Hey for those that like V-day hope it was great. For those that don't and are going out Hope you have a great time and maybe get a little bit of or a lot of action tonight and for those of you who hate it have a fun time hating it. Oh I do like V-day story lines, ok gotta go so I don't mis bones.

I wanted to find an awesome picture of a Black Rose or some cool gothic like valentine image to change to my user picture For V-day but I didn't find one that i like. Ok but onto the reason why I'm posting. Well I borowed this off another serch I did it isn't exactly what I want but it is good enough.

I will admit I love 24 and have to watch it every monday (today 8-10pm) , however I wonder how many of those actors can really act. I think Kieffer can pull it off but he is the only one possibly. Take hugh Laurie (from House) as an example. He has a strong accent but yet when he plays house he plays him where you don't even know he isn't american no matter what he says and he makes him sound like a jerk on top of that. So few actors ever do that anymore. Most actors in major movies play there character in the way that they speak wether it be Sam Jackson, Hugh Jackmen, The Rock, Jude Law, Kevin Spacey or who ever. Yes they do play differant characters in differant movies or even TV sometimes but they never change there voice. Hence when you see an actor you don't see the character you see the actor. But I wonder if this is the actors fault or the writers fault. If someone is just writen words and not a manner of speaking then you will always here the actor. This is true in animation sometimes as well. Sometimes after the people read there lines the mouths are redrawn to fit the voice person. But shouldn't it be the other way around sot that the actor fits with the character. Maybe I'm spliting straws here. But to hear actors in differant voices and manners of speaking would give films more creditablity and make characters move belivable. Or maybe I just have to see a wider range of movies where acents and manner of speaking is more important.

That says Paul said why dosnt any one use this . As you may be able to tell I need to get a new mouse it really makes writing tough on the draw tool. I think that sometimes people forget about features on here like that and the inlink and spellchecker other things.

Last night the concert I went to was very good. The Opening band was called Leo I thought they where verry good and bought there CD and they signed it for me. I also Enjoyed Burden Brothers and got there CD also. Breaking Benjimen was fun to watch to and the crowd went nuts they where really awesome I thought. I had a good time.

On a side note: If you arn't happy with your life Change it. If you hate your job go find a new one. If your parents babied you or coddled you or did something else to screw you up, don't complain, don't be complacant change who you are. Often we as people arn't happy about where we are in our lives so we do things that don't help us. To relax we do drugs or alcohol to forget. We get angry and upset and take it out on other people. If you arn't happy with where you are strive to change it. I'm not saying it is easy but instead of complaining and fealing sorry for your self use that anger and hate to propel your self in a positive direction. This isn't aimed at anyone specificly but just kinda a rant that I can't really say anything more about on here.

Just sord of a question am I the only one that hears some blogs as I read them?

I'm not talking about video blogs or listening to comments I mean when I read some blogs I hear them in the writers spoken voice. So far it only happens that I can think of on a couple blogs that I can think of. The first is on My Space I admit it is the blog Of Kevin Smith (Mallrats, chasing amy, dogma and other movies). I have heard him speak on commentaries and on and evening with kevin smith. So since I've heard his voice so much it kinda makes sense that I would read his blog and hear it in the way that he speaks. It may happen in a couple journals here but the one that comes right to mind is (e:Enknot)'s blog. I think that might be bacause even though I did read his blog before I met him he never had a picture up where you could tell what he looked like. Everyone has their own voice and maner of speaking and some of those combo are verry distinct maybe that is also part of the reason I hear those to a voices when I read there blogs. I'm going to have to pay more attention to other blogs and see if this happens with any one else. I kinda think it might also tie into how much you read proportionaly to how much you hear of someone. Then I also think that the time factor may have and effect. Or maybe I'm just losing my mind a little bit.

