Oh ya, this election season is going to fricken rock!
First off, the GOP has the worst field of candidates possible. Which makes me giggle. But then, what is this? Quinipiac has a poll that shows Guiliani beating the snot out of Hilly, Obama, Edwards, and Richardson in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida. But can't win against Al Gore. Guiliani moderate image (and let's face it, he is putting on a show for his party, he is pretty fly for a GOP guy on abortion, GLBT rights, etc) tugs at the heart strings of swing stators.
But then what happens?
Michael Bloomberg tonight filed with the board of elections to change his party from Republican to non-affiliated. The man has an approval rating of 75% in NYC, and can steel the thunder from Edwards (poverty and education) Gore (environment, holy shit his green city plan is awesome) and Hilly (New Yorkers love him).
His announced plans are to finish his term in office until 2009 and then spend the rest of his days in philanthropy.
But yesterday he was in California speaking at the Google campus. It was not officially part of the series of stumping that presidential candidates have been doing (Clinton, Edwards, McCain, and Richardson). He spoke on Presidential topics like Iraq and Immigration. And in announcing his resignation from the Republican party he sited that two distant and entrenched parties are hurting America, Michael Bloomberg is sounding like the anti-partisan answer to the most pervasive problem in contemporary American politics.
It sounds like we may have a third party candidate who can pull some major support from both parties.
Watch out Bull Moose party, I think Bloomberg is out to topple your record.
My apologies to Leon Theremin for postponing my post about him.
James's Journal
My Podcast Link
06/19/2007 21:34 #39737
OMGWTF ROXOR06/19/2007 10:28 #39732
Pet SoundsEveryone loves the Beatles.
They are a very safe band to love. They have the ability for their fandom to encompass the burgeoning psychedelic with Sgt. Pepper, Rubber Soul, Revolver. The radio-friendly pop-rock of their early career. The avant-gaurde and fluxus with John and Yoko.
By liking the Beatles you can say that you are a man of taste. A universally likable person.
Over the last month we have been looking back and celebrating the 40th anniversary of the seminal Sgt. Pepper album. Yes, yes. A fine album. But man, we sure missed a bunch of great albums along the way.
For example, last year was the 40th anniversary of the Beach Boys' Pet Sounds album. And I did not hear even a bar of their cagillion part harmony on the radio. And it is an album, which I think, in the long run will be much more influential than Sgt. Pepper (next time you hear an orchestra, theramin, timpani, tuvan throat singing, anything other than a guitar, bass, drums, or keyboard you have Brian Wilson to thank).
Or this year we have the 30th anniversary of the Sex Pistols' Never mind the Bollocks album. That hits the big 3-0 this October. It is an album that defined punk which gave emo boys license to scream, metal bands license to burn churches, and something other than those fucking guitar lines in ska bands. Punk made rock, rock again. The swinging hips of Elvis were reborn as STD ridden filth children.
But, neither of these bands are nearly as likable as the Beatles. Wilson's tragedy isn't as compelling as the Beatles because he is mental ill. Where as the great tragedy of the Beatles is that the two least talented members are the only ones alive. And while punk may be coming back into fashion it is difficult for people to get hard thinking about heroin shooting Sid. Where as even Ringo has that muppety charm that could weasel a perked nipple on anyone.
so, happy birthday gents. I am sure Paul will be spending it with a Wings reunion tour.
They are a very safe band to love. They have the ability for their fandom to encompass the burgeoning psychedelic with Sgt. Pepper, Rubber Soul, Revolver. The radio-friendly pop-rock of their early career. The avant-gaurde and fluxus with John and Yoko.
By liking the Beatles you can say that you are a man of taste. A universally likable person.
Over the last month we have been looking back and celebrating the 40th anniversary of the seminal Sgt. Pepper album. Yes, yes. A fine album. But man, we sure missed a bunch of great albums along the way.
For example, last year was the 40th anniversary of the Beach Boys' Pet Sounds album. And I did not hear even a bar of their cagillion part harmony on the radio. And it is an album, which I think, in the long run will be much more influential than Sgt. Pepper (next time you hear an orchestra, theramin, timpani, tuvan throat singing, anything other than a guitar, bass, drums, or keyboard you have Brian Wilson to thank).
Or this year we have the 30th anniversary of the Sex Pistols' Never mind the Bollocks album. That hits the big 3-0 this October. It is an album that defined punk which gave emo boys license to scream, metal bands license to burn churches, and something other than those fucking guitar lines in ska bands. Punk made rock, rock again. The swinging hips of Elvis were reborn as STD ridden filth children.
