Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Joshua's Journal

joshua
My Podcast Link

04/22/2008 11:51 #44097

CCTV, Buffalo and Me
To continue with (e:paul,44064) and his earlier journal entry regarding the new cameras -

At this point everybody knows that my brother and I live on a block where one of the cameras has been placed. If you haven't noticed it yet, its hung directly off of the light post in front of the parking lot between Globe and Wilson Farms.

(e:jason) and I have been talking this over lately. I'm inclined to believe without much consideration that this is an incredibly poor idea, but if they were to place a camera where they have I can't say that its in a bad spot in this case. My block first and foremost is a commercially zoned area, including the property where our building is located. Where they have placed the camera was a relatively wise choice - it will cover and theoretically act as a deterrent for any trouble makers goofing off and harassing people in a very well traveled shopping area. That is, if you believe in the power of these cameras preventing crime via its qualities as a deterrent.

Had the camera been placed 200 feet in either direction I'd be a raving lunatic because the camera would more than certainly be too close to a residential corner. It may seem like splitting hairs but in the case of my block its an important distinction. In my view if they were going to do this, putting the camera where it is, as opposed to sticking it directly on the corner or Elmwood and Auburn, or Elmwood and Cleveland, or Elmwood and Breckenridge, or Elmwood and West Ferry was a more prudent choice. Setting aside my objection to the whole idea to begin with - that exact spot was not a bad choice if they had to make one because it is centrally located on one of the busiest commercial blocks of the city.

Is my block unsafe? Not in the slightest, in my view. I'm coming up on my 8th year of living here and in that time I can count the number of times I've seen or experienced something off on one hand, and half of those I could attribute to my own laziness or lack of foresight. It is certainly possible, and in the case of one instance almost certainly plausible, that if the camera had been there it may have prevented a crime from happening. That is if you believe that these cameras provide enough of a deterrent force to justify unnerving and angering everybody that lives in the neighborhood.

People are a tad paranoid in the 'hood to begin with - could you imagine a more famous liberally inclined area than ours having this imposed on them and what their reaction might be? These cameras perpetuate a suburban myth - that the City of Buffalo is dangerous. I don't see a guaranteed enhancement in any regard whatsoever as a result of installing these cameras. At best, and to be fair I did notice this, the cameras may prevent the beggars from bothering people. Way to go get those vicious criminals!

This doesn't erase the fact that something this important to our civic life was IMPOSED on us, and in the end will not prevent a crime in progress. You'd think if City Hall wanted to begin popping CCTVs around the city they might consider asking the citizens what they think about such a provocative and freedom-sapping action. The fact that they didn't speaks to the arrogance and utter lack of fear of backlash that these public officials continue to get away with.

At this point we know the drill. There is virtually nothing that City Hall does that doesn't make people cringe. Who wasn't immediately cynical when they heard about this development? These cameras will not prevent a crime from happening any more than the thousands of CCTVs in London could not prevent a terrorist from bombing the Underground. Ultimately these are meant as a deterrent force, and that is exactly how it will be defended. I see it as an investment in the perpetuation of the laziness and potential for corruption that have always plagued our civic life. Who doesn't actually believe that the camera on my block won't be occasionally used to spot cars to tow or ticket? This potential for misuse is central to my brother's argument that they are inappropriate, and I think he's right. If a tool like this can be abused and misused in Buffalo, it almost certainly will be because that is simply how things are here. The potential for abuse is almost limitless so lets ask ourselves - do we trust our local officials or don't we?

Fuck Buffalo Rising, by the way. They have no interest in the well-being of the area outside of the preservation of the economic well-being of the local businesses.
I approach them with the same skepticism as I do the Elmwood Village Association, to be honest. Buffalo Rising is a deplorable publication. I absolutely loathe those people. They will promote and protect a local business to the utter detriment of the residents and the neighborhood that it rests in. It is truly shocking how inept and rife with greed they are. Just a question - who or what has granted them credibility anyway? I read the article and comments that (e:paul) linked to. Anybody outright defending this CCTV policy has shit for brains. To make such poor excuses for a bad policy is something I can't tolerate and my patience for these people completely withers away when I listen to their warbling. Its as if I'm in an echo chamber in the basement of City Hall.

