09/18/07 08:06 - 73ºF - ID#41183
Pro Lifers...
My mother...yes, the christian...was/is pro-life. However, I felt the need to discuss with her why we need to have safe, afordable abortions available for those who want/need it. She understands. The world is not perfect. Yes, in a perfect world, women would not have to get abortions, but we all know too effin well that this world is not perfect and it is ridiculous to go about pretending like it is. I guess my issue here is similair to that of the crazy funadamentalist sign carrying christians who shove their morals down other peoples throats. Go home. Be with your kids. Get a hobby that doesn't involove making other people feel like shit so you can make yourself feel better.
Permalink: Pro_Lifers_.html
Words: 229
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: elmwood
09/18/07 11:59 - 65ºF - ID#41174
Fire
In the article you can really feel the pain of the guy who owned the house and puts lots of money and work into it. He loved that house and compared losing it to the death of his parents. Very sad. I am not sure where I am going with this, but I guess it is making me think about loving inanamate things, objects really, and the human ability to bring them to life in all but the true sense of the word.
Moving on to more mundane things like the weather. Tomorrow it is supposed to be beautiful and felly and I both kinda have the day off (although I feel like I can never have a day off because the reading just keeps on coming). Either way, I know that beautiful days like today and tomorrow will not be around for much longer, so I plan on enjoying them as much as I can.
In other news. I have come to discover that driving west on 33 at 7:00pm is the worst idea ever. The sun is soooo blinding that I can't see the road, the car in front of me, the signs, nothing. For this reason, and this reason only, I am looking forward to the sun setting a little earlier each day. and if you happen to be driving on that road at the time, I am the douche bag driving 50 mph in the middle while people pass me on both sides because I can't see a godam thing!
Permalink: Fire.html
Words: 331
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: religion
09/17/07 12:48 - 58ºF - ID#41153
Re: Is religion harmful?
Way to go Drew. It is sad but true that crazies like Fred Phelps and others wave the banner of religion and christian beliefs using the name only to spout hatefull slurs that encourage violence. This only leads to more hatred of these so called christians. I refuse to believe that all christians are like this, because, for example, my parents are quite religous, every sunday church goers if you will, yet openly accept me and my partner with loving arms. granted they were not always so accepting, but sometimes all it takes is a little love, patience, and guidance and cure those nasty habits. fundamentalists, extremists, people that teach hate...they should not and do not exemplify christianity. they are confused, scared, and ignorant to what the bible really teaches...love, respect, honesty. not that i am saying that christianity works for me, because after 18 years of (presbyterian)religious knowledge, i know that, right now, it doesn't. that however does not mean that I go around disrespecting those who find meaning within that community. whatever floats your boat, thats why I say. i think throughout history, as Drew said, people have shown themselves to need religion, spirituality of some sort or another. why? to find meaning, understanding, peace of mind, security. many reasons I am sure. the problem comes only when one group refuses to acknowledge that other options exist. I have my beliefs, you have yours...can't we all just get along?
Permalink: Re_Is_religion_harmful_.html
Words: 264
Location: Buffalo, NY
09/17/07 11:14 - 58ºF - ID#41151
Sally Fields
Permalink: Sally_Fields.html
Words: 71
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: school
09/16/07 11:55 - 54ºF - ID#41127
Bath Time
I have always been a reader. I remember being young and staying up late reading, becoming so connected with the characters to the point of never wanting the book to end. And now, well, I have read 200+ pages of this book since yesterday, because I couldn't put it down. Partly because it is a relief to be reading a novel rather than theory of one type or another, but also because, even though it is fiction, it is about people. About people's lives, relationships, hardships, joys and sufferings and all that jazz. This is what I cling to. This is why feminism grabbed me the way it did, and this is why I despise reading abstract theories that have nothing to do with individual people. And even though I accept a certain universalism about humanity, I think it is dangerous theoretical ground to walk on.
