to be demeaning or cutesy. I do however, often use and hear "girls" and I don't think it sounds demeaning or cutesy. It is more equivalent to the "guy" word than using "gal", I think.
So "guy/girl" it is!

jenks writes at 11:38:54 10/31/08 - Comment #41367: yeah I agree, there's a hole in the language there. We need a female version of "guy". I think I say girl... like "I was talking to this girl at work..." or maybe woman if they're older/more senior. But I will call a group of girls 'you guys' all the time. I have no problem with that.

jim writes at 11:32:37 10/31/08 - Comment #41366: Or Baltimorian "yos", as in: "Haven't seen yos in a while."

"Yos" and "y'all" both sound southern and informal of course. And we can't forget Drew's Appalachian "yinz" or the (common in Buffalo) "yous", completing our tour of common second person plural gender neutral pronouns in American sub-dialects.

I tend to use "y'all" sometimes.

drew writes at 11:32:28 10/31/08 - Comment #41365: yinz? It works in Pittsburgh.

jim writes at 11:25:36 10/31/08 - Comment #41362: y'all, maybe

jason writes at 11:08:04 10/31/08 - Comment #41358: I usually say "you girls" which hasn't earned me a kick to the crotch yet.

mike writes at 11:01:59 10/31/08 - Comment #41357: i generally refer to guys my age or younger as kid. which i guess is weird. And i think whatever age I am will be the cut off in my head. I will say like I saw this kid today but really it could be a 25 year old but i never use kid when referring to females. Weird.