Developer back to cut down foliage
Amherst officials say work appears to be legal
Amherst's foliage is on the chopping block - again.
Chain saws sputtered to life Thursday afternoon, clearing underbrush and felling more than 100 small trees in a Wehrle Drive plot owned by developer William Huntress. But while residents on nearby Bellingham Drive fretted over losing their backyard woodland, town officials assured residents that the developer's men appeared to be within legal bounds.
"We're just taking down all the trees that we are legally able to do," Huntress said.
Hey, why not? They're there, right? Who the fuck needs trees? Useless obstacles to creating a new vacant lot or something. This guy's got some nerve... Oh! But I'm just some sort of wacko environmentalist, right? And this developer is actually just doing what he needs to do to make a living, right? Read on:
Area homeowners were variously incensed and saddened by the renewed clearing.
"This is a spite cut," said Bellingham resident Ann Suchyna. "He [Huntress] will just destroy for the point of destroying."
"If Ann wants a park in her back yard, she should have moved in behind one," Huntress said.
OK, so maybe a little he-said, she-said bickering. They're probably both wrong. But remember the developer's snotty remark, OK? It's important. Now, keep going:
Construction of an office building on the site has long been stalled over a 1983 agreement between the town and the EPA, which forbids wetlands developers from connecting with the town's sewer line. Huntress' company, Acquest Wehrle LLC, which took over the land in 1997, has since sought a waiver from the regulation, but support from the Amherst Town Board has been tough to come by.
"There's no approval to build any kind of building on that property," [Amherst Assistant Building Commissioner F. Robert] Danni emphasized.
So wait... lemme see if I've got this straight... the developer bought the land 14 years AFTER the town's agreement with the EPA to preserve the wetlands area, and NOW he's complaining because the town won't give him a waiver to build an office building in that area? You've got to be kidding me.
I say, hey there asshole, if you wanted to build an office building, you should have bought property that's connectable to the town sewer line!
Ugh. For any of you who is sensitive to foul language or who has a developer in your family, I apologize if I've gone too far. But these bully tactics are total garbage, and no one should level a wooded area just because they're having a temper tantrum because they didn't do their own damn homework!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUGH
you make me feel like a bad buffalonian... you don't even live here yet and you know more about local stuff than I do... I think I've read the buffalo news TWICE in the two YEARS I've been here. Pathetic.
maybe lex luthor was on the right track in creating a new continent :P
seriously though, even if you want to build, there's nothing wrong with keeping trees in a parking lot, or on the sidewalks...i wish developers would at least consider more eviro/asthetic/concious designs to implement in their concrete jungles.
That is one of the main thing that pisses me off about AMherst. If a store vacates a spot, it rarely gets reused. They throw up new buildings like a virus, but rarely work to reuse anything. Stuff at the Corner of Sheridan and NF Blvd. has been vacant for years, yet 1 mile up the road construction on more craptastic store continues unabated. No wonder the deer have no place to go.