Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Tinypliny's Journal

tinypliny
My Podcast Link

06/25/2008 10:51 #44781

The TinyPliny Avatarolution
Category: art
Almost everyone has a story about their avatars - those 125 X 150 pixels of online identification that stay with your readers through the thick and thin of your posts. Since my posts have dropped to the extreme triviality level of picking arguments about comic book fonts and posting pie-charts from arcane web-gadgets that nobody uses, I am under some pressure here. The immediate challenge is to achieve the nadir of triviality and set the bar even lower for the most trivial post on (e:strip). This entry to the "Who-wants-to-be-most-trivial?-I-DO!"-contest is the nausea, triumph, obsession, and nitpickiness-filled story of the evolution of my 18750 pixels. Start holding your breath, the lower boundaries of a tonload of totally unnecessary fluff are about to waft your way.

Anyone who has walked through the Cancer Cell Center (CCC) at Roswell, and has even a fractionally functional olfactory apparatus, can recall the all-pervasive sickly and somewhat homely smell that hangs about in that building. I have heard people make all sort of wild guesses about the source of this smell, ranging from imported transatlantic ducks being slaughtered alive in the building to cell-culture media rotting away to yuck-tastic glory. When your imagination is not up-to-creative-snuff with the almost-hallucinogenic peak of glory that your companions seem to have, you usually have three choices: a) Accept the most entertaining conjecture and hurry away from CCC, b) Make a mental note to not recall the smell while you are eating your lunch and hurry away from CCC and c) Decide in an unhinged moment that you will find out the source of that yucky smell and thrust your already unimaginative mind into the deeper doldrums of absolute, annoying and certain knowledge.

Needless to say, I took the third route. (Now, don't tell me you didn't see this coming!!) Though the exact source of the CCC smell still remains elusive, I do have a fair idea... and also my very own avatar. If you cannot see the relationship between between the last assertion and the rest of the sentence, then I guess you can safely assume that you are sane. (Yeah, breathe slow. You can cancel that shrink appointment today.)

Late last year I took the "Working with the Laboratory Mouse" course in the Animal Lab Facility in the CCC/Library building. It was then that the sickly smell hit me full force. It invaded my senses and took over whatever grey matter I had left, when I got out of the stairwell and headed toward the Animal Lab Facility. At this point, countless crime novelists over centuries might have hastily scribbled, "The realization dawned on her." Since these cool novelists were not around to make their erudite observations, I took on the responsibility of playing up EUREKA moment by shouting, not the eponymous "EUREKA!" but the painfully obvious, "IT'S THE MICE!!!". I quite understand why the veterinarian of the facility smiles in sympathy at me even after all these days. I earned the smile in extreme style.

I spent the better part of the practical training sniffing around the facility in what I thought was a discreet and sophisticated manner. But unfortunately, my discreetness was mis-interpreted as an incipient cold and a precautionary mask was thrust into my hands. Being masked put a damper on my detection capabilities and thus the mystery of the exact source of the omnipresent smell remains thus.

I came home, and did what any disappointed graduate student would do - wikisurf. I discovered fascinating details about the life and times of numerous members of the rodent family, hit the wikimedia commons road and fell in love with this magnificent image of the wood mouse.

image

I resized it and adopted it as my 18-odd-k pixels of online fame. Days passed, and at a party someone remarked that seeing a mouse reminded them of me (actually, they didn't really say this, but my brain came to this euphoric interpretation). My avatar had finally arrived! It was thus time to embellish it with idiosyncratic accessories. I chose a starred neck-tie. As any movie enthusiast would agree, drawing montages are always rolled out to the background of music. My music of choice for the nitpicky tale of avatarolution is the genre better known to the mainstream listeners as rap and to the classicist snobs as poetry.


