Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Drew's Journal

drew
My Podcast Link

11/07/2008 00:07 #46580

Suffering
Category: religion
This is a response to (e:libertad) 's question.

Suffering may be accepted as a way, but I must speak carefully. So, some caveats:

1. No way of living should be imposed, but this one definitely should not.

2. Suffering in itself should not be seen as an end, or even a means of repentance, as seen here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redemptive_suffering


Still, Christ said, "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. " (Matthew 16:24, please excuse the non-inclusive language). When living differently than the rest of the world, even if it is for the good of the world, one might expect to suffer. Again, this does not mean that suffering should be sought out, but the fact remains that Jesus was executed by the state, as were many of his followers. Christianity, practiced faithfully, is not good for empire.

Instead, we should be living in community with those who are suffering already, and thus, bearing another's burdens. There is already enough suffering in the world that we do not have to seek out/create government persecution, or practice self-mortification. We can enter into the suffering of others.

This, oddly enough, is what compassion means literally. "Passion," as we learned from passion plays and that movie, means suffering, and com- as a prefix means "with." Compassion = suffering with. A way of compassion is a way of suffering.

Christianity works from beneath (or at least it is supposed to) rather than stand on a pedestal or shout from a distance, we are called to enter into the brokenness of the world, as our leader did. Another key bible verse (Philippians 2:5-8):


Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death- even death on a cross.







metalpeter - 11/08/08 12:39
A couple things to add. Comment wise this morning it looked like we passed 40,000 comments by 40. (e:tinypliny) you are a big contributer to that and I'm sure you will pass me soon.

Not to make things more confusing but there is a Chinese Philosphy of Suffering. I looked it up and couldn't find much except that it has to do with pain and pleasure and ties in with budhism I wish I was better at explaining it.
tinypliny - 11/07/08 22:05
Yes, but in a literal sense, how can you do anything else but commisserate and if possible, alleviate it with therapy/solace?

Is joining in the pain a real and tangible thing that you do, or just empathize so much that the pain doesn't seem like somebody else's? Thus, efforts to provide the therapy/solace aren't half-hearted in this case.

I am just trying to understand this construct of suffering. It's at conflict with the detachment practices and advocated in medicine. Sometimes, I feel we need to let go of detachment in research and medicine but there are unwanted adverse effects to that approach.

Do you think this is one aspect that keeps you from feeling that Science can be as inspiring as religion probably is?

---40K!----
drew - 11/07/08 21:40
it's more than realizing you are lucky--its joining with the person in pain.
tinypliny - 11/07/08 18:24
So in essence, by suffering you mean empathy with people in pain (in many forms) and the humility to recognize your luck that you are not in any such pain?
janelle - 11/07/08 15:04
I do all the whipping of Drew in this marriage ;)
libertad - 11/07/08 15:02
So does this mean you don't whip yourself? Thanks for your clarifications!

11/06/2008 09:34 #46569

More religion and Science.
Category: religion
As is becoming a habit, this is a post that started as a comment. See for back story.


I am having a hard time talking about "religion" in the abstract, so I will be concrete, specific, and personal. This isn't intended to be a defense of religion, but rather an explanation of why my particular faith is important to me.

It's important to me, because it is a counter-narrative that creates a counter-community in a world that is full of lies.

"Lies?" you say. "Yes--lies."

Advertising tells me that I am not ok the way that I am, but that buying a certain product will make me ok--and it invariably does not.

Government tells me that other people (gays, terrorists, immigrants, stock brokers, religious people) are the source of my problems. Often, the proposed solution is violent defeat. The idea that violence will produce peace is another lie that is common in this world.

Other things promise to give me value, and fail. Sex, popularity, food, power--whatever it is that entices, it mostly does so with lies.

Now, those of you that know me know that there is nothing wrong with any of these things in and of themselves. Some of them (most of them?) I like quite a bit! But they can and do lie to you.

In the person of Jesus, I see one who did not live according to the lies. In fact, he exposed them for what they were, and created a counter-community that loved the enemy, received violence without returning it, and found value not in consuming resources, but in distributing them.

I need these stories, and the experience of the presence/love of God that goes with them to resist becoming a part of the system of lies that I outlined. There may be other ways, and if you are on a different one, that is fine with me, but this is what frames and shapes my life. I don't think I could be who I am without the grace of God in my life, and (for the most part) I like who I am and who I am becoming.

When I think about it, Tiny, you seem to experience science in similar ways. You live differently than others, because you have tested your experience.

