This is in response to
(e:jsl,39452)
"GPL-licensed software can't be sold for profit; you can only charge enough to cover "reasonable" distribution costs." -- (e:ajay)
Can't vs Won't
Ya, if people fucking admit to using it. I can't tell you how much stuff I have seen other graphic designers and web programmer's rip off of true open source projects and projects where the source was just laying around, re-package and sell for ridiculous amounts of money.
Clients do not know the difference between open source code and not open source code, that is why they are hiring a web programmer. To freelancing web programmers, time is money and to them there is no higher authority who has to evaluate the legitimacy of their code. Simply put, people take the open source code, put a new look on it an resell it for commercial purposes. If you are a web programmer and don't believe this is happening you are crazy or in denial.
Opensourcing Tools
I am totally for open source on many things I do. Especially tools. In fact I regularly contribute useful sourcecode to other groups of programmers.
Most of the client side magic is done with my surebert flash/javascript toolkit and that is opensource.

which has been used in many other projects at Roswell. I am also working on a php framework called surebert framework which estrip is created with and it will be open source - as I will most of my future tools, which there should be a ton of. I like to opensource tools that allow other builders to build bigger and better, easier and faster but I am not really into open sourcing final projects.
I feel that a web programmer should make those things on their own, as I did with estrip or use something way easy like all the yahoo community building stuff - which by the way is great. Taking the tools I created surebert and surebert framework and the tools someone else created e.g. PHP, javascript, etc. it is a simple step to create estrip.
It has little to do with security as it did when I wrote that so long ago and much more to do with I don't want anyone else to use surebert journals (which estrip is an instance of). It takes like 30 seconds to create a new instance of estrip for another place and that is quick enough to be commercially useful. Back in 2004 we tried this with

is it even there still
(e:twisted) ?
I don't want anyone to make any commercial anything out of the estrip system ever. I created as a response to all the commercial systems out there. Not to mention that the fact that it was my master's thesis at UB means that they probably would claim rights on it anyways, if it ever became anything.
Like Chicken Wings
To make it a Buffalo analogy. Call me pretentious but I feel like me giving away estrip as a single, installable source package is akin to the Anchor Bar giving away their famous chicken wing sauce recipe. Then everyone would just use it and be the original Buffalo Chicken Wings and worse yet they could make it commercial. Even if I tell them they have to put a note on it saying I made it, and not use it for anything commercial, who is to stop them from putting their own label on it and just ignoring that. I basically don't have time to taste every sauce and see if it's my flavor.
Not Just Commercial Derivatives
Frankly, it's not just commercial projects, I just don't want any derivative works created even if they were non-commercial. I hate the thought of creating publication software that can be used for communities I don't want to help. I mean what if someone made an anti-gay community using my software. I just don't even want to go there.
In fact, I really don't want it to be used for similar communities in other places. I feel it is part of what makes it unique is that it is not just another vBulletin, yahoo group, myspace friend clique, livejournal group, instance of the same thing that everyone else has.
I know people can make things exactly the same or better, and I encourage them to, but they will have to put the time and effort into that.
At Work
When roswell asked me for a similar system

(I did not do the graphic design) I ended up writing it from the ground up just so that it was not the same software. Although, it has similar features none of the code is shared other than surebert.
While estrip took me several years to fully develop it took me only a month to build yRoswell because I am a much better programmer and because surebert toolkit and the surebert framework were already there. Not to mention that PHP is just so much better now than it was in version 3 and 4. Bye, bye procedural madness.
Need New Features
However, if you have feature requests feel free to email me and I can see what can be done about it. Can't promise they will be done tomorrow or ever, but at least they end up in the list.
Paul - you make me excited to move to buffalo with all these great photos/videos. thank you.
also "how unprofessional: what is wrong with you paul?" = HAHA
that being said.... usually when i see these holy rollers around here in new paltz (the land of sinful homo goodness) i like to wink and flirt with the ladies... they LOVE that! hehe
Whats a Thursday at the Square without a pack of 'Ruckmanites" ?! --jumping on the "ExtremeChristian" thread, I am so fascinated with these people. Well, extreme religionists, cults, 'holy rolling bible thumpers' in general, etc.
(e:mrdeadlier) - oh I remember the pack of them that take up select Tranist corners in Lockport. Several years ago I used to live there and had to drive by them frequently. Before learning to just roll up my window and look away, I had taken to cranking the most offensive music I could find using the intense bass sound system in my car (I did say this was several years ago, haha, and it seemed a good idea at the time). Everything I did then probably just reinforced their beliefs..
Occasionally I try to chat with them, get in for a 'closer look'- but its just a scripted monologue preach fest on their part.
think they have a myspace page? haha
They're probably attracted because they know there's going to be a ton of people there. There's actually a group of them in Lockport (might be the same people) that street preach on South Transit at a traffic light. They shout at cars that are waiting for the light to turn.
But I'll bet they actually don't like seeing the women at the Square. These folks are so racked with legalistic guilt (self-righteous pride notwithstanding) that they probably can't look at themselves in the mirror for a week after seeing them.
I totally release that these people are serious freaks. It would be great for a group of other christiands to confront them. Actually, I have seen lots of people confront them directly on the street. What I don't understand is exactly what they oppose at Thursday at the Square. I am sure the guy ones like watching all the practically topless ladies considering most of the women they bring are in some sort of farm bonnet costumes.
I hate those "Christians" at the Square. I actually recognize some of the drawings on their placards. They call themselves "Bible Baptists" because apparently normal Baptists are too worldly (color me guilty). If you want to make them really angry call them "Ruckmanites" since they hold to the standards and teachings of Peter Ruckman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Ruckman), which in my opinion are heretical. He's a King James Version only guy and is one of the most offensive-speaking people one could ever meet (I actually saw him preach 11 or 12 years ago). So yeah, in summation, those clowns really are a tiny (albeit vocal) segment of Christendom in the US. I've actually been giving thought to setting up shop across the way from them and calling them out, but I'm far too non-confrontational for that.
Sheez, I should have made this its own journal entry.