Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Twisted's Journal

twisted
My Podcast Link

05/28/2007 00:57 #39429

Craziness
I know I say this all the time, but it's been a crazy week. Granted, there are plenty of boring weeks in my life, but I usually don't post about those. And it's not for lack of crazy things to do -- it's just I get so caught up in my head (or on the computer) that I don't get out there.

To wit:

I had to vacate my home for two hours on Saturday for the second-to-last open house. It's so weird to feel "homeless" while dozens of strangers parade through my house deciding if they want to by it. Which reminds me, offers are due on Wednesday. Special consideration to peeps if you're interested! Either way, you're probably going to have to hear about it.

In any case, this was a good opportunity to enjoy another spectacular club sandwich at the Acoustic Cafe and catch up on my SF Weekly. Just as I was cramming down another mouthful of savory goodness, I flipped the page to a blurb about this event happening at exactly the same moment:

Ok, I don't know how I might have participated at that particular event if I'd known about it, but golly gee whiz! I have to catch up on my local news before life passes me by. And you thought the cost of living in SF was too high. It all depends on where you look.


metalpeter - 05/29/07 18:51
The Event sounds awesome. But I wonder how many ladies show up. That I wouldn't mind watching at all. I don't know as I could do that in front of people watching or maybe people watching would be a turn on. I wonder how the judge the orgasums. How do they know the women aren't faking it and just because you shot a load doesn't mean you had "The Big O".
paul - 05/28/07 10:55
I participated in something very similar in boy scouts once, lol.

05/22/2007 17:49 #39378

location location location
image
Bay to Breakers was the same day as my first Sunday open house. Sweet! (p.s. to (e:j3sse), I caught Inki on camera...contact me for details.)

Had a free pass to Stinson this weekend. Can't believe this nirvana is only 23 miles from my house...
image
image

image

See that tower in the distance? That's Sutro Tower. A few peeps accompanied me up there not too long ago, although I guess I can't prove that now. But who cares. It's all good.

ajay - 05/23/07 04:23
  • Every* race in SF is a "race with all the naked people". :-D

At last year's B2B, the Mayor was complaining that there wasn't enough nudity.
paul - 05/22/07 19:02
Is that the race with all the naked people?

05/19/2007 23:16 #39347

Staging
Category: real estate
WARNING! The following post contains pictures of rugs that are known to be harmful to certain peeps in the state of California.

image
(p.s. -- notice what's on the Mac screen? Nice color coordination!)

image

image

image

Own your own little piece of San Francisco!

fellyconnelly - 05/22/07 19:21
impressive staging!
ladycroft - 05/20/07 18:36
isn't that the seaweed rug?!
imk2 - 05/20/07 08:46
oh wow, that house has come a long way! it looks great!
metalpeter - 05/20/07 08:42
Verry nice it looks like you did a lot of work.
jenks - 05/20/07 07:11
wait, is that the house that had no walls a few posts ago?! You've been a busy little bee! It looks great!

05/18/2007 22:17 #39338

Point of View
One of my contractors is about to father his third kid with his third partner. And he must be at least 10 years younger than I am. That freaks me out. Not because I feel like I have to "catch up" (on the contrary). I feel like I'm not sure what the hell is going on out there in procreation land.

In other news, Ron asked me to write an explanation about how my little plot of nirvana is chain-gained down the line. Here's my ego-centric (at this particular point in time) view. It's a long history, I can probably live it down, haha.

"F" Addendum

The 600 block of Buchanan Street is comprised of three pairs of 3-story properties each sharing common walls, foundations and roofs in the style of row houses.

image

618-620 Buchanan Street is connected to 622-626 Buchanan by a party wall, foundation, and roof. The two sides even divvied up space for utility meters (electrical meters on the 618-620 side, gas meters on the 622-626 side) back when same-family ownership made such arrangements a matter of convenience.

When I bought 618-620 Buchanan, the owner of 622-626 Buchanan and I agreed we would move the utility meters to each property's respective side. The electric meters were moved and approved by the city in August 2007. Once PG&E hooks them up, we can start moving the three gas meters for 618-620 Buchanan Street over to their rightful side.

