As a kid, I always liked the brown crusty edges of bread and the two extreme-end slices (that are completely crusty on one side) way more than the white portion. Even now, I really like the brown bits and eat them first.
No one else in my family liked bread enough to eat it so I had no idea that many people actually prefer to throw the brown crusty edges out when they make sandwiches. I am constantly amazed whenever some kid makes a fuss about the edges. Surely everyone knows the crust is the most delicious part of any bread!!? If I were given a choice, I would like all my slices to be the extreme-end slices.
PS: Extreme-end slices toasted with a hint of hummus, mint sprigs and raw crispy red onions. Mmmm...
Tinypliny's Journal
My Podcast Link
08/18/2010 08:59 #52467
Bread CrustCategory: the odes
08/12/2010 00:56 #52418
What are the right questions?Category: science
How do you know you are asking the right questions in research? I was in a fascinating meeting with a brilliant basic science researcher at Roswell recently. I went in with my ideas and background and after the discussion, came out with a virtual unique-coloured lens that lends an entirely new perspective to what I thought I knew before.
There are infinite ways to look at a problem. And of course, there are infinite problems. So in the midst of all this infinity, how do you pick the one problem, the one perspective that really will go forward and help the patients? How?
If you trawl through NIH RePORT website you will be amazed at how many billions and billions of dollars have been awarded to the vast landscape of researchers and institutions across the board. Research has become an industry. But what are the products that this industry is so industriously producing? How many of these generously funded projects are actually making any tangible positive impact on what an average patient with cancer is going through? Are we even thinking of this patient?
Is it possible to think of the patient when you are dabbling in population research and you can't really say anything with a lot of certainty about any one individual? I thought about all of this after the meeting. There are so many ways I could dissect what I know. How would I really know which approach is the correct one that will perhaps lead me a smidgen closer to my personal objective? Time will tell - but I wish there were some kind of certainty today and at this very moment.
I could present a counter argument to my own thoughts that Science is always a quest towards the unknown - and so it is perhaps prudent not to look at the ends too much. But I am conflicted about treating Science as an abstract entity. I want to be involved and productive in Science that has a tangible practical impact on people who need it the most. I am just not clear about the path to this personal Nirvana, though. This lack of clarity worries me... I need to work out a way to cut through some of this smog of consciousness.
Meanwhile, I am loving this speech by Atul Gawande. Even more entertaining are the comments. Spot on!
There are infinite ways to look at a problem. And of course, there are infinite problems. So in the midst of all this infinity, how do you pick the one problem, the one perspective that really will go forward and help the patients? How?
If you trawl through NIH RePORT website you will be amazed at how many billions and billions of dollars have been awarded to the vast landscape of researchers and institutions across the board. Research has become an industry. But what are the products that this industry is so industriously producing? How many of these generously funded projects are actually making any tangible positive impact on what an average patient with cancer is going through? Are we even thinking of this patient?
Is it possible to think of the patient when you are dabbling in population research and you can't really say anything with a lot of certainty about any one individual? I thought about all of this after the meeting. There are so many ways I could dissect what I know. How would I really know which approach is the correct one that will perhaps lead me a smidgen closer to my personal objective? Time will tell - but I wish there were some kind of certainty today and at this very moment.
I could present a counter argument to my own thoughts that Science is always a quest towards the unknown - and so it is perhaps prudent not to look at the ends too much. But I am conflicted about treating Science as an abstract entity. I want to be involved and productive in Science that has a tangible practical impact on people who need it the most. I am just not clear about the path to this personal Nirvana, though. This lack of clarity worries me... I need to work out a way to cut through some of this smog of consciousness.
Meanwhile, I am loving this speech by Atul Gawande. Even more entertaining are the comments. Spot on!
You don't know where the solar plexus is? Really? It lies tangent to the velluvial matrix, just below the avorial passages.
08/11/2010 23:14 #52417
Amazing.Category: the odes
I have seen the swallow-dance incorporated into so many films and videos, but I think this is probably right up there among my favourites.
08/08/2010 14:39 #52397
My blender jar just shatteredCategory: eating in
I was expecting the motor to give way before this happened.
I knew this day would come, with all the torture I put it through but it's depressing, nevertheless.
I knew this day would come, with all the torture I put it through but it's depressing, nevertheless.
tinypliny - 08/10/10 01:35
You mean you wonder what happened to her from the ill-effects of using the plastic blender before you? She broke up a pop band from Liverpool.
Maybe (e:Mike) needs to be warned now...
You mean you wonder what happened to her from the ill-effects of using the plastic blender before you? She broke up a pop band from Liverpool.
