After work today we tried to stop by the mansion to see what is up with the seller. He has been consistantly pushing our closing date back since July 11th, the date when it was supposed to happen.
This time he really freaked out. About halfway throught the conversation, after he told us the date is now possibly Aug 4th but no guarantee, he just yelled a bunch and went in the house.
I am so sick of him treating us as though we are somehow lesser in understanding than he is because of his age or wisdom. The other two guys would not believe me that he was a staller, draggin his fe3t unitl today. Everytime we met with him they would give him the benefit of the doubt. I thought he was a sketcher from the getgo.
I just need an answer. At least a firm date that he can agree on. Originally, our landlord wanted us out on July. I love how he told us he oredered a moving truck to take stuff from his house on the 4th (the earliest they could get one), but because he cannot give us a closing date, we are not afforded that luxury.
It kills me that everytime we talk about it. He tells me that I live in dreamworld that I actually believed we would close on the closing date of July 11th. He said that is just an arbitrary date they put in the paper. I have repeatedly asked him why he would have signed the contract a full month earlier on June 11th, stating a July11th closing date (with a time is of the essence clasue) if he could not handle it or had no place to live. It ias only two weeks ago that he even began finding a new place. Frankly, I have had it with him so much. I almost want to just pull out of the deal.
Tomorrow, i am calling the lawyer and telling her that time is of the freakin' essence, whatever good that will do. I wish i had just done it before because really there was just no point in working with him or being nice, as I had suspected.
Paul's Journal
My Podcast Link
07/25/2006 19:39 #32703
The purchase of 24 LinwoodCategory: housing
07/24/2006 01:07 #32702
youtube, blog media and buffalo blogsCategory: web
A sidenote: While (e:matthew) and (e:terry) went canooing today, I spent my whole day working on my thesis. I wrote a lot more the last couple of days. It should really be done within a week. I cannot wait to put this part of my life behind me so that I can go back to doing what I do best. Speaking of which did anyone visit and make a gallery
On another side note:
One thing I noticed when writing my thesis is that by the end of the summer we should have about 16,000 journal entries under our belt. Add 14,000 images and a multitude of other media formats.
Why do I keep finding references to wnymedia.net as buffalo only blogging community. I think it is fair to say we beat them to that by a long shot and that our network of journal writers are much more of a comprehensive community then they have.
"Marc Odien... wnymedia.net Dude is responsible for creating Buffalo Blogger Central... In a lot of ways, his is responsible for turning or should I say taking the whole Buffalo blogworld to new heights... "
So onto the main feature:
youtube
The youtube : slogan is "broadcast yourself." I think it is a great slogan for a great conecpot but what I am seeing less and less of is peoples personal broadcasting content. There seems to be a tremendous amount of copyrighted television shows and other copyrighted media. This is deifnaetly going to endanger the entire youtube site. Ironically they were just sued by Robert Tur the guy who filmed the Reginald Denny for having the copyrighted video on the site. Instead of asking the to take it down, he sued demanding $150,000 for each of the 1,000+ viewings that occurred. Youtube then took down the video. AL the blogs refering to it now have a big gaping hole.
I am curious what is going to happen to all the blogs that refer to youtube if it goes away. I never want to make my blog dependent on some outside media server. In fact that is why you cannot link in any external media data on your elmwoodstrip.org journal as I want to maintain its long term storability integrity of the data as a historical document.
One day when youtube away and it will be so tragic to watch as all the blogs that reference those videos becoming meaningless, like pulling the threads out of a quilt. Does no one else think about this? It is like putting all your eggs in one basket. Or worse yet, it goes really corporate, and even though you wrote an entry refereing to a one free video, they then make the readers pay to see it.
Part of the beauty of digital media culture is the fact that data gets replicated and protected through sheer multiplication factor. If everyone posts their video content to youtube and then youtibe goes away, will everything go away.
On another side note:
One thing I noticed when writing my thesis is that by the end of the summer we should have about 16,000 journal entries under our belt. Add 14,000 images and a multitude of other media formats.
Why do I keep finding references to wnymedia.net as buffalo only blogging community. I think it is fair to say we beat them to that by a long shot and that our network of journal writers are much more of a comprehensive community then they have.
