Opposers of the Elmwood Village Hotel have decided to pull a counter attack on the so-called "rally" in support of the hotel on Monday at 5pm on the proposed site at Elmwood and Forest.
Opposers say that the protest of the hotel will be peaceful and be isolated to opposite the side of of the street from the supporters of the hotel. They are asking anyone who is AGAINST the proposal to attend.
WNYmedia.net is calling the opposers "Banannas" and "Nimby's" (Not In My Backyard).
The opposers of the hotel have not once called names of those who support the project and to this day have respected those who support the project and their stance. They have never subjected to name calling and or any kind of rotton names etc... We fought for our cause without the severe defense mechanism that this support group is.
My question is, where were they when we opposed? Why is this the FIRST support rally they had? And most important, how many of them live in the city? I respect those opinions of those who live in Derby, Cheektowaga, Amherst, etc...But I do not support them telling the opposers what's best for their neighborhood/community.
Lets not forget that the only reason why this proposal came about was because of one person. Hans Mobius. If he was not such a "slumlord" and kept his proerties up to code and looking at least halfway decent, then there would be no proposal. He neglected them for many years and continues to do so. And all the crime and violations disappear in to thin air, and he gets a hefty 3 to 4 million dollars for his crimes.
Dragonfire1024's Journal
My Podcast Link
07/13/2006 18:52 #21966
Opposers of Hotel launch counter protestCategory: elmwood hotel
05/21/2006 08:04 #21963
CigarettesI have decided to quit smoking. I have not bought a pack of ciggs since Wednesday.
I thught I was going to get past the being depressed and stuff part, but today, it hit me. I have taken a drag or 2 from a ciggarette here and there, but have not had a full one in days.
Quitting is easier said than done. I have patches, but its just not enough. When I get bored, I want to smoke. After a few hours of working, I want to smoke. If I am on the computer, I want to smoke. Its really hard and today, just not too long ago, it hit me and I am now startig to know what withdrawls feel like. I hate it and it feels as if I was a heroin addict, and have not shot up in 4 days. I don't like it, but I hoipe it will pass soon.
I thught I was going to get past the being depressed and stuff part, but today, it hit me. I have taken a drag or 2 from a ciggarette here and there, but have not had a full one in days.
Quitting is easier said than done. I have patches, but its just not enough. When I get bored, I want to smoke. After a few hours of working, I want to smoke. If I am on the computer, I want to smoke. Its really hard and today, just not too long ago, it hit me and I am now startig to know what withdrawls feel like. I hate it and it feels as if I was a heroin addict, and have not shot up in 4 days. I don't like it, but I hoipe it will pass soon.
leetee - 05/21/06 17:26
I don't have much in the way of words of wisdom for you. I quit smoking about a year and a half ago after smoking for 25 years. I didn't do it in a typical way and i hate hate hate to exercise. All i have to say to you is... good luck and don't give up, you can do it!!! :O)
I don't have much in the way of words of wisdom for you. I quit smoking about a year and a half ago after smoking for 25 years. I didn't do it in a typical way and i hate hate hate to exercise. All i have to say to you is... good luck and don't give up, you can do it!!! :O)
mrdt - 05/21/06 14:36
I used the gym for two months or so then broke myself from the gum. I think I increased my narcotics intake too. I took me six months to stop constantly thinking about it but maybe you'll be lucky and won't have an obsessive complex about it.
It will get easier everyday and just tell yourself every month that you have to make it to next month and so on.
Now that I have broken the addiction I do my damdest to stay away from them cause it is so easy to become addicted again.... Although when I was in Vegas I had a couple and when I was in Florida I bought a pack or two. Nevermind that part!
I used the gym for two months or so then broke myself from the gum. I think I increased my narcotics intake too. I took me six months to stop constantly thinking about it but maybe you'll be lucky and won't have an obsessive complex about it.
It will get easier everyday and just tell yourself every month that you have to make it to next month and so on.
Now that I have broken the addiction I do my damdest to stay away from them cause it is so easy to become addicted again.... Although when I was in Vegas I had a couple and when I was in Florida I bought a pack or two. Nevermind that part!
libertad - 05/21/06 14:33
I know it's hard, but it gets easier. I agree with (e:paul), excercise is key. It has been two months since my last smoke and the days I work out are so much easier. You eventually stop thinking about it less and less. If you were a heavy smoker like me, you will always be addicted. I quit for two years before and I started up again like I had never stopped. Keep us posted.
