Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Drew's Journal

drew
My Podcast Link

11/01/2008 15:14 #46461

comment became a post
I told tiny that my comment was too long and became a post, so now I have to back it up.

But I was lying.

The party was fun. Now I have to begin my novel.
tinypliny - 11/01/08 20:02
Nice meeting you and (e:Janelle), as always. Very convincing "costume". :)

What is the general plot outline of your novel, does it have murder?

10/31/2008 13:26 #46450

Redistribution of Wealth
Category: politics

I know that some people are coming out against it, but I have to think that in reality, they are not. If you are not in favor of "redistribution of wealth," than why do you work/invest/by/sell/trade? If you hope to receive an inheritance, than you expect your parent's wealth to be redistributed to you. If you have an interest-bearing bank account, then a borrowers' wealth is being redistributed to you. A lottery ticket is redistributing many small pieces of wealth, in the hopes of receiving a large redistribution.

Most people, when they say this, really mean that they prefer a "market-based" redistribution of wealth. Most of the time (because some people enter a market with advantages), in a completely open market, wealth becomes re-distributed by becoming concentrated. A concentration of wealth is the opposite of what is commonly referred to as "spreading the wealth around."

Nobody wants their wealth to be redistributed into somebody else's concentration, but everybody wants their concentration to grow.

If people do not think they will enjoy their wealth, than people will lose the incentive to work. Sometimes, high taxes discourage them from working. Other times, a market out of control discourages people, (as in "I owe my life to the company store.") Both must be checked.

I could go on regarding the different ways that tax policy encourages the re-distribution of wealth in different directions, but that isn't my point right now. My point is: everybody wants wealth redistributed. The only question is, how?

10/29/2008 17:13 #46408

Mean girls
Category: film
It's not going to be a big party (like Friday) but some friends are gathering at my house to watch mean girls tomorrow night (Thurs). Call my cell for the address: 510-7086.



I really like this movie. On the surface, it's a teen film, but underneath it is a study in Girard's understanding of the scapegoat, and how religion is born out of memetic imitation and the violence to which it leads leads.
tinypliny - 10/29/08 20:16
hahaha... I love bad versions as well. I am movie-holic. :)
matthew - 10/29/08 20:13
Disney came out with 3 versions. The original 1976 version with Jodi Foster, a 1995 made for television version (CRAP!), and the 2003 version with J L Curtis and Lindsay Lohan. Leave it to disney to milk every penny!

Oh, and I swear i only know this because of my field of work! :)
tinypliny - 10/29/08 20:03
YEAH!!! She's the one! Thanks (e:matthew). :)
I didn't know there was an old now! Now, I totally need to see that!
matthew - 10/29/08 20:01
(e:tinypliny), i think you mean Jamie Lee Curtis. She played the mom in the new (2003) version. of Freaky Friday. In the original 1976 version, the part of the daughter was played by a very young Jodi Foster. A Classic!
james - 10/29/08 19:47
on the surface it is a teen movie. But at its core I thought it was Heidegarian journey of Hermeneutical phenomenology in which Cady must create meaning out of a foreign world by transversing different contexts.
tinypliny - 10/29/08 18:21
I love teen vacuous movies. I don't remember seeing this one!!
And whoa, what an interpretation for a movie with that girl in the still in it! She was also in Freaky Friday - which I loved, mainly because the actress playing the mom was SO COOL! (I just can't seem to remember any hollywood names today!)
mike - 10/29/08 17:14
wow i love but mostly cuz it is a teen film

10/28/2008 09:32 #46382

For Jim, James and Janelle.
Another flim short from my favorite improvisers.

And, for Mom and anyone else who might be offended: Yes, this film includes a dirty word.




jason - 10/28/08 18:39
Yo, if you want to come over for football you're more than welcome.
james - 10/28/08 10:58
That. Was. AMAZING!

A dream come true!

10/27/2008 21:10 #46374

It's monday . . .
Category: football
and that means it's time for another episode of "Yinz luv da Stillers."



PS Next week the game is on ESPN. (e:twins), can I bring beer and make use of your big screen HD with cable? Or should I invite people to meet me at the thirsty buffalo (opening tomorrow!)
tinypliny - 10/27/08 23:33
Heh... "strategery" indeed. :)