Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Drew's Journal

drew
My Podcast Link

09/17/2007 12:28 #41152

Is religion harmful?
Category: religion
Short answer: yes. As seen in the post that inspired this, from last week by (e:paul), it is perfectly clear. Add abortion clinic bombings, terrorism, and the crusades, and it's simple. Religion brings all kinds of problems into this world.

Then, why, pray tell (haha! pun!) would I so involved in religion?

There's a few reasons: In no particular order--

a. (using letters so this is not confused with my "10 things lists") We are, by nature, religious people. By saying this I mean to say that we are all prone to ask questions about meaning for our life, and we are all likely to give ourselves in worship. I believe that even those of us that deny the existence of GOD have other "gods," because we need them. My devotion to u2 and to the Steelers is borderline religious. I know that is pathetic, but I offer it up as an example. Our tendencies to ask "why," to connect with other people, and to give ourselves to something bigger than ourselves are religious tendencies.

b. Religion is still a force for good. Ironically, religious people invented the ideas of religious tolerance and of the separation of church and state. Although we have been on the wrong side of these issues, too, Christians were the driving force behind most of the positive progressive social movements in this country.

c. The best cure for bad religion is not "no religion," but "good religion." This is just my opinion, of course, but I think that the best way to help Christians that behave badly is not to ask them to abandon their devotion (unlikely, to say the least) but to show them a truer picture of the one they are devoted to. I really do believe that the best picture of true justice and true grace is found in Jesus as shown in the Bible. Name calling, threatening encounters such as the one that (e:Paul) had to deal with are, to put it simply, inconsistent with how Christians are called to act. Good religion seeks the best, not for itself exclusively, but especially for its non-adherents.

d. Personal experience. I know that this is different for everybody, but based on what I know and what I've experienced, I believe that God exists, that he existed on earth in the person of Jesus Christ, and that those statements affect everything about the way that I live my life. I COULD try to make sense of those things on my own, but I am better off trying to do so with other people, and that's the seed of religion.

I think my next post will be a guide for non-believers and believers to deal with scary people of faith.
lizabeth - 09/18/07 00:49
Drew, if you've found the impetus for self-examination in Christianity, that's great, but I'm afraid it doesn't work that way for everyone. One of my biggest problems with religion is that it so often seems to allow people to turn their critical thinking skills off instead of helping them hone those skills.

"Why do we do things the way we do?"
"Well, because it says so in this really old book."
"What's so special about this book? How do we know this book is right?"
"Well, because we got this book from God."
"How do you know?"
"Because we just do. Stop asking stupid questions."

And the discussion just ends there. Too many people use their religion as an excuse for not thinking deeply about what they believe and what they do. They just go along with whatever because it's tradition, or because it's what everyone else they know does. I don't think this blind adherence to a belief system does anyone any favors.
drew - 09/17/07 20:43
Everybody justifies their own behavior, right? religious people use their religion, but other people use other things, right? I mean, almost nobody really believes that what they do is bad.

Of course, this doesn't make sense, because there are a lot of bad people in this world, some believers, some not. But ask any person if they are good, and even most of the worst offenders will say "yes," and offer an excuse for their behavior.

Maybe this is why I like my particular faith, because it encourages me to examine my own choices based not on what I think is good, but on some exterior standard. (I'm sure that some other faiths do this, but I can only speak to my own experience).

Where do problems come up? When that standard is distorted, or used on others, rather than on one's self. Or when the inability to meet the standard drives a person to desperation.

For me, the best cure is a religious one: self-examination, confession, and then forgiveness. Repeat until death, hopefully with less to confess each time (but don't count on it--see the posts about mother Theresa!).
metalpeter - 09/17/07 19:45
The dangerous side of religion is that most people who follow there belief system believe that what they are doing is right. That could be a person who thinks Abortion is killing and killing is wrong but that killing everyone in an abortion clinc is ok. The other danger is that I think a lot of people use there religion to back up or to enforce the moral belief system they all ready have. So for example if they think women are inferior they can use the story of Adam & Eve and how women was created from Adams rib as a way to say women are inferior. Often times people believe that their way is the only way and anyone who doesn't think the way they are is evil and is going to hell, and in some cases that they should die.

To me it does seem that often religion is used to devide people instead of bringing them togather. Again I think it is people using it to do that not the religion its self. I sort of get what I think it was (e:james) said that people should act more like the leaders. In other words when I go to do something I shouldn't do what the church would have me do, I should do what Jesus would do, or at least what I think he would do. That same idea can be applied to other religions to. I think that people should remember that they are being taught be people and not these other very powerfull profets and take that into consideration when they learn things, but most people don't.

