OK, so I'm no tree-hugger, and I know some
(e:strip)pers don't give a damn about the suburbs, but this story in the Buffalo News reminds me of some of the crap I was so happy about leaving behind in New Jersey.
Developer back to cut down foliage
Amherst officials say work appears to be legal
Amherst's foliage is on the chopping block - again.
Chain saws sputtered to life Thursday afternoon, clearing underbrush and felling more than 100 small trees in a Wehrle Drive plot owned by developer William Huntress. But while residents on nearby Bellingham Drive fretted over losing their backyard woodland, town officials assured residents that the developer's men appeared to be within legal bounds.
"We're just taking down all the trees that we are legally able to do," Huntress said.
Hey, why not? They're there, right? Who the fuck needs trees? Useless obstacles to creating a new vacant lot or something. This guy's got some nerve... Oh! But I'm just some sort of wacko environmentalist, right? And this developer is actually just doing what he needs to do to make a living, right? Read on:
Area homeowners were variously incensed and saddened by the renewed clearing.
"This is a spite cut," said Bellingham resident Ann Suchyna. "He [Huntress] will just destroy for the point of destroying."
"If Ann wants a park in her back yard, she should have moved in behind one," Huntress said.
OK, so maybe a little he-said, she-said bickering. They're probably both wrong. But remember the developer's snotty remark, OK? It's important. Now, keep going:
Construction of an office building on the site has long been stalled over a 1983 agreement between the town and the EPA, which forbids wetlands developers from connecting with the town's sewer line. Huntress' company, Acquest Wehrle LLC, which took over the land in 1997, has since sought a waiver from the regulation, but support from the Amherst Town Board has been tough to come by.
"There's no approval to build any kind of building on that property," [Amherst Assistant Building Commissioner F. Robert] Danni emphasized.
So wait... lemme see if I've got this straight... the developer bought the land 14 years AFTER the town's agreement with the EPA to preserve the wetlands area, and NOW he's complaining because the town won't give him a waiver to build an office building in that area? You've got to be kidding me.
I say, hey there asshole, if you wanted to build an office building, you should have bought property that's connectable to the town sewer line!
Ugh. For any of you who is sensitive to foul language or who has a developer in your family, I apologize if I've gone too far. But these bully tactics are total garbage, and no one should level a wooded area just because they're having a temper tantrum because they didn't do their own damn homework!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUGH
Spray on Nylons :::link::: - that is insane. I was goingthrough your journal for some research for my thesis -which is done today!- and decided to visit the link that google suggested as a sponsor link. I had seen this journal entry before but didn't get a chance to visit the link at work. Anyways, spray on nylons is insane. I assume no one else had visited the link if they didn't coment on weirdness. Has anyone ever used these?
kool aid man in drag? that's a new one for me. gotta say it's pretty hilarious.
that is too too funny.
Kara, that Kool Aid man sketch is REALLY funny...thanks for the link. I am now afraid that some 400-lb dancing pitcher of red juice is going to smash up the walls of my house. :-)
I can't think about or drink koolaid without having this sketch by Dane Cook :::link::: pop into my head.
Oh yeah.