11/17/06 12:57 - 41ºF - ID#24697
Things I strongly dislike
Then the funniest and most stereotypical thing happened. I notice as I cross the street that she is going to Wilson Farms as well - nice! So I walk to the door, passing a black homeless guy who is standing by the door talking to himself. I look back through the door, and I notice that after the white lady in the Audi notices that she parked directly in front of the black homeless guy, she puts the car in reverse and drives away!
This, my dear friends, is a perfect example of what we don't want in our neighborhood, and as far as I'm concerned, is emblematic of ANY interest from suburbanite types in our neighborhood. Sure, our neighborhood is affluent and kitschy - many white middle aged ladies come to our neighborhood and deal with the eccentricities without batting an eyelash. I submit as evidence the white middle aged affluent ladies that stream in and out of Globe Market. I am sure that these ladies are Buffalo residents because anybody from Clarence simply could not deal with "colored folks" around their neighborhood, particularly people who are destitute.
What I saw today I found to be shocking but not terribly surprising. Buffalo is *the* most segregated city I've visited, and there isn't a major city in the United States that I haven't spent significant time in. We are segregated racially, economically and socially to such an extent that the white people from Clarence unwittingly expose their ignorance and intolerance of people who are either poorer or a different color - they simply cannot help it because they are so underexposed and used to their ideal and extremely sheltered environment in some cul de sac.
Memo to suburbanites - if you can't deal with it, then don't come down. If you are looking for an urban, sophisticated shopping mall then I suggest heading to Transit and pretending that you are in Buffalo and not Williamsville/Clarence. I hear that Sienna has a FABULOUS holiday menu, and hey - your kids at Willy South aren't going to have to come face to face with BLACK PEOPLE - and if they do, at least you know that in your district they aren't poor and you can chat with their parents (maybe, remember - they are black) about interior decorating ideas!
Oh yeah, and you people are FAKE ASS Sabres fans, too. We'll see you in three to five years when the team is average again..... right?
Permalink: Things_I_strongly_dislike.html
Words: 459
11/15/06 02:49 - 50ºF - ID#24696
Nice Web Site
Its clean and attractive looking, its extremely easy to navigate, it has a cool chanting sound and its about beer. Can I ask for more?
Still though. Abbey beer rocks and I'm a very thirsty man.
Permalink: Nice_Web_Site.html
Words: 54
11/13/06 02:02 - 41ºF - ID#24695
Why my dad is cooler than me
Some of my fondest memories are of riding in my dad's white Oldsmobile 2-door listening to The Police, Phil Collins/Genesis (not that fucking 'Invisible Touch' crap), Peter Gabriel with or without Genesis, U2, Pink Floyd, Tori Amos, Yes, Supertramp, Frank Zappa, The Eurythmics, The Grateful Dead, Herbie Hancock, Fleetwood Mac, Miles Davis, The Alan Parsons Project - I've forgotten most of it but you catch the drift. Dad looooved Tori Amos. I think he found her very sexy, and she is - especially when you see her perform. But she was fucking freaky - not Annie Lennox crazy freaky, but just enough that you have to wonder whether or not you would 'take the plunge' if you had the chance. Anyway, I digress.
The best thing my father ever did for (e:jason) and I, and I think he would agree, is plant the music seed in us. He was an all-state caliber trumpet player when he was in high school and so we ended up being similarly killer musicians as well. I even enrolled at Fredonia to major in Music Composition (nobody knows that about me but now you do!) but promptly left to go to UB since it hit me that Music Comp wouldn't be the best career move. My knowledge of the classical repertoire is entirely my own - dad doesn't listen to much classical. I think his proudest moments are when he gives me music, which he does all the time knowing that its going to collect dust for a year, and after that year I come to him on my own and ask for more from particular artists.