Maybe (e:Mike) needs to be warned now...
tinypliny - 08/10/10 01:30
It's probably the smell from the friction between the metal of the motor against the plastic base. You can't escape it even in glass blenders. In India, you get this blender called the "Mixie" - which is 100% stainless steel and can grind the most stubbornly hard spice into pixie dust. I don't think they sell them here. I really want on of those rather than a replacement to what I had... They are so hardy and make cooking so much more easier.
It's probably the smell from the friction between the metal of the motor against the plastic base. You can't escape it even in glass blenders. In India, you get this blender called the "Mixie" - which is 100% stainless steel and can grind the most stubbornly hard spice into pixie dust. I don't think they sell them here. I really want on of those rather than a replacement to what I had... They are so hardy and make cooking so much more easier.
libertad - 08/09/10 10:39
How sad. I want a new blender. Mine is plastic and has always smelled funny but I use it anyways cause it is all I got. My friend Yoko gave it to me and I wonder what happened to her.
How sad. I want a new blender. Mine is plastic and has always smelled funny but I use it anyways cause it is all I got. My friend Yoko gave it to me and I wonder what happened to her.
tinypliny - 08/08/10 21:26
The spoon looks like it was attacked by a T-rex. Plus of course, I would now need to get new blender attachments. What a completely avoidable inconvenience!
The spoon looks like it was attacked by a T-rex. Plus of course, I would now need to get new blender attachments. What a completely avoidable inconvenience!
tinypliny - 08/08/10 21:25
Neither. I foolishly forgot to take out the spoon I was using to put in the cheese I was blending with the milk and saffron. I started the blender and it was too late. :(
Neither. I foolishly forgot to take out the spoon I was using to put in the cheese I was blending with the milk and saffron. I started the blender and it was too late. :(
paul - 08/08/10 19:10
Were you mixing hot food in a cold blender or vice versa.
Were you mixing hot food in a cold blender or vice versa.
08/06/2010 23:06 #52378
Lights. Art. Music!Category: art
The gorgeous opening sequence of the Pillars of the Earth.
With an awesome score by Trevor Morris.
Without the SFX
With an awesome score by Trevor Morris.
Without the SFX
tinypliny - 08/14/10 20:01
MAN! They killed one of my favourites! What is this? The medieval version of Spooks?!
MAN! They killed one of my favourites! What is this? The medieval version of Spooks?!
tinypliny - 08/12/10 12:57
Ohhhh - you mean the ridiculous Macbeth-like premonition dream?! Yeah, too melodramatic and too Shakespearean... I wish they had not put that in but they use it as a plot-device to fake-garrote the redhead. Apparently, that didn't happen in the book where people didn't have Hamlet-like scenes and their dead-uncles preaching to them through a curtain of blood streaming down willy-nilly.
Ohhhh - you mean the ridiculous Macbeth-like premonition dream?! Yeah, too melodramatic and too Shakespearean... I wish they had not put that in but they use it as a plot-device to fake-garrote the redhead. Apparently, that didn't happen in the book where people didn't have Hamlet-like scenes and their dead-uncles preaching to them through a curtain of blood streaming down willy-nilly.
tinypliny - 08/12/10 12:51
Well... I don't think you need your tongue to project your voice into a tune. Think about it. Birds do it all the time. There is no enunciation required - just adjustment of the air columns for the right frequencies. Also, I think the stones singing is an analogy - as he explains to the Earl's daughter. He follows the hollows and thickness of the stone to find the right carving line. Many of the ancient sculptures in India are carved out of natural stone that could not be moved and the technique of "listening" to the stone was widely used for carving in many temples across the country. So I guess Follett did his research well when he wrote the book. The red haired bloke is able to carve his father because his mum describes that singing scene to him and the rest of the bunch in detail - remember? I thought the carving was intentional.
I am sure no one else is religiously watching the series on here as both of us seem to be. ;-) So what is the biggest one?? And I don't really care about spoilers. I am more inclined to watch things if I know something. Heh.
Well... I don't think you need your tongue to project your voice into a tune. Think about it. Birds do it all the time. There is no enunciation required - just adjustment of the air columns for the right frequencies. Also, I think the stones singing is an analogy - as he explains to the Earl's daughter. He follows the hollows and thickness of the stone to find the right carving line. Many of the ancient sculptures in India are carved out of natural stone that could not be moved and the technique of "listening" to the stone was widely used for carving in many temples across the country. So I guess Follett did his research well when he wrote the book. The red haired bloke is able to carve his father because his mum describes that singing scene to him and the rest of the bunch in detail - remember? I thought the carving was intentional.
I am sure no one else is religiously watching the series on here as both of us seem to be. ;-) So what is the biggest one?? And I don't really care about spoilers. I am more inclined to watch things if I know something. Heh.
metalpeter - 08/11/10 19:55
There are a few super natural things going on, but I guess they could be called Miricales not that they have been called that. Guy with no toungue (witness) sings and somehow his son who doesn't know about it makes the statue of it. It is as if some how the rock (or something else) talks to him and that is how he makes it. The Biggest one I can't mention cause it is to much of a spolier (4 episodes so far for me but not sure when the newest one airs so...)
