Since at least mid-June, BRO has been posting negative stories about Buffalo that are saved to a hidden cache page and not posted to or made mention of on the main pages that we are all familiar with.
I didn't read about the YWCA heroin-at-daycare case on BRO, did you? Yet here it is, and it was Dugg by nearly two thousand users. Which put it on the frontpage of one of the web's most visited pages, seen in the neighborhood of 200,000 times.
Here's a story BRO didn't post (but did) about the man who was beaten with his own prosthetic leg. I especially love the accompanying graphic. It's been posted to Digg.
To top it off, BRO has even posted stories from way outside city limits - Lockport, County of Niagara, is representing on BRO's cache site, with sodomizing pitbulls galore. Digg? Check. Over 1,000 Diggs, to be precise.
[...]
So, while promoting the wonders of Buffalo to the local audience, Buffalo Rising is perfectly content to promote some very ugly, very negative stories about Buffalo (and Lockport, County of Niagara), to a separate worldwide audience in order to artificially inflate web statistics.
- Z
Great journal title though, love that word -- fun to say tougher to spell. Nice work
ok, a little OT here, but that sodomizing pitbull story is, I am told, TRUE.
Horrifying. I didn't believe it AT ALL. I'm sorry, but dogs don't RAPE people. Hump legs, yes. But anal penetration?! To the point that the kid needs emergency surgery to save his life?! Um- no.
But then I heard (from people involved in the case) that it's true- the dog's owners were supposedly drug dealers, or at least involved in the drug scene, and had TRAINED the dog to "have sex" with crack whores.
I know, it sounds too unbelievable to be true, and god how I hope it is.... but that's what I hear has come of the investigation so far.
Who gets more traffic, Artvoice or BRO?
Not that I think you particularly care about the pathetic pseudo-rivalry between members of the local media.
The implication laid out by this blogger is implausible to me. How is it that they are "promoting," as the writer puts it, negative stories about Buffalo when they are in fact cached and people are actively seeking out these articles, probably from a search engine?
Are we so insecure locally that even negative (but true) stories about our area that are cached on a web site are subject to ridicule based on a speculative conspiracy theory? This is EXACTLY!!!! why I pay absolutely no attention to local bloggers or periodical media. Its fucking unspeakably pathetic and I can't handle it without going into a tirade of expletives.