Nowadays my father is in full bore hippie mode - tie dye and all. He is NEVER without tie dye. I actually have his rain stick and his didgeridoo. He would cut my throat if I tried to take his drums and other instruments. He is heavily into new age/world music, the newer jazzy stuff like MMW and jam band material. He is a 49 year old man that goes to hippie music festivals. He's seen Pink Floyd and The Grateful Dead, in original format, live. That is a fact that makes an extreme amount of jealousy boil up in me.
He votes Democrat and cannot understand for the life of him why I chose to register as a Republican at 18 - he wrote in big block letters "I'M AN ASSHOLE" over my brother's picture of President Bush.
His co-workers call him "The Big Kahuna," or simply "Kahuna." He can whistle so loud that he could almost puncture an ear drum if you stand too close. He is a single digit handicap golfer. He refers to my grandma by her first name. The raunchiest thing he has ever told me about was the infamous "Three Hole Tammy" story (if you don't catch the drift, it should be fairly obvious!). He gets tears in his eyes when he listens to my solos at the 1995 All-County Jazz Festival. Since I was first, he wisely named me after my grandfather; (e:jason) got the shaft in this regard and he LOVES IT when people ask him what his middle name is. (sarcasm, guys... sarcasm).
Obviously the man has had an enormous influence on me and I love him a great deal. He along with my grandparents laid the foundation for me to be the man that I am, and God willing, the father that I will be one day. The only thing that I wish he would have done is push a guitar into my hands when I was younger; this way, I would be a great player right now! When I have kids, I will encourage them to not only excel and participate in organized musical activity but strike out on their own as well; my world was classical for a long time but I think I would have been a better musician had I joined a band outside of school.
Looking at the evidence, if people had a choice between a 28-year old Josh and a 28-year old Mark, Mark would be cooler and get all the chicks. Luckily there is just enough of him in me that the chicks still like me (occasionally!). Anyway - here is my tribute to my father!
Permalink: Why_my_dad_is_cooler_than_me.html
Words: 752
11/09/06 02:44 - 59ºF - ID#24694
Shyte!
Today I am cleaning out the corner of our kitchen that I've avoided for years now. Its a vortex where all of our unused junk has collected. Boxes, old computer parts, 4 year old mail, bags, a toaster oven I've had for 5 years but never have used, collapseable shelving, paper and plastic bags, even an old coat that I didn't even know I still had. Its unbelievable. This is something I never, EVER want to do again. :(
Permalink: Shyte_.html
Words: 133
Category: my
11/08/06 04:36 - 56ºF - ID#24693
100% Bulletproof Election Analysis
One of the things that has bothered me is the fact clearly the leadership at the Pentagon has been inadequate, yet President Bush has stuck with him. Mr. Bates has served 6 previous Presidents and I think will be a fine addition to the cabinet.
Republicans having lost the House will mean gridlock, period. Forget about all the niceties that people are exchanging and promises of good will - very little is going to get done in the next two years. Subpoenas will likely start flying like confetti, because although it was moderate and conservative Democrats who brought the House to Pelosi, the senior leadership that will be running the different comittees are among the most liberal in the party. Pelosi is crazy, but she's no idiot - as a skilled politician she knows that if certain kooks in her midst aren't restrained, everything that Republicans and Conservatives have been saying about the Democrats having power will show to be true.
There are a few things that I hope get achieved within the next two years, and are very plausible -
1. Substantial increase in the federal minimum wage. I'd love to see ANY politician make it on $5.15 an hour. Many Americans earn this level of money, but not nearly enough to suggest that somehow this will mean a substantial increase in the quality of life for the middle class. It should be done simply because its the right thing to do.
2. Some kind of agreement on stem cell research. Science shows that the embryonic variety has promise although its yielded less results. If embryos that exist are going to be destroyed, why not use them for research? I see no problem with this. However, creating embryos specifically to destroy them for research will not fly. To be honest this is a long shot since a similar bill already got vetoed.
3. Immigration reform. Build a wall, create a method by which the border can be tracked 24x7, set up a guest worker program, and create an arduous but meaningful method by which the illegals we currently have can be naturalized. Any bill that comes short of the absolute best way to stop the flood of illegals will be unacceptable.
