Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Tinypliny's Journal

tinypliny
My Podcast Link

10/14/2008 22:12 #46119

And now for some party pooping...
Category: science
Watch that alcohol intake this holiday/party season... oh wait, better watch it ALL the time because:


From:
In contrast to studies on cardiovascular disease, this study found that moderate alcohol consumption was not protective against normal age-related differences in total brain volume. Rather, the more alcohol consumed, the smaller the total brain volume*.



Yeah, I *love* to be the messenger of any news against my favourite two HUGE preventable causes of >60% of morbidity and >100% loathsomeness around the world.



Reference:
  • Paul CA et. al. Association of Alcohol Consumption With Brain Volume in the Framingham Study Arch Neurol. 2008;65(10):1363-1367.

10/11/2008 11:11 #46057

The Financial Crisis: Whiteboard 101
Category: the odes
I was looking up good presentation software alternatives for the PC (yeah, I do not have keynote, you elite mac owners!) when I found this very cool whiteboard explanation of the credit crisis. With my fascination for the KISS (K.eep I.t S.imple and S.tupid) principle for presentations and additionally, a new-found fascination for understanding what the hell is going on with the economic situation facing the planet, I could not help but appreciate the wonderfully coherent way, in which Paddy Hirsch explains it all.

Basically, its a champagne and whiteboard enhanced version of (e:jim)'s detailed and awesome explanation ((e:tinypliny,45704)).



It strengthens my opinion that the whiteboard is the most effective presentation software out there. I am still playing with the idea of going the whiteboard way for my dissertation proposal...

There are some other alternatives for out-of-options PC users who are sick of the clunky and ugly PowerPoint or even the open-source OpenOffice Impress (yeah, opensource is very appealing, but after 5 years of non-stop use, I think Impress is still not up to snuff with what makes an appealing presentation). Google Docs is at an embryonic bare-bones state. 280slides.com might be a messiah but I need to try it out first to be sure.

The real questions are, however:
1. Am I coherent enough to take this risk and let go of the presentation software crutch altogether?

2. Though my advisor here is at the leading edge of creativity, super-awesome, very open and receptive to experimentation, my remote advisor is old-school-by-the-book, too practical and grounded-to-rules kind of a person and might be difficult to persuade. The contrast between them is so striking when I think about issues such as these. :)

10/10/2008 22:17 #46053

I meet The Evil Dr. Fing!
Category: e:strip
Yeah! It finally happened! I was walking out the main hospital and I thought the face in front of me was really really familiar - like a friend you see in a 125px x 150px window almost everyday. It was the evil (well, not really but it sounds so cool!) Dr. Fing!!!!!!

It was wonderful to finally meet you (e:fing)! I wish you and your wife good luck with the baby!!! Hope it all goes well when the exciting time rolls around. Personally, I am just jealous of the baby already. I always wanted my own room with orange-accented walls and cool artwork! :^)

PS: I actually can't believe I am so involved in my (e:strip) screen persona that I forgot to tell you my real name and introduced myself as tinypliny! Yikes.

metalpeter - 10/11/08 17:21
I can kinda believe that it makes sense since you said you meet (e:fing) and didn't mention him by name. I know at one point a got your real name and had trouble saying it so you are (e:tinypliny) and I don't even remember your real name.

10/05/2008 17:53 #45948

Apparently, E:strippers LOVE OMGBlog!
Category: e:strip
According to this site's statistics about (e:strip), we have a more than 138 times likelihood of visiting omgblog as compared to the average netizen. In addition, we are also 90 times more likely to be wannabe health care practitioners. Does that make us OMGdocs?

image

And, that's not all. Less that one percent of us are official quantified (e:strip) addicts.
image

The average (e:strip) visitor is a hispanic male teenage kid who comes from a middle income household and is not precocious enough to have entered a college.

image

Who knew?!

___________
How the hell are these statistics even calculated???!!!
metalpeter - 10/06/08 18:16
Interesting based on visitors and not users seems odd. I take it that this isn't you non politcal correct journal that you where working on, I'm still waiting to see why you think people won't like you after that.
gardenmama - 10/06/08 00:05
I don't think I've ever been to any of those sites, unless it was by accident. I don't think I'm a hispanic teenager either.
james - 10/05/08 18:37
man, the bots must all be teen age hispanics. Who knew.
drew - 10/05/08 18:26
I don't visit any of them--yet.

I'm thinking that most of us posters are addicts, but there are so many more visitors than posters.

10/08/2008 22:44 #46006

Single.. er.. Double Issue Voting
Category: opinion
I feel like I should take a stance today, now that I feel conflicted about the shaky economic policies of not only the right, central and left winged but also, the wingless scum in politics.

If I had franchise (I don't, unfortunately. So this is basically building a stance-castle in pure air), I would MOST CERTAINLY NOT vote for:

1. People who are against abortion and euphemistically call themselves pro-life.

Several reasons:

-- I think the health and quality of life of women is important to the future of mankind. You cannot have unhappy, ill-treated women who are sick in mind and in body and expect their children (of either gender) to be healthy and lead fruitful and enriching lives or better this planet in the future.

