I have some things that I wanted to say to you guys, and I didn't want to create a post that was twice the length of my usually very long journal entries.
I would apologize for the length of my journals but I'm not sorry!
Music
For fun the other night I checked out New World Record on the web to see what their staff picks have been. I know, incredibly lazy considering that literally could spit on NWR from my porch, but hey - leave me alone. Anyway, after sampling dozens of albums I came away with a half dozen that I thought would suit me. One of the bands that did not come from a NWR recommendation is called Stars of Track and Field - I know I've mentioned them in my journal before. If you like (or love!) The Postal Service then I would highly, highly recommend this band. You can enjoy Centuries Before Love and War for the time being until The Postal Service releases their new album, which is due out this year.
Passports
Do it now if you don't have a passport. If my some miracle you don't already know, the Depts. of State and Homeland Security have implemented new rules for air travel if you are entering the United States from anywhere in the western hemisphere. Canadian citizens - this is true for you as well so be prepared. You can read more about it here -
What is particularly relevent are the requirements that will be implemented next year - if you want to cross the border and return you will be REQUIRED to have a passport. While this isn't finalized yet, you don't want to be the guy or gal that waits last minute and gets royally shafted. I've gone through this process before, and for those of you who are a little unsure about what to do or are intimidated by the process, here is what you do -
1) Get informed -

- this site will detail any and all questions about what you need.
2) Complete the application either by traditional methods or by using the Dept. of State online form then printing it out.
3) Collect your birth certificate, photo ID, $92, passport photos (I did mine at Wal-Mart for $10 when I got an oil change once) and the application and bring it to a local passport acceptance facility. Aka the Post Office. A note about the pictures and identification - there are specific rules for the photos and additional information for those who were not born in the United States so be sure to have everything in proper order before you go to the Post Office.
4) Submit your cash and the other stuff for review. They will mail your birth certificate back to you, if I remember correctly.
5) Wait between 4-8 weeks for your passport to arrive by mail
The US government is now issuing e-passports, which look identical to the other tourist passports with one major exception - there is a microchip implanted into the cover that holds a digital photograph that can be compared with your actual face at immigration with the use of facial recognition technology, as well as other things. For more information, check out this link -

- the new passport pages are actually really cool looking.
You can expedite your application, like I had to do because of a pressing need to go overseas for work, but generally its going to end up costing you nearly twice as much. If you aren't in a hurry then don't bother with the expedited service.
Cool Web Sites
I have to share some interesting sites with you, if you haven't seen or heard of them yet.
First on the list - Wii Have A Problem -

- this site actually has a damage counter that lists various reported personal injuries and/or destruction to property as a result of playing games on a Nintendo Wii. If you haven't played on a Wii before - let me just say that it requires the use of a "wiimote" that must be tethered to your wrist, for the butterfingered fools out there. Some of the personal injury entries are gruesome and amazing - one guy broke his clavicle playing Home Run Derby, another popped his knee, and the absolute best - one guy reached back violently and accidentally punched his girlfriend in the face. What did she do? She posed with her shiner, a big smile and a "thumbs up" - if this were a Foster's commercial, I'd be saying "KEEPAH!" Shattered TVs, broken glass, broken lamps, obviously fake (coughpatheticattemptstogetnoticedonawebsitecough) submissions - its all chronicled here.
Secondly. SongMeanings -