4. Taxes are going up. And by that I mean that the tax cuts that were implemented as they stand will not be renewed. We'll see exactly how this turns out, but generally this will likely be bad for small businesses - which is also why Democrats are talking about aid specifically for small businesses - paid for by the rich. Taking money from one person to give to another is absolutely deplorable. However, can somebody explain to me why oil companies need tax breaks?
Here are a few things that are certain NOT to happen -
1. Strategic redeployment in Iraq. Everybody knows that this is an effective pullout and will guarantee the collapse of a fledgling Iraqi government. President Bush will never allow it, so therefore its not going to happen, regardless of what Pelosi wants. We made our lunch in Iraq and we are going to eat it. By the way, the polls that many Democrats are quoting about the American people wanting a partial or full pullout from Iraq are the same polls that suggest an equal amount of people want none or only a few troops to be moved out.
2. Impeachment. Not only would this be a betrayal of the wishes of the voters who actually carried the House to the Democrats, but Americans in majority have no desire to see President Bush get impeached. Impeachment is a minority desire stressed by liberal special interest groups and do not reflect the majority of even the Democratic party. Pelosi has already stated that there will be no impeachment proceedings.
3. Social Security reform. Anything that Conservatives wanted to do with SS is certified dead as of today. There wasn't much political will to partially privatize SS anyway, and now that Democrats are in control of the House its a certainty that this will never happen. For me, I think its a wonderful idea just to leave it alone, but the big problem will soon be how to pay for the benefits that the baby boomers are going to be collecting. Although this may not happen in 2 years, *something* will have to happen within the next 4-8 years; none of the options are good.
In general, nobody is going to get the things that they really want and no big decisions are going to be made. This is officially a lame duck government until '08, which is why most political operatives, as of today, are working on the election in '08.
Permalink: 100_Bulletproof_Election_Analysis.html
Words: 807
11/07/06 01:25 - 55ºF - ID#24692
Here it goes!
This is getting entirely pathetic. Harold Ford Jr. is already complaining. Defeat is unthinkable - its as if they don't win, its not their policies or ideas; its got to be that somebody cheated!
If Democrats are this frazzled before what looks like should be a House takeover, I am frightened over how they will handle power of any kind. Luckily there will be no Democrat agenda being created that will pass - the purpose of the Democrats, if they control the House, will be to be ubstructionists for 2 more years.
By the way - Rep. Alcee Hastings is somebody you will be hearing about soon. He was acquitted on bribery charges as a federal judge, although his co-conspirator was actually charged. What did he (allegedly) do? He (allegedly) agreed to take money in exchange for reduced sentences. Nevertheless, then Judge Hastings was impeached by a vote of 413-3 in the House and 69-26 in the Senate. Why is this important? This is the person that Nancy Pelosi, who by the way voted to impeach him, is going to have run the Intelligence Committee, thereby skunking Jane Harman.
So he was acquitted, but still was massively, massively voted against in an impeachment. Now he may run a Congressional Committee? Jane Harman is the #2 craziest politician in California behind Rep. Pelosi, so the thought of Harman getting overlooked is fantastic. On the other hand though, are Democrats really going to have an (alleged!) criminal head the Intelligence Committee? Oh, my friends, this surely will not last long.
Permalink: Here_it_goes_.html
Words: 288
11/06/06 12:38 - 54ºF - ID#24691
Josh's Election Special! Plus TV.
Ok - election tomorrow - go out and vote. Here are the candidates I'll likely vote for or otherwise endorse during this season.
Governor - Elliot Spitzer (D). He isn't really a liberal - (e:jason) says that he is a Republican in Democrat clothing. Ok, I can buy that. I admit that the guy has balls - Giuliani sized balls. I'm very comfortable voting for him this time around. I'm not terribly optimistic about NY shaking from the status quo, so Spitzer's propaganda is hollow for me until I see results. On his track record, this is by far my favorite Democrat running in any race - local, state, national and in between.
