data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/766ae/766ae327ad45a9b2b59ef5ccd99d8f6fbabb5b72" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/766ae/766ae327ad45a9b2b59ef5ccd99d8f6fbabb5b72" alt=""
Regarding the blowup on Wall St. - I wanted to make a comment since (e:jim) said something in the chatter that made me consider it. The thing about investment banks is that they are generally not lending institutions, but borrowing institutions. They do not affect the everyday life of Americans in the same way as a lending institution. I don't think there is any doubt that more regulation on Wall St. is needed, and regardless of who is elected it is definitely coming. However, there is no divine right for investment banks to be in business. It was their own incredible stupidity for backing these so-called strategic investment vehicles (or whatever the term is, depending on the company) with bundled mortgages that were never going to be paid back. If they crash and burn, so be it.
I don't want today's confusion to necessarily worry people who are wondering what this all means. The most damage to everyday Americans has been caused by lending institutions, who gave out money freely to people who clearly couldn't afford what it was they were borrowing. Even worse, many of these companies encouraged this type of reckless borrowing. Investment banks like Lehman borrow money just like individuals do, except at much larger scales and for different reasons. Their mistake was in borrowing money to make investments backed by what is now essentially bundled junk debt. They couldn't borrow more money to keep the ship afloat, which is exactly why Lehman is walking the plank. This is also why Merrill Lynch sold up before it got too late.
Consumers can begin gulping if a big boy like Citigroup folds. Having the financial sector in turmoil is bad for the economy, and therefore is bad for America, but Lehman is not a Fanny or Freddie, whose decisions directly affect millions of lives. It is ironic that it is the lending institutions are getting bailed out, since they were the ones who really made the big mistakes that are costing people their houses. I would never advocate for an investment bank to be bailed out. Bear Stearns was bailed out, but according to some circles they are "too big" to be allowed to fail. It remains to be seen how many more banks fit into that category, but based on the government's mood I wouldn't count on any more bail outs for publicly traded, mismanaged companies in the future. Free markets are about survival of the fittest - I think I'm going to nominate Lehman Bros. for a Darwin Award, if at all possible.
Check this out :::link:::
I liked him better in the "THEY HAVE NO IDEA!!!"
I responded here: :::link:::
Ha - well, you can be sure that it already is. According to the article the link was discovered by scientists at Oxford, who aren't known for being dummies. I know vegetarians who swear up and down that B12 deficiency is easily coped with, and with the right knowledge and access to the right food I'm sure it can be. However, I gotta say, in poor countries they pay less attention than those people committed to a dietary/social agenda in a wealthy nation like ours.
I'm not really sure what this means in the long run, nor do I care, since I eat meat!
Oh boy! I can't wait to see this article being trolled about on forums.