I know it's hard, but it gets easier. I agree with (e:paul), excercise is key. It has been two months since my last smoke and the days I work out are so much easier. You eventually stop thinking about it less and less. If you were a heavy smoker like me, you will always be addicted. I quit for two years before and I started up again like I had never stopped. Keep us posted.
paul - 05/21/06 13:46
I quit smoking in december (after like 10 years) and never had another cigarette. Lots of pictures of diseased lungs worked fo me. I mean I know its gross but just start looking them up whenever you crave cigarettes. Also, the gym helps or some other form of intense exercise.
Th other most important thing was not hanging with my smoker friends for a bit.
I quit smoking in december (after like 10 years) and never had another cigarette. Lots of pictures of diseased lungs worked fo me. I mean I know its gross but just start looking them up whenever you crave cigarettes. Also, the gym helps or some other form of intense exercise.
Th other most important thing was not hanging with my smoker friends for a bit.
ladycroft - 05/21/06 11:38
what you described is not really the craving for the nicotine, but the behavior. when you're bored, on the computer....you must find something little you can do to replace the old one, perhaps a squishy ball. you can do it!
what you described is not really the craving for the nicotine, but the behavior. when you're bored, on the computer....you must find something little you can do to replace the old one, perhaps a squishy ball. you can do it!
boxerboi - 05/21/06 10:48
Good luck! I agree with (e:jenks), it's better than smoking. Your lungs will thank you in a few weeks :o)
Good luck! I agree with (e:jenks), it's better than smoking. Your lungs will thank you in a few weeks :o)
jenks - 05/21/06 09:54
good luck to you... the gum worked well for my mom b/c you can chew it when you have a craving, unlike the patch. Two years later she still chews a lot of it, but I guess it's still better than smoking.
good luck to you... the gum worked well for my mom b/c you can chew it when you have a craving, unlike the patch. Two years later she still chews a lot of it, but I guess it's still better than smoking.
05/17/2006 09:17 #21962
9/11 Pentagon VideoCategory: 9/11
Yesterday, the Department of Justice released the video from a security camera of American Airlines flight 77 hitting the pentagon.
JudicialWatch.org Filed a lawsuit in Deceber of 2004 to request that security footage be released through the Freedom of Information Act. Although the DOD released the security tapes from the Pentagon, Officials stated that other tapes from the Citgo Gas station, the Sheriden Hotel "DO NOT EXIST"
What a load of crap. you mean to tell me out of all the what 100 cameras pointed at the Pentagon (the same exact spot where the plane hit) that only 2 cameras recorded te event? I highly doubt it.
Judicial Watch has posted the new video released yesterday and the other video that has recently been featured in the Google Video: Loose Change.
What is different from these videos? Any comments are welcome.
JudicialWatch.org Filed a lawsuit in Deceber of 2004 to request that security footage be released through the Freedom of Information Act. Although the DOD released the security tapes from the Pentagon, Officials stated that other tapes from the Citgo Gas station, the Sheriden Hotel "DO NOT EXIST"
What a load of crap. you mean to tell me out of all the what 100 cameras pointed at the Pentagon (the same exact spot where the plane hit) that only 2 cameras recorded te event? I highly doubt it.
Judicial Watch has posted the new video released yesterday and the other video that has recently been featured in the Google Video: Loose Change.
What is different from these videos? Any comments are welcome.
ajay - 05/17/06 11:39
What I don't understand is: why the need to keep this video secret? It's not like people didn't see what happened? Honestly: what possible reason was there to hide these tapes?
There were many other cameras which captured events in that neighborhood. Why haven't their contents been released? Cameras like the one on the Shell station nearby, the hotel security cameras, etc. (all of the tapes were seized immediately, so they haven't been erased).
The cynical answer is: this release is timed to fan the flames of 9/11 to boost someone's sagging ratings.
What I don't understand is: why the need to keep this video secret? It's not like people didn't see what happened? Honestly: what possible reason was there to hide these tapes?
