
On another side note:
One thing I noticed when writing my thesis is that by the end of the summer we should have about 16,000 journal entries under our belt. Add 14,000 images and a multitude of other media formats.
Why do I keep finding references to wnymedia.net as buffalo only blogging community. I think it is fair to say we beat them to that by a long shot and that our network of journal writers are much more of a comprehensive community then they have.
"Marc Odien... wnymedia.net Dude is responsible for creating Buffalo Blogger Central... In a lot of ways, his is responsible for turning or should I say taking the whole Buffalo blogworld to new heights...

So onto the main feature:
youtube
The youtube

I am curious what is going to happen to all the blogs that refer to youtube if it goes away. I never want to make my blog dependent on some outside media server. In fact that is why you cannot link in any external media data on your elmwoodstrip.org journal as I want to maintain its long term storability integrity of the data as a historical document.
One day when youtube away and it will be so tragic to watch as all the blogs that reference those videos becoming meaningless, like pulling the threads out of a quilt. Does no one else think about this? It is like putting all your eggs in one basket. Or worse yet, it goes really corporate, and even though you wrote an entry refereing to a one free video, they then make the readers pay to see it.
Part of the beauty of digital media culture is the fact that data gets replicated and protected through sheer multiplication factor. If everyone posts their video content to youtube and then youtibe goes away, will everything go away.
Dude...
You guys do deserve some pub to for what has been created with e-strip...
Peace...
There is plenty of personal content on YouTube - I have several friends who post videos covering all kinds of things.
Yeah, I think I learned pretty early on in blogging that I shouldn't hotlink to an image. Even if my traffic is negligible, you never know when the owner of that other server is going to move the file.
And I really, really, really hate bloggers that link with meaningless text. You know:
"This (link) has totally changed how I feel about N! Can you imagine? Oh my god!" And then two days later the link is either broken or refers to a news article that's gone behind the archived-for-pay wall.
Ugh. I've gotten to the point where I don't click the link if it's not immediately apparent what it is. And if i am linking to something, if I think it might go away or become unreadable after some time, I will put in a quote or summary to explain what I'm writing about. Just so that, in a week, the entry I just spent an hour writing and will probably refer back to, actually will mean something on its own.
I'm not that big a media person so mostly I'm referring to your standard-issue link rot, which has been a problem since the Internet was invented. But it's a major issue when dealing with a medium that is, by its very ease of use, very fluid: if you want to create something that is meaningful for longer than it takes you to write it, then you have to be aware that relying on someone else's content for context may very well leave your piece isolated and out of context within a relatively short period of time.