26th Congressional District - Tom Reynolds (R). While anybody that runs for Congress is likely to be a power hungry schmuck, its embarrassingly blatant for Jack Davis. The storm gave Reynolds a lucky and timely chance to display some leadership and tap into government resources, since he is an incredibly powerful congressman. The polls say this is a close race - as usual, I stick with the incumbents in cases like this if I have to predict who will win.
Junior Senator - John Spencer (R). I know that Shrillary will win, I simply will never vote for her. She isn't going to see her whole term through anyway.
NYS Comptroller - Christopher Gallaghan (R). Alan Hevesi (D), our current comptroller, would have likely won easily if he had not used and abused state resources on behalf of his wife. Hevesi will not stay in his office, even if he gets re-elected, because misuse of the state's financial resources is grounds for immediate removal. Even the NY Times, "with some trepidation," is endorsing Gallaghan, and Elliot Spitzer has withdrawn his endorsement of Alan Hevesi... which should say plenty.
NYS Attorney General - Andrew Cuomo (D). I cannot express in words how conflicted I am with this. In my estimation Ms. Pirro (R) has basically been smeared to death because of her extremely shady husband - the fact that her husband is a shady bastard says nothing about her ability to do the job and on those same grounds its fair to say that Hillary Clinton shouldn't be elected President when she inevitably runs. Andrew Cuomo worked in the Clinton administration, which normally is immediate grounds to vote for whoever the (R) is. However, Ms. Pirro has never really helped herself and Andrew Cuomo has been more precise in describing what he would do in office. When it comes to politicians, and make no mistake; this is a political office, I'll take the one that is more forthcoming about what he'll do. Its better to know and hope than to not know and wonder.
State Assembly, Senate, etc. - Whoever the alternative is to the Democrats. We know that the Democrats will win, but I cannot in good faith support Antoine Thompson or anybody like him. We cannot poison state politics by sending our clearly inept people from here to Albany. By the way, Antoine Thompson rubber stamped that incredibly bad Casino deal that everybody hates.
Nationally - Its going to be very close and Democrats are definitely in the position to take the House. Whoever gets the house will have a very, very slim majority and if the vote is split 50-50 Republicans will retain the House because as President of the Senate, the Veep Cheney will cast the deciding vote. Republicans will retain the Senate.
For those of you fringe kooks panting like a dog for Pelosi to begin impeachment if she is Speaker, you heard it here first - it WILL NOT happen.
Permalink: Josh_s_Election_Special_Plus_TV_.html
Words: 664
11/01/06 09:39 - 40ºF - ID#24689
Buffalo News protects another Democrat
Any thinking person would realize that he is once again attacking the military. Now he is claiming that it was a botched joke that was intended to criticize the policies of President Bush. Why is it that these prominent Democrats continue to impune and degrade the people who serve? What he is saying here is, "get an education or you are going to be stuck with those cretin neanderthal types who aren't as smart as YOU are to go to college and educate themselves."
But oh, no! Democrats are PRO-military according to them, particularly around election time. And now Kerry is further insulting the American populace by basically saying, "Oh no, you just didn't 'get it' - I was bashing Bush again!" There are three things that Democrats are getting 100% absolutely utterly wrong here, and its going to kill them next week when it looked likely that they would take one of the two houses in Congress. 1) Guys like Kerry are proving that Democrats are lying about their devotion to the troops and the armed forces; 2) this election is NOT a referendum on President Bush, since he is not on the ballot... Bush bashing will not grants results in local elections; 3) As a result of the first two, Kerry has reminded voters that Democrats are not to be trusted with defending the nation because of the constant contradictions - not that Kerry and/or Murtha alleging that our troops are essentially terrorists themselves is helping them at all - all of this is now coming back to light. Kerry refuses to apologize, which is only making this multiple times worse for him and his party.