There were many other cameras which captured events in that neighborhood. Why haven't their contents been released? Cameras like the one on the Shell station nearby, the hotel security cameras, etc. (all of the tapes were seized immediately, so they haven't been erased).
The cynical answer is: this release is timed to fan the flames of 9/11 to boost someone's sagging ratings.
libertad - 05/17/06 10:39
From what I can see the released videos do not disprove the conspiracy theories. Certainly numerous events of 9/11 seem fishy, but I just don't understand why it would be necessary for the government to damage the Pentagon themselves? I can't see what their motivation would be. I mean when most people think of 9/11 they think of the World Trade Centers, not the Pentagon. The attack on NYC alone was enough to scare the people into blindly following their government. My big question is this...why do so many people in this country think Bush is tough on terrorism? I believe they had enough info to thwart these attacks, but didn't (I don't know why). Yet Bush gets to go around with this wierd reputation of being tough on terrorism? I just don't get any of this mess.
From what I can see the released videos do not disprove the conspiracy theories. Certainly numerous events of 9/11 seem fishy, but I just don't understand why it would be necessary for the government to damage the Pentagon themselves? I can't see what their motivation would be. I mean when most people think of 9/11 they think of the World Trade Centers, not the Pentagon. The attack on NYC alone was enough to scare the people into blindly following their government. My big question is this...why do so many people in this country think Bush is tough on terrorism? I believe they had enough info to thwart these attacks, but didn't (I don't know why). Yet Bush gets to go around with this wierd reputation of being tough on terrorism? I just don't get any of this mess.
07/13/2006 13:14 #21965
Elmwood Village Hotel proposal withdrawnCategory: elmwood
Buffalo, New York - According to the developer Savarino Construction Services Corporation, the proposed Elmwood Village Hotel which would be placed on the corner of Elmwood and Forest Avenues in Buffalo, New york has been withdrawn from the city's Planning Board and Common Council and will undergo a "do over"; however, Eva Hassett, Vice President of Savarino says that the proposal will be resubmitted, from scratch by the end of next week.
The hotel would require the demolition of at least five properties, 1109-1121 Elmwood and would cause the closer of several businesses. Already, two businesses, Skunk Tail Glass and Six Nations Native American Gift Shop have relocated, outside the Elmwood Strip. Don apparel, H.O.D. Tattoo and Mondo Video still remain on Elmwood; however, Mondo Video is planning on moving to a new location. The hotel will be 72 rooms and will cost at least 7 million dollars to build.
"We're lovers, not fighters. Our energies should be spent on developing a really wonderful project, not wasted in court. We'll start over with a clean slate and take as much time as necessary to hear people out and end up with a very positive project for the neighborhood," said President of Savarino Construction, Sam Savarino.
The hotel will not undergo any major changes in its design says Savarino. "We would anticipate little if any physical change to the plans." He also alleges that the issues with the hotel were not with the design or the proposal and also says that the hotel is still right for the intersection.
"The perceived problem was with the process, not the proposal itself. We believe this is the right thing to do on that corner," added Savarino.
According to the Buffalo News, the projects resubmission is aimed to "shed the lawsuits" against the proposal. The Buffalo News also claims that the Common Council members are all still "in favor of the project." The proposal was unanimously passed by the council on March 21, 2006.
Attorney Arthur J. Giacalone who represents the plaintiffs, Nancy Pollina and Patricia Morris, who operate Don Apparel (a vintage clothing and collectibles shop at 1119 Elmwood Avenue), Angeline Genovese and Evelyn Bencinich, owners of residences on Granger Place which abut the rear of the proposed site, Nina Freudenheim, a resident of nearby Penhurst Park, and Sandra Girage, the owner of a two-family residence on Forest Avenue less than a hundred feet from the proposed hotel's sole entrance and exit driveway, says that the hotel proposal was "inappropriately rushed," but some council members disagree. Defendants in the lawsuit against the hotel are, Buffalo's Common Council and Planning Board, Mayor of Buffalo, Byron W. Brown, Savarino Construction Services Corporation, Hans J. Mobius and his son Hans S. Mobius owners of the properties at stake, Pano Georgiadis, owner of Pano's Restaurant on Elmwood, and Cendant Corporation, the parent company of Wyndham Hotels, which will be, according to Savarino, the hotel operator. Attorney David State is representing the city, Planning Board, Mayor Byron Brown and the Common Council.
