
I tend to have a wild imagination, so when I see developments like this I get really excited. By their own admission they do not believe that this technology could be transferable to larger passenger aircraft but I don't see that as a failure. After all, what is wrong with marketing hydrogen-powered Cessnas that private individuals can fly at a drastically reduced operating cost? Seems like a winner to me. Or even better - perhaps in their quest to find more efficient means of running airplanes on alternative fuels they end up developing even better hydrogen technology that could be use in cars and trucks.
I think our government should be plowing money to companies who are doing work like this so that research can be sped up. After all, as far as I'm concerned anyway, for 30 years we've known how vulnerable our economic and political stability can be when crude prices fluctuate. It has to end, but where do we start? With ingenuity and technological developments like this one, which is being developed in private industry.
I happen to think that the only answer to effective and faster energy independence will be partnerships between government and private industry, in exactly the same way that military technological advancement takes place between the military and say, Skunkworks, or NASA and Northrop Grumman. Its too important - we have to pool public and private resources and intellectual capital to make it happen, just like we have in the past when quick technological advancements were in our best interests.
Then, maybe when China still insists on stealing secret American technology -

Hydrogen (PEM) fuel cells like these have a lot of ups and downs in any application, let alone in powered flight.
I wish the article had more technical minutia because I wonder if they were able to ditch any of the equipment you need on motor vehicles.
One of the biggest party-poopers for hydrogen powered flight is the the relatively lousy density for liquid hydrogen storage both in terms of weight and overall volume. (ie a full gas tank is very close in weight and volume to the actual fuel it holds. With hydrgoen not so much.)
Who knows, perhaps hydro-aero-machines will some day soar to new heights in ball-suckery.
Ha - well, I've always said that I am not a conservative... I can't help it if people never believe me simply because I am not anti-war!
Actually, to take it further, I think certain farm subsidies should be diverted to exactly this sort of thing. I don't think we need to be subsidizing things like caviar production.
"I think our government should be plowing money to..."
First you reregister as an Independent and now you are advocating government subsidies? You have really come around my friend ^_^
I of course 100% agree, just wanted to tease.