With ball-point ink and felt-tip pen, I fell to sketching
But captured with a flash, it didn't look so fetching


image

Under lamplight the eyes were perfectly beady and filled with vice ((e:libertad,41910))
But I had an issue with brightness and I said, "No Dice!"


image

Tweaked brightness and contrast in PAINT.NET
A software so free that it is not a financial threat


image

At this point it lacked a certain punch
The oil paint and ink filters gave it the furry scrunch.


image

But alas, it didn't gel well with (e:strip) so I tinted it red.
However, in the comments background it looked rather dead.


image

The magic wand and colour inversion came to my rescue
OH NO! I had neglected the neck-tie with the stars askew


image

Added the sparklies and lightened it up a bit
Behold the 18750 pixels of the TinyPliny image-split.


image

But those 18750 pixels make it so hard to see
The eye on the right, won't you agree?


image

Looking out my window I found the perfect antidote
The rich blue of summer skies with a hint of creosote.


image

'Twas too much of colour and one too many alteration
Got sick of 'em all and opted for a modified third iteration.

johnallen - 06/26/08 02:13
Holy crap you go into detail. That's awesome, makes for a great read.
james - 06/25/08 22:54
That was awesome. Thank you for sharing.

06/21/2008 10:22 #44737

Oh, how I missed this...
Category: art
I need to sketch graffiti.

image

Does Buffalo have an official free-to-all-artists graffiti wall?

06/17/2008 10:57 #44686

A year in retrospect
Category: goals
It's exactly 365+1 days since I physically moved to Buffalo. It's time to list the the ten things I hate the most about myself (and want to try to eliminate this year in Buffalo.)

1. Unwarranted Snobbery.
2. Occasional rude behaviour.
3. Cutting into people's speech
4. Crazy Multitasking
5. Poor time management and not finishing tasks on time.
6. Confused explanations.
7. Saying the first thing that comes to my mind.
8. Sticking with damaging influences
9. Identifying priorities and then not taking action.
10. Eating out too much


image
metalpeter - 06/17/08 18:43
I say you can give more reflection and give 10 positive things, you could even give 10 things that you are not sure about. You could give 10 things you learned.
chico - 06/17/08 12:31
How about a complementary, complimentary Top 10 of the most awesomest things about yourself or your life that you want to focus on even more during the next 365 days? I promise I won't count it as "Unwarranted Snobbery". :-)

Love the comic strip btw
james - 06/17/08 11:05
Despite your harsh top ten list, I still think you are pretty damn awesome Ms.Pliny.

06/23/2008 23:48 #44764

The Chaotic Red Musical Pie
Category: music
Not surprisingly, my daily airplay breaks down into quite a heavy dose of metal of various flavours along with a smattering of other genres:

image

My "open mind index" that apparently measures how open-minded I am when it comes to music is 102.

image

To get this silly graph, you need to:

a) have a last.fm profile
b) have played and scrobbled a sizeable chunk of music
c) Go here: and enter your profile name, type in the security code and choose your preferred colour craziness.

And Voila, your musical tastes are neatly broken down into a pie-chart in eleven different colour schemes ranging from tame to frank-epileptic-fit inducing. The epidemiologist in me cannot help but plot a population musical-taste study with such detailed statistics...

Happing Musickuming! :)


mike - 06/24/08 18:39
it always surpises me tha tyou love metal. I would never have guessed!

06/19/2008 16:03 #44721

The Comic Sans Font.
Category: whine
This question is for the designers and the typographers among you. Why is it that you hate the comic sans font so much? It is the only font that is extremely legible at small sizes, is pleasant to look at and can be read without giving one a headache, and yet there seems to be this almost virulent bunch of people who are hell-bent on eliminating this happy font from the web. Why is that?

I don't find any logic in several of their arguments:
1. It is ugly: How can such a legible font be "ugly". The word "ugly" implies loathsomeness and annoyance - both of which, are far away from your mind when you read text typed in comic sans. It's so darn easy to read it. No effort is required to make out what the alphabets are. It's so eye-friendly.

2. It's inappropriately used in varied contexts: How do you define inappropriate? Who defined what is formal and what is informal? Fonts are not equivalent to clothes, that analogy never works. Is eye-friendliness and ease of reading only meant for kids? What happens to us as adults? Do we intentionally want to ruin our moods and eyesights by being forced to read fonts that don't even have breathing whitespace?

3. It's ill-designed: Again, which font is the "best-designed" according to you? Why is it that only the designers complain ad-nauseum about this beautiful down-to-earth font and the general "lay-public" uniformly love it? Why can't typography be user-friendly instead of being snob-friendly?