"I don't think it was a rush job," said Dominic J. Bonifacio Jr., the council's Majority Leader. He also alleges that the only way to make "it [the hotel] a better project and ease the concerns of some neighbors would be to find a way to provide more parking."
In an exclusive phone interview with Wikinews, Giacalone states that the lawsuit against the hotel and the city "will not be moved [withdrawn] unless the Common Council resins their [prior] decisions in passing the proposal." Giacalone also says that Savarino has yet to sumbit any new plans for the proposal to the city. He also says that he "still plans to represent all plaintiffs" if they wish to continue with the suit and the use of his services.
Giacalone rescheduled the preliminary hearing which is "still in place" for July 27, 2006. When asked if the properties are still owned by mobius, Giacalone replied "yes" and that according to attorney Bob Knoer, the Lawyer representing Hans Mobius, the owner of the properties that could be demolished, there is "no contract between Savarino" and that Mobius "plans to put the properties back on the market." Mobius has not returned phone calls or e-mails and has not yet commented on the situation or the proposal itself. The city denies these claims.
Area councilman Joseph Golombek also states that the reason for the resubmission of the proposal was due to "a mistake in the Planning process" and that none of the council members have "indicated that they have changed their opinions on the hotel" and still remain in favor of the project.
"I still think the Hotel is a good idea for that part of Elmwood. For Elmwood to stay strong and vibrant it must continue to grow and adapt to change. It is a different community than it was twenty years ago and will be different in another twenty years. The opponents of the Hotel have the opportunity to challenge it and are doing that. Even though I disagree with them I am glad there is a safety mechanism for people who disagree with government. We need to keep moving forward," added Golombek.
Supporters of the hotel proposal are planning on holding s rally to support the new development. WNYmedia.net claims that the first rally will be held to support the hotel proposal on July 17, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. on Elmwood and Forest, on the site of the proposed location. According to WNYmedia.net they "are tired of the anti development crowd in Western New York." They also blast opposers of the hotel proposal calling them "banannas" and "nimbys." Opposers of the hotel proposal are planning on "counter attacking" with their own protest on the same day and time.
Copyright Wikinews.org
Liscense: Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License unless otherwise specified (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/)
The hotel would require the demolition of at least five properties, 1109-1121 Elmwood and would cause the closer of several businesses. Already, two businesses, Skunk Tail Glass and Six Nations Native American Gift Shop have relocated, outside the Elmwood Strip. Don apparel, H.O.D. Tattoo and Mondo Video still remain on Elmwood; however, Mondo Video is planning on moving to a new location. The hotel will be 72 rooms and will cost at least 7 million dollars to build.
"We're lovers, not fighters. Our energies should be spent on developing a really wonderful project, not wasted in court. We'll start over with a clean slate and take as much time as necessary to hear people out and end up with a very positive project for the neighborhood," said President of Savarino Construction, Sam Savarino.
The hotel will not undergo any major changes in its design says Savarino. "We would anticipate little if any physical change to the plans." He also alleges that the issues with the hotel were not with the design or the proposal and also says that the hotel is still right for the intersection.
"The perceived problem was with the process, not the proposal itself. We believe this is the right thing to do on that corner," added Savarino.
According to the Buffalo News, the projects resubmission is aimed to "shed the lawsuits" against the proposal. The Buffalo News also claims that the Common Council members are all still "in favor of the project." The proposal was unanimously passed by the council on March 21, 2006.
Attorney Arthur J. Giacalone who represents the plaintiffs, Nancy Pollina and Patricia Morris, who operate Don Apparel (a vintage clothing and collectibles shop at 1119 Elmwood Avenue), Angeline Genovese and Evelyn Bencinich, owners of residences on Granger Place which abut the rear of the proposed site, Nina Freudenheim, a resident of nearby Penhurst Park, and Sandra Girage, the owner of a two-family residence on Forest Avenue less than a hundred feet from the proposed hotel's sole entrance and exit driveway, says that the hotel proposal was "inappropriately rushed," but some council members disagree. Defendants in the lawsuit against the hotel are, Buffalo's Common Council and Planning Board, Mayor of Buffalo, Byron W. Brown, Savarino Construction Services Corporation, Hans J. Mobius and his son Hans S. Mobius owners of the properties at stake, Pano Georgiadis, owner of Pano's Restaurant on Elmwood, and Cendant Corporation, the parent company of Wyndham Hotels, which will be, according to Savarino, the hotel operator. Attorney David State is representing the city, Planning Board, Mayor Byron Brown and the Common Council.