But, neither of these bands are nearly as likable as the Beatles. Wilson's tragedy isn't as compelling as the Beatles because he is mental ill. Where as the great tragedy of the Beatles is that the two least talented members are the only ones alive. And while punk may be coming back into fashion it is difficult for people to get hard thinking about heroin shooting Sid. Where as even Ringo has that muppety charm that could weasel a perked nipple on anyone.
so, happy birthday gents. I am sure Paul will be spending it with a Wings reunion tour.
james - 06/20/07 10:24
Drew: they sell kits. It looks super easy.
Though most theramin sounds are made with keyboards and computers on recordings today.
libertad: yes, it is. The Sex Pistols ^_^
Drew: they sell kits. It looks super easy.
Though most theramin sounds are made with keyboards and computers on recordings today.
libertad: yes, it is. The Sex Pistols ^_^
libertad - 06/19/07 21:40
STD ridden filth children...is that a band?
STD ridden filth children...is that a band?
drew - 06/19/07 16:58
I also love the theramin, and hope to make one some day, although I have neither the time nor the talent.
I also love the theramin, and hope to make one some day, although I have neither the time nor the talent.
james - 06/19/07 16:21
The Theramin is one of my favorite instruments.
1) The story of its creator is cold war amazing awesome.
2) It is featured heavily on bad sci-fi soundtracks
3) it is the only instrument that is played without touching it.
a post titled "Everything I know about the Theramin" is to follow
Joshua: I am not a Beatles fan. I do however love Brian Wilson. So, I hope that explains my tone a little.
MrMike: Indeed sir
Jenks: there is a cosmic order to things.
The Theramin is one of my favorite instruments.
1) The story of its creator is cold war amazing awesome.
2) It is featured heavily on bad sci-fi soundtracks
3) it is the only instrument that is played without touching it.
a post titled "Everything I know about the Theramin" is to follow
Joshua: I am not a Beatles fan. I do however love Brian Wilson. So, I hope that explains my tone a little.
MrMike: Indeed sir
Jenks: there is a cosmic order to things.
jason - 06/19/07 16:12
Also, color me impressed that you are aware what a theramin is.
Also, color me impressed that you are aware what a theramin is.
jason - 06/19/07 15:20
You are absolutely right about Pet Sounds. No less than Sir Paul himself thinks it's a gold standard.
You are absolutely right about Pet Sounds. No less than Sir Paul himself thinks it's a gold standard.
joshua - 06/19/07 12:39
People compare Sgt. Pepper and Pet Sounds all the time, but in truth Pet Sounds was the first. Sgt. Pepper was the Beatles' "Pet Sounds" capped off with a psychodelic, pseudo-hippiesh influenced twist. The Beatles even admitted as much that Sgt. Pepper was a reaction to Pet Sounds. That being said it was still a fine album and innovative in many ways. The cover art is legendary, they utilized new recording technology and because they were The Beatles I think this is why many consider Sgt. Pepper to be more influential, although without Pet Sounds Sgt. Pepper probably would never have materialized.
To be honest though, Sgt. Pepper isn't my favorite Beatles album and I prefer Pet Sounds in general. Rolling Stone has them at #1 and #2 of all time but I usually feel that trying to quantify albums in such a way is a pointless venture. Gimme Rubber Soul anyday.
People compare Sgt. Pepper and Pet Sounds all the time, but in truth Pet Sounds was the first. Sgt. Pepper was the Beatles' "Pet Sounds" capped off with a psychodelic, pseudo-hippiesh influenced twist. The Beatles even admitted as much that Sgt. Pepper was a reaction to Pet Sounds. That being said it was still a fine album and innovative in many ways. The cover art is legendary, they utilized new recording technology and because they were The Beatles I think this is why many consider Sgt. Pepper to be more influential, although without Pet Sounds Sgt. Pepper probably would never have materialized.
To be honest though, Sgt. Pepper isn't my favorite Beatles album and I prefer Pet Sounds in general. Rolling Stone has them at #1 and #2 of all time but I usually feel that trying to quantify albums in such a way is a pointless venture. Gimme Rubber Soul anyday.
mrmike - 06/19/07 11:27
Pet Sounds is an awesome album. I liked Brian Wilson's reprise of the whole thing a few years back. Born to Run turned 30 awhile back too. I'm not holding my breath for the Wings tour ;)
Pet Sounds is an awesome album. I liked Brian Wilson's reprise of the whole thing a few years back. Born to Run turned 30 awhile back too. I'm not holding my breath for the Wings tour ;)
jenks - 06/19/07 10:45
funny... i was JUST talking about that (beach boys/pet sounds) the other day.
funny... i was JUST talking about that (beach boys/pet sounds) the other day.