I know, I know. You'd think real estate disclosures would be racier. I guess you'll just have to come to the open house and rifle through my lingerie drawer. Oh wait! You live 3,000 miles away! Don't worry, you're not missing anything.

metalpeter - 05/20/07 08:55
The fact that you don't have a racey diclosure Is a good thing. Nothing like saying this little ding no matter what I do won't go away a even put in a new board and it came back I guess the evil spirits don't want anyone to forget about the axe murder that happened here. I'm kidding around of course but you know what I mean. 3000 miles is a little bit of a deturent to go to the open house. But that being said How awesome would it be to just say "Hi I'm from Buffalo I came all this way to just go to open house and then fly back home" You know not to visit you or the city but just for the open house. I wish you luck with it, the house looks pretty cool.

05/11/2007 02:00 #39233

Blog therapy
To pass the time during my hour-long commute to Napa, I started developing OK Cupid tests. No one could be more surprised than I am, considering I've only taken three myself. (I totally aced the "Commonly Confused Words" test, by the way. That was satisfying.)

Anyway, I've got the "communication style" test and the "driving style" test in the hopper. Many more where that came from.

Also to pass the time, I've been listening to the radio without changing the station the second they start talking. So I caught an interesting tidbit about a study showing people who blog about their relationships are xx% more likely to stay together than those who don't. Now, I'm about as cynical as you can get about drawing hard and fast conclusions from so-called "studies." But I do enjoy exploring a theoretical question now and again -- as long as you don't take it too seriously -- and I can see this particular theory having some merit.

Anyway, this study also made me think of (e:Jason). (Oh yes, all you (e:peeps) are frequently in my thoughts. You have no idea!) Of course, I would have rewritten the study to see whether blogging helps people resolve whatever the natural path of their relationship might be. It makes sense you have to be honest with yourself before you can be honest with someone else.

I actually have quite a bit more to say on this subject (surprise, surprise!) but I'm having a hard time concentrating right now because I finally broke down and bought a CD for the first time in ages and it ROCKS! (Listen to my new usersound.)

I ended up at Amoeba tonight because I thought it was the free Dinosaur Jr. in-house. (It's not 'til next Tuesday.) So I salvaged the trip by finally buying Razorlight. Even if you've never agreed with my musical suggestions before, this is a must-have! Ok, if you insist I'll upload it to Gather (tracking number: 0047419001178863042) so you can give it a proper listen. See for yourself.
twisted - 05/11/07 10:55
Actually they said "keeping a journal about the relationship" helps, not "blogging" per se. So I guess that goes to show you REALLY shouldn't trust the results of a study designed, performed, and analyzed by the same group of people; interpreted and reported by the media; and blogged about by someone who doesn't believe it in the first place. ;-)

Anyway, my point is: "It isn't the conclusions that matter; it's the ideas raised by the question." Discuss.
dragonlady7 - 05/11/07 10:32
Ha ha, they probably mean blogging privately, then. If some of us were smart enough not to blog where the other person can read about said feelings... but I would argue that even that is, in the end, beneficial. Blogging often entails discussing one's feelings and worldview, and it can be beneficial for a partner to read that.
If one can keep the "n is a terrible person" to a minimum...

But yes, you're right, next month will probably tell us that blogging causes cancer.
twisted - 05/11/07 10:08
Since I distrust the results of a "study" most likely designed, performed, and analyzed by the same group of people, you can imagine how I feel about the results as interpreted and reported by the media. ;-) But the person reporting the story said it had something to do with having a safe outlet to work through how you feel before discussing it with your partner.

Whatever. This month blogging is good for you. Next month it'll probably kill you.
zobar - 05/11/07 07:55

I caught an interesting tidbit about a study showing people who blog about their relationships are xx% more likely to stay together than those who don't. Now, I'm about as cynical as you can get



Ya me too, considering how much I dislike reading terrible things about myself on the Internet, nevermind the unnecessary yet obligatory endless comment thread of 'What a dick' and 'How could someone be so rotten,' and worse.

But you've piqued my interest: how is that supposed to improve a relationship?

- Z