"I don't think it was a rush job," said Dominic J. Bonifacio Jr., the council's Majority Leader. He also alleges that the only way to make "it [the hotel] a better project and ease the concerns of some neighbors would be to find a way to provide more parking."
In an exclusive phone interview with Wikinews, Giacalone states that the lawsuit against the hotel and the city "will not be moved [withdrawn] unless the Common Council resins their [prior] decisions in passing the proposal." Giacalone also says that Savarino has yet to sumbit any new plans for the proposal to the city. He also says that he "still plans to represent all plaintiffs" if they wish to continue with the suit and the use of his services.
Giacalone rescheduled the preliminary hearing which is "still in place" for July 27, 2006. When asked if the properties are still owned by mobius, Giacalone replied "yes" and that according to attorney Bob Knoer, the Lawyer representing Hans Mobius, the owner of the properties that could be demolished, there is "no contract between Savarino" and that Mobius "plans to put the properties back on the market." Mobius has not returned phone calls or e-mails and has not yet commented on the situation or the proposal itself. The city denies these claims.
Area councilman Joseph Golombek also states that the reason for the resubmission of the proposal was due to "a mistake in the Planning process" and that none of the council members have "indicated that they have changed their opinions on the hotel" and still remain in favor of the project.
"I still think the Hotel is a good idea for that part of Elmwood. For Elmwood to stay strong and vibrant it must continue to grow and adapt to change. It is a different community than it was twenty years ago and will be different in another twenty years. The opponents of the Hotel have the opportunity to challenge it and are doing that. Even though I disagree with them I am glad there is a safety mechanism for people who disagree with government. We need to keep moving forward," added Golombek.
Supporters of the hotel proposal are planning on holding s rally to support the new development. WNYmedia.net claims that the first rally will be held to support the hotel proposal on July 17, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. on Elmwood and Forest, on the site of the proposed location. According to WNYmedia.net they "are tired of the anti development crowd in Western New York." They also blast opposers of the hotel proposal calling them "banannas" and "nimbys." Opposers of the hotel proposal are planning on "counter attacking" with their own protest on the same day and time.
Copyright Wikinews.org
Liscense: Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License unless otherwise specified (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/)
zobar - 07/13/06 14:25
'Mondo Video is planning on moving to a new location'
Do you know where? You'd think somebody around here would have the scoop, considering that M. is also our film editor - but nobody seems to know.
- Z
'Mondo Video is planning on moving to a new location'
Do you know where? You'd think somebody around here would have the scoop, considering that M. is also our film editor - but nobody seems to know.
- Z
06/03/2006 09:51 #21964
Rooms for rentI have 2 rooms in a 3 bedroom apartment for rent on Elmwood and Forest. 275 a month and 275 security. Available on June 15 or just before. Living room, dining room, den, bathroom and kitchen. Cheap utilities. No lease needs to be signed but minimum stay time is 6 months.
I need someone(s) to move in with me or I will have to move myself. My roomie had a root canal done and is moving back to her parents house. I really do not want to move and I love the place. Its nice, clean and its right by everything on Elmwood and kiddy corner (5min walk or less) to Buffalo state College.
If anyone can help let me know :)
Jason
I need someone(s) to move in with me or I will have to move myself. My roomie had a root canal done and is moving back to her parents house. I really do not want to move and I love the place. Its nice, clean and its right by everything on Elmwood and kiddy corner (5min walk or less) to Buffalo state College.
If anyone can help let me know :)
Jason
fwiw, I don't think that they are saying that you and others who oppose the hotel are crazy or a yellow fruit.
BANANA is an acronym for "Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything" or "Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone" that has been in use for at least 20 years if my memory serves me correctly.
It's like NIMBY ("Not In My Backyard") but on a grander scale.
I wouldn't have thought that the use of either was calling "names" but, of course, that is in the eyes of of the beholder.
It is an effort to characterize your anti-hotel stance in a simplistic, and possibly inaccurate, way.