First of all if anyone wants to watch 24 but thinks they are to far behind to catch up on the story that isn't true. At the begining of every episode they a short couple minute catch up. You can also watch 24 on line at Fox.com I'm not sure how but I belive they have all the episodes that have aired on the site. Also on Monday 24 starts at 8pm and is on for 2 hours that should be awesome.

Saturday is as I'm sure some of you know The Hugs and Kisses event at Rainbow rink. I will be at The Edge's misfit Christmas with Breaking Benjimen and Burden Brothers. It should be a good time.

I know it isn't finalised Yet but the big ozzfest anoucement is that it will be free this year. I guess you will get tickets through companies that sponser ozzfest. I doubt they will come to Buffalo and I'm guessing I won't wind up going, but going to an ozzfest would be cool.

I know I don't talk about Boston Legal verry often but I think it is a great show. How can you not like a show with Candice Bergmen, William Shatner, Kal from Kenan and Kal, and James Spader. Yes it is kinda wacky some times but it is so fun to watch. I burned it last night and watched it today. There where multiple court cases but one was about a judge that paid to go to church couseling to be turned stright the church even had a name for it like it was a diasee. It is kinda ironic that, that topic came up in that show with the post I wrote yesterday about the snickers ad.

Van Halen are getting back togather for a tour But Micheal Anthony is having nothing to do with it, and Van Helan's 15 year old son will play bass and David Lee Roth will be singing, wonder how long that will last.

The Police are getting back togather for the Grammies. I wonder if they will try to make a comeback if things work out well on the show.

Where is Metallica, I miss Metallica.

I heard that the Goo Goo Dolls performed on QVC and then you could buy the DVD of there performance, that sounds interesting. I think there are other bands that are doing or did that to. I think that is a neat idea I just wish I knew about it.

The O.C. is winding down with only a few more episodes to watch. I for somereason really like that show.

Oh by the way MTV does still play Music videos. If you watch (i don't) TRL you will see part of the video. I forget what the exact name of the show is something like nocturnal nightmare or something about not sleeping VH1 has a simalur late night early morning show. MTV2 is the place to see Videos or one of there other specialty MTV stations like MTV hits or what ever it is called. I also do like some of there reality shows but don't always stay up on them. The Real world is good. Last night I saw Mauai Fever and it reminded me of Laguna Beach. My question is where were the ugly or normal looking girls they didn't have any they where all hoties. After the show they had A Good Charlote video on that was kinda cool. I havn't seen Bam's unholy union yet but I bet it is funny. from what I understand MTV2 is going to have New episodes of Crank Yankers and Celebirty Death match.

I guess that is enough of my yamering if I know it is early but I hope everyone has a great weekend.

Before I get into the entire snickers ad thing I want to say what my beliefs are. I think my beliefs on homosexuality arn't had by many people but I could be wrong. First of all I belive that there is nothing wrong with being gay or even bi. I think that there is no real realigous base for people who say it is a sin. I belive that it is a natural state of being and that people who are gay arn't screwed up. I do belive that there are gay animals. I think that gay Marriage is fine. I also belive that there is a differance between a religous marriage in a church and by the state. I think civil unions that give all the same rights as mariage should be legal in every state. I also belive that state mariages should be legal for gays in every state. However I don't think that priests and other religous people who grant marriages in churchs should have to merry gay couples. The reason is that a state marraige and a marraige in the eyes of the lord are differant. I also belive that realigous people who only do realigous marriages can't be sued for not doing a gay mariage. I also belive that they shouldn't merry anyone who isn't doing it for love and undergod in a church. I belive people who are gay should stand up for there rights and march in parades and they shouldn't be harrased for it. But what I don't like is when someone says hello I'm gay oh yeah and my name is. If you are gay that is fine but I don't walk up to you and say I love pussy and BJ's nice to meet you.