Dar dar...I have to write a paper. The first paper (whoa 2 pages) I have written on over two years. The last paper I wrote was 15 pages about the way beauty standards affect black women and white women differently. I loved that class because the woman who taught it was from Ohio and sounded a lot like my Aunt. She was also a Black Panther and taught Anthropology with a lens that addressed race and gender and class. She was cool. This paper, not so cool.
Permalink: Bath_Time.html
Words: 395
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: school
09/15/07 01:41 - 55ºF - ID#41113
Tada
I guess I haven't really thought very much about what IS going on in the international arena to address these kinds of issues. Yes, I know that the UN exists, I have indeed heard of the Human Rights Approach. But did you know that there is also the Human Development Approach, the Human Security Approach, the Basic Needs Approach, etc? I certainly had no idea that there was this type of academic theorizing going on. I must perhaps give them a hand for attempting to name and address poverty, hunger, health care, education etc, on a global level, but one thing they do not do is ask WHY or HOW these issues became realities in the first place. It does no good, in my opinion, to try to "fix" these realities, to offer solutions, without first addressing the problems. It is easier to talk about money, about health services, about children going to school, than to talk about ideologies, hegemonies, pervasive cultural constructions of gender, race, class, etc. This, to me, is like trying to run the wrong way on an escalator. You can put lots and lots of energy into trying to get to your goal, and it sure does look like you are working hard, but chances are you will run out of steam before making it to the top.
Is my idea less realistic then theirs? Is it possible to change hundreds of years worth of oppressive ideologies? How many generations would it take before they were completely if ever gone? How would one even go about attempting this massive feat? I honestly don't know.
I am not saying that I don't think people, nations, institutions of various shapes and sizes should stop their efforts to make the world a little more bearable for those in need, but I do not think that this is a sufficient strategy for ending the hunger, the povety, the pain that is so prevelant in this world.
Permalink: Tada.html
Words: 448
Location: Buffalo, NY
09/14/07 12:09 - 78ºF - ID#41092
Bookmark
I am basically writing this post to place a bookmark on what entries I have read. I am not ashamed.
Permalink: Bookmark.html
Words: 54
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: music
09/13/07 11:50 - 65ºF - ID#41076
On Ani
Anyway, the show was fabulous. I must admit, I really like Melissa Ferrick, but when you are able to compare the two so directly it is obvious who has been around awhile. Ferrick generally stood in the same spot on stage and while the crowd certainly loved her, she was nothing compared to Ani. Ani came onstage and the whole crowd erupted to the point where it was almost painful because of the noise level. And when she started playing, dancing around stage, doing the oh so typical Ani leg lifts in sync with her guitar strums along with great chemistry with her band, which consisted of a stand up bass player, a drummer and a "vibraphonist" who added a unique sound to the whole thing, well she rocked.
The music was a delightful mix of old and new, along with some of her poetry/spoken word mixed in. It was enough so I was never bored waiting for her to play a song I knew. I also was happy that she so outspokenly talked about motherhood, love, growing up, and sang new songs about her daughter. It is this kind of things that remind us all that she is human.
Anyways...I had a fabulous time and when she sang the song with the words "I built my own empire out of car tire and chicken wire" it became very apparent that she indeed has.
Permalink: On_Ani.html
Words: 398
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: adventure
09/10/07 11:37 - 65ºF - ID#41031
Ouch
Anyways, we started walking and this chick leads us up up up this trail and we stop at some arbitrary point and she's like, uh, let's turn around. And so we did. Overall it ws very fun and I would much like to go back and am glad that I know where it is now.
But the point is...that after we returned I started noticing that my legs hurt, and were almost to the point of shaking whenever I stood up. Of course I knew it was a result of our upward climb, but I was surprised that my body couldn't handle that type of excercise.
