Tinypliny's Journal

12/13/2011 20:04 #55729

Dragging and Dropping in Chrome
Category: e:strip

I just noticed that I don't drop the image when there is a + symbol. I drop it when there isn't any and it is just an empty box. Sorry about that oversight. I guess I wasn't paying attention.

And this is the result:

Can you replicate these steps? I captured the screencast using ScreenCast-O-matic

metalpeter - 12/14/11 19:56
Not for this But might have to take the computer to Best Buy can't get the disk Drive to work... So this might be a moot point... One of my Sis friends hooked up wireless internet so my mother can use her Kindle well get stuff from the store here and so after Christmas she can stream netflix to the DVD player... Maybe something got changed?

metalpeter - 12/14/11 19:47
Not sure what that is just got something that said 15 something..... and now it is Or was installing the newest version we shall see....

tinypliny - 12/14/11 19:17
I am stumped. I need to show you in person someday. I can't imagine why it would not work on chrome. Can you post your chrome version? Click on the small spanner on the right-hand-side top corner of the browser below the [x]. Click on "About Google Chrome" and post the string of numbers that appears below "Google Chrome"

metalpeter - 12/14/11 17:28
Tried it Doesn't work on Chrome it just goes Green and nothing happens.....

metalpeter - 12/14/11 17:20
oh it is a the square not the plus ok I'll try and do a post about something fun...

tinypliny - 12/13/11 22:03
lol, that is actually faster than firefox. :)

paul - 12/13/11 21:12
Omg, it is so slow. How do you live with that 3rd world internet connection.

12/11/2011 18:53 #55722

Firefox, the slow monster.
Category: i-tech

It takes 2 minutes or forever in internet-time-units for e-strip and gmail to load in Firefox. I have to stare at this appalling animation all the time.

Granted, I don't have a fast connection but 2 whole minutes?? 2 Freaking MINUTES!??? I have never seen this incomplete phase of the (e:strip) homepage in the past couple years.

The last time I remember seeing it was in... Firefox. before I ditched it. There was a reason I hated you so much. This is it. You are a slow monster.

I booted up chrome at the same time and gmail and estrip loaded instantly, even though I emptied the cache before. (i.e. nothing was pre-loaded in the cache).

tinypliny - 12/13/11 20:08
What is a wends? I just posted a screencast for you. I was giving you wrong directions. Sorry! You don't drop it when there is a + symbol. You drop is when there isn't any! Can you post back and see if that works?

metalpeter - 12/13/11 19:56
it will be a Wends.. Thing for me now...

tinypliny - 12/13/11 19:54
I will try and do a screencast... Hold on.

metalpeter - 12/13/11 19:29
It takes me back to the site I was on... Maybe I need small thumb nail sized pix?

metalpeter - 12/13/11 19:26
When I did it It changed from the little box with lines to the plus and I thought I let it go on the plus but maybe I didn't... I'll try again....

tinypliny - 12/13/11 19:24
^keep it clicked and then unclick when you are over the orange bar AFTER you see the box with the + symbol.

tinypliny - 12/13/11 19:23
When you drag and drop things you have to
a) click on the image you want to drag and drop
b) keeping it clicking you *hover* over the large orange area that says: "DRAG MEDIA HERE TO ADD TO ENTRY".
c) You will see the mouse pointer changing to a small box with a + on it. Do you see this? If you don't see this, dragging an image will simply load it in a new page. If you see the small box with the + on it, only then can you drag and drop successfully. This is true in both chrome and firefox.

Can you post back about whether you see the mouse cursor changing to a box with a + symbol (just over the big orange bar)?

metalpeter - 12/13/11 17:17
Yeah No Luck either way.... Firefox won't let you even slide anything so... No big deal oh well.....

metalpeter - 12/13/11 16:56
Yeah Got the newest Version of flash but not a big deal that it doesn't seem to work in Chrome ........ You can drop and drag it to (e:strip) but it will only show up as it own page.... I'll see what happens with fire fox.....

metalpeter - 12/12/11 19:56
Hoping to try on Tuesday and see what happens.....

tinypliny - 12/12/11 19:41
You can find out here: :::link:::

What version does it say you have? Visit the page in Chrome as well as Firefox on every computer you have and post results. It could be a flash-related issue. Those buttons are flash based.

metalpeter - 12/12/11 19:31
Not sure....

tinypliny - 12/12/11 19:15
Yes, it definitely works in chrome. I would have been the first one to whine if it hadn't! :) Do you have the latest version of flash?

metalpeter - 12/12/11 18:29
Oh it works on Chrome as Well? I tried it on the chrome the other day and drop and drag didn't do anything.... Thought it was only of firefox.... Also didn't know chat lost that? That being said though I also may not have had the window sizes set up right.... Maybe when I have time to play around a bit I'll try again.....

tinypliny - 12/12/11 18:06
LOL, yes. Getting a cup of tea is an old-fashioned option. :) Back in the day, when I was on dialup that is exactly what I would do. Slightly greater speeds on DSL has spoilt me.