Ok now onto my point. Today at work I heard that the snickers add that was on the superbowl where two guys kiss on acident was pulled because of complaints that is was homophobic. I didn't think it was at all. It was a play on of that scene from "lady and the Tramp" where the two dogs kiss. Granted that may have been based on something else. Below I have the article and then I will talk more about it after the article.

chicagotribune.com >> Business

---

Snickers Ad Pulled After Complaints

By Associated Press
Published February 6, 2007, 4:52 PM CST


HACKETTSTOWN, N.J. -- A commercial for Snickers candy bars launched in the Super Bowl broadcast was benched after its maker got complaints that it was homophobic.

The ad showed two auto mechanics accidentally kissing while eating the same candy bar and then ripping out some chest hair to do something "manly." One of the alternate endings on the Snickers Web site showed the men attacking each other.

The Human Rights Campaign and the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation complained to the maker of Snickers, Hackettstown-based Masterfoods USA, a division of Mars Inc., which also makes M&M's and other candies.

The Web site also featured video of players from the Super Bowl teams reacting to the kiss.

"This type of jeering from professional sports figures at the sight of two men kissing fuels the kind of anti-gay bullying that haunts countless gay and lesbian school children on playgrounds all across the country," Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese said in a statement.

GLAAD spokesman Marc McCarthy said Tuesday the group believed "this kind of prejudice was inexcusable."

Masterfoods spokeswoman Alice Nathanson issued a statement in which she said the company would stop running the ad on television and the Web site.

"As with all of our Snickers advertising, our goal was to capture the attention of our core Snickers consumer," Nathanson wrote.

"Feedback from our target consumers has been positive. In addition, many media and website commentators of this year's Super Bowl commercial line-up ranked the commercial among this year's top ten best. USA Today ranked it 9 of its top ten picks," she continued.

"We know that humor is highly subjective and understand that some people may have found the ad offensive. Clearly that was not our intent," she wrote.

Masterfoods brands include Uncle Ben's rice, Pedigree dog food and Whiskas cat food. It is part of Mars Inc., a family-owned company.

• __

On the Net:

Masterfoods:



Copyright © 2007, The Associated Press

I will be the first to admit that I never went to the website so I didn't see the guys attack each other. I also didn't see the reacation of the football players to the add. I can't figure out why they would have that video on their site that makes no sense and it would also make it look like no one liked their ad. Two guys attacking each other sounds like it could be offensive. To me it sounds like the web content is what got them in trouble so they should just take that down.

I will admit I thought the comerical was funny my self and it isn't the first ad to use to guys touching each other and not being happy about it. I don't remember what it is for but there is one where two guys are watching a game and there hands touch on the couch it takes them a second to notice it and then they both move to opposite ends of the couch. To me the ad had nothing to be with being gay at all. It was about how Men are men and can't kiss or hug or do anything unmanly so then to be masculine they rip off there own chest hair. That being funny points to it not being about gays at all. I think sometimes people just have to learn to have a sense of humor about things. That is kinda what all those caveman comericals are about "so easy even a caveman can do it" winds up sending him to a shirnk. I know that you don't want commericals that blantly discrimanate aganst anyone, but at the same time ads should be allowed to be funny. What if when they kissed in stead of freaking out one of the guys said oh you are not my type get away from me, or get off of me I'm not french. Ok then I could see the french getting mad but it would still be funny. When ever a comerical is funny it makes fun of someone. I don't think we should be censoring our ads what is next then.

There is another thing that this kind of complaining does. I think that it causes more problems. It makes in this case gays look like they have no sense of humor and that they think they are special. It also pisses off some of their supporters. I think the complaining does more harm then good in this case. If I where more sensitive or gay I might feal differantly. I think the real problem here is intent. People who are discrimanated against can sometimes assume that the intent was to hurt them (sometimes they are correct and sometmes not). The only people who really know the intent are the ones who wrote the add. People like myself see that there was no intent. Then people who think that homosexuality is wrong or who are on the fence think that the gays are going to far and that they are trying to push there agenda onto us (as they might say).

Ok I have allready wrote a post that is way to long. But what I said is true. I have no problem with anyone who is gay and I think condeeming them is wrong. I just think that in this case there may be some over reacting. That dosn't mean I like anyone who is gay anyless.

