Category: religion
10/31/07 09:01 - 48ºF - ID#41902
Christianity and Politics
So should religious values be removed from the realm of public debate? While some would like this, as a person of faith, I don't see that as possible. My faith involves values that encompass WAY more than the "moral values," that the media talks about. My faith says that I have to work for peace, for justice, for the hungry, homeless, and imprisoned, and for for the good of an alien/stranger. It says that I have to love my neighbor.
How can I separate loving my neighbor from the way that I vote?
I have not found an issue that is not, to me, a "'moral issue." If I could not base my vote on my faith, I could not vote based on the war, health care, marriage, abortion, education, taxation, or immigration am I leaving an issue out?
Should I just walk into the booth a pull a lever at random?
A lot of people see faith as something like rooting for a sports team. It effects how you dress sometimes, what you do on game day, and who you talk to. Some people are more into it than others, but obviously nobody bases all of their life decisions on their association with a team.
However, its not that way for me, and many other people of faith. All that I am is wrapped up in my faith. To say otherwise is to lie.
So, while I hate the blind obedience that was demonstrated in (e:changeisgood)'s post, and I disagree with that guy's conclusions, I find myself taking action on global warming, BECAUSE of my faith convition, not in spite of it.
Lots of people do horrible things, with and with out faith. Likewise, plenty of people are altruistic without faith to guide them.
Me, I can't imagine living any way except selfishly without my faith. I know (from observation, mostly) that others can do it, but without my faith, I think I would be all about me--which would change my perspective on the war, immigration, and global warming, to name a few things
Which isn't to say that I don't believe in the separation of church and state. More on that later . . .
PS. really, if anybody wants to take a trip to New Orleans, it will be cool. Scroll down in my posts to check it out.
Permalink: Christianity_and_Politics.html
Words: 421
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: sermon
10/29/07 10:24 - 53ºF - ID#41872
1984 quote.
When George Orwell wrote, "He who controls the present controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future," it was a scary picture of government controlling history.
For Christians, this scary quote is actually good news--not because we have taken control of the present (and therefore, history), but because we see efforts of control in the present as fleeting compared to the extraordinarily different power the Christ exhibited in the past, which we believe to be a guarantee of the future.
Fate is not in control, and neither is Caesar, or George W. Bush, or whoever comes after that.
So, because of an event in the past (namely Christ's resurrection and ascension) we have hope for a resurrection-life in the future, and claims to power based on death (i.e. all of them, save God's) are empty--setting us free to live a different way in the present!
We'll spend more time unpacking that idea on Sunday, and considering how it might affect us as individuals and a community.
Permalink: 1984_quote_.html
Words: 178
Location: Buffalo, NY
10/29/07 01:23 - 50ºF - ID#41860
Want to go to New Orleans?
The cost of the food/lodging while you work will be $120. Plane tickets are reserved for $300 (round trip) and can be held with a $100 deposit. The deposit is due next Monday.
The work will be construction and deconstruction. There is a special need for skilled workers, but there is plenty to do for everybody. Even those with physical issues can assist in feeding other volunteers or handling the paperwork that is involved in the relief effort.
Want to go? Comment and I will email you an application right away.
Permalink: Want_to_go_to_New_Orleans_.html
Words: 126
Location: Buffalo, NY
10/29/07 10:23 - 40ºF - ID#41857
I only wrote 13 blogs so far this month
And of those 13, a few were lame, like this one, #14.
And the more lame ones I write, the less likely they are to get read.
Therefore, I will write a good one tonight. Really. #15 will be fantastic.
Will I get to 20 before the end of the month?
You'll have to stay tuned to find out.
Or realize that I would have to post 2 and 3 times a day to get there, which really just defeats the purpose.
So, no, I won't.
Are you still reading this? I'm sorry.
The party was fun. Happy Halloween.
(also happy Reformation Day, All Saint's Day, and All Soul's Day)
Permalink: I_only_wrote_13_blogs_so_far_this_month.html
Words: 115
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: halloween
10/27/07 05:35 - 54ºF - ID#41840
Research for the party tonight
Conservapedia.org
and
creationwiki.org
as well as at Answers in Genesis
if you want to engage with the distinguished member of the scientific community tonight.
Those sites should cover all of those things that you Roswell Doctors missed in your sinful "universities" and "medical schools."
Permalink: Research_for_the_party_tonight.html
Words: 50
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: 10 things
10/26/07 09:46 - 47ºF - ID#41812
10 Things I like about google docs
A special 10 things presentation.
I have another relatively new post below, but I couldn't wait to do this one.
Paul, is there a way to imbed the presentation? Or is linking to it best?
Permalink: 10_Things_I_like_about_google_docs.html
Words: 34
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: religion
10/25/07 11:08 - 48ºF - ID#41806
Money
And I'm actually ok with asking for money, because I believe in what we are doing. (My guess is that Paul feels the same way regarding asking for estrip money--his appeal inspired this post).
Here's my problem. Most of the proven methods of getting people to give are counter to our message. They either appeal to pride (Christians shouldn't be too keen on that) or fear (we believe that there's nothing for us to fear). It's all well and good for Paul to give out titles and stars (and I DO want my title!), but the church's message is quite different.
So anyway, we normally kick things off with a letter. Here's my first draft. (there will be a 10 things I love about google docs soon)
It's the kind of letter that normally gets written by Presbyterians Pastors, with a little bit of Drew style thrown in.
But I was almost ready to mail it and it didn't feel right. So I scrapped it and wrote this letter.
More honest, more direct, less about pride and/or fear.
To be honest, I don't know if it will make any difference, but I feel much better about the second effort.