06/17/2007 18:57 #39707
In inescapable grasp of the summer BBQ(e:Jim) and I had a BBQ for the Buffalo flickr group yesterday.
The rules went like this
We provide meat, buns, and condiments you folks provide side dishes and beverages. Only one person told us they would be bringing anything before the day of the BBQ, so here is what I made on the fly.
Fake Tapenada
tomatoes, black olives, green olives, garlic, and parsley whirled up in my beloved food processor toped on sourdough bread toasted with butter.
time: eight minutes
Everything but the kitchen sink salad
Romaine, carrots, cucumber, croutons, capers, parmesan cheese. Bottled caesar dressing (home made creamy dressings gross me out to make.)
time: six minutes
Not Just cow hamburgers
80% lean chop meat, worcestershire sauce, oats, garlic, cayenne pepper, more salt than you really should use, 2 eggs.
time: five minutes
let me tell you, there is nothing as disgusting as mixing six pounds of chop meat and eggs in an aluminum bowl. The bowl chills with the meat in it and cold metal and meat is just gross.
Well, folks showed up, and they brought stuff in abundance in a delightful uncoordinated way. We have four bags of tortilla chips, a gallon of salsa, and so much beer. OH so much beer. Most of the beer is gone now. Through we did get a mini-keg of Heineken which went largely untouched to to its late arrival. I am not much for light beer and Jim doesn't drink the stuff. So if you want it, it is yours.
Alternatively, we could have a nacho and light beer party.
yum,
The rules went like this
We provide meat, buns, and condiments you folks provide side dishes and beverages. Only one person told us they would be bringing anything before the day of the BBQ, so here is what I made on the fly.
Fake Tapenada
tomatoes, black olives, green olives, garlic, and parsley whirled up in my beloved food processor toped on sourdough bread toasted with butter.
time: eight minutes
Everything but the kitchen sink salad
Romaine, carrots, cucumber, croutons, capers, parmesan cheese. Bottled caesar dressing (home made creamy dressings gross me out to make.)
time: six minutes
Not Just cow hamburgers
80% lean chop meat, worcestershire sauce, oats, garlic, cayenne pepper, more salt than you really should use, 2 eggs.
time: five minutes
let me tell you, there is nothing as disgusting as mixing six pounds of chop meat and eggs in an aluminum bowl. The bowl chills with the meat in it and cold metal and meat is just gross.
Well, folks showed up, and they brought stuff in abundance in a delightful uncoordinated way. We have four bags of tortilla chips, a gallon of salsa, and so much beer. OH so much beer. Most of the beer is gone now. Through we did get a mini-keg of Heineken which went largely untouched to to its late arrival. I am not much for light beer and Jim doesn't drink the stuff. So if you want it, it is yours.
Alternatively, we could have a nacho and light beer party.
yum,
ladycroft - 06/17/07 20:07
no no no! i called first dibs! me eme me me!
no no no! i called first dibs! me eme me me!
drew - 06/17/07 20:05
I can help with that, too. And isn't the photo pool trying to curry my favor?
I can help with that, too. And isn't the photo pool trying to curry my favor?
mrmike - 06/17/07 20:04
Free Heine?? Cool, if it needs a home, just yell.
Free Heine?? Cool, if it needs a home, just yell.
ladycroft - 06/17/07 19:58
holy shit i love hieni!! me me me!!! oh pick me!
holy shit i love hieni!! me me me!!! oh pick me!
06/14/2007 21:04 #39662
Oh Mother Russia, I Take it All Back!Hi,
Over the last month or so I have been rehashing reports about how backwards Russia is on Gay rights. Backwards, my history training tells me, is both a word considered insensitive as well as often heard in reference to Russia. And while smuggling a radioactive agent across several borders to poison a states enemy is pretty hot shit, where as having fat bearded priests gathering hordes of dull eyed ass midgets to harass gay people at a meeting place is backwards. Yes, not permitted to love in public we will fuck on the fringes of society. That is how it works Mr.Bishop. Sorry it happened to be a shrine. Boo hoo.
backwards Russia, backwards.
Say it with me, backwards.
But then, something like this happens and for some reason two guys can have hot oral sex in public with a cheering crowd around them.
And Russia, I have to think that maybe you aren't all bad.
Nostrovia
Over the last month or so I have been rehashing reports about how backwards Russia is on Gay rights. Backwards, my history training tells me, is both a word considered insensitive as well as often heard in reference to Russia. And while smuggling a radioactive agent across several borders to poison a states enemy is pretty hot shit, where as having fat bearded priests gathering hordes of dull eyed ass midgets to harass gay people at a meeting place is backwards. Yes, not permitted to love in public we will fuck on the fringes of society. That is how it works Mr.Bishop. Sorry it happened to be a shrine. Boo hoo.
backwards Russia, backwards.