Went to the Bandits game and saw my boss there, that was interesting. I did enjoy the game but the Bandits lost. There where a lot of Penalities on the Bandits at least a few of them where bad from my viewpoint. That let Toronto get off to a good lead. Buffalo would start coming back but could never catch up. They Play again in Toronto I can't find the game on TV anywhare so Maybe I'll listen to it and watch the Sabres. The computer I use to go on line now has MSN/Verison DSL. I'm new to it but it is preaty nice. Now I can actually watch video on line. I'm sure there is more stuff that I have to look into like games and the messanger that I may use at some time, but for now it is preety nice. I wonder about downloads and uploads and if they will be much faster, in time I will play around with it. Once online firefox seems to work fine. I know there was something else I wanted to talk about that wasn't superbowl related but not sure what. Hopefully soon I will have some more pictures to upload. I still feal like going someplace to take pictures but not sure where would be a good place.

So on Friday the Bandits Play the Toronto Rock at HSBC Arena. Early on in the season it is really an important game allready. The reason it is so important is that they Play Toronto on Saturday in Toronto. If Buffalo can somehow win both games then they will have two wins and The Rock will really be behind but if the opposite happens then Toronto hopes right back into things and the Bandits will be introuble. Then the big game is Sunday. In some ads you hear the Superbowl mentioned as the big game. The reason for this is that they don't have the rights to use the Term "superbowl" in an ad. If any one can have the rights to the use of there name then there name has no power and they lose a lot of money on advertisements and sponsers. It is kinda strange but I completely get it. If it wasn't for the superbowl I might have decided to go up to Toronto for the night and see the bandits play there and then maybe partake in some nightlife of the adult kind, but not bold enough or rich enough to find the illegal stuff but one night of the bandits will be good enough. I wonder if the Toronto Game will be on TV I have heard Vs. has some Lacrosse games on, on a delay I'll have to look into that.

First of all I put up a new user pic. It isn't a new picture really but I croped one from a couple years ago (maybe). The beach is in (if memory serves me correctly) San Juan, Puerto Rico. I should admit that it is the San Juan that cruise ships go to. I have heard there are two of them from someone I know. If they where pictures from a digital camera I would put up more from that area. I remember there wasn't much access to the beach and you could see it from an overlook.

Since Thursday I have been watching the Winter X Games. I like a lot of differant sports. Not sure what event I like the best. One sport that the added that is really cool to watch is freestyle snowmobile. It isn't just one trick they follow a course of jumps and have a time limit. The only downside is that they took out a sport that I really liked for it. That was freestyle motorcross. That was really insane they had these screws in the wheels so they could get tracksion but it was really fun to watch. But in all honestly snowmobiles makes more sense, oh yeah and they can and do backflip them. Ok now I'm off to watch Prision Break, and in just over an Hour 24 and hopefully burn Heroes (great show by the way)

The pictures I'm putting up are from my "Hood". For those of you who may read this and don't know, I live on the west side of Buffalo. If you walked down Elmwood to Bryant and then down Bryant to Richmond that gets you to Conneticut(however it is spelled) st. Not that I ever do but if you went down conneticut a few blocks you would be about a block away from my house.








I took those picture today on my way to and from the bank. The strange part is that those two houses next to each other are next to the church on Richmond, what is going on there? One of them is boarded up from the outside and looks like a window is open and the other one looks like it is boarded from the inside. Why is that shop on Elmwood Boarded up? I looked in the window and it looked like there was stuff inside like they are still open and there are posters or signs in the windows, What is going on in this town? Boarded up places in my part of the "Hood" isn't so strange. The multiple porch house is verry close to me and I just noticed the boards yesterday. Is the boards a good sign that people arn't there or is it bad (I don't know enough to know)?

I mis spoke about Richmond a little bit This picture was from around the Oct. Storm near Utica I think.