I do just want to add that religion does have a lot of good points to but that isn't what the post was about so that is why I'm not getting into them.
janelle - 09/17/07 18:46
Hm, I guess I'll call it a draw on the contradictory argument. It was the least interesting of all of our discussion to me anyway, but it's so damn hard for me to walk away from even the littlest of arguments! But here I am.... w.a..l...k....i.....n......g away!
LOL I need that little walk icon from the chat box.
james - 09/17/07 18:28
I do not think that it is contradictory. I personally do not believe that religious doctrine is legitimate. However, there certainly are scores of people who do. I am totally cool with their personal beliefs so long as it does not harm anyone or pollute the public interest. Which is why religious communities that work towards social good are cool shit and people like James Dobson are stinky jerks.
janelle - 09/17/07 17:25
(e:james):
"Third, I say I'm following Christ, but so does the guy who bombs the abortion clinic."
I guess the point I was trying to make with the above statement is everyone constructs their own view of their religious follower and their method for understanding religious texts. Those methods and constructions are influenced by our personality, intelligence and environment. Even you have indicated a method for doing so, it seems largely based on your education in history, and you have made a determination that someone who blows people up is not following Christ or Allah. So naturally, people are going to have different views of Christ, Allah, etc...and thus follow them differently and that will sometimes lead to conflict and issues and it's a constant struggle for those faith communities. I guess my overall point is that your statement in your first comment is easier said than done for religious communities and I was trying to flesh out some of those difficulties.

I still think it's contradictory to promote religion for its benefits while ultimately questioning the legitimacy of religion. Especially, since you could theoretically have no religious institution and still have soup kitchens. But I probably think this way because from my perspective I believe in the legitimacy of my faith as well as the benefits of my faith.

Thanks for the challenging dialogue =)

james - 09/17/07 16:43
The two are not contradictory. The benefits of religion are not necessarily religious in nature. That is, a religious institution can do positive things whether or not there is any legitimacy to their spiritual doctrine. If god didn't exist that soup kitchen or support group is still equally useful. Coming from a point of view that there is no such legitimacy I am uneasy with people prescribing to a world view that is false. However, I also recognize that human perception is infinitely small and that no one can grasp the ultimate reality. So, once again, I am willing to let is go.

"Third, I say I'm following Christ, but so does the guy who bombs the abortion clinic."

Under any sort of scrutiny the guy who blows people up is not following Christ, just as the Muslim car-bomber is not following Allah. They may view their acts as divinely sanctioned, and so consider themselves followers of their god, but seriously, have they even read the book? Where this sort of unhinges itself is that the laws prescribed in these holy books are attached to the cultures of Abraham's, Christ's, and/or Mohammed's time. The old testament LOVES the capital punishment. Talmudic law does not. Jesus turns the other cheek. Crusaders kill in his name. etc, etc. In the struggle to not be outdated one has to redact modernity from an ancient tome. Which certainly causes problems when the same book tells you to love your neighbor and kill your Shia neighbor.

That is why I don't put my faith into the literature of long dead men but in man's capacity for change. As a historian I certainly appreciate dialogue with the past through records like the Bible. But also as a historian I hope that the lessons pulled from that text is set in a modern context of compassion. And if you can do that I don't care if the text is about Jesus, Krishna, or Mighty Taco.
janelle - 09/17/07 16:07
so sorry, James, I called you (e:jim). you can spit at me or something next time you see me. lol.
janelle - 09/17/07 16:05
"But odd things like Mother Theresa crusading against condoms in nations with high rates of AIDS infections. Or the Dalai Lama raising money to fund Tibetan separatist militias... it is disheartening".
It's a very human attribute to fall from the ultimate standard or to have inconsistencies in belief. Religious folks aren't immune from that attribute. Xtians might attribute it to the sinful nature of man, but I'll defer to preacher man on that.

"The world would be a much better place if all followers of religion were more like those they are following."
I'd like to say yes to that statement, but I can't. I think it's because it's an easy statement on the surface, but difficult in practice. First, see above, all humans fall short of the perfect standard. Second, some of the individuals whom we might say are examples of what makes religion dangerous, believe they ARE like that religious figure they are trying to follow. Third, I say I'm following Christ, but so does the guy who bombs the abortion clinic.

I'm curious, (e:Jim), but you don't have to answer... You make the statement that the world would be a much better place if followers of religion were more like those they follow, but you also say you question the ultimate benefit of faith. How do you reconcile those two ideas ? ...or do you just accept that they are contradictory? ... Or you haven't figured out a way to reconcile them? (In vietnam, it's okay to have two contrary ideas, it's just a different way of processing information)

james - 09/17/07 14:57
It is a little over-reaching to say that religion is a force for good or for bad when, like everything else in this world, it has mounds of both. Religious institutions do a lot of good. They help people in need, though I question the ultimate benefit of faith, and so I am willing to let it go.