- this is a site that I occasionally use to read what some peoples' collective takes on what song lyrics actually mean. This is a virtual treasure trove of verbal cockfights between people who consider themselves superfans of one band or another, and as a result the arguments and the "I know more than you about this band" approach some of these pathetic nerds are guilty of perpetrating are nothing short of explosive and very comedic. You'll no doubt run into one of these kinds of scenarios if you search long enough, but the site is useful if you've ever wanted insight into a set of lyrics. Over 26,000 artists are catalogued.
First of all I do belive that there is Genderdismorphia and i do belive that it is real. It sounds like this kid has all the social aspects of a girl playing with barbies and whearing dresses. There are two problems I have with this decision. The first is that If i understood this correctly the kid hasn't hit puberty yet. There arn't enough studies to know what will happen when hair starts growing and the kid starts choking the chicken. He may love his cock and want to have a cock and still be one of the girls. But if he gets female hormones this won't happen and he will only know the women side.
The second thing that bothers me about genderdismorphia is that I don't think it is really a dieasee. We classify it a dieasse becuase whe as a society have soicietal norms for what makes a women and what makes a man. Yes I do understand that there is a chromsome differance and that can be checked for. So since a guy likes to wear a dress and play with dolls he is considered a girl. But why can't a guy play with dolls. In fact guys do play with dolls for example Spawn Dolls, Transformers, Gi Joe Dolls, G.I Joes (little ones), Wrestling Figures. All of those are just Masculine versions of those and we call them action figures but they are no differant. When a girl is born we give them girly stuff and boys sports and war stuff and trucks are the toys they are given. Our society decides what is a girl and what is a boy. Maybe we will stop indoctornating our kids and We can clean up the grade schools and high schools and get the indoctornation out of them as well.
Don't take what I'm saying the wrong way. I do think that there are really stright women in guys bodies and vice versa and they should have the freedom to get an operation to fix that and that health insurance should cover it. Once you start saying that there are things that arn't cosmetic that it shouldn't cover you start to go somewhere you don't want to wind up at. But I also belive that this kid is to young physicaly. I can't say emotionaly because I don't know him. But from the article he hasn't hit puberty and he needs to go through all the changes first.
Not only did I read the article you linked to, I've also read this :::link:::
Let's see where to do start:
1. It is my understanding that performing gender re-assignment surgery under the age of 16 or 18 depending on the country is illegal. However, hormone therapy is legal. Otherwise, it would not be done and the German government would not be paying for.
2. The "illegality" of the surgery is a non-issue because it has not been performed.
3. Laws are capricious and arbitrary. Just because something is legal doesn't make it necessarily morally right. And, in the same vein, just because something is illegal doesn't make it morally wrong. Just look at the abortion and drug laws in this country - both sides insist theirs is the morally right side and that the other side is morally wrong.
4. The problem with logic is that if one starts with false premises, one will end up with false conclusions. But the syllogism will be logically sound. I'm not saying your premises are necessarily false. I'm saying that I don't have enough data since I've not met the child or talked to the family or to the doctors to verify your assumptions.
5. I think it is fairly clear that you were criticizing the German government with your statement "Regardless, this is something that taxpayers should never have to foot the bill for." To me that means that you were trying to protect the German taxpayers from footing the bill for things they shouldn't. But I'll accept that you don't want to protect the German taxpayer.
6. I can't say that any specific 12 year old should or shouldn't have a sex change or even drink alcohol without knowing the person involved. I think some people are more mature at the age of 12 than others are at the age of 60. There isn't a switch in the brain that automatically makes a person mature at 18 or 21 or any other arbitrary age. In Germany the legal drinking is 16 or 18 depending on the beverage. In the U.S., the drinking age is 21. In Ontario, it is 19. And a few countries such as China don't have a minimum drinking age.
Minimum ages for drinking and anything else are arbitrary standards that assume that everyone is exactly the same. Some people are no better equipped to drink alcohol at the age of 60 than they are at the age of 12. And I think the same holds true for gender-reassignment surgery.
And, personally, I don't see a problem (in general terms) with a 12-year-old having a glass of wine with dinner with his parents.
And contrarywise, I think it is just as bad for a 60-year-old and a 12-year-old to go out on a multi-day bender.
7. And last but not least, I assume that the doctors and family involved are caring individuals who have the best interests of the child involved. I also assume that they know more about the specifics of this than the rest of the world. Thus, I assume that they are doing the right thing for the child.
You obviously don't make the same assumptions that I do. For the child's sake, I hope you are wrong and I am right.
Secondly - I almost forgot. Its important to understand that in most European countries, as the article highlights, sex changes are actually illegal for those under 16 years of age. It doesn't take a rocket scientist (or even a doctor) to understand that a sex change for a 12-year old is inappropriate, but since you wondered and I'm not really sure if you read the article anyway, I thought I would toss that tidbit of info in there.
I don't pretend to be a doctor, but none of my takes on the contradictions in their own statements are flawed logically.
If you are inclined to believe that a 12-year old is physically, mentally and emotionally capable of making a decision about a sex change operation then surely a 12-year old should be able to make decisions about things like drinking alcohol, correct?
Its called bad stewardship. Which is quite clearly the crux of my opinions outside of the taxpayer funded aspect of this story.
You'll have to excuse me - I've gone over my own article a couple times now and I've yet to see where I've offered to protect German taxpayers. I'm CRITICIZING them. That is fairly clear.
Wow (e:joshua)!!! It amazes me that upon the basis of reading an article online, you think that know better than the many people (family and health professionals) who actually know the child involved.
You have every right, of course, to your opinion. And for all I know, you might even be right. But in general terms, I would not trust your medical diagnosis skills without a concurring diagnosis from someone who has actually examined the patient.
Personally, I'm not a doctor, I haven't studied gender identity, and I haven't spoken to the child or his family or his doctors. I don't feel that I have enough information to make a judgment about this.
As to the taxpayers of Germany, I don't think they need an American to protect them. If the German taxpayers think this is wrong, they can choose to do something about it.