-- Banning abortion not just takes away health-rights of women and decreases their quality of life, but also opens the wicker gate to the insanity of illegal non-medically approved life-threatening amateur abortion practices. Nothing can be more cruel to any living being than dying with a stick or a chemical abortifacient eroding your uterus just because some block-headed self-appointed judgemental delusional rich woman with several people to look after her own brood of kids decided that you need to carry your foetus to term as well, because she did and that some insular "God" of hers thinks its the "right" thing to do. Yeah, shame on you if you are not a "caring sacrifice-making parent" regardless of whether you can or cannot afford it, mentally, physically, emotionally and financially. Who cares about the mom, right? We just need to bring as many kids into this world as we possibly can regardless of the cost to the woman. They can take care of themselves and also their kids. If I did it, well, so can anyone.

-- Double-standard-ridden privileged freaks who are far far away from understanding what it is like to be a helpless real-world middle class single poor woman who is also pregnant do not really deserve to be honoured with the status and title of a "woman".

-- Making abortion a social stigma is just as bad, if not worse. Not only do you judge women for the simple fact that she wants control over her dizzyingly out of control life but make it mentally, psychologically and emotionally a trauma for her to get even a legal abortion. Can you be any more effective in violating the human rights of a living being? I think not.

2. People who still believe in Creationism.

-- Frankly, at this point, after centuries of scientific proof, you are shuddering-ly scary. Your ignorance points to the fact that you are happy living under a rock. What will you do when medical principles behind this "far-fetched" "fiction" of evolution lead to the conception and design of drugs/therapies that cure cancer (and yes, I see this happening in the future)? Will you go into self-denial and refuse to take these drugs. I hope you do. The world would be rid of morons like you. Ugh

Yeah, these two issues are going to be my two heavy and stable cornerstones of political decisions for now.



@(e:metalpeter): This is not my "tough" post either. That needs to be on the back-burner some more time.
tinypliny - 10/11/08 19:24
"What I think that means is that it wasn't 7 literal days that was the passing of time."

Okay, fair enough. :)

"When I was in school there was this theory that all the animals where on one big land mass and it broke apart and that is why you have some animals that are the same but have slight differeces on different continents."

Actually, that land mass is called the Pangaea :::link::: It's not a theory because its borne out by fossil evidence, the existence of continental drift, geology of several continental mountain ranges, earthquake faults, and plate tectonics :::link:::

"In the tower of bable story....If there where people on that land mass before it broke away then the tower of babel would make sense."

How would you then explain several human evolutionary species (not just one species) with some species sharing a continuum of anatomic characteristics and some completely different?

"I think science is a kind of faith."

If faith is borne out by solid proof left, right and centre, almost DAILY in a continuous stream of scientific findings from around the globe, well, then it is faith, I suppose. I would much rather relate to a faith that doesn't rely on blind unprovable scoping about.


"When you die your body loses 21grams of weight?"

That unfortunate pseudoscience charade has been debunked completely. :::link::: Besides being statistically inaccurate, the methodology behind the 1907 article claiming this myth was terribly flawed. Additionally, the bodily functions continue after death because they are chemical in nature and not organic. Gases emitted from the body after death can easily amount to around 200 - 300 grams or more. I am not sure Hollywood movies are a credible source for argument that creationism is believable.


"I think that science and Realigon don't have all the answers and some of what is thought is wrong on both sides."

I agree we don't have all the answers. However, Creationism is an unnecessary and completely inaccurate theory that is trying to worm into biology classes in the pretext of "objectivity". If anyone is interested in objectivity they really don't need to look any further than Science. When religion is subject to an objective evaluation, every single story and myth fall apart. Creationism is one of them. While scientists take pains to point out alternative explanations to their theories and provide proof to the contrary all the time, I don't see any creationists even questioning what they believe. The mere absence of self-evaluation is an indication that the theory of creationism is too fragile and fails to stand up to even a modicum of objective and logical questioning.
metalpeter - 10/11/08 17:18
Here is one Idea that would explain both Creationsim and Evolution at the same time. I'm sorry that I don't remember every single fact from the bible I haven't read all of it. There is this part where God Created the world. Everything took six days and then he rested On the 7th. What I think that means is that it wasn't 7 literal days that was the passing of time. Sorry I don't remember what he made on all six days but he did make animals first and humans later. Who says that the way of the humans being made wasn't evolution. When I was in school there was this theory that all the animals where on one big land mass and it broke apart and that is why you have some animals that are the same but have slight differeces on different continents. In the tower of bable story. Yes the did a cartoon version of this with a giant egg king. The basics of the story is that Man Kind built a tower to try and be with god and he destoryed it and sent the people all over the world and said that they will all speak there own langueges and won't be albe to understand each other until they speak the word of god. That could mean untill they are in heaven or untill they understand god or are uninted in his ways, how ever you want to say that. If there where people on that land mass before it broke away then the tower of babel would make sense. I think science is a kind of faith. Yes there are laws and rules and formulas and things that can be quantified but have they figured out why when you die your body loses 21grams of weight? yes there was a movie I never saw based on that. Some people think that is the loss of the soul. There are something that both science and faith seem like they are saying are different but they really are the same. I do think that animals evolve over time. But look at the balance of nature or currently the unbalance of it, some Indian tribes (sorry to sterotype) might cry over that when they see the balance is off and they don't need science for that. I'm not saying that I'm a heavy believer and I think that science and Realigon don't have all the answers and some of what is thought is wrong on both sides.
tinypliny - 10/09/08 23:39
OOPS, I missed this comment. :)

@metalpeter:
"There is no reason why you can't believe that god created the world. ..."

