The Bad First - Sorry!
Today I locked myself out of the apartment and had an hour and a half to kill, so I hung out at Spot and read Artvoice cover to cover. I think this week's issue is one of the better ones they have released in recent memory. Granted, it is, as always, loaded down with the predictable - hifalutin non-starters such as the Bruce Fisher article about spending $26 billion to clean the Great Lakes, which Democrat is going to suggest this (news flash - none of them), and the coup de gras - its Bush's fault that the Great Lakes are still dirty! I could spend an hour picking the article apart and highlight the fact that Democrat politicians that have been firmly entrenched in the Rust Belt political system ignored this problem for 40 years, including Dennis Kucinich when he was mayor of Cleveland and every single Mayor of Buffalo of the 20th century.
To suggest that this is a Bush problem is laughable. So is the suggestion of economic benefit from the investment - according to Fisher, the $26B expenditure will yield $80-$100B in economic benefits. Where will much of the money come from? C'mon guys - you've heard me say it for years so say it with me - higher taxation. This time, they say it with their own words. In particular, the investment and local cleanup would create higher property values, which would in turn generate more tax revenue for the local government. Thats right - the "economic benefit" would be coming out of your pocket. Only a Democrat would spend your tax money in order to attempt to take more of your tax money. These people foolishly believe such an idea would be a boon to our local economy - in fact it would only be taking even more desperately needed money out of the pockets of working people, while simultaneously exacerbating a problem that is already devastating our region - yet higher taxes which make companies laugh when considering locating here.
This is one of the reasons why our area is fucked and will never recover. People actually believe suggestions like this are good ideas, most of all the local politicians. As usual, they don't consider the consequences because the importance of the action (in this case, environmental cleanup) trumps any devastating consequences. Add a little dash of payola and you have Buffalo politics. Stupid people coming up with stupid ideas that will ultimately have long running negative consequences, and quite literally the only group to benefit is the government. The least capable people of the bunch. Byron Brown is a fucking joke - I can't even get started on him. All I have to say is that I didn't vote for him, so a big thanks to all the people who ushered him into office.
These people talk about constituents as if they are sources of revenue. They never talk about making the area hospitable to job creation. Job creation is a far more efficient, and for that matter a far more ethical way of raising tax revenue. Their answer to the "brain drain" is to raise taxes on some of the most taxed and economically disadvantaged people in the entire nation, instead of finding ways to attract jobs to the area.
I'll have left Buffalo long before things get really ugly because I love the city and can't bare watching this slow death. Sort of like my dear grandpa - I'd prefer to remember him when he used to bring Jay and I to McDonald's as 10-year olds than remember him as that emaciated dead man on the hospital bed when I was 24. I am the sort that would love to get involved and help our area, but if I am working with these types who are so utterly misguided and wrong about literally every single ill that has befallen our city, how can honest people with truly good ideas get any support here? Our area's system is too entrenched and I see it as irreversible as our state government. Forget climate change - it is Buffalo that is in irreversible decline. For now, I'll just make sure that my block is clean and safe for residents and visitors, make sure dog owners clean up their pet's shit and occasionally hose off the sidewalk in front of the house to remove cigarette butts from the cracks in the blocks.
My message to local politicians and would-be local economists - you and your ideas are the problem, not the solution, and your insistence and persistence with these bad ideas are going to force me to leave the region. I love Buffalo but not enough to deny myself a better standard of living, better job opportunities and less government hands in my wallet. I'm not the first or the last - get your shit straight or you are going to be smaller than Syracuse or Rochester in 50 years. What happens when most of the young people are gone and all the old people die? Who are going to pay all the taxes? I love Buffalo in the same way that James Joyce loved Dublin - it will always be a part of me but I'll be writing about it from afar rather than while I'm here. YOU are making it impossible for young people who have Buffalo in their hearts, that would otherwise stay here, to actually stay here. You are indeed offering NOTHING to us and are guaranteeing a harrowing future for our city. You sat by and did nothing during the supposed economic boom of the 90's and had the embarrassing nerve to ask why nobody helped us out. When we do leave, we don't want to return during Christmas and see visible proof that we were right. I don't want Buffalo to become merely the place I plan to bury myself when I'm gone.
