Suffering may be accepted as a way, but I must speak carefully. So, some caveats:
1. No way of living should be imposed, but this one definitely should not.
2. Suffering in itself should not be seen as an end, or even a means of repentance, as seen here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redemptive_suffering
Still, Christ said, "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. " (Matthew 16:24, please excuse the non-inclusive language). When living differently than the rest of the world, even if it is for the good of the world, one might expect to suffer. Again, this does not mean that suffering should be sought out, but the fact remains that Jesus was executed by the state, as were many of his followers. Christianity, practiced faithfully, is not good for empire.
Instead, we should be living in community with those who are suffering already, and thus, bearing another's burdens. There is already enough suffering in the world that we do not have to seek out/create government persecution, or practice self-mortification. We can enter into the suffering of others.
This, oddly enough, is what compassion means literally. "Passion," as we learned from passion plays and that movie, means suffering, and com- as a prefix means "with." Compassion = suffering with. A way of compassion is a way of suffering.
Christianity works from beneath (or at least it is supposed to) rather than stand on a pedestal or shout from a distance, we are called to enter into the brokenness of the world, as our leader did. Another key bible verse (Philippians 2:5-8):
Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death- even death on a cross.
A couple things to add. Comment wise this morning it looked like we passed 40,000 comments by 40. (e:tinypliny) you are a big contributer to that and I'm sure you will pass me soon.
Not to make things more confusing but there is a Chinese Philosphy of Suffering. I looked it up and couldn't find much except that it has to do with pain and pleasure and ties in with budhism I wish I was better at explaining it.
Yes, but in a literal sense, how can you do anything else but commisserate and if possible, alleviate it with therapy/solace?
Is joining in the pain a real and tangible thing that you do, or just empathize so much that the pain doesn't seem like somebody else's? Thus, efforts to provide the therapy/solace aren't half-hearted in this case.
I am just trying to understand this construct of suffering. It's at conflict with the detachment practices and advocated in medicine. Sometimes, I feel we need to let go of detachment in research and medicine but there are unwanted adverse effects to that approach.
Do you think this is one aspect that keeps you from feeling that Science can be as inspiring as religion probably is?
---40K!----
it's more than realizing you are lucky--its joining with the person in pain.
So in essence, by suffering you mean empathy with people in pain (in many forms) and the humility to recognize your luck that you are not in any such pain?
I do all the whipping of Drew in this marriage ;)
So does this mean you don't whip yourself? Thanks for your clarifications!