Say it with me, backwards.
But then, something like this happens and for some reason two guys can have hot oral sex in public with a cheering crowd around them.
And Russia, I have to think that maybe you aren't all bad.
Nostrovia
jason - 06/15/07 08:15
Amen, James. Amen.
Amen, James. Amen.
james - 06/15/07 00:03
No, I would say that the whole of Russia is backwards. The state hates them some homos, and there is always a ton of people to back it up.
Such as when an international group of people working for GLBT rights brought a petition to the Moscow municipal government and a gang of citizen fascists beat the fuck out of them and then the state arrested the petitioners, not the fascist assholes. Following that there have been something like nine stabbings in Moscow of gay people. This is all in the last month.
So, when two guys in some outling town can get it on in public and be cheered, man... that would be like electing a black, muslim, lesbian president of the US. I suspect an Atlantis cruise was in town or something.
Tis a strange, strange world.
No, I would say that the whole of Russia is backwards. The state hates them some homos, and there is always a ton of people to back it up.
Such as when an international group of people working for GLBT rights brought a petition to the Moscow municipal government and a gang of citizen fascists beat the fuck out of them and then the state arrested the petitioners, not the fascist assholes. Following that there have been something like nine stabbings in Moscow of gay people. This is all in the last month.
So, when two guys in some outling town can get it on in public and be cheered, man... that would be like electing a black, muslim, lesbian president of the US. I suspect an Atlantis cruise was in town or something.
Tis a strange, strange world.
fellyconnelly - 06/14/07 22:48
would you say then that the state is quite backwards, while the general population is more accepting? or is it just a chance happening that everyone was cheering?
would you say then that the state is quite backwards, while the general population is more accepting? or is it just a chance happening that everyone was cheering?
06/14/2007 14:38 #39658
The GoonsI love Metafilter.
It means that if I find a good link I can waste the better part of an afternoon. In this case though, it was a comment on a question in which the person didn't know what he was talking about. An irrelevant introduction to what I am talking about: the goons.
Before there was Money Python there were (WIKIPEDIA - The_Goon_Show). A comedic trio, deadpan BBC announcer, and a live band. The show was broadcast before a live audience on radio in the early 1950's and had a very brief incarnation as a TV program.
The show lives on the sort of absurd puns that made Python iconic and which influenced generations of comedians. For example:
There is the reoccurring villain the Red Bladder. Or in the riding hood sketch a nervous elderly noblewoman asks her stage coach driver "where are we" to which he replies "Riding in a coach madam." Which, on its own isn't that funny but each line in the show is a rhythm of set up and punch line. The collective chuckle of each mediocre joke gets a weigh of immense hilarity. It is the sort of writing and performance that is at a break neck pace. You wonder how the heck anyone could have the stamina to do this.
The three principle comedians involved are Spike Milligan, Harry Secombe, and Peter Sellers of Being There and [i]Pink Panther[i] fame.
The show makes heavy use of special effects. The sort of sureal noises created in a lab and used in really strange context. Stranger still are the various voices the actors use. A beloved retarded man who when asked a question replies "hold on, I have it written down on a piece of paper" even when asked 'what time is it' or 'who are you?' it is a reoccurring character. You just wet yourself when you hear it.
And you should hear it. There is a streaming podcast, which is getting me through work today. Check it out.
It means that if I find a good link I can waste the better part of an afternoon. In this case though, it was a comment on a question in which the person didn't know what he was talking about. An irrelevant introduction to what I am talking about: the goons.
Before there was Money Python there were (WIKIPEDIA - The_Goon_Show). A comedic trio, deadpan BBC announcer, and a live band. The show was broadcast before a live audience on radio in the early 1950's and had a very brief incarnation as a TV program.
The show lives on the sort of absurd puns that made Python iconic and which influenced generations of comedians. For example:
There is the reoccurring villain the Red Bladder. Or in the riding hood sketch a nervous elderly noblewoman asks her stage coach driver "where are we" to which he replies "Riding in a coach madam." Which, on its own isn't that funny but each line in the show is a rhythm of set up and punch line. The collective chuckle of each mediocre joke gets a weigh of immense hilarity. It is the sort of writing and performance that is at a break neck pace. You wonder how the heck anyone could have the stamina to do this.
The three principle comedians involved are Spike Milligan, Harry Secombe, and Peter Sellers of Being There and [i]Pink Panther[i] fame.
