I also got my mercury test back. No problems there so do I stop restricting my large fish consumption or assume the restriction kept it good? The whole thing makes me want a tuna steak.



I also found this report ::READ PDF:: about mercury levels in great lakes fishermen pretty encouraging.
I didn't look at the chart but that is because it is Lake Ontario Fish, now Lake Erie fish that would be a different story........... Oh and not of the good kind
What really blew my mind was the PDF I just attached. You will like it (e:tinypliny), it is very sciencetastic. Look how much fish these people are eating, and from lake ontario and there levels really aren't that high either.
It was the blood test. That one is supposed to be very accurate for long term exposure type test vs the urine test which is so short, high level exposure you would get from like a workplace exposure/spill.
I think your levels might have been low because of your inherent tendency to seek out organic and high-end stuff - maybe the majority of seafood that you eat is actually farmed for size and quality in controlled environments rather than caught randomly at sea.
Was this a blood/hair/urine test?
Damn. If your mercury levels are fine then I am going to fish it up a bit more.