I guess what is sad is that too many people live with bad science/religion or no science/religion, and just believe what they are told.

(e:jim), upon further reflection, I think you are on to something--much of religion's problems come because we have refused to respect limits. Now, this is tricky for me, because I don't believe in compartmentalizing my faith to only a part of my life--a hobby that I do sometimes and ignore others--it is a way of life.

But on the other hand, it cannot speak with authority over others not practicing that way. We overstep our limits when we generalize the conclusions that have worked for our community to other individuals/situations. While I may accept suffering as a way for myself, it is quite another thing to impose it on another.

Yet, for me, even staying within limits is a religious value--Jesus never took power "over" another, and encouraged his followers to focus on dealing with their own sin, rather than those of others.

Maybe that's enough for now. Just one postscript:

@(e:paul) I hate being a snotty child, but here's my kid-like remark: (e:heidi) and (e:tinypliny) started it! Seriously though, I thank you for creating this tolerant community, where different ideas can be discussed. I am not sure I would have been able to make friends with so many different people without (e:strip), and I am better for the experience.
metalpeter - 11/06/08 18:10
I'm not bashing anyone really but I think (e:drew) brings up a good point that people do believe what they are told. I think most people believe what they are taught if they grew up with parents of a different faith they would believe that. I think most people don't go to church of a different belief system even if it is only a Baptist checking out southern baptists.
drew - 11/06/08 16:57
@jason -- sure enough. My first responsibility, however is to make sure that I am tolerant, not tolerated, and that I respect MY limitations, rather than enforce somebody else's.

drew - 11/06/08 16:55
libertad--those are two really good questions. I think I can answer the first one, but the second one will require another post and more time.

Bad science/bad religion is unexamined, uncritical science/religion, or s/r done with the intent of practicing power over another. For extreme examples of both, see the Arianism of Nazi Germany, or--closer to home, American science that "proved" that black people were only good for working and procreating, and the religion that invented a "curse of Ham" to justify said science/slavery while ignoring the story of Exodus.

Both use bad methods and bad reasoning for really bad results.
libertad - 11/06/08 15:28
You said: "I guess what is sad is that too many people live with bad science/religion or no science/religion, and just believe what they are told."

I might have missed something but I was wondering what you consider bad science/religion?

Also, I was wondering why you accept suffering as a way? I mean I know that suffering is part of life but it just sounded curious to me that you accept it as a way. Why would you want to accept suffering as a way? Again, I understand how suffering can be used in positive ways but it just doesn't seem like it has to be a way of life.
jason - 11/06/08 14:47
Tolerance and respecting limits goes both ways.
paul - 11/06/08 13:57
I didn't mean you specificaly. I meant the site as an entity on it own. It talks about a lot of things I never expected. I guess that means it's growing up now, LOL.
heidi - 11/06/08 13:45
wow! I'm really glad i started it. Great conversation. I'm totally in with (e:jim) & (e:tinypliny)...

11/05/2008 12:54 #46556

It's amazing how much cooler . . .
Category: politics
. . . candidates get when they lose.

Comments on McCain sparked this, but I also remember watching Dole on Letterman after he was defeated and thinking he may have one if he acted more like that.

Gore got a lot more friendly after he got beat--grew a beard, put on weight, smiled more, and started talking about global warming more.

Maybe the conventional wisdom about how to behave in a campaign isn't so wise!
gardenmama - 11/05/08 22:52
I agree. It sort of seems that as candidates these people become some type of weird pod-people. It doesn't make any sense. Despite evident intelligence, Gore was the most dry, uninteresting thing running, like some lifeless drone. Later, after the run, he was actually funny in some of his presentation, and I kept thinking: "Where the hell were YOU a few months ago?"

11/04/2008 15:50 #46521

YLDS Election Day Special
Category: football

tinypliny - 11/05/08 19:39
Yinz love DA STILLERS!!!!!!!!

11/04/2008 00:20 #46505

When Obama wins . . .
Category: football
. . . you can thank/blame the Steelers, for beating the Washington Redskins.

. . . Or McCain, for speaking at halftime with EMPTY SEATS and DISINTERESTED PEOPLE behind him. Hey John--this race is televised!

Did you see this? It's like he wants to lose!

(Sorry I can't share it--ABCnews.com is all messed up.)

jason - 11/04/08 12:58
Yeah, dammit, the Skins blew it of course. I'm still mad at the Steelers D for handing me a loss in FFL though.

I don't think it's the end of the world if Obama wins, but it is the end of the world if the left wing gets a supermajority.