Before I had a car I often walked to work which was about a 15 minute walk. Later after getting the car I stopped this and noticed a slight decline in my ability to walk without getting cramps or what have you, but I was still on my feeet 8 hours a day and was often doing heavy lifting such as crates with 4 galls of milk in them. But now, I don't walk because obviously, the campus is not within walking distance and I admit to being inclined to laziness.
So now, a day after, my legs still hurt. I was hoping it would go away with a good nights sleep, but I was sorely mistaken. Now I am thinking, damn girl, you aren't getting any younger, what are you going to do about this pathetic inability to move your body? I guess this is something I need to work on.
Also, seperately, I would like to say that I enjoyed our time spent with Jim and James at Colter Bay, although it was way more crowded than the first time we went there, so we hid in the back part. However, I will admit that my jaw and cheeks hurt because I had been laughing so much. This is not a bad thing.
Permalink: Ouch.html
Words: 377
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: school
09/08/07 04:16 - 82ºF - ID#41007
Did you know?
"In 1954, the Supreme Court for the first time held one component of the US apartheid sysetem, segregated education, unconstitutional. It did not hold antimiscegenation laws unconstitutional until 1967, over ten years later. At the time of its ruling, sexteen states still prohibited interracial marriage."
From
Racial Purity Laws in the United States and Nazi Germany: The Targeting Process
by Judy Scales-Trent
found in Human Right Quarterly
ahhhh. 40 years ago. Thats IT!!! I dunno, it grosses me out.
I will hold myself back from writing about how "race" is a social and political construct of those in power to define the "other" for their own gain.
Oh yes, and one more fun little tid bit.
Did you know that at one point in Nazi Germany they believed that children who born of "mixed race" were STERILE??? Ya know, kinda like how when a horse and a donkey produce a mule? Yeah, like that.
Permalink: Did_you_know_.html
Words: 175
Location: Buffalo, NY
i like safe/legal/rare, and though I understand what you are saying, lauren, about making those rare cases be a result of people looking down on them, i don't think it would have to be if the 'rare' part was because the NEED for abortion wasn't there. As in our society progressed to the point where sexual education was taught properly in all schools, research into and the availability of birth control and contraceptives were widespread and not considered a sign of a degenerative society. And sex crimes were eliminated.
Then rare wouldn't be as much of an issue.
but wouldn't that be a perfect world?
Also Drew, while I appreciate your point about not toning down rhetoric for the feelings of others, I would disagree with your choice of comparison. This is a woman's body we are talking about, not the car she drives. This is fundamental to who she is, how she sees herself, creates her identity, and how others do the same about her.
Finally, I do agree with the problems associated with the words pro-choice/life. They imply a dichotomous view of two "opposites" which are therefore portryed as fundamentally different. It does not take into account the complexities of both the politics and the individual/cultural beliefs that are deeply involved when one chooses to side with one or the other, if they do indeed choose a side at all.
And as for the whole safe, legal, and rare thing making women feel guilty, well, I guess that if and when people feel shame, than it is up to them if they feel shame. I certainly would not go out of my way to shame a person for anything, but I am not going to go away from what I believe is a very reasonable policy (safe/legal/rare), to save somebody from feelings of shame.
I mean, people don't tone down rhetoric about global warming because somebody who drives an SUV might feel bad, right? Shame is a part of society.
That being said, grace is more important. While I think it is wrong to drive an SUV, have an abortion, or vote to authorize a war, I also believe that it is important to love and welcome and forgive all of those people, not because of what they did or did not do, but because they are people. I would rather remove guilt/shame through forgiveness than pretend that it isn't there, because ultimately, we all have things that we are ashamed of and/or guilty of.
And jenks, I am with you that the terms are bad. It's just that it takes so long to say ,"pro-abortion being legal," or "anti-abortion being legal." It gets especially tricky when people that describe themselves as "pro-life" are pro-death penalty, anti-health care, pro-war, anti-environmental care or anti-poor people. It seems as if some are "pro-unborn life only." GWB has been satirized quite a few times for saving stem cells and disregarding the lives of soldiers and citizens in Iraq.