The show makes heavy use of special effects. The sort of sureal noises created in a lab and used in really strange context. Stranger still are the various voices the actors use. A beloved retarded man who when asked a question replies "hold on, I have it written down on a piece of paper" even when asked 'what time is it' or 'who are you?' it is a reoccurring character. You just wet yourself when you hear it.
And you should hear it. There is a streaming podcast, which is getting me through work today. Check it out.
Well, Thompson is the de facto favorite amongst conservative voters - its interesting to me that at this point he is ahead of Giuliani by a percent although he hasn't declared yet... statistically meaningless but interesting.
I generally agree with you that there is some disenfranchised red staters and that without a candidate with stronger traditional GOP positions on the soft issues turnout might be a problem. For a guy like Giuliani I think the key will be whether or not he can lure more independents to make up the difference if he gets the nomination... which in my view he will not win if Thompson gets in.
As far as political hemispheres are concerned, with respect to Mike Bloomberg, he is who he is. I think he would have succeeded in NYC regardless of his party affiliation, although Bloomberg in effect switched to the Republican party because the Dem candidate pool was too saturated. His views reflect the views of a majority of his constituents, he gets shit done and his favorable rating is Clintonesque.
Ron Paul - he's an incredibly principled guy. He refuses to vote yes for war funding because of the fact that pork is attached - that takes balls when you can easily be accused of abandoning the troops. A lot of people respect what he is about but with 1% of the attention at this point he's beyond a long shot.
With respect to the GOP, I like a broad range of ideological diversity within the parties and the GOP suffers because of this. Republicans don't believe that the way to beat Democrats is to make a big left turn so I don't think this will happen anytime soon.
Honestly, I wish I could just have politicians like JFK again.
Joshua: Unless Thompson wins I don't think the candidates currently can compell voters to turn out for them. Guliani fails the abortion and GLBT litmus for republicans (which is not to say there aren't super fly GOP folk) he is winning over folks with his New York City 9/11 air, which is mostly qualification by proximity (I was close to the attack, therefor I can run your country). I am curious if Bloomberg can mooch off some of that spirit as it wasn't too long after he took over the city and made it a much nicer political climate.
Basically, I am excited because a strong third party candidate will make this a very interesting election season. Good sport. So, I agree with much of what you say.
Mrdeadlier: See Joshuas comment about his party affiliation. I don't care for this two party deal. As if the whole spectrum of political thought can be contained in neat little hemispheres. That is why I am down with people like Bloomberg and Ron Paul who can giver their parties a little more elbow room to define themselves. Otherwise it would be a party of Santorum's and a party of Feingolds. And that would be creepy.
Drew: It is coming. Tomorrow, I promise.
Mayor Mike wasn't really ever a Republican. He was a lifelong Democrat until he ran for mayor. To be honest though, by looking at his policies anybody would have known that he wasn't really a GOPer. Mr. Bloomberg would be a textbook definition of a "RINO" in the non-pejorative usage of the word.
There is a lot of hub-bub about him running for president but he has stated that he wants to finish his term as mayor of NYC, as you said. I simply don't believe that he'll run despite the commotion.
Teddy Roosevelt as an "independant" got roughly 19% of the popular vote, which is astonishing since in the modern political context most believe that this wouldn't be possible these days. People discuss who would be most affected by a Bloomberg candidacy, and I tend to believe that Democrats would have the most to lose precisely because of his policies that you outlined. His policies barely if at all reflect GOP philosophical focus and as far as choices for the GOP-inclined are concerned he would be the most liberal... not exactly what most GOPers look for in a candidate. If he pulled meaningful support from a guy like Fred Thompson I would be astonished, but nothings impossible.
On the other hand though, I think that because of the poisonous political atmosphere (the worst since the late 60's) many people are disenchanted with politics. There is something to be said about this, but many are keenly aware of what I like to call the "Nader effect" from 2000. Did you notice how Democrats weren't fooled the second time around in 2004? I think to affect American politics in the populist scale Teddy Roosevelt did you would need someone far more charismatic and sellable to "middle America" than Michael Bloomberg.
(e:mrdeadlier) - Ron Paul is definitely libertarian - I think he aligns himself with the GOP for similar reasons that a guy like Bernie Sanders aligns himself with the donkeys. Its close but not exact.
Since you asked (oh wait), I have nothing but <3 for Ron Paul. He's the first candidate I've ever actually wanted to jump on board with. He's a registered Republican but come on, he's just a Libertarian who can't admit it to himself.
I don't know Bloomberg, but a third party can only be good.
And I want the Theremin Post! C'mon!