Permalink: Money.html
Words: 267
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: 10 things
10/23/07 10:09 - 60ºF - ID#41758
10 Things I like about rain/CELEBRATE!
2. It makes football more interesting (less passing, more fumbles, more slips).
3. Playing in mud (it's been a while, but its fun)
4. It keeps whatever I am allergic to down.
5. It's cheaper/easier than a car wash.
6. The arrested development song "rain."
7. My dog will not bug me for a longer walk.
8. Rain helps streams, and I like streams.
9. Rain can cover for me if I accidentally leave the house with bed-head.
10. Estrip tells me that it is raining.
Why the celebration? This post put "10 things" in the tag cloud on the estrip main page. My lack of creativity/tendency to make lists has finally paid off! I am slightly less insignificant now!
Permalink: 10_Things_I_like_about_rain_CELEBRATE_.html
Words: 116
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: 10 things
10/21/07 01:23 - 74ºF - ID#41735
10 Things I like about Sundays
2. The Simpsons.
3. Football.
4. Naps.
5. Sunday Dinners.
6. Phone calls home.
7. Walking outside when the weather is great, like today. Building a fire and/or hunkering down when it is cold.
8. The Sunday newspaper.
9. Brunch
10. Seeing the "early Elmwood" people on the way to church.
Permalink: 10_Things_I_like_about_Sundays.html
Words: 54
Location: Buffalo, NY
Category: food
10/19/07 02:09 - 72ºF - ID#41714
Wegman's Sushi
I decided I deserved a treat, but I wanted to be healthy.
"Wegman's has Sushi I thought!" excitedly.
I went over to the little place and quickly realized that Wegman's made ahead of time sushi is MORE EXPENSIVE than the great, custom made, fresh sushi of Kuni's.
I like Wegman's, but they are way off with their sushi pricing.
Permalink: Wegman_s_Sushi.html
Words: 89
Location: Buffalo, NY
Author Info
Date Cloud
More Entries
After This
My Fav Posts
- This user has zero favorite blogs selected ;(
I agree with Drew, that the problem comes when a religion aligns itself with a candidate or with a Party, instead of the issues. No party can claim to support all the issues of a particular faith, except a theocratic one, and that would be patently un-American. So when a religion aligns itself with a party, that religion has betrayed itself, and it's members.
Who's stupid idea was it to say, "Christian, therefore, Republican", oh, that's right, it was Jerry Falwell, and his legal "pittbulls". his mission was to overturn Roe v Wade, and he was willing to pervert the purpose of the church in order to do so. Church goers are a pretty cohesive bunch, so he decided to take advantage of them, by telling them who was good or evil in politics. Instead of sticking to the issues, many Christians stuck to the Republican party, or at least pretended to, so they would avoid being ostracized.
What a legacy, turning a diverse group of seekers into a mob, bent on imposing their will on the US through the power of government. Of course, not all Christians were drafted into this mob, and many thoughtful people were alienated from the church because of this Republican adventure.
In political science, blind partisan loyalty is described as an "Information Shortcut". We citizens are to busy paying off our debt and trying to survive the rat race, that we don't have time to pay attention to all the issues, or all the politicians. We want to trust a party or an individual to help us decide, so we don't have to bother with all this information. The result, we are being exploited.
Also, religion or faith is simple another facet to someone's ideology which instructs their propensity to vote, mobilize etc and if people want to merge their political views with their faith it's up to them, it is hard to divorce the two but that doesn't necessarily point toward forward or even inverse causation in policy opinion. People who are not religious simply have other, socially defined cues which we don't object to because we can't pin them down in a 'does god exist' debate Sure it can be a little crazy when people say 'god says a certain policy is wrong' but if you remove god from the equation I think people would have the same view so, like I said, great measurement tool and even if some people get out of control with religion and politics, Madison made sure that there is more than enough slack in the electoral system to reign them in...
In the 19th century WNY was known as the 'burned over district' because of all the great religious revivals that came through it (including the Mormons). But one of the things that I really like about this period is how religion in the area was the voice of progressivism. Preachers fighting against slavery. Churches standing up for universal suffrage.
I don't know how 100 years later we have religious leaders calling for the subjugation of women, AIDS cures fags, and removing evolution and global warming from schools.
But, my point is, religion in politics is neither good nor bad. That depends upon the climate of the country and the climate of the religious community.
I just wish more religious voters now a days were like Drew and Janelle (I am sure there are cool religious folk on this site too.)
There are many reasons people give for voting a certain way, or supporting a certain principle, that I find hopelessly naive, irrational, and immediately deserving of rejection, but I don't go as far as to say you can't have your own reasons for thinking whatever way you do about any topic. To do that is as Un-American as it gets.
But, Drew, I fundamentally agree with what you're saying - that a very small sect of Christians tries to speak for everyone, and makes a grab for power. I think their influence is shrinking by the day, but unfortunately there still are too many people who really don't know any better, and can't tell the difference between a Drew and a Fred Phelps. Hopefully, the Moral Majority is in its last days.
This did two things.
1. It alienated a lot of Christian voters.
2. It made it necessary for other politicians to speak of their faith in relation to their political stands, in order to disrupt said short hand.
That way, when people say, "Barak, how come you are a Democrat? I thought you were a Christian!) He can say, "As a Christian, I have a concern for peace, for the poor, and for the enviornment--THAT is why I have aligned myself with the Democratic party."
This whole thing is a reaction the political power grab made by some Christians a while ago. Now, even some of those who did it have realized that they made compromises that they should not have made. Other people of faith should have spoken more clearly then, but we did not.
Which goes to show that it's gonna take a while to get out of this mess.
Also I would love to go to New Orleans but I doubt I can swing all of that time off considering I'm taking most of Thanksgiving week, and some of Christmas week off.