I also have to trash the EVA as well. It would have been impossible for them to not know something about the advent of this idiotic program. EVA could never stop the city from doing this, but you'd think the city would at least ask an organization like this where the best place for a camera might be. I have always criticized EVA for being basically useless outside of administrating the art festival every year and putting the flower pots out when the weather breaks. This year at the art festival when I go to the kiosk, introduce myself as an 8-year resident of the very block their kiosk is located at, point up to the camera and ask them what they knew about it, what do you suppose the response will be? We'll find out in August but I expect a lot of stammering and stuttering.

In the end, the camera on my block will likely only prevent beggars from harassing shoppers, which is exactly what the businesses want. They want Suzie Suburbanite to feel as safe and as comfortable here as they do in Clarence, or wherever they hell these people come from. Prior to the CCTV being there they have been coming in droves anyway so that argument is moot.

When the shoppers, and a vast amount of the business owners for that matter, head home do they have a CCTV pointing at their front door? None of the interested parties actually care about the needs of the residents. Something like this has to be well planned out, in consultation with residents. When is the last time anything remotely well planned out has occurred in Buffalo? UB North location - genius. Metro train closing off and choking Main St. to death - brilliant. Bass Pro? Non-starter. Luxury condo development in Empire zones clearly meant to benefit the poor? Well done - we are on the rise now, baby! Waterfront development, new bridge construction? When the best example of our public servants acting in our best interest is the demolition of the Black Rock and Ogden tolls on the 190, my friends we are in some serious trouble.

The people behind this imbecilic idea scare me as much as the cameras do, if not more.
joshua - 04/23/08 09:28
(e:drew) - thanks. In the back of my head I kind of assumed that there must have been some sort of contact between EVA and the city, and that chances are there were a diverse number of opinions.

What I fear the most is exactly what you mentioned - to the degree that monkey business happens, its simply going to be pushed around the corner. In my case that is a residential street no matter what direction you go. =/
metalpeter - 04/22/08 18:37
See since cameras push crime someplace else put on every how ever many feet apart they need to be and monitor the entire city, kidding kind of. I think the cameras are there to make people feel safe. They are big so people know they are there. That brings up another issue. What if Buffalo went small. What I mean is what if at that time after the bar crowd is home and some people are just on their way to work the city sent spy crews out and over a month they hid tiny little cameras in street lights and crossing lights and walk signs all over the city and no one except the state trooper knew and they monitored them any one who did anything illegal would be issued a warrant for there arrest if big time drugs where being pushed from a house with lots of traffic maybe give the tapes to the DEA. Would that be worse it better. It would be big brother watching and no one would know. My point is from a civil liberties point. With the big cameras you know you are being watched and you can chose to wear a mask or walk backwards or stop and crawl face down or even have a sign that says "fuck you Big Brother, fuck the Police" or something along those lines. See with these cameras you have a choice if you don't want to be watched. I still think that there need so be some kind of civilian oversite. What happens if 3 white guys beat up some black dude who is asking for money then the cops show up and the "white power" white boys swear at the cops and maybe even throw coffee or spit at them and then the cops rough them up and it is all caught on tape. The Cameras are police cameras who is there to make sure the tapes aren't lost or tampered with and can that stuff be used it court? I think in theory the cameras are a great idea But think there are a lot of kinks that need to be worked out.
jason - 04/22/08 16:39
If the city wanted to use technology to scare people and, even more effectively curb crimes or potential crimes, in addition to the panhandling, why not just use a modified UAV? The military already does this.

Just pop a big ol' flash on it, have the UAV swoop to within range and make a big FLASH. Or, like you suggested, taser turrets. Sure to freak out even the most out of it shithead.
drew - 04/22/08 16:37
The city approached EVA about the cameras and gave them just a few days to respond.

At the meeting, there was intense discussion, but they did vote to invite the city to put the cameras up.

They expected the city to consult as to where cameras would be placed, and that did not happen.

At the time, the EVA board was merchant-heavy. It is less so now.

Not every board member or merchant is/was in favor of this decision.

I've probably already said more than I ought to online, but I am happy to talk about it more in a private conversation.

As I have already stated, I believe cameras just move crime away from cameras, and have a high potential for abuse.
joshua - 04/22/08 16:21
LIE to a pastor, LIE!

(thats not a command)
joshua - 04/22/08 16:21
(e:drew) - thanks man. Despite my cynicism concerning EVA I welcome the fact that you are a part of it. Will you let us know if anybody from EVA, to the best information available to you, had a part in planning this? I figure they won't like to a pastor. =D Hehe.
joshua - 04/22/08 16:12
That is true (e:paul) - in a way you can hardly blame them for wanting to panhandle where its most efficient. I'm glad that you fully enjoyed the entry!