There is another article worth reading about how local corporations, including Kissling Interests, are taking advantage of the Empire Zone rules to create luxury housing that gives rich people tax breaks for being able to afford living there. Kissling isn't the first (hi Carl Paladino) and you can hardly blame them for using the rules to their advantage - after all, when the guys who voted for the Empire Zone legislation were too naive to see obvious loopholes (I'm talking to you Sam Hoyt so stop apologizing) who is more at fault - the businesses following the law or the people who created the law to begin with?
I'm scared for our city - this sort of disturbing corruption extends itself through all services, including public education. To see what I mean, read the blurb in the "recent news" section highlighting the nonsense at the Board of Education.
The Good - As Promised
This Wednesday at 8pm, on WNED, you'll find a production involving 26 students filming their impressions of the city of Buffalo. I think its an interesting concept, but I hope that it would be good enough to be valuable to an outsider. I'd like for something that shows why it is that we love and stick up for this old, worn out sweater we call home. Still, I'll approach this collective pseudo-documentary with a clean canvas. I'm really interested in seeing our city through the eyes of other residents. Our politicians suck, we live in one of the highest taxed counties in the single highest taxed state in the union, our jobs pay less than in other areas unless you are a slip and fall lawyer - but damn it, we do have each other. I can't wait to see how other Buffalonians view our city... particularly young people. Maybe you don't share that enthusiasm but I least wanted to let you all know about this upcoming show on WNED. There will be a replay on ThinkBright TV on the 23rd I believe, in case you wanted to see it but missed it.
Joshua's Journal
My Podcast Link
03/17/2008 19:49 #43709
Recent Artvoice Article03/11/2008 15:17 #43623
Hey guys - my iPod will look like me nowHa!
Josh
Josh
jenks - 03/12/08 18:32
good choice in tunes, too. :)
good choice in tunes, too. :)
fellyconnelly - 03/12/08 09:15
ha! cute!
ha! cute!
hodown - 03/11/08 16:49
ok, so cute!
ok, so cute!
03/09/2008 19:21 #43595
Chinese death camp for cats...I wish I were kidding - congratulations to the people that run the Olympics for being a bunch of fucking assholes. I love people who reward historically proven brutality against their own people and now apparently animals.
I'm not gonna lie - this is disturbing.
Josh
I'm not gonna lie - this is disturbing.
Josh
megan - 03/10/08 21:09
"Paranoia is so intense that six stray cats -including two pregnant females - were beaten to death with sticks by teachers at a Beijing kindergarten, who feared they might pass illnesses to the children."
...wow I bet that was memorable for the kids. That'll teach them to listen to their teacher.
"Paranoia is so intense that six stray cats -including two pregnant females - were beaten to death with sticks by teachers at a Beijing kindergarten, who feared they might pass illnesses to the children."
...wow I bet that was memorable for the kids. That'll teach them to listen to their teacher.
metalpeter - 03/10/08 17:47
First of all Paul does make a great point that we in the USA do the same thing sort of. We round up animals and give them 3 weeks and if they don't get picked up they are killed.
But there is a difference we don't have the government telling us how bad these animals are and how they will kill our kids. We also don't do that to peoples pets. The government is getting people to get rid of there pets and why? Well for the same reason ever place that gets an olympics does something like this. They Want to clean up the city for the people who are coming to the country for the first time. Granted you want your city to be at its best but it should be how it really is. If I go to China I want to see the games but I want to see the real china and maybe go find some adult fun someplace to, I don't want everything all cleaned up an AMericanised or europised. I remember something like this made the news with the sydney games, it had something to do with aborginal people being moved. I understand you don't want SARS to break out, but I have never seen wild chinesse cats that roam the streets and it would be cool to see them.