Once in a while, you see Democrats say what is really on their mind, and once again John Kerry is seemingly trying to blow it for the Dems next week. Don't believe me? Thus far, as of today, his scheduled campaign stops in Iowa, Minnesota and Pennsylvania have been canceled by the candidates, and more are surely to come. Don Imus, prominent radio personality and Bush basher, is telling Kerry to keep his fucking mouth shut because he's going to blow it for the Democrats. Democrats are running as fast as they can away from Kerry right now.
Where does our local trash rag come into play here? Shameless and utter distortion of the truth in today's headline. I Buffalo News - YOU ARE A FUCKING JOKE. Stop playing loose with your headlines. They are factually incorrect and shameless. At least in Rochester they call it the Democrat and Chronicle - perhaps the News needs a name change to more accurately reflect their politics.
Kerry did NOT attack the President with what he said about the troops. Nobody believes him except only for the most blindly partisan and rabidly anti-Bush contingency out there. Oh yeah, don't forget - he is a Vietnam vet! Trust me, the media won't let you forget it either. In any case, the reactions from the candidates themselves says all you need to know.
Permalink: Buffalo_News_protects_another_Democrat.html
Words: 554
10/30/06 11:10 - 49ºF - ID#24688
WTF.
This is NOT a 'surplus." It is overtaxation. It is not as if the state somehow miraculously came up with another billion as a result of clever schemes to earn profit - it is money taken directly out of taxpayer pockets. The money doesn't belong to the state and it never has, yet they are going to tuck it into a "rainy day" fund. Tax levels quite clearly need to go down, but this is New York State - expecting it any time soon?
This is one of many reasons why our state is atrocious and one of many reasons why I want out of here ASAP.
Permalink: WTF_.html
Words: 138
10/29/06 06:19 - 44ºF - ID#24687
Favorite place to be?
Permalink: Favorite_place_to_be_.html
Words: 81
Author Info
Date Cloud
- 01/11
- 07/10
- 06/10
- 05/10
- 03/10
- 02/10
- 01/10
- 12/09
- 11/09
- 09/09
- 08/09
- 07/09
- 06/09
- 05/09
- 04/09
- 03/09
- 02/09
- 01/09
- 12/08
- 11/08
- 10/08
- 09/08
- 08/08
- 07/08
- 06/08
- 05/08
- 04/08
- 03/08
- 02/08
- 01/08
- 12/07
- 11/07
- 10/07
- 09/07
- 08/07
- 07/07
- 06/07
- 05/07
- 04/07
- 03/07
- 02/07
- 01/07
- 12/06
- 11/06
- 10/06
- 09/06
- 08/06
- 07/06
- 06/06
- 05/06
- 04/06
- 03/06
- 02/06
- 01/06
- 12/05
- 11/05
- 10/05
- 09/05
- 08/05
- 07/05
- 06/05
- 05/05
- 03/05
- 02/05
Category Cloud
More Entries
My Fav Posts
- This user has zero favorite blogs selected ;(
I think that the only reason that developers aren't developing immediately east of Main Street like they are west of Main Street is racism. Not necessarily the racism of the developers who worship the greenback but that of their customers who wouldn't live east of Main no matter how wonderful the house is.
I suppose that it would be hard to truly say what cities are most segregated - I only espouse my view.
In Chicago, as you may know, there is a massive Latin American neighborhood that stretches through a large part of the southern and western part of the city. In Chicago, it isn't just white and black, its black vs. the latins! Its very strange.
Off the top of my head, I think that Detroit; Atlanta; Knoxville, TN; Memphis, TN; Chicago, IL to name a few cities are all more segregated than Buffalo to my eyes.
Of course, in several of the cities I named, there is an African-American power base that is not present in Buffalo (I think that Byron Brown proves this)
So while I don't agree that Buffalo is the most segregated city, I do think that it is a city in which its minorities are amongst the most marginalized in the U.S.
So maybe we agree more or less.
Maureen - I feel perfectly fine using generalities and speaking flippantly about people that I see *every* *single* *day* perpetrating what I saw today, or variations on what I saw, in a neighborhood that I have lived in for over 6 years. I certainly agree that I'm being unfair, to an extent, about the people I generalized today. I watched this ladies eyes, ok? She didn't just pull in the Wilson Farms lot then randomly change her mind. There is no question as to why it was that she "changed her mind." End of.