For me; safe, legal and rare is acknowledging a legal right to the act, but it doesn't mean I morally aprove of the act in all circumstances and situations. Same for other acts that are legal but that I find questionable from a moral stance. Why? Because I'm not looking to live in a biblical theocracy. Not morally approving of the act also doesn't mean that I get up in people's face about it. As for being careful about judgements, we all make judgements consciously or unconsciousy of people given the information available to us based on our morals, values, etc... I think the most important thing is how we allow our judgements to affect our behavior and whether we allow our judgements to be flexible enough to reconsider them when presented with new information.
Yes, you are correct in stating that I am passing a moral judgement call when it comes to these protestors. I am not saying that I think it should be illegal for them to do so. I understand the ramifications of such implecations. They have thier morals, and I have mine. But keep in mind, I don't go to thier churches with giant posters of my girlfriend and I having sex. Is this the same? I don't know.
Ok. last thing...I suggest being careful when it comes to this "safe legal rare" business. I think that supporting choice while being against abortion is shaky ground...be thoughtful of what you think about women who have gotten/are getting an abortion. Be careful those little judgements don't creep up into your thoughts and put shame on her without you even knowing.
I really don't know what I would do if I found myself in the situation of needing an abortion... It's certainly not an easy decision.
But I absolutely believe that it needs to be MY decision. And that I have no right to judge/criticize people who do/don't have abortions.
Like everyone else said- safe. legal. rare.
It reminds me of the South Park episode where the guy gets his sex change operation, and the doctor goes through how "natural" it is, with all the blood and guts gory surgery photos. The first thing the guy wants to do, almost obsessively, is to start rattling off abortions. That was the funniest episode ever, outside of the PETA episode.
If they could only teach how to use a condom with the same zeal as they picket the clinics, maybe there'd be less abortions.
Since you touched on it - I think one of the motivating factors the crazies make light of, perhaps unintentionally because they simply didn't consider it, is that the decision of having an abortion is not a light one! Supporting abortion, or going through with it, isn't tantamount to being heartless. The emotional ramifications are deep and long lasting, but this is a secondary concern to many people. This is why I think call centers, programs for women who have had abortions, etc. are so incredibly vital. Women that go through this need support, not a moral examination from someone who doesn't understand what they are going through.
Then there's the legal argument which is we have to within reason allow them to protest. No matter how much we dislike the ugly pictures. Part of America is that people do get to try to "shove their morals down others throats" with in established limits.
You may already know this Lauren, but there are Christian ministries outside of abortion centers that use more gentle approaches to ask people to reconsider abortion. They tend to target the women who appear to be under the undue influence of parents or boyfriends. If they see someone who looks distressed, they try to offer options and provide real assistance and support if they choose not to have an abortion. There are also some great (and some not so great) Christian ministries to help women who have had abortions to find healing from a faith perspective.
Ditto on the safe, legal and rare, (e:Jason).
So what do you do? Telling them, or forcing them, to "shut up" is probably the most un-American idea possible, and should immediately be rejected. No, the right idea in my mind is to give them enough rope to hang themselves, and to allow them the opportunity to make themselves irrelevant. No, it doesn't make protestors go away, but then again, the second we start picking and choosing who can protest and who cannot, we are going to slip further into the abyss of employing fascist tendencies.
A quick word on Abort - I don't like it, especially the Dilation and Extraction, which is just shocking. However, I'm pro-choice because of exactly what you said, Lauren. We do not live in a perfect world, nor a uniform one, so staying ideologically rigid is inevitably going to fail, no matter where we sit. People who cannot, to some extent, be flexible are going to soon become obsolete.
Safe, legal, and rare. All three, not two, not one, all three. The trinity. That should be the goal I think.
BTW - and this is not a criticism - should all protesters "go home" if we find what they have to say disgusting?