I have seen people followed to their car door in that parking lot, and I've practically been followed right to my front door by people asking for money. Would a camera have prevented that action? Some cracked out idiot asking for money isn't going to be swayed by the presence of a camera - these people are in too much of a fog to appreciate that someone may be watching. Would the alternative prove better? We'll never know but my estimation is that it couldn't be any worse, and it certainly would have proven a more welcome action than alienating everybody with cameras. It really is a hard question to answer, but at the very least they should have tried more effective patrolling first.

Or any patrolling at all. They've historically done a shit job on Elmwood. The only time I see cops on Elmwood is a) when a barfight is being broken up, b) when they are speeding up the street with fire trucks and ambulances to go somewhere else or c) when there are tickets to be levied on local residents. I do emphasize local - on the weekends this vigilance seems to disappear when I see both sides of Cleveland lined up with cars, half of them absolutely positively parked illegally. Those are shoppers, not residents... so its okay to ticket residents and not shoppers? Its a shame the thought makes me laugh/cry too much to pose the question in a fashion other than a rhetorical question.

At least they could have done a better job of making the cameras discreet. Honestly, a flashing blue light on a large white box with Byron Brown's name on it? If I were BB I'd be mortified and whoever is giving him PR advice has lost the plot. I'm waiting for the new version that has pop-out Taser turrets.

I'm all for the suburban crime watch... with special focus on the amount of drugs that flow in and out of the suburbanite schools in the area. Allow me to be the first to break a taboo and suggest that our local shopaholic suburbanites' typical fears aren't related just to economics either.
drew - 04/22/08 15:26
I don't know anymore right now, but I am going to see board people tomorrow morning.
tiburon1724 - 04/22/08 14:06
Just went to the Buffalo News' site and saw the have a huge article on the cameras...I like this part..

Mayor Byron W. Brown said the cameras have been making a difference even during the test phases.

"Crime in neighborhoods around these cameras seems to be drying up," he said.

lol crime is drying up where the cameras are!! See they're working already!!!

I love janelle's idea btw
tiburon1724 - 04/22/08 14:01
I thought all the cameras were being put around town to catch red-light runners? At least isn't that what we were told? Or am I thinking of a different project?
mrmike - 04/22/08 13:55
Agree with you wholeheartedly, Josh, watching the flashing blue light while doing laundry last night gave me the feeling that we have a blue light special of a neighborhood, save for all suburban Kmart shoppers.
paul - 04/22/08 13:47
Thought provoking journal (e:joshua). I think it may be the first time I whole heartedly agree with the entire entry, lol. We should really find some outlet for this? I wonder if anyone has a contact within the program itself? Or maybe Drew, you know someone or have something to day being on the EVA board?

Thats a great idea Janelle and the suburban crime blog - I would love to host it here. You could start it as another estrip blog under the name suburbancrime - I would be more than happy to make an exception to the one blog/person policy for something so original.

What I think is most interesting about the whole issue is that since the rise of more suburbanite shoppers, the beggars have gotten more plentiful and who can blame them. There is certainly a lot more money to be spooked and tear-jerked out of those people than out of the city folk who live here.
jason - 04/22/08 13:13
I really don't have any patience anymore for suburbanites who need to have their paranoia coddled. If you don't want to experience anything different than what you see in Clarence or East Amherst, by all means, stay the fuck where you are. I hate the insinuation that my block is akin to Port au Prince.

Presumably, it is to deter crime. Our block isn't riddled with goons with knives. No, it is riddled with panhandlers - something I've bitched about before. At one point I almost considered leaving the hood because every 50 feet I walked I would get screwed with. When has Buffalo been serious about this problem?

They pretended to be serious almost a year ago, when the Common Council passed an Ordinance which would give citizens, cops, and lawyers a legal mechanism to deal with them. Yeah, thanks! Last year was one of the worst years ever in this regard. Your ordinance, as expected, didn't do dick.

This camera, and others like it, will be about as effective as the Ordinance if no real people are put on the street to keep it tidy. More likely, they will be used to issue tickets for parking overnight in the Globe lot or on the street in the winter. I don't see one damn person who deserves it being shuffled into a police cruiser.

The perps will learn very quickly where they can and cannot operate - the activity will simply be shifted to another area in the neighborhood, and people will simply become more desperate and aggressive where the cameras do not see. I already saw this yesterday, when some jerk walked up and down Cleveland by SPoT harassing people on the patio.