If you like I can list around 584,806 reasons from the biological, chemical, physical sciences why I can believe that "God" did NOT create the world as portrayed by creationists. I don't contest the fact that "God" might have had a hand in guiding evolution. ;-)

"I also want to ad that you can Science and Creationism can both be kinda right at the same time."

Really? Can you give me an example where Creationism is as believable and logical as the scientific explanation?? I am really interested as to why you would say that.
tinypliny - 10/09/08 22:46
More like a fetushark. HaHaHa.

I agree with all, except one, of your opinions (e:Jason). Calling abortion rights a necessary evil is not really doing anything to erase and lessen the social stigma behind it.

I see the argument behind the evil tag attached to abortion, but I don't see any grey areas when it comes to choice. Either you support it or you are against it. You cannot support the concept for some reasons and view it with disdain for others. This ambiguity is what forms the foundations of the construct of a "social stigma".

Medically and legally, a fetus is considered to be a baby after 20 weeks or so (may differ a bit in different countries). This is when all organogenesis has taken place and the baby could potentially be viable and alive with some machine support were it born premature. Before this period of time, the fetus is just that - a systematic growing mass of cells.

I don't see any of the ethical arguments against abortion at the fetal stage being ANY different from calling stem cell research unethical and "evil".

Both arguments and really, any stigma, is often rooted in religious and unscientific beliefs and biased mores. They are an impractical and ostrich-like approach to the problems facing real humans in real situations. If we want to move forward as a race (of humans), we need to be clear about how our ambiguity in opinion and grey areas in practice have seeded and nurtured these so-called "stigmas" and eventually dragged down quality of life for many of us.
jason - 10/09/08 19:16
Peter I agree with much of what you're saying. But check this out: If a chickenhawk is someone who advocates war while not daring to send anyone dear to him into the fight, what do we call someone who advocates abortion but refuses to abort one of their own? A Fetushawk? Heh, just jokin.
metalpeter - 10/09/08 18:59
Well if this isn't your tough post I can't wait to see it now. In terms of Abortion you make some good points. The thing that gets lost is Often People who are Pro-Choice get labeled as liking abortions, that isn't true they think that women should be allowed to have them, that doesn't mean that they approve of them. Yes you can be anti abortion and still be pro choice. The term pro-life isn't right either. If you are pro life then you think abortion should be illegal but see if they where illegal then women who got them illegaly would sometimes die so that isn't really being or life.

In terms of the creationism: There is no reason why you can't believe that god created the world. But there are questions that it doesn't answer what about the other planets did he create them also? amd if so then why no life on those planets? I get that is faith and they Have a right to believe that. I also want to ad that you can Science and Creationism can both be kinda right at the same time.
jason - 10/09/08 11:47
Yeah, Tiny, I hope so too - social change usually isn't immediate, right? =)
theecarey - 10/09/08 10:47
indeed!

and the general stigma can change over time; at least that is what I hope for too.
jason - 10/09/08 07:39
First of all, I've said this before but I'll say it again - I see abortion as a necessary evil, like war. It reflects poorly on us, we are only slightly less savage than we ever have been, but abortion has to be legal and it has to be safe because it isn't a perfect world out there.

1) I don't think that being pro-life means you are anti-women's health, or that you want them to be unhappy. I'm willing to give the pro-lifers at least that much.

2) Totally agree, and to me it is another case of people thinking government action eliminates "bad" behavior. Abortions will still happen, under conditions nobody should accept. It isn't a perfect world!!!

3) Totally agree about the double standard as it applies to people being completely ignorant of what goes on outside of their bubble.

4) We can't do anything about the stigma. People have sovereignty and can accept or reject anything freely. I myself think everything has its limits. Let's worry more about the legal and political issues that people can see a tangible benefit from.

5) Creationism - gah. Again, people can believe what they want. I just don't want it taught in biology class.
imk2 - 10/09/08 07:26
AMEN, sister!
james - 10/09/08 02:45
Sadly, I think many people get suckered into the GOP on issues like abortion or creationism and just come to believe every other part of the platform as a show of support for that single issue. My mom, for example, is really a democrat at heart. But her support for restricting abortion to the point where it kills mothers has made her gradually accept destroying social security, support Iraq, and be fearful of Muslims.

Any argument that reducing poverty reduces the number of abortions wont sway her, a drop of fetus blood and the whole party is tainted.

Poor bastards.
johnallen - 10/09/08 01:59
You go girl. I like to thake this and throw this hooplaa back at them. How is taking away human rights, women's health, and sometimes even her life christian at all? Short answer is it's not. That's why I love being an Episcopalian, we're allowed to think.