I am not sure I understand the second bit about firefox completely. What were you trying to do? Adding an image works in 2 ways on (e:strip). One is through the file upload button (that needs flash to be working). The second is through the drag and drop way. It works the same on both Firefox and Chrome. Chat lost the whole display images functionality a long time back...

metalpeter - 12/12/11 16:39
Couple of things since you know it takes a few minutes to load try opening those pages first then go onto something else and then it will be ready.... Also I thought there where some things that I don't remember how to do that you can only do on firefox like that you can drop pictures from internet by dragging them into chat and it makes a link and then if you do it to the blog it shows up in the blog?

uncutsaniflush - 12/11/11 22:22
Without a millisecond stopwatch both firefox and chrome seem to load gmail and estrip at around the same speed on my Fedora 16 box using roadrunner cable internet.

I'm with (e:paul), as I wrote elsewhere, try chrome without extensions.

paul - 12/11/11 22:13
I use firefox 80% of the time and both gmail and estrip load instantly. Maybe chrome is somehow better optimized for choppy or slow connections?

Maybe this is why people are still using desktop apps for writing and programming.

I wonder if its a chrome extension. Have you tried the browser in safe mode or without extensions?

uncutsaniflush - 12/11/11 21:51
not a bug but a feature too

uncutsaniflush - 12/11/11 21:50
Well, look on the bright side. If Firefox is slower than Chrome, you will have a longer mean time between crashes. You know that during those two grusomely long minutes, your fedora system won't crash. It's not a but, it's a feature. (sad but evil grin)

12/11/2011 14:39 #55720

Switching to Firefox on Fedora 16
Category: linux

With continuing problems on fedora 16 with Google Chrome, I am going to give it one more shot before switching back to fedora 15 by switching my browser to Firefox. Maybe it is the Chrome-Fedora 16 dynamic that is causing all the trouble.

I have not been on Firefox for the past many years. Chrome is my absolute favourite but right now, I am kind of desperate for a system that doesn't keep hanging and crashing on me when I try and write online.

It helps that the firefox homepage is this pretty orange that I love. :)

Let's see how smooth this ride goes...

metalpeter - 12/12/11 16:22
When I first had Firefox it was great.... Then turned into slow city.... Guessing it had something to do with how they had extensions I think.... Not sure I do use it every once in a while hope it works for you....

12/11/2011 11:38 #55718

All I want for Christmas
Category: music

is to finish and submit my dissertation with help from a untroublesome smooth-performing OS.

:-)

(e:metalpeter), this is what the song feels like in my heart.
The concept

The rendition.

And that is why I am in love with Michael BublÃ©'s voice. I feel that Justin Bieber could have easily pulled off BublÃ©'s rendition (well, if his voice changes a bit and he gets that deeper tenor/baritone-ish sound) if not for the pop-rot that they loaded that version with. I feel like they took someone with such an awesome singing and musical talent and are doing an equivalent of what-brown's-drugs-did-to-Whitney-Houston's-voice. Only this time it is what-overproduction-and-mindless-pop-did-to-Justin-Bieber's-talent. Choked and drowned it.

metalpeter - 12/12/11 15:45
Very good but I don't know as Bieber could have done this well maybe he could have... But I doubt it....

12/11/2011 11:10 #55717

Fedora 16: "Soft lockup"
Category: linux

Okay. It just happened AGAIN. I could not even use the REISUB even though I have now enabled it on the system. None of the other methods of system rescue that I listed in my earlier post work with Fedora 16 when it freezes.

This is so insane. I don't understand what is so wrong. NEVER has been an OS so crappy as Fedora 16. I am switching. This is eating into my productivity.

Attached is the text file with the log of the "Oops" errors, which will hopefully show up when (e:paul) sees this message.

This is how it all starts:

Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.169994] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [kworker/2:2:520]
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.169999] Modules linked in: ppdev parport_pc lp parport fuse 8021q fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt garp stp llc nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep ir_lirc_codec lirc_dev snd_seq snd_seq_device ir_mce_kbd_decoder rc_rc6_mce ene_ir snd_pcm ir_sony_decoder ir_jvc_decoder snd_timer ir_rc6_decoder ir_rc5_decoder arc4 ir_nec_decoder uvcvideo videodev media rc_core rtl8192ce rtl8192c_common rtlwifi mac80211 wacom cfg80211 iTCO_wdt r8169 snd mii v4l2_compat_ioctl32 sparse_keymap iTCO_vendor_support rfkill jmb38x_ms memstick microcode soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 joydev uinput sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core i915 nouveau ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core mxm_wmi wmi video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] CPU 2 
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] Modules linked in: ppdev parport_pc lp parport fuse 8021q fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt garp stp llc nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep ir_lirc_codec lirc_dev snd_seq snd_seq_device ir_mce_kbd_decoder rc_rc6_mce ene_ir snd_pcm ir_sony_decoder ir_jvc_decoder snd_timer ir_rc6_decoder ir_rc5_decoder arc4 ir_nec_decoder uvcvideo videodev media rc_core rtl8192ce rtl8192c_common rtlwifi mac80211 wacom cfg80211 iTCO_wdt r8169 snd mii v4l2_compat_ioctl32 sparse_keymap iTCO_vendor_support rfkill jmb38x_ms memstick microcode soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 joydev uinput sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core i915 nouveau ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core mxm_wmi wmi video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] 
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] Pid: 520, comm: kworker/2:2 Not tainted 3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 TOSHIBA Satellite P750/PEQAA
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] RIP: 0010:[]  [] do_raw_spin_lock+0x21/0x25
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] RSP: 0018:ffff88022fa83e60  EFLAGS: 00000287
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] RAX: 0000000000003020 RBX: ffff88021847644a RCX: 0000000000006a1d
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] RDX: 000000000000301f RSI: ffff880218451ff8 RDI: ffff880218451d74
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] RBP: ffff88022fa83e60 R08: ffffffff813cfb77 R09: 000000007be27d4a
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] R10: 000000007be27d4a R11: ffffffff81b5d230 R12: ffff88022fa83dd8
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] R13: ffffffff814be49e R14: ffff88022fa83e60 R15: ffff880218450540
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88022fa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] CR2: 00007f7e8a6d7000 CR3: 0000000001a05000 CR4: 00000000000406e0
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] Process kworker/2:2 (pid: 520, threadinfo ffff88021a3a0000, task ffff88021d9ddcc0)
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017] Stack:
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017]  ffff88022fa83e70 ffffffff814b7216 ffff88022fa83e90 ffffffffa0277866
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017]  ffff880218451ff0 ffff880218451ff8 ffff88022fa83ea0 ffffffffa02793cb
Dec 11 10:57:07 why kernel: [  832.170017]  ffff88022fa83ed0 ffffffff8105cdd3 ffffffff81a040b0 ffffffff81a040b0

[txt]1211/SoftBugFedora16.txt[/txt]

Update:
I located this thread on Fedora forum with several people having random freezes on Fedora 16 almost everyday, sometimes multiple times a day, with varied hardware.

In addition, all the system rescue effects including ssh-ing remotely into the system are not working during these freezes. Nothing except a hard boot via the power button rescues the system. This is hardly some random whine isolated just on my laptop.I have added my information to the thread.

There is a bug-report for these odd freezes as well:

One of these freezes now has a bugfix in the updates:

Going to update my system and see if all this happens again.

EDIT 2:
More updates from the FedoraForum: A couple other users think the wireless module is the problem child.

Also, one of them reviewed my logs and said:

You seem to have rtl driver errors and also some apic timer problems.
Try adding "noapic" option to the kernel command line
Edit /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and put "noapic" you'll see some lines like
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3..... buncha options LAN=en_US-UTF-8 noapic

I am going to try that see if it helps.

tinypliny - 12/12/11 18:28
No wonder the wireless performance of Fedora 16 is SO mediocre. Its a driver issue!

tinypliny - 12/12/11 18:27
More insights from the fedora 16 freeze thread seem to indicate that it is a problem with the wireless driver module.

I knew it. That is probably the only thing that is substantially different in F16 compared with F15 (I had compile the driver for the wireless myself in F15) But apparently they have messed up including this driver module in the kernel.

tinypliny - 12/12/11 10:30
Woohoo! Bugfix for this particular freeze!!!!!!!!!!!! :::link:::

tinypliny - 12/11/11 20:30
This thread is filled with people having the same Fedora 16 freezes multiple times a day on a wide variety of hardware: :::link::: It would be interesting to see what we all have in common.

tinypliny - 12/11/11 11:49
The system crashed and I recovered this log from /var/log/messages. There is no PID 520 right now when I do ps -aux
The only things in the 500s range are:

root 500 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 11:00 0:00 [kauditd]
root 501 0.0 0.0 17760 1960 ? Ss 11:00 0:00 /sbin/udevd
root 509 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 11:00 0:00 [flush-253:1]
root 512 0.0 0.0 23200 908 ? Ss 11:00 0:00 /lib/systemd/systemd-stdout-syslog-bridge
root 523 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 11:00 0:01 [kworker/2:2]

Don't PIDs change for processes in every session? Or do they remain stable i.e every process always has the same PID. If they change, there is no way of actually finding out what PID 520 is because the system would have crashed and I would have rebooted it all before accessing /var/log/messages.

Am I missing something here?

uncutsaniflush - 12/11/11 11:31
At the risk of asking an obvious, have you bothered to find out what process 520 is? It might be helpful to know what process is hogging your cpu.

tinypliny - 12/11/11 11:28
I am on Chrome 100% of the time. :/ I write everything nowadays in google docs and use the final revisions to port into M$hit Office and LaTeX.

I could say that I am the ideal consumer for chrome books but then I need the hard drive and the analyses software.

I was happy with fedora 15. I was with it for a month and a half. It did occasionally throw errors but nothing as major as this.

paul - 12/11/11 11:18
I swear its only crashed on me once this whole time, and I think it had to do with my dock becoming disconnected.

I do use chrome but not as much as you.