The one valid reason I can see for having it is to catch people being criminally naughty very late at night. Mostly, this doesn't have to do with protecting residents. It has to do with protecting business interests, who have never seen things as bad enough to invest their own money in private security, and anything else is a nice plus.
janelle - 04/22/08 12:54
I often feel tempted to start a blog that features crime committed in the Buffalo suburbs as well as suburbanites who come into Buffalo and commit crimes. Maybe now is the time to start it to counter this idea that Buffalo is so crime ridden that it needs surveillance cameras everywhere.
james - 04/22/08 12:06
Buffalo: if it ain't broke, break it.

04/18/2008 13:01 #44045

Ha! Victory!
Just when I was bitching to my brother about the fact that we haven't gotten an issue of SPIN Magazine in a long time...

... the new issue comes in today!

  • raises arms in triumph*
jason - 04/18/08 15:51
I wonder what overhyped NYC area upstart is going to be on the cover next?

04/17/2008 11:46 #44035

Do you doubt the existance of God?
Then read on. This is a true story. You've all met me and hung out with me a few times - I think its clear that I'm not crazy in the traditional sense. This is something that nobody can rationally explain. Think what you like, choose not to believe that the spiritual realm exists, but consider this story and weigh it on its own merits.

I have a personal stake at what goes on in Iraq - I have two cousins who serve in the United States military. The older cousin is in the Air Force and is based out of Beale AFB in California (the home of the U2 spy plane, for the nerds out there). The younger cousin is an Army paratrooper who is now being trained in radiology. Both have served more than one tour in Iraq, and my cousin in the Army has seen some particularly gruesome and dangerous activity in the traditional hot spots during the apex of the violence in that country. I don't ask a lot of questions because I know all the answers. Did he have to kill somebody? Did he get shot at? Did he see a friend die before his very eyes? Did he wonder about whether or not he'd come home alive? For my part, I've always let them know that I love and support them, that I'm proud of them and their unwavering willingness to sacrifice on our behalf. My cousins, if I do say so myself, represent the best of what our military has to offer. I'm proud and relieved to say that neither have been injured.

That is a worry, however, that never really subsided from my aunt and uncle while my cousins were serving in Iraq. My aunt and uncle are very religious people - they are the only ones in my family that I have religious discussions with on a semi-regular basis. One particularly desperate night, they sat at home and prayed to God. They had not heard from their son in a long time, were in utter despair and told God that they were scared that perhaps the lack of news meant something negative. They told God that they asked local officials to help them get news but nothing came of it.

Then a voice said to my aunt and uncle, "Why didn't you ask me?" By relaying this story to me, it brought my uncle to tears. An angel spoke to my aunt and uncle, and told them that their son was in harms way but was safe, and even told them that he was occasionally behaving badly. The angel even displayed a slight sense of humor in divulging my cousin's bad behavior, which alleviated their concerns and made them smile during a very low moment. The angel told them not to worry - that they would see him again and he would be unharmed.

My aunt and uncle did not have a mass hallucination, nor are they crazy. They are more in tune with the spiritual world than I am. Its not to say that I don't believe in God, because I do. Its just that in some ways I feel that they are closer to that world than I am because I know they are more devoted. This event happened to them, in their own home. How do we explain occurrances like this?

I think the answer is that we can't - there are some things that are utterly beyond our human understanding. Sometimes things just are what they are, and open ended answers are the only way.
metalpeter - 04/18/08 17:47
I will admit I'm a bit skeptical that an angel talked to them. I'm not saying they or you are lying so don't take it that way. I'm not saying I don't think that there aren't angels just look at my myspace page or this one picture I have in my bedroom. I don't know what all the different kind of angels are other then that there are different kinds. That being said sometimes I do wonder if we do have guardian angels, years ago I would have thought that is crazy. But here is why. Everyone has a certain schedule they follow for work or what ever sometimes you run late or maybe early. Well a few times that I was late there was someone else who was going my same way who would I see if I was on time. It struck me as odd that we would both be late on the same day and wind up being at the same place at the same time still and it did get me thinking. The thing about belief that I find strange is that so many people believe in god and even a heaven and Hell but not angels or spirits. That to me seems so odd that you could believe in all of that but think that no souls or ghosts could be on earth. I have heard that thoughts of not beliving in angels and beliving in god is very common.
jason - 04/18/08 15:53
I have a deal with God. God says to me, Jason, you do your part and I'll do mine. Don't be a lazy fuck, don't rip people off, don't lie or mislead people, do the best you can in every situation, and I'll make sure you'll always be okay.
lilho - 04/17/08 15:09
i do doubt, and i dont think they are nuts, or maybe i do. but i just really dont think i believe. maybe religion is for people who have more blind faith than me, because i dont think i really have any. my mom has stories like that, i dont think she is crazy(at least, not like that), but i still have trouble with it.
drew - 04/17/08 13:56
Thanks for the story. May your cousins (and all those who serve) return safely.