First of all Paul does make a great point that we in the USA do the same thing sort of. We round up animals and give them 3 weeks and if they don't get picked up they are killed.
But there is a difference we don't have the government telling us how bad these animals are and how they will kill our kids. We also don't do that to peoples pets. The government is getting people to get rid of there pets and why? Well for the same reason ever place that gets an olympics does something like this. They Want to clean up the city for the people who are coming to the country for the first time. Granted you want your city to be at its best but it should be how it really is. If I go to China I want to see the games but I want to see the real china and maybe go find some adult fun someplace to, I don't want everything all cleaned up an AMericanised or europised. I remember something like this made the news with the sydney games, it had something to do with aborginal people being moved. I understand you don't want SARS to break out, but I have never seen wild chinesse cats that roam the streets and it would be cool to see them.
james - 03/09/08 22:07
self-aware or not, animals definitely suffer if you make them.
self-aware or not, animals definitely suffer if you make them.
paul - 03/09/08 20:54
Seriously, pigs definitely are as smart as dogs. Even my pet tortoise comes to me when I call it because he knows when I call there is food. Same with mice?
Seriously, pigs definitely are as smart as dogs. Even my pet tortoise comes to me when I call it because he knows when I call there is food. Same with mice?
tiburon1724 - 03/09/08 20:51
I hear what you're saying paul and can't say I totally disagree, but cats and dogs are self-aware while I don't feel the animals we eat here are..if I call my dog he'll come to me but a chicken probably not so much!
I hear what you're saying paul and can't say I totally disagree, but cats and dogs are self-aware while I don't feel the animals we eat here are..if I call my dog he'll come to me but a chicken probably not so much!
paul - 03/09/08 20:33
Wow, my hatred for cats is so great I really don't care.
You realize in America we take all the stray cats that get brought to the pound and kill them too. Same with the animal control people, they round up and kill the animals or sell them to industry for animal testing.
I could never understand why some animals were treated so differently than others and why it outrages people so much when its a cat or a dog but not when its a chicken or a veal calf. You also have to consider that in many parts of china, cats are food animals
Barely anyone one cares how chickens are treated to make our eggs, or milk cows are treated not to mention all the animals that are outright killed for their meat or as pests such as rats.
Is it any more morally objectionable rounding up and killing these cats, than it is have a legally sanctioned animal testing policy in America.
I would much rather be beaten to death than be subjected to chemical tests.
I just don't see it as that outrageous when you look at in the the general sense of how humans treat animals.
Wow, my hatred for cats is so great I really don't care.
You realize in America we take all the stray cats that get brought to the pound and kill them too. Same with the animal control people, they round up and kill the animals or sell them to industry for animal testing.
I could never understand why some animals were treated so differently than others and why it outrages people so much when its a cat or a dog but not when its a chicken or a veal calf. You also have to consider that in many parts of china, cats are food animals
Barely anyone one cares how chickens are treated to make our eggs, or milk cows are treated not to mention all the animals that are outright killed for their meat or as pests such as rats.
Is it any more morally objectionable rounding up and killing these cats, than it is have a legally sanctioned animal testing policy in America.
I would much rather be beaten to death than be subjected to chemical tests.
I just don't see it as that outrageous when you look at in the the general sense of how humans treat animals.
jenks - 03/09/08 20:01
yeah... I don't really like cats- but that's awful.
Reminds me of this one: :::link:::
"Indian authorities to poison 100,000 stray dogs
Slaughter aimed at combating rabies; activists decry plan"
yeah... I don't really like cats- but that's awful.
Reminds me of this one: :::link:::
"Indian authorities to poison 100,000 stray dogs
Slaughter aimed at combating rabies; activists decry plan"
james - 03/09/08 19:29
If only cats had a one child policy they wouldn't have this problem.
If only cats had a one child policy they wouldn't have this problem.