I ask you, all you people heading to the Typography convention next month, here in Buffalo. Give me some logical arguments and not snob statements as to why I should not use this font. I sent out two international reports to the scientific community using this font and none of them had any problems with it. I even found a LaTeX version of the comic sans font! Why do you view it as a fly in the typographic ointment? I swear I shall be sneering at you if you say its a "kid font" because being an adult does not mean you punish your eyes!
tinypliny - 06/20/08 13:41
Gee. I stirred the hornet's nest with a comic book font. Hahaha...

Nice points, (e:Jim). (or snobbery, well done?!! ;-))I don't think I knew all of that. I just came upon the whole "put the sans back in comic sans" campaign and was pretty needled, considering it does happen to be my favourite font. It doesn't have specific italics and bold versions? That is interesting... So the output pretty much depends on what the recipient's comp can or cannot do. Does it mean that the font has the capacity to look disfigured in some older computers? What font do you usually use for your regular reports etc.? My audience is uniformly above 50 years so all of them are hypermetropic (+3.0D or more) and easily irritable. What would you recommend for such a scenario?

@(e:metalpeter): I love making out what fonts have been used, in random documents. (Even though I am not professional/amateur anything related to web-design or typography). It's just a lot of geeky fun. I also read design blogs, A List Apart and browse the CSS Zen Garden just for the sheer fun of it. (Especially, when I am running short of time on a deadline and feel the massive need to be distracted anyway.)

@(e:Drew): I LIKE the Papyrus font AS WELL!! Talk about being the most average person from the middle of the bell curve. Hehehee.

@(e:Zobar): I think there are some classy and tastefully done websites out there with the Comic Sans Font. (Eg. my own google group. HEHEHE, what did you expect?! And also this site here: :::link::: ) And holy molly! My next favourite might well be the HIGHWAY FONT!!! It is interesting that you bring up the point about dyslexia and easy readability. If you read through these guidelines here: :::link::: you realize that writing and composing documents that are dyslexia-friendly is not really a whole lot different from the guidelines for writing well! And LaTeX rocks. \m/ I think people who don't get this and stick to microshit word are just in a huge state of denial - especially when they are composing their 300 page dissertation in word and swearing every couple seconds about some messed-up format.

@(e:Jason): Who knows... Maybe that is why Marvel Comics is as successful as it is. Hehehe...
I agree that I probably should be worrying about my content, but sometimes, it is fun to project your worries to other aspects of your writing so that you can willfully ignore the sheer mediocrity of what you have just composed! What are your favourite fonts?

@(e:felly): Wow. I think that's why I like it. It's not all uniform and looks somewhat imperfect and full of flaws... more human, perhaps.
It's as if you are reading through the text in Comic Sans and almost expect the writer to have crossed out some words at some point, thought through the composition and handed you the finished product, in triumph. Very non-sterile and colourful! It's like falling in love with a scar on your lover's arm/leg and associating happiness and familiarity with it.

@(e:joshua): I need to check this font out. Is it because all the urgent faxes in your office addressed to you are in this font? :)

@(e:jenks): Very subtle indeed. (e:jim)'s made quite a few points that I never even thought about. Maybe we should have our very own Typography Thursdays and also our own Typography convention. Let's pip those suckers at the Hyatt!











jenks - 06/20/08 11:18
wow. that's a lot of passion about fonts.

But jim is right. it's very subtle art. Way more goes into it than most people would ever realize. It's pretty cool, actually.
joshua - 06/20/08 09:30
I hate Lucinda Fax.
fellyconnelly - 06/20/08 07:50
(e:jim), thank you for so eloquently putting all the educated reasons for the inappropriateness of Comic Sans.

When I look at a piece of type that is put together well, my eyes flow through it evenly. Its neat and well organized and there are no odd spaces or gaps or odd curves of a random u sticking out in the middle. Words written in comic sans just stick out wherever it wants. Leaves holes in the middle of words. It just is not a visually appealing text.

I don't think it should be banned, because it does provide a sense of happiness to those who think the world of it. I think anyone who is serious about the visual appearance of their type can see that it just doesn't work well. That is their choice to make though.
jason - 06/19/08 19:11
Haha!
jim - 06/19/08 19:02
My butt cheeks are crushing walnuts as you read this, Jason.
jason - 06/19/08 18:57
Clearly it was meant to be a limited use font. I would never even consider using it in my work. Could you imagine handing a bank a proposal looking like it came out of Marvel Comics? I lol just thinking about it.