"Marc Odien... wnymedia.net Dude is responsible for creating Buffalo Blogger Central... In a lot of ways, his is responsible for turning or should I say taking the whole Buffalo blogworld to new heights... "
So onto the main feature:
youtube
The youtube : slogan is "broadcast yourself." I think it is a great slogan for a great conecpot but what I am seeing less and less of is peoples personal broadcasting content. There seems to be a tremendous amount of copyrighted television shows and other copyrighted media. This is deifnaetly going to endanger the entire youtube site. Ironically they were just sued by Robert Tur the guy who filmed the Reginald Denny for having the copyrighted video on the site. Instead of asking the to take it down, he sued demanding $150,000 for each of the 1,000+ viewings that occurred. Youtube then took down the video. AL the blogs refering to it now have a big gaping hole.
I am curious what is going to happen to all the blogs that refer to youtube if it goes away. I never want to make my blog dependent on some outside media server. In fact that is why you cannot link in any external media data on your elmwoodstrip.org journal as I want to maintain its long term storability integrity of the data as a historical document.
One day when youtube away and it will be so tragic to watch as all the blogs that reference those videos becoming meaningless, like pulling the threads out of a quilt. Does no one else think about this? It is like putting all your eggs in one basket. Or worse yet, it goes really corporate, and even though you wrote an entry refereing to a one free video, they then make the readers pay to see it.
Part of the beauty of digital media culture is the fact that data gets replicated and protected through sheer multiplication factor. If everyone posts their video content to youtube and then youtibe goes away, will everything go away.
indabuff - 08/03/06 18:34
Dude...
You guys do deserve some pub to for what has been created with e-strip...
Peace...
Dude...
You guys do deserve some pub to for what has been created with e-strip...
Peace...
joshua - 07/25/06 16:59
There is plenty of personal content on YouTube - I have several friends who post videos covering all kinds of things.
There is plenty of personal content on YouTube - I have several friends who post videos covering all kinds of things.
dragonlady7 - 07/24/06 11:15
Yeah, I think I learned pretty early on in blogging that I shouldn't hotlink to an image. Even if my traffic is negligible, you never know when the owner of that other server is going to move the file.
And I really, really, really hate bloggers that link with meaningless text. You know:
"This (link) has totally changed how I feel about N! Can you imagine? Oh my god!" And then two days later the link is either broken or refers to a news article that's gone behind the archived-for-pay wall.
Ugh. I've gotten to the point where I don't click the link if it's not immediately apparent what it is. And if i am linking to something, if I think it might go away or become unreadable after some time, I will put in a quote or summary to explain what I'm writing about. Just so that, in a week, the entry I just spent an hour writing and will probably refer back to, actually will mean something on its own.
I'm not that big a media person so mostly I'm referring to your standard-issue link rot, which has been a problem since the Internet was invented. But it's a major issue when dealing with a medium that is, by its very ease of use, very fluid: if you want to create something that is meaningful for longer than it takes you to write it, then you have to be aware that relying on someone else's content for context may very well leave your piece isolated and out of context within a relatively short period of time.
Yeah, I think I learned pretty early on in blogging that I shouldn't hotlink to an image. Even if my traffic is negligible, you never know when the owner of that other server is going to move the file.
And I really, really, really hate bloggers that link with meaningless text. You know:
"This (link) has totally changed how I feel about N! Can you imagine? Oh my god!" And then two days later the link is either broken or refers to a news article that's gone behind the archived-for-pay wall.
Ugh. I've gotten to the point where I don't click the link if it's not immediately apparent what it is. And if i am linking to something, if I think it might go away or become unreadable after some time, I will put in a quote or summary to explain what I'm writing about. Just so that, in a week, the entry I just spent an hour writing and will probably refer back to, actually will mean something on its own.
I'm not that big a media person so mostly I'm referring to your standard-issue link rot, which has been a problem since the Internet was invented. But it's a major issue when dealing with a medium that is, by its very ease of use, very fluid: if you want to create something that is meaningful for longer than it takes you to write it, then you have to be aware that relying on someone else's content for context may very well leave your piece isolated and out of context within a relatively short period of time.
07/22/2006 21:39 #32701
speedy mobile internetCategory: mobile
People ask me how fast the internet is on my phone and I never got around to checking till just now.
I get 605.7 kilobits per second Communications. That is freaking fast.
I get 605.7 kilobits per second Communications. That is freaking fast.