04/16/2008 11:26 #44028

German Schoolboy One-ups NASA!
Well done, well done.



A 13-year old corrected a NASA projection on how likely it was that a specific asteroid would hit Earth. NASA said it was 1 in 45,000. The young fella said it was 1 in 450. It turns out the boy was right, and NASA has publicly acknowledged his correction. Not to mention probable job offers when the kid graduates from college, lawl. Cheers guys - here's to enjoying our time until approximately 2036!

In another story - I honestly had no interest but at a glance clicked on a link to an article titled "EPA urges Great Lakes residents not to flush old meds." Of course, the report was filed from Buffalo.



I'm not going to be alarmist about this one. We honestly have no idea to the extent this may be going on, or even if its dangerous at all. Its obviously not good, however, so I see this as a good practice being put in place. I wonder why they are worried about the drugs though - we've been dumping raw sewage into Lake Erie for decades. That is sort of like licking someone's butt every time we go for a drop of water out of the tap. Isn't that a more urgent waste control measure we should be considering for the Great Lakes?
megan - 04/16/08 21:48
oh, and in addition to (e:carolinian)'s comment, that same test concluded that there is far more illicit drug evidence in the sewage from suburban areas. i guess the rich are just better at hiding their drug addictions...
jason - 04/16/08 15:15
Oh, and no googling, turds!
jason - 04/16/08 15:15
A cold one for anybody other than Janelle who can pronounce "Schuylkill" correctly!
janelle - 04/16/08 15:02
I'm really bad at reading "cheekiness" into comments online <blush>. I take about everything at full face value.

If you want to compare stinky bodies of water, I'm pretty sure the Schuykill in Philly can give the great lakes a run for its money...ewww...it's a nasty body of water.
joshua - 04/16/08 14:32
That is all true (e:janelle) - my tap comment was me merely being cheeky. Really the thrust for me, and my cause for mentioning the raw sewage, is that although the drinking water is purified the Great Lakes remain unchanged and generally disgusting. The GL region may be home to the largest fresh water cache on Earth, but the water is extraordinarily polluted and pharmies are really the minnow in the pond in comparison. Coincidentally trace elements of all kinds of scary things end up in water - I'm actually not terribly surprised.

Like I said though, this article does not necessarily suggest a major cause for public concern for our drinking water supply. I'm not going to turn off my tap anytime soon. At best, any risks involved are not well known, but when we are talking about parts per billion I'm not freaking out. To compare - Al Gore's global warming frothfest centered around a future carbon presence in our atmosphere at 350 or 400 parts per million. That is a thousand fold smaller figure than the figures we are talking about with respect to the pharmaceuticals.

Ooh! I was just surfing around and found something. Since you love Philly you may be interested in this - :::link::: - same topic, different city and no freshwater lakes involved.
carolinian - 04/16/08 13:15
Strangely enough, scientists have been doing experiments where they test sewage as a way of gauging the demographics and usage habits of users of various illicit substances in major cities. They made the amazing discovery that people are more likely to do recreational drugs during the weekend (didn't see that coming, did ya'?)
janelle - 04/16/08 13:13
Here's a short article that explains that most water treatment plants in the US are not designed to treat water to remove any traces of pharmaceutical products. Water treatment plants, do however, deal with raw sewage.

:::link:::
janelle - 04/16/08 13:06
I think it's easier to clean or sanitize water of raw sewage (or whatever it is they do) than it is to free it of chemical residues from medications.

So far, we seem to be okay drinking the Great Lakes water. I am more concerned about the number of chemicals that are in the water.

04/10/2008 09:49 #43969

Funniest Description of a Golfer
Behold - 1986, Alan Partidge of the BBC on Seve Ballesteros.




tinypliny - 04/10/08 21:38
hehehe.. those hole shooting bastard ballerinas.
joshua - 04/10/08 11:40
Indeed it is! Well done.
james - 04/10/08 10:30
Is that a clip from "The Day Today"?

That show is fucking hilarious.