Promissory Estoppel
I'm reading the info on distinctions between Pennsylvania contract law and common law or Uniform Commercial Code Art. 2 and it includes promissory estoppel, which @kookcity2000 thinks is interesting.
Promissory estoppel allows a promisee to enforce a promise against a promisor even when there's no consideration. Consideration is a legal detriment that binds one to a contract. It's usually money for service or product but it could be product for service or something else.
Example: @lilho promises @paul that she will give him a year's worth of tortoise food if he stops going out dancing for a month. @paul thinks this is a good bargain and stops growing dandelions and strawberries for Basra and T2. At the end of the month, @paul hasn't been dancing but @lilho laughs and says she wasn't serious. Now Basra and T2 are hungry. Can @paul sue @lilho for tortoise food?
Yes! Why?
- Was a contract formed? @lilho made an offer, @paul accepted, so yes.
- Was there consideration? @lilho isn't getting anything for her promise, so no (@paul not dancing for a month doesn't affect @lilho's life although that's what she asked for).
- So why can @paul sue? Promissory estoppel: Because he relied on @lilho's promise by tearing out the dandelion and strawberry garden and an injustice will occur if @lilho's promise is not enforced - Basra & T2 would go hungry. Was it reasonably foreseeable (or even just reasonable) that @paul would rely on the promise? Yes, because @paul thinks growing tortoise food is a pain.
Promissory estoppel allows a promisee to enforce a promise against a promisor even when there's no consideration. Consideration is a legal detriment that binds one to a contract. It's usually money for service or product but it could be product for service or something else.
Example: @lilho promises @paul that she will give him a year's worth of tortoise food if he stops going out dancing for a month. @paul thinks this is a good bargain and stops growing dandelions and strawberries for Basra and T2. At the end of the month, @paul hasn't been dancing but @lilho laughs and says she wasn't serious. Now Basra and T2 are hungry. Can @paul sue @lilho for tortoise food?
Yes! Why?
- Was a contract formed? @lilho made an offer, @paul accepted, so yes.
- Was there consideration? @lilho isn't getting anything for her promise, so no (@paul not dancing for a month doesn't affect @lilho's life although that's what she asked for).
- So why can @paul sue? Promissory estoppel: Because he relied on @lilho's promise by tearing out the dandelion and strawberry garden and an injustice will occur if @lilho's promise is not enforced - Basra & T2 would go hungry. Was it reasonably foreseeable (or even just reasonable) that @paul would rely on the promise? Yes, because @paul thinks growing tortoise food is a pain.