02/29/2008 16:50 #43510
Communist Paradise02/27/2008 18:49 #43486
William F. Buckley, Jr.1925 - 2008
Today is a sadder day in American life if you are into political and civic discourse. William F. Buckley, Jr. is one of the people that influenced my interest in politics. For many years he hosted a debate program on PBS called Firing Line, which was the best debate show on any network before or since. He routinely hosted legends of political, cultural, intellectual, political and academic persuasions - the roster of his past guests is without peer and is pretty impressive.
He was the only conservative in American public life for many, many years. He is generally credited with laying the groundwork for the modern conservative movement, which is something the evangelical conservatives have utterly, utterly bastardized and twisted around into an embarrassing mishmash of bigotry, hypocrisy and hubris. Buckley was famous for denouncing the John Birch Society and he was criticized by conservatives for doing so. If he's the grand poobah of the conservative movement, if you ask me which side I'd pick in a debate I'll take the guy who was the grand poobah of it all. He and Barry Goldwater were virtually identical in terms of political and philosophical outlook, although in Goldwater's case what he lacked in eloquence he made up for in humor.
Buckley was a Connecticut WASP, Yale educated and spoke with an aristocratic patois that you'd certainly pin to his upbringing... and you wouldn't necessarily be wrong. What people do not know is that English was Buckley's third language that he had learned by the age of 7. He had spoken Spanish and French prior to that, having lived in Mexico and France with his parents at an early age. As a result, his English accent was idiosyncratic and sounded somewhere between northeastern WASP and English. During his life he routinely described himself as a libertarian or a conservative, which in the absolutely purest academic sense of conservatism that he subscribed to, could ultimately be interchangeable terms although in today's society what it means to be a libertarian is defined a hundred different ways. When Bill Buckley was around, conservatism and the church were not intertwined as it is now.
Hands down - the best debater to ever have appeared on television. He was an intimidating person to debate against because of his deep intellect, verbosity, steely gaze and sometimes uncomfortable line of questioning. The Hoover Institution at Stanford University has archived his past television shows; links to 5-minute clips from various shows have been provided. Many of the shows topics are provocative and at least one should pique your interest. Click here -
In London they now charge $15 or so if you want to drive a car into the city center. A lot of people think its a great idea. Guess who proposed that 43 years ago when he ran for mayor of New York? He also proposed installing bike lanes. Bloomberg has been suggesting ideas like this for New York these days and people think he's a genius. Buckley finished third in that race.
The main reason why we are poorer for his passing today is because he was the last remaining credible debater/pundit who insisted on intelligent, polite, civil public discourse in our society (with the possible exception of the Gore Vidal debacle). The days where we could simply talk to each other seem so long gone when you watch Firing Line. We don't talk to each other like this any more. Buckley showed that it was good, even great, to argue with each other if we're going to thoughtfully consider the issues in our society. What makes him different from most is that he maintained great personal friendships with people he had vehement philosophical differences with. Its an incredibly telling thing, when you are greatly loved by people who otherwise would be considered an "enemy."
I don't know if we'll ever have people like this anymore. Its a shame because our country needs more people with the same outlook on how to proceed with civic discourse as he had. I hope its our generation that returns to this way of thinking and talking. And why can't we be funny about it? Buckley was interviewed in Playboy in the late 60's/early 70's and people wondered why he agreed to appear in a bawdy publication such as that. His response was classic - "to communicate my views to my son!"
Today is a sadder day in American life if you are into political and civic discourse. William F. Buckley, Jr. is one of the people that influenced my interest in politics. For many years he hosted a debate program on PBS called Firing Line, which was the best debate show on any network before or since. He routinely hosted legends of political, cultural, intellectual, political and academic persuasions - the roster of his past guests is without peer and is pretty impressive.