If its not yet obvious, I strongly dislike this ilk of human debris. While I'm certain that your mom is a fantastic lady and many suburbanite mothers are fantastic ladies, I was *very* specific about the people I am talking about. Unless your mother is a rich, snooty lady who enjoys driving luxury cars in busy city streets recklessly and being rude to every person she encounters that doesn't smell as rich as she is, I'm not speaking about your mother or people like her. Is living in a suburb a crime? Certainly not. Behaving like you are better than someone else because of your socioeconomic status, what school you go to or where you send your kids to school, or what have you? In my book that IS a crime. Was Frank Zappa wrong to criticize and mock the people he did during his career? Absolutely not. While I'm not Frank Zappa, I'm speaking to a larger social point, like he would, that I believe is an absolute plague for this neighborhood.
Peter - fantastic points. I didn't stereotype the homeless guy - he is well known in the neighborhood. He happens to be one of the guys I say hello to and occasionally give him money as well. I believe that if its the middle of the day and you (hypothetical 'you,' not Peter 'you' to be clear) are afraid to get out of your car in a convenience store parking lot because you are afraid of being swarmed upon by the beggars, you probably don't belong down here.
One of the best conversations I've ever had on a plane was when I was leaving New Orleans for Chicago - a guy about my age who essentially dressed like Lil' Jon was sitting next to me so I asked him about the city, how it was recovering, etc. Extremely engaging individual, articulate and very cool guy. How many people would have judged him?
You are so right about how the media and television portay blacks that it isn't funny. Its absolutely unfair. We don't see many stories about the white kids in the suburbs getting into trouble with drugs, but is there a doubt as to whether such a problem is persistant, even in our area? Hell no! Its interesting and saddening to see how people can point out the problems from one segment of society and ignore what is going on in your own home.
That being said you are right this city is verry racialy devided. There are a lot of factors having to do with race and money and crime. I have a theory about what I call "New Racism" I think that there is a lot of prejudice based on culture and not skin color.
A good example of this is (not all of it) rap music about drugs, guns, and bitchs. The media also only reports about the ghetto when bad things happen. You only hear about football players who are black when they do bad things . TO is a great example of this. Or you may hear about the guy who's brother was shot, they never talk about the guy who busted his ass to make his team or who came from a good family. The fact is that culturaly blacks and whites sometimes are verry differant. Watching TV you never hear about blacks doing good things. So people natrualy assume that if someone is black they are ghetto. That of course isn't true but when you don't know anyone who is both black and poor you assume that people who are black and poor are no good. Kids dress like the rappers who dress like the drug dealers and so with out knowing someone you see baggy pants and assume they are trouble and most times that isn't the case.
I personaly belive that everyone in this country is biased agganst someone. I also think that it is ok. It is how you treat other people that counts. If you don't think poorly another race or skintone then there is also sexual preferance, religion, country of origin. Beliving in good sterotypes is the same thing. I gues that is the end of my rant.
I think you might not want to make snap judgments about people you’ve seen for all of 2 minutes in your life. Aside from being a bad driver, which I can’t argue against since she almost hit you, why do you think you know anything about this woman? You watch her back out of a parking spot and then decide you know what she is thinking. This doesn’t seem any different to me than you accusing her of thinking she knows the homeless man because of his status or appearance. The only difference is that your stereotyping is verified and hers isn’t. My mom is middle-aged, white, and lives in a suburb (although it’s not Clarence and she doesn’t drive an Audi). She and her friends, who also fall into your characterization of this woman, are nothing like what you describe and I think that she’d be really insulted if someone assumed she was racist, ignorant, or intolerant because of an action as perfunctory as changing her mind about going in a store. I share you intolerance for racism and classism. I just don’t think you should through these things around so flippantly. Maybe you should think about who, in this situation, “unwittingly exposed their ignorance and intolerance of people†who are different than them.