Skip to the posts
Buffalo's neighborhood journals since 2003 🍀 Patrick Spicy Devil Logan🌭 Sahlen🥨 Weber Spank🥟 Pierogi🐸 Scaj🍺 Labatt Utica Pink Cherio❄️ Snow Murder

tinypliny’s journal

Julie and Julia

· · 🌡️ 36°F

Is pitch perfect.

image

Only, I think Amy Adams was a very poor choice. She is just too goody-shoes to be convincing and absolutely fades in front of Meryl Streep. That actress who played Bridget Jones could have been more effective. The real author could have been a fabulous choice.

The movie was a nice contrast between the 60s and now; a look at just how far we have come in terms of personal freedom of expression without bureaucratic constraints. Evidence is this blog that came to life as the movie. Of course, being recognized for it in the face of enormous odds of sinking into oblivion, is a fairytale and a real one. But really, that is very thin justification for casting that chirpie unreal disney fairytale fluff woman. I think the movie could have done on the "Julie side" with a lot more grittiness and conviction - would have made it happier, ironically.

Throughout the movie, I wondered about the cooking. If Julia Child's cooking was so iconic here, what influence did she really have on American home-cooking, in general. Could it be that her rich French recipes were slightly misinterpreted across the pond and people ended up with more plaque in their arteries than they could manage? I have never really read her recipes or seen her shows but what were the portion sizes she advocated? Anyone know?
237 words

💬 3 comments

  1. mike ·

    I'm sorry you are so wrong but Amy Adams was perfect for that movie! I loved the movie and i loved her. But i always love her so maybe i am bias. But i love that movie!
  2. tinypliny ·

    Hehehe, I didn't say I dislike Adams, in fact I think she was way beyond AWESOME in Enchanted (which I LOVED!) but it is just that the original author of Julie and Julia was not as privileged or "sophisticated" as the real Julia Child seems to be. She was forced to blog at a time when her life was full of negatives.

    I know they tried to portray it in the movie, but I am really critical of cooking movies, so I felt something was missing in sarcasm and darkness that goes into cooking usually - on Julie's side. It was too sunny. Sometimes, humour is just dark. Cooking humour is almost 90% dark. I simple HATED that movie "No reservations" because it was terrible in my opinion. I liked this movie but I couldn't identify with any of the cooking or the chefs, and that took away something from the movie. Maybe I had too high expectations... But the movie, on the whole, was beautiful.

    The cinematography was amazing, the colours popped everywhere, the sets were detailed and really picture perfect!
  3. dimartiste ·

    Did you get the DVD with the Bonus Disc? It was more expensive,but my mom and I watched it the other night over Chinese Take out. Go Figure! Anyhow. This movie really got me thinking about the courage Julia Child had and what she did for American Cooking. As well as blogging, but I mentioned that in my post. The extras were cool. There was a 90 minute best of the best with Julia Child. Merryl Streep did an amazing job. Rene Zellwiger definately can do train wrecks better than most. Have you seen New In Town? Very funny. I did like Amy Adams in both rolls. Although during the meltdowns a page from Bridget Jones would have made for an intreguing possiblity. Although the real Julie did not seem the same as either might have portrayed her.

💬 Write a comment