He was the only conservative in American public life for many, many years. He is generally credited with laying the groundwork for the modern conservative movement, which is something the evangelical conservatives have utterly, utterly bastardized and twisted around into an embarrassing mishmash of bigotry, hypocrisy and hubris. Buckley was famous for denouncing the John Birch Society and he was criticized by conservatives for doing so. If he's the grand poobah of the conservative movement, if you ask me which side I'd pick in a debate I'll take the guy who was the grand poobah of it all. He and Barry Goldwater were virtually identical in terms of political and philosophical outlook, although in Goldwater's case what he lacked in eloquence he made up for in humor.
Buckley was a Connecticut WASP, Yale educated and spoke with an aristocratic patois that you'd certainly pin to his upbringing... and you wouldn't necessarily be wrong. What people do not know is that English was Buckley's third language that he had learned by the age of 7. He had spoken Spanish and French prior to that, having lived in Mexico and France with his parents at an early age. As a result, his English accent was idiosyncratic and sounded somewhere between northeastern WASP and English. During his life he routinely described himself as a libertarian or a conservative, which in the absolutely purest academic sense of conservatism that he subscribed to, could ultimately be interchangeable terms although in today's society what it means to be a libertarian is defined a hundred different ways. When Bill Buckley was around, conservatism and the church were not intertwined as it is now.
Hands down - the best debater to ever have appeared on television. He was an intimidating person to debate against because of his deep intellect, verbosity, steely gaze and sometimes uncomfortable line of questioning. The Hoover Institution at Stanford University has archived his past television shows; links to 5-minute clips from various shows have been provided. Many of the shows topics are provocative and at least one should pique your interest. Click here -
In London they now charge $15 or so if you want to drive a car into the city center. A lot of people think its a great idea. Guess who proposed that 43 years ago when he ran for mayor of New York? He also proposed installing bike lanes. Bloomberg has been suggesting ideas like this for New York these days and people think he's a genius. Buckley finished third in that race.
The main reason why we are poorer for his passing today is because he was the last remaining credible debater/pundit who insisted on intelligent, polite, civil public discourse in our society (with the possible exception of the Gore Vidal debacle). The days where we could simply talk to each other seem so long gone when you watch Firing Line. We don't talk to each other like this any more. Buckley showed that it was good, even great, to argue with each other if we're going to thoughtfully consider the issues in our society. What makes him different from most is that he maintained great personal friendships with people he had vehement philosophical differences with. Its an incredibly telling thing, when you are greatly loved by people who otherwise would be considered an "enemy."
I don't know if we'll ever have people like this anymore. Its a shame because our country needs more people with the same outlook on how to proceed with civic discourse as he had. I hope its our generation that returns to this way of thinking and talking. And why can't we be funny about it? Buckley was interviewed in Playboy in the late 60's/early 70's and people wondered why he agreed to appear in a bawdy publication such as that. His response was classic - "to communicate my views to my son!"
(e:imk2) that can never happen in the new version coming out soon. Sorry that can't help you now.
(e:carolinian), it was where i was writing a comment and had a small window open, i then clicked on my own journal, which was fine, because the comment window i had open is independent of that, but i wanted to change my user pic and so i clicked on my avatar, and that is what replaced my comment that i was writing in the small window i had open. when i pressed the back button, it was all gone. damn, i did so much research for that comment too.
Ouch - that sucks imk. Its happened to me. At that point it is just not worth trying to go back and piece together what you wrote. One day I had a journal written and I lost it. I was so pissed - I don't think I journaled for a couple of weeks after that.
(e:imk2), was it the thing where you're writing a comment in a comment window, and then you hit "Click here to add comment" link on the journal page absent-mindedly and the stuff you were previously writing in the comment window disappears?
Oh man that sucks so bad. Writing realy long stuff in a browser is always dangerous.
i mean seriously, it was like 10,000 words, and they're all gone now. and i hate writing so much that i'll never be able to put it back together. did i say FUUUUUUCK? no? well then, again, FUUUUUUUCKKKKK!
oh my fucking god, i just had a monster response to your comments and just clicked the wrong key and lost it all!