Ya, Fred Phelps is an ass and Pat Robertson... makes you wonder if Christ would even recognize his religion as his own with these clowns.

But odd things like Mother Theresa crusading against condoms in nations with high rates of AIDS infections. Or the Dalai Lama raising money to fund Tibetan separatist militias... it is disheartening.

The world would be a much better place if all followers of religion were more like those they are following. In the meantime we will just be grateful for the folks that aren't the Freds and pats of the world.

09/13/2007 18:12 #41080

10 Things I like about flying
Category: 10 things
I'm going away this weekend on (you guessed it) an airplane! Hence the latest installment of the series named after the number of fingers I have right now.

1. Taking off. I like the feeling of being pressed back into the seat and the roar of the engines. (e:Janelle) does not like this, but this is my list.

2. Snacks. I would probably like hell itself if they came around with a cart of snacks. For that reason, they probably don't.

3. Newspapers. I don't even buy one (yes, I am that cheap), but there are always some around airports, and I like to grab one and read it.

4. The little puffer machines that sniff you to see if you have explosives. I don't even know if they have these in Buffalo, but they amuse me.

5. Seeing all sorts of people have to take their shoes and belts off. Sure, its inconvienient, but it also gives me a good, democratic feeling that the bigwig buisness travellers go through the same stuff as schlubs like me.

6. Moving sidewalks. When will the rest of the world catch up to airports?

7. Free internet stations. Ok, so I have only seen this in foriegn airports. The US needs to catch up on this one.

8. Airport drinks. Sure they are expensive, but there is no better way to pass the time waiting for a connection than at an airport bar.

9. My favorite Men's room in Minnesota. Just kidding! I've never been to Minnesota!

The real 9. Landing. It's like taking off, but its where you want to be.

10. Going through the gate after landing, and re-joining people with out tickets. I love it when there is a crowd waiting and people holding signs, even if none of them are looking for me.
lizabeth - 09/18/07 00:54
One of my favorite things that I haven't seen on anyone's list yet:

Spotting local landmarks from the air! I love playing name-that-building, or looking for my school or house or relatives' houses... Naturally, this only works if you are flying into/out of a town you know well.
jenks - 09/14/07 17:25
ATC? (means "around the clock" to me...)
ladycroft - 09/14/07 12:55
i love take-off for the same reason - nothing like a little g to put a smile on your face.

and buffalo does have one of those machines, if you're lucky enough to get in that lane :)
lauren - 09/14/07 11:28
(e:Jbeatty) I knew this was right up your alley! And (e:Drew) I LOVE moving sidewalks, like on the Geico commercials :)
drew - 09/13/07 22:33
Cool. I can't believe I didn't include #2. I don't care about a few of the others, can's say I've done a few more, and don't like #5.
jbeatty - 09/13/07 22:28
What a great post! I don't mean to hijack it, but my personal list would be.
1)keeping track of what aircraft I flew on.
2)Free booze on international flights.
3)Spotting at the airport, especially Heathrow and Kuala Lumpur.
4)the feeling of GTFO of wherever you are.
5)powerful toilets
6)sitting by yourself from KL to Stockholm
7)the sound of the 777's GE90's on takeoff roll.
8)sitting in the flight deck and flying the thing.
9)ATC
10)Getting another stamp in the ol' blue book.
btw I also love getting some g's on rotation.
metalpeter - 09/13/07 19:57
I was at an airport and saw a sign that said you didn't have to take your shoes off, if you didn't want to. However if you didn't then there was all kids of other stuff you would have to do.

Hey on a side note maybe if you fly southwest you will see them make a 3rd women cover up what she is wearing, HA.

09/11/2007 21:14 #41056

Sometimes life sucks
Tonight I was driving a kid home from church. He came because his friend invited him--we welcome high school guys on Tuesday nights and we play ball, discuss the Bible together. Its good for our church to have some kids that are a little bit more "street" around.

Anyway, I was driving a kid home, and it was his first time here, so he is kinda checking us out. He asked me for advice about how to deal with a girl he likes (such a ninth grader!), and we talked about that for a while, but then I realized that we are driving through a neighborhood that looks more and more menacing.

"So do you feel safe here?" I asked, tenatively.

"Not really. My best friend got killed here three weeks ago."

The kid's in ninth grade. Not a thug. A sweet, kind, skinny, freshman.

His friend was shot because he hit on a girl, and the girl's brother didn't like it.