What you're stuck on are the practical elements, which are important to you, and ignoring the contextual and aesthetic elements which are important to other people. You have to consider your audience. There are good alternatives.

Tiny, it's just a font, and in the big picture it is about the 12387163128th thing you should care about unless you are a graphic designer, professional or amateur, or simply a fan of typography.

I wouldn't ban it either, and I know some people have their butt cheeks clenched so tight over it they could crush a walnut. I'm not one of those people. As a web developer it is just one of those things you have to be practical about.
zobar - 06/19/08 18:49
For websites, Comic Sans screams 'I am an amateur.' But it's not because of the font itself, but because it's usually surrounded by background images, animated mailbox icons, 'men at work' icons, and even the occasional background sound. For print production, the message is instead 'I don't really care,' 'I only care enough to switch from Times New Roman,' or perhaps 'I want this to be cute but I don't know where to find any other fonts.' But it's not the font so much as where you find it: church bake sales, public libraries, garage sales. It's to the point now where people pay attention to the font rather than the message.

Think about Highway Gothic :::link::: - it's easy to read, bold, professional, and even kind of interesting. But nobody's going to use it in a corporate newsletter, because of where else it gets used. People will look at your newsletter and go, 'is this the highway font?'

Comic Sans is very easy for dyslexics to read, either on-screen or in print, due to its asymmetry. On-screen, even more legible fonts are widely available [the Lucida series in particular :::link:::].

:::link:::
:::link:::

On another note: LaTeX?? Dang man, I used LaTeX in college which was not that long ago, and nobody even knows what that is anymore! I'm all: LaTeX? and they're all condescending like: um no we just type it into Word. Fucking whippersnappers don't know what's good for them.

- Z
drew - 06/19/08 18:23
Tiny, I used to like the font, but got tired of it. It has been over-used.

Jim, that was an impassioned and educated response. I never realized a lot of what you pointed out, but sure enough, it's there.

I would like it if there were more readable fonts that were also casual. My current favorite is Trebuchet.

I used to really like Papyrus, but it is WAY overused now.
metalpeter - 06/19/08 18:21
I think Jim does a pretty good job saying why people don't like it. I myself will say I can't see a font and tell what one it is just by how it looks. I do think there is a difference between what is used on a screen and when something is printed. Hey using one of the those handwriting fonts is great if you want to write someone a letter or sign your name, but they can be hard to read and so it goes to the bottom of my list along with anything that makes boxes and lines well expect webdings I think it is that makes pictures (mircosoft word). I think that some fun fonts can be good to use but they have to be used in the right way. Yes fancy is good but if it starts to make things hard to read then it shouldn't be used.
jim - 06/19/08 16:32
There are specific ways that type is designed to be readable - proportionality and spacing, line thicknesses and complementary weights and styles. It's a system which includes bold, italic, display and text alternates. Each individual weight and size of every one of those alternates is carefully sized and re-proportioned to create a coherent and efficient system.

Typography is design, it is a subtle art that aims to be an invisible container for the words which it carries. Design is not 'making things pretty', it's making things work. The best design goes unnoticed. A door handle which you don't have to even think about how to grab onto to open. A website with an easy checkout process. A font which is compact and efficient for reading tiny details on a map, or another that's clear and loud from across a train station.

Comic Sans does not stay out of the way, it intrudes and obscures. And this is why: it is a bad typeface, it is not actually readable compared to other possible font choices due to bad kerning and equally sized downstrokes and horizontals. Every ounce of research into readability speaks to this fact and the need for those distinguishing features.

More reasons: it was not designed as a book face, it's a one-off suitable for only one purpose. The designer of comic sans has said that he did not design it for such a purpose. It has no italic face, no bold face, and no weighting at different point sizes. The computer fakes the italic and bold variants by just slanting or thickening the characters willy-nilly.

There was no thought put into its creation, in terms of use as a text font.

I am biting my tongue here at your accusations of snobbery, but let me just add, to snob it up even some more, that typography is one of the oldest technical skills in the world, dating back to the printing presses of ancient China and middle-ages Europe. It matters. What makes good typography is buried in the tiniest details, but it is those small things that the foundation of the most mighty power of human kind is laid down: the written word.