Category: politics
06/24/11 09:37 - ID#54569
New York same sex marriage
Permalink: New_York_same_sex_marriage.html
Words: 22
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/24/11 09:39
Category: tourism
06/24/11 09:02 - ID#54568
Outer Harbor
Permalink: Outer_Harbor.html
Words: 34
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/24/11 09:03
Category: silly
06/23/11 10:55 - ID#54553
Mahna Mahna!
Permalink: Mahna_Mahna_.html
Words: 37
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/23/11 10:55
06/22/11 08:33 - ID#54550
Guest
Permalink: Guest.html
Words: 20
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/22/11 08:33
Category: ideas
06/15/11 08:33 - ID#54500
Madeline Davis
Permalink: Madeline_Davis.html
Words: 16
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/15/11 08:33
Category: food
06/13/11 10:14 - ID#54492
Sexy sink
Permalink: Sexy_sink.html
Words: 2
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/13/11 10:14
Category: food
06/12/11 05:52 - ID#54486
Groceries
Permalink: Groceries.html
Words: 25
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/12/11 05:52
Category: school
06/11/11 01:44 - ID#54469
First cousin vs gay marriage
(Gotta love the domain "unicornbooty")
How 'bout those states that allow both?
Permalink: First_cousin_vs_gay_marriage.html
Words: 55
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/11/11 01:47
Category: home
06/07/11 09:17 - ID#54444
Walmonster!
Permalink: Walmonster_.html
Words: 12
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/07/11 09:17
Category: family
06/07/11 03:54 - ID#54441
The little things
Permalink: The_little_things.html
Words: 70
Location: Buffalo, NY
Last Modified: 06/07/11 03:54
Author Info
Date Cloud
- 03/16
- 12/15
- 05/15
- 02/15
- 01/15
- 11/14
- 10/14
- 09/14
- 08/14
- 07/14
- 06/14
- 04/14
- 02/14
- 01/14
- 12/13
- 11/13
- 10/13
- 09/13
- 08/13
- 07/13
- 06/13
- 05/13
- 04/13
- 03/13
- 02/13
- 01/13
- 12/12
- 11/12
- 10/12
- 09/12
- 08/12
- 07/12
- 06/12
- 05/12
- 04/12
- 03/12
- 02/12
- 01/12
- 12/11
- 11/11
- 10/11
- 09/11
- 08/11
- 07/11
- 06/11
- 05/11
- 04/11
- 03/11
- 02/11
- 01/11
- 12/10
- 11/10
- 10/10
- 09/10
- 08/10
- 07/10
- 06/10
- 05/10
- 04/10
- 03/10
- 02/10
- 01/10
- 12/09
- 11/09
- 10/09
- 09/09
- 08/09
- 07/09
- 06/09
- 05/09
- 04/09
- 03/09
- 02/09
- 01/09
- 12/08
- 11/08
- 10/08
- 09/08
- 08/08
- 07/08
- 06/08
Now I admit that I can't figure out for the life of me since we are supposed to have the separation of church and state how Plural marriage is illegal wouldn't that be the endorsing a religion that isn't being a Mormon? But isn't also right in line with the Catholic Church the you can only love one person.... What I don't get even more is how one gets a licence to marry and do it at a church and it is something legal...What sounds like the two are connected to me....
In any event I don't think someone who is "A Minister" should have to perform a Marriage he doesn't agree with... Might be old fashioned but I don't think it stops at gays if Husband is abusive ..... Not sure it is true or not but at one time didn't kids have to take classes before they got Married?
On kinda a side note if "People of the cloth" had to perform them I think the law would have been struck down... I think that a lot of those who don't want to do them would have put pressure on their followers to put pressure on their Representatives... I also think that this freedom of "Clergy" helped people who might be opposed vote yes....
All this Being Said If I had the Cash I would Open up some Wedding Chapels and things in say Niagara Falls.... I would start running ads.... Yes I would have to Advertise the stuff in Canada .....
So does that mean religious organizations CAN discriminate against same sex couples and they don't have the power to sue these religious organizations? Why on earth would anyone say yes to this type of clause? "Marriage" as it is defined currently in an albeit limited way has a ton of religion-community-faith issues entwined in the definition. By allowing free-reign to religious organizations to discriminate against same sex marriages, you are making the definition of what "marriage" is different for same sex couples. That is discriminatory in and of itself -no?
- California's same-sex marriage came into being because of a state supreme court case, not because the legislature passed it.
- California has a citizens' initiative process that NY doesn't have.
- NY already recognizes out-of-state same-sex marriages (judicially and administratively).
The only risk to ssm in NY is the "inseverability clause" in the legislation. Most pieces of legislation have clauses that say that if a court finds some piece of the legislation unconstitutional, then the rest of it stands, ie. the bad part can be severed from the good part. This one has a different provision, that if one piece of the legislation is found unconstitutional, the rest is gone, too. That's to strongly discourage lawsuits over the religious exemptions pieces (which allow religious orgs & their affiliates to discriminate against same-sex couples). I didn't read the text of the law, this is what I gathered from the Senate speeches. Other states have not had much litigation about their same-sex marriage laws; the NY Senate Republicans were using the issue to be assholes. :::link:::