No kid his age should have to deal with crap like that.
lauren - 09/12/07 17:08
Yes yes, quite sad...but certainly not an anomaly. It is lucky for you that you have the oppotunity to spend time with some of these kids and see what they think about it. I think a common misconception is that people who live in those kinds of neighborhoods like it there, are comfortable walking the streets while outsiders are not. No one should have to deal with that kind of fear.
fellyconnelly - 09/12/07 15:21
its amazing how many kids these days have to deal with things like that.... so sad...
lizabeth - 09/12/07 14:57
Oh man, that is really heartbreaking.
jason - 09/12/07 14:21
Damn, damn, damn damn damn. That is so sad Drew.
twisted - 09/11/07 21:51
Sure as hell would make you think twice before giving advice about "how to deal with a girl he likes."

And no. No kid should have to deal with that.

09/10/2007 16:56 #41037

Ten things I like about Troy Polamlu
Category: 10 things
1. His hair.

image

2. His car. Dude is a professional athlete, making millions in salary, plus endorsements, but he drives a Kia. Why? Because he doesn't need a fancy car. A Kia seemed good to him.

3. He's super fast.

4. He hits REALLY hard
image

5. He's a Pittsburgh Steeler.

6. He never lifts a weight over 15lbs. Sure, he trains really hard, but its all speed, flexibility, and repetition. He believes this sort of training is more conducive to football then lifting weights. I'm not going to argue with him.

7. He's anti-Gatorade. He thinks water is better for you and Gatorade is all marketing.
image

8. He's a spiritual guy.

9. He's Samoan. I don't know why I like that, but its cool.

10. He's not even that into football. Well, he likes playing, but he doesn't watch it at all. I guess we are different in that way, but I appreciate that he is interested in other things.

mrdeadlier - 09/14/07 21:38
That's enough Steelers for now, Drew. Thanks. ;)
lizabeth - 09/11/07 02:39
I am not into football at all, but this guy does sound like an intriguing character. :)

09/07/2007 10:22 #40984

10 things I like about the Bible
Category: 10 things
1. Lot's of "dark heroes," i.e good guys that do bad things or bad guys that do good things (well, guys and girls actually, even if it is guys in most cases). Really, there's only one completely good guy in the whole thing, and his contemporaries thought he was a bad guy.

2. The language. It was written, mostly, in Hebrew and Koine Greek. Both are relatively simple, for ancient languages. The Greek used was not literary (Attic) Greek, the language of the marketplace, which means that it was written to cross languages and cultures.

3. It surprises me. Still. Even after reading it as much as I have, the Bible still kicks my ass. Martin Luther used to call scripture, "my enemy," because he said, "it destroys me."

4. It's an underdog story. The younger brother gets the inheritance. The slaves get land of their own. The Romans get beat, non-violently at that! Remember the term "David and Goliath story" comes from a book that is full of David and Goliath stories.

5. It's honest about where it comes from. For example, there are four different accounts of Jesus' life, and while they DO converge, they DON'T completely line up. Rather than just pick one, and "get the story straight," early Christians included all four in the Bible, because all four had value. Some thing with other sections of the book (actually, the Bible is better described as a library than a book, but I digress . . .)

6. It reads well. The church has tried to ruin this, by chopping the stories up, or always skipping ahead to its favorite parts, but exodus is exciting! So is Mark. Esther is regarded as great literature by plenty of people who could care less about whether the Bible is "God's Word" or not.

7. It reads even better in community. It raises questions that have to be discussed. It's a "book club" kinda book. (Instead of a book you club people with, which is how it often gets used!).

8. It really does show me God. Sometimes its easy, other times its hard, but God is revealed in that book.

9. It also shows me humanity. No where is it clearer how dumb/selfish/stubborn we can be, but also what God can do with stupid humans like us. It's a pretty good mirror

10. It's got a happy ending. (like this list, I hope). Despite other interpretations that have become popular in recent years, the Bible isn't about how sinners finally get their comeuppance. The Bible is a love story, and thus it ends with a wedding. Humanity and God are made one again, and there's no more death or pain or sickness. Is there judgment? Yes, but that is second to last. The story ends well (and many would argue [using the Bible no less] that it ends well for everybody, not just Christians).

Next: 10 things I like about Troy Polamalu, unless somebody makes a better suggestion.
lizabeth - 09/11/07 02:37
"(Instead of a book you club people with, which is how it often gets used!)"

Sad but true.
jenks - 09/07/07 15:05
you know... you made me realize I've never really thought of the bible as a story- i.e. something that can be read cover to cover, with a plot, and a beginning/middle/end- I guess I've always thought of it as just a bunch of individual/independent stories mushed together into one big book. Interesting.