07/22/2006 00:59 #32699
Image SmoothyCategory: design
Want your own personal image smoothy. Just visit my new surebertCom demo. You don't need to be a programmer to mix images. When you're done you can save the web page as HTML or as an JS program.
Wow - sidenote - I just left in the middle of typing and when I got back, the restore backup button restored me my data. That was great.
This one is just from estrip
This one is estrip mixed with myspace, livejournal, and friendster.
CNN after saving as a webpage and viewing full screen.
Wow - sidenote - I just left in the middle of typing and when I got back, the restore backup button restored me my data. That was great.
This one is just from estrip
This one is estrip mixed with myspace, livejournal, and friendster.
CNN after saving as a webpage and viewing full screen.
paul - 07/22/06 12:54
I changed it :::link::: so that it works with the artvoice gallery :::link::: now
I changed it :::link::: so that it works with the artvoice gallery :::link::: now
paul - 07/22/06 10:09
The $ is a part of the surebert.com javascript toolkit. It is very different from other $ functions out there as it maps more than just documenet.getElementById. I documented it here :::link:::
The $ is a part of the surebert.com javascript toolkit. It is very different from other $ functions out there as it maps more than just documenet.getElementById. I documented it here :::link:::
zobar - 07/22/06 09:22
Interesting ... I've never seen this $('id') notation before - I assume that's a shortcut for document.getElementById('id')? Is that a Surebert thing?
I tried it on the contact sheet for our photo gallery :::link::: and it said our server was too slow. )-: I tried it on cnn.com and Anderson Cooper exploded all over my screen. D-:
- Z
Interesting ... I've never seen this $('id') notation before - I assume that's a shortcut for document.getElementById('id')? Is that a Surebert thing?
I tried it on the contact sheet for our photo gallery :::link::: and it said our server was too slow. )-: I tried it on cnn.com and Anderson Cooper exploded all over my screen. D-:
- Z
07/22/2006 17:06 #32700
A day in south east buffaloCategory: buffalo
The bees are dead, apparetnly they are stupid enough to swim into soapy water. The landlord later used chemicals even though most of the bees were gone at that point.
Started out with a trip to the Larking Building to see the Leonardo de Vinci exhibit.
When they say that Leonardo invented the helicopter, this is what they meant.
They also had this really nice Rocroft Table that would look sweet in our new dining room. Unfortunately, it is not for sale and says do not touch. Not that I could ever afford it.
Afterwards we stopped Uncle Sam's Army Navy Surplus. It is the largest army navy surplus store I ever saw although it smells extreemly moldy - they really do have everything - that is othe rthan geiger counters. I really want one so I asked. Does anyone know where I could get one in town?
They did have these totally transparent microwave radiation protection suits. I almost bought one.
Afterwards, we headed over to Tifft Farm. Nothing like a nature preserve build on a land fill.
Started out with a trip to the Larking Building to see the Leonardo de Vinci exhibit.
When they say that Leonardo invented the helicopter, this is what they meant.
They also had this really nice Rocroft Table that would look sweet in our new dining room. Unfortunately, it is not for sale and says do not touch. Not that I could ever afford it.
Afterwards we stopped Uncle Sam's Army Navy Surplus. It is the largest army navy surplus store I ever saw although it smells extreemly moldy - they really do have everything - that is othe rthan geiger counters. I really want one so I asked. Does anyone know where I could get one in town?
They did have these totally transparent microwave radiation protection suits. I almost bought one.
Afterwards, we headed over to Tifft Farm. Nothing like a nature preserve build on a land fill.
paul - 07/24/06 02:24
Anyone want to contribute to a portable geiger counter fund. I am dying to map out radioactivity readings in buffalo on web based maps. Looks liek the portable unit costs around $250.
Anyone want to contribute to a portable geiger counter fund. I am dying to map out radioactivity readings in buffalo on web based maps. Looks liek the portable unit costs around $250.
zobar - 07/22/06 21:10
I used to work for this place :::link::: - they don't usually sell to the public but I bet they'd totally hook you up if you could get some kind of official-looking P.O. from Roswell.
- Z
I used to work for this place :::link::: - they don't usually sell to the public but I bet they'd totally hook you up if you could get some kind of official-looking P.O. from Roswell.
- Z
I"m so sorry to hear that (e:paul)
I was hoping that no news was good news with your closing.
I agree the time to be nice is gone.