There are a few super natural things going on, but I guess they could be called Miricales not that they have been called that. Guy with no toungue (witness) sings and somehow his son who doesn't know about it makes the statue of it. It is as if some how the rock (or something else) talks to him and that is how he makes it. The Biggest one I can't mention cause it is to much of a spolier (4 episodes so far for me but not sure when the newest one airs so...)
jenks - 08/10/10 08:03
book. not back. ugh.
book. not back. ugh.
jenks - 08/10/10 08:02
ooh, I've always been meaning to read that back... didn't know they've made it into a show!
ooh, I've always been meaning to read that back... didn't know they've made it into a show!
tinypliny - 08/10/10 01:15
I am caught up as well and can't wait for the next ep!
All the whingers on the net seem to be nitpicking about the book-screen discord; some even going to the lengths of saying that the story is incomprehensible. I can only say, what a herd of blind sheep bleating in discordant unision! Have they even heard of the term artistic license and variation? Besides, a novel is not really a play. You can't really translate any book to screen word for word. Everyone interprets each book and its characters differently. It's an impossible task to please everyone. I guess, not having read the book is an advantage in this case.
I think the series, by itself, is beautifully made. The acting is spot on because the villainous bunch are creeping me out and the good guys are getting some empathy - always a good sign. I remember some of the other costume dramas in the past which have been so hilariously off-track and so badly acted that I have laughed through "tragedies" and "tortures".
I agree, it does have an old school look about it. I actually like that there is no crazy supernatural omg-what-the-hell-was-that stuff going on. That is probably what is hilarious and off-tune about some of the other period dramas. I am not counting the Austen dramas of course - even ordinary plots in them are so unbelievable that they are unnaturally hilarious.
I am caught up as well and can't wait for the next ep!
All the whingers on the net seem to be nitpicking about the book-screen discord; some even going to the lengths of saying that the story is incomprehensible. I can only say, what a herd of blind sheep bleating in discordant unision! Have they even heard of the term artistic license and variation? Besides, a novel is not really a play. You can't really translate any book to screen word for word. Everyone interprets each book and its characters differently. It's an impossible task to please everyone. I guess, not having read the book is an advantage in this case.
I think the series, by itself, is beautifully made. The acting is spot on because the villainous bunch are creeping me out and the good guys are getting some empathy - always a good sign. I remember some of the other costume dramas in the past which have been so hilariously off-track and so badly acted that I have laughed through "tragedies" and "tortures".
I agree, it does have an old school look about it. I actually like that there is no crazy supernatural omg-what-the-hell-was-that stuff going on. That is probably what is hilarious and off-tune about some of the other period dramas. I am not counting the Austen dramas of course - even ordinary plots in them are so unbelievable that they are unnaturally hilarious.
metalpeter - 08/09/10 19:53
I'm kinda caught up, I watched 4 episodes. With out giving anything away the story seems good with a lot of twists and turns but maybe that is just me, but I have no idea if it follows the book or how closely. The battle scenes are good. In terms of look it is kinda dark and kinda looks like a movie you might have seen in school, not that it is a bad thing, kinda looks like and older style. It could also be that since it is supposed to be england that it is dark and gloomy and so that effects the look, I like it so far.....
I'm kinda caught up, I watched 4 episodes. With out giving anything away the story seems good with a lot of twists and turns but maybe that is just me, but I have no idea if it follows the book or how closely. The battle scenes are good. In terms of look it is kinda dark and kinda looks like a movie you might have seen in school, not that it is a bad thing, kinda looks like and older style. It could also be that since it is supposed to be england that it is dark and gloomy and so that effects the look, I like it so far.....
tinypliny - 08/07/10 11:45
that is strange. I can still watch the video. Can you watch it on my channel --> :::link:::
that is strange. I can still watch the video. Can you watch it on my channel --> :::link:::
metalpeter - 08/07/10 10:56
Hoping to watch this this weekend sunday, you tube pulled the video or atleat on here they did
Hoping to watch this this weekend sunday, you tube pulled the video or atleat on here they did
lol - how is wonderbread crust any different?
Toasted on hummus? hmm... never did that. I have a pop-up toaster. The thought of cleaning a post-hummus-toast residue on the wire frame is tiresome. Also, it might kill the garlic undertones.
I just thought about that and decided probably not.
I like krustyazz bread too. I think that crust removers are traumatized by the crust of a white, overly processed bread such as
Wonder bread. Your p.s. sounds good. I would make it with a slathering of humus rather than a hint. Do you toast it with the ingredients on?