FUCK FUCK FUCK, FUCK it, i give up. and it was so good too. DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMN
Another thing about the Scandinavian countries, well, at least Sweden, which is constantly touted as the ultimate we should aspire to, is that their statutory tax rates are much lower than ours.
Artvoice is laughable. All "Bush is dumb" all the time. But I see absolutely nothing wrong with a plan that would increase home values and thus taxes. BUffalo is at the bottom of the real estate market for US cities. You would think cheap, cheap homes would draw people to the area but that isn't going to happen as we can hardly afford to pay teachers, police, and firepersons.
Now, more money wont fix all our problems. Managing that money well certainly should be a priority. But this city can't turn around and still keep property values as stupidly low as they are.
As for the actual thrust of my journal entry and how taxes apply to that - you are currently living in a city where increasingly higher taxes have been applied and will continue to be applied, only to see catastrophic returns. Higher taxes aren't going to make Buffalo into a socialist paradise - it hasn't worked yet.
To your comment though, (e:imk) - this is a bit of an aside but is interesting! Don't worry Yvonne - you'll be paying 40% soon. Just don't expect to be getting what they do in the socialist paradise of Europe, where the countries are routinely mediocre in terms of economic ability and political clout, yet offer more "free" stuff, which isn't actually free.
Your taxes aren't going up to pay for health care and likely they never will in your lifetime. Your taxes are going up because social security is going bankrupt, which is why I say that politicians that are trying to sell you on a socialist health care scheme are selling you a promise that they will NEVER keep!
I can't let this go uncorrected because of my extreme financial nerdity.... you likely pay 25% above the marginal base tax of $4,386 unless you make above $77,100 as a single filer or $110,000 filing as head of household. Its not 10% more, its 15% or more, depending on what you earn in your new socialist tax scheme! =D
You may be interested to know that in Scandinavia, particularly Sweden, personal income tax rates go as high as 60%. In Canada I've read editorials proclaiming paying such high taxes as a patriotic virtue, which I got a bit of a chuckle from reading. In the socialist paradise of Canada it looks like this.
FEDERAL -
15% on the first $37,885 of taxable income, +
22% on the next $37,884 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $37,885 and $75,769), +
26% on the next $47,415 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $75,769 and $123,184), +
29% of taxable income over $123,184.
This is in addition to provincial tax rates of -
6.05% on the first $36,020 of taxable income, +
9.15% on the next $36,021, +
11.16% on the amount over $72,041.
Personally I would never support a socialist system as applied in Europe or Canada, but thats just me. I am a better judge of how to spend my money than the government is.
and do you know why norway has all of these pro family and pro career enabling policies? It's because they require women to be part of the government. Which is quite different from ALLOWING women to be part of the government. In 1981, provisions concerning a required gender balance in publicly appointed committees, etc., were introduced into the Gender Equality Act, and since 1988 there has been a requirement that representation be a minimum of 40 per cent of each gender.
Since then, no Norwegian Government has been formed with less than 40 per cent women. :::link:::
So this means that if you have women in goverment, they will make laws that allow women to have opportunities to have both, careers and families, and not be required to choose one or the other because they cannot afford to pay for child care, or afford to stay home to care for their children if they choose to do so.
i know this is off topic, but i had to put it out there.
i would gladly pay higher taxes to have a variety of services that other countries have, such as health care, child care elderly care, parental leave (norway has 53 weeks at 80% pay for both parents to divide between themselves!), family allowance (The family allowance scheme was introduced to help to cover the costs of raising children, and is designed to facilitate equitable redistribution between families with and without children. In 2006, the child benefit has been set at NOK 970 per month per child. Single parents receive child benefits for their children plus the equivalent of one extra child. An extended child benefit is available for single parents who have children under three years of age and who satisfy certain requirements. There is also a regional supplement available for families residing in the far northern areas. source listed below.
I'd gladly pay 40% of my salary for these things. I'm already paying 30% in taxes....and for what? measily social security and medicare? Right!
:::link:::