So... I like what I do. I really do. But sometimes it's hard to remember that. And I hate that I bitch about it so much, and I apologize. But my hours suck.... suck suck suck. I get one day off every week or two, and have to (or rather, should but don't) spend much of it sleeping. I haven't had a whole weekend off since may. I never even know these long weekend holidays occur until i get home and realize I didn't get any mail. Last night I was just thinking "wow... peeps are hardcore tonight! going out at midnight on a sunday!" totally didn't realize today was a day off.
But it sounds like I missed a good time at OPM last night, not to mention meeting new peeps... must say I think I'm a little jealous.
But we did make it to rochester for ethiopian, though I think I may have had
(e:imk) fearing for her life a few times (sorry!). And
(e:leetee), gotta say I disagree. I love the bread (injera). Yum yum. And it's all yummy and tasty and spicy... Mmm. Hope everyone's tummies were ok today! (my god, am I five? yummy? tummies? haha.)
And just some thoughts on this whole hotel business....
First off, I agree with uncut. He said what I was thinking, more or less, and put it more eloquently.
Now, my house is not in danger of being demolished. But, I am still only a couple blocks away from the proposed site.
I would like to read the hotel's side of the story. I feel dragonfire's version is very one-sided and colored by the fact that his house is in danger.
I don't want to see thriving local businesses torn down for the Gap and Starbucks. Don't get me wrong. I like my neighborhood. But I have to say that those houses are not really wonderful pillars of Elmwood history. And I'm not sure trying to make the area more 'upper-class' is necessarily such a terrible thing... I'm not saying bring the suburbs and chain stores downtown, but a swanky boutique, cafe, etc- that would be cool. And would probably contribute more to the local economy than a video shop... And no, I do not need a hotel since I live in the area. But that's the point of a hotel- for people who do NOT live in the are, am I wrong? So I think that argument is flawed logic...
Hmm. I think I will shut up. I don't know both sides of the story and thus should not go off on a rant about it. I don't like arguing points that I can't defend very well. And at the risk of voicing an unpopular opinion, it's just sort of sitting wrong with me to see
(e:strip) used as a means to promote an agenda.
On that note,
later peeps.
-cranky jenks
Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about it- I can kind of see both sides. As seems to be the running theme these days, I think either extreme is no good. I had a set of twins in my class in HS- their parents made sure their names each had the same number of letters (to decrease competition), and dressed them the same until they were about 12... they went to the same HS (snooty new england prep school), then both went to Harvard... they were pretty well adjusted etc, but I would just think it would be nice to be on your own someday...
I'd be interested to hear what "our" twins here have to say on the issue.
I dunno, twin stuff fascinates me. Twin languages, feeling each other's pain, nature vs. nurture twin studies etc. I wonder how much of a difference fraternal vs. identical makes....
But the article makes me think of the pro-choice issue. I don't know if it's better for them to be together or apart, but why not the parents/kids have the right to CHOOSE what's right for them? Sounds good to me...
I don't know if I agree with the article.
One of my close friends has identical twins. When the little rascals were growing up (before they got to school) they devised their own language and would be happy just playing with each other. I couldn't understand a word of what they were saying to each other; it was almost like telepathy. In school, I think the parents urged the teachers to keep them apart so they'd interact with the other kids somewhat more.
"Joshon", that works. I have screwed up and sputtered, "Jashon" while trying to say their names.