Seriously, the entire institute is on IE 6 for next eternity, a browser that came out in 2001. We had a major initiative to push to IE 7 but we couldn't because our medical records system, a vendor product called sunrise record manager by eclipsys

The vendors rake in the big bucks and then can't do simple things like be IE 7 compliant despite years of beta and tons of data on how to update your software. It makes me sick.
How can we say as an organization that we want to push our technology into the future and rely on web based solutions and then use a delivery interface that is an insecure, non standards compliant, memory-leaking piece of crap from 7 years ago. Even Microsoft thinks it sucks. I mean they had IE 7 a forced update but we had to turn that off.
We, and I am sure many other organizations, have many other problems that come from relying on other expensive vendor products. Its like they have no responsibility once the buyer signs on the dotted line. This one product which is not even in production yet and comes from a major vendor and is susceptible to SQL injection. Instead of forcing the vendor to fix the problem (which there is an answer for) we are now getting a $90,000 reverse proxy for the server that will look for possible sql injection attempts and stop them before they hit the server. How did we get so in bed with the vendor that they can get away with this. I feel like they should be sued for selling an insecure product.
If I ever ran an organization like Roswell I would do a major re-evaluation of the cost benefit of such heavy reliance on vendor products. Most of them could be reproduced with teams of dedicated in house developers and moreover even make money for the institute if we could sell to others. Its not like the vendor products just get purchased and work out of the box. They all have teams of people that have to support them anyways. I guess it is hard to find people who know how to program.
Really, I don't know the answer - I do know that it is not just keeping IE6 forever and relying on more vendor products to act as band-aids.
oh paul, I am so with you. I mean I don't know squat about the programming side of it, but roswell (and all the hospital I work at) needs to get with the program and upgrade. And personally I think roswell's EMR is crap. I mean I'm sure they're hard to design etc, but really roswell's is the worst.
and I hate IE.
What do you think about the new version of safari? I haven't noticed any difference myself, but apparently a lot of stuff has changed 'under the hood'?
seriously though, could you even imagine trying to design a program like EMR? that would be such a huge and complex undertaking. it would take a team of developers and like years to complete. (well at least it seems like it would) and besides, i thought EMR is not a web based application? i know many other ones are like SIS-Web (duh) and scheduling.com are, but i thought EMR did not use the browser. i mean it doesn't have any browser functionality or anything like that. maybe i just don't know what i'm talking about.