Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Dcoffee's Journal

dcoffee
My Podcast Link

11/12/2005 20:59 #21693

Kitten
Category: photos
picture from today.




image

indo - 02/07/06 16:46
those are freakin sweet eyes, I wish I had a kitty, especially one that looks like her
jim - 11/12/05 23:19
yeah, very striking. i've seen your pics on flickr before, looking through the buffalo tag. you've got some nice ones.
drchlorine - 11/12/05 22:12
She is beautiful!
dcoffee - 11/12/05 21:51
yep. she's about 6-7 months old now.
jim - 11/12/05 21:02
Is that your cat?

11/12/2005 01:29 #21692

At the Statler Tonight...
Category: photos
We went to go see Dar Williams at the Statler Towers tonight.
image

The Building is an amazing piece of Buffalo's history. we took some time to explore before heading into the Randezvous room to see Girlyman and Dar Williams.

image
Dar Williams on Stage in the Randezvous Room

image
it was tough to get a clear picture, she moved around a lot.


after the concert we realy explored...
image
yep, we found this view while exploring. in the near future this window and it's view of city hall will be part of a condominnium. you will actually be able to own this amazing space in the heart of downtown. I think it's fantastic, wish I could afford it.
indo - 02/07/06 16:52
wow you make our city hall look nice and not like a penis :) nice photos, they're beautiful
dcoffee - 11/13/05 17:16
Norstar is already in the first phase of construction.
buffalopundit - 11/13/05 11:35
Are there plans to convert the Statler to condo units? I hadn't heard anything about that.

11/08/2005 12:18 #21691

Please Vote
Category: politics
Today is the day.

Voting is especially important in local elections. 500 votes can mean life or death in these types of elections.

if you are fed up and you feel disenfranchised by the electoral system Vote for Judy.

if you want to tell the Democratic and Republican machines of Buffalo and Erie County that we are not going to tolorate their corruption any longer, vote for Judy.

Why? because she genuinely cares about this city. she is not in it for the paycheck or the perks or the power, she is running for mayor because she feels an obligation to help.

Good intentions do not mean everything however, and luckily Judy has the skills and the background to make her absolutely qualified. She was director of a project here in Buffalo which helped over 90 low to moderate income people set up and manage their own businesses. Why spend money on Bass Pro whose proffits are mostly going out of state, let's invest in our own people and help them utalize their own creativity and ambition.
in addition she earned her Masters from the Harvard Graduate School of Education where she focused her studies on community problem solving and decision making. maybe it's just me but I think it's a good idea to base Buffalo's decisions on research, rather than who knows who, and who gets money out of the deal.

if you still have doubts go to her website and watch the debate, or the interviews. you can see her honesty and determination for yourself.


See you at the polls
you have until 9:00pm






image

dcoffee - 11/08/05 19:39
very true uncut. it is a belittling practice. I'm just using Judy for the superficial reason that it's catchier than Einach. it's more memorable and good for advertising. but you're definitely right. I should ask her if she prefers Einach.
jason - 11/08/05 15:53
I may very well vote for Judy. I'm still undecided.
uncutsaniflush - 11/08/05 15:07
I voted for Einach. I have a question or two- Why "vote for Judy" instead of "vote for Einach"? Is the Einach name somehow tainted?

Historically, feminists have viewed referring to women by their first names while also referred to men by their last names as part of the historical marginalization of women.

I recently read a post where reference was made to Brown, Helfer and Judy. This struck me as odd.

To my way of thinking, it should be Byron, Kevin, and Judy or Brown, Helfer, and Einach.

But that's just me. I'm weird. I've been told that I can see nuances so subtle that they aren't even there.

11/07/2005 23:59 #21690

War Justification - recap
Category: politics
I stumbled upon an old quote from our great leader, George W, from the day before the war in Iraq began.

Some of you will remember that day, March 17, 2003, Bush got on prime time TV and demanded that Saddam Hussein and his sons leave Iraq within 48 hours. seems like a reasonable request to me! *sarcasm* First we asked him to let the UN weapons inspectors back into his country or we would start a war, so he did, that fool, he must be just trying to trick us, let's try something harder! Leave your Country Bastard!!

Here's the Quote, and a link to the Presidents adress. it is interesting to read these things from today's perspective, knowing all that we do now about the situation. his statment sounds grave, but the monster that he is confronting is in reality a weak paper tiger. no links to Al-Qaeda and no WMD.

anyway the justification, straight forward...

"The danger is clear: Using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country, or any other."



11/07/2005 01:05 #21689

Torture Exemption
Category: politics
[size=l]Cheney wants CIA to be Exempt from ban on Torture[/size]

I saw that headline on the Buffalo News yesterday, and I was simply astounded. I don't know how people can say that kind of stuff with a straight face and think it's OK. Seriously, what have we become.

I posted about this amendment before
[inlink]dcoffee,21[/inlink]Bush loves Torture
[inlink]dcoffee,22[/inlink]PS. on anti-torture amendment

for anyone on the fence about using torture, you don't get credible or useful information from someone by beating them up, you must befriend them and make them trust you. convince them that you are not an enemy and help them open up to you. torture either leads to people saying whatever you want to hear, or it validates the idea that America is the great Satan and if you die by our hands you are surely going to heaven as a martyr.




anyway here's the Full article

Cheney wants CIA to be exempt from ban on torture
By DAVID ESPO and LIZ SIDOTI
Associated Press
11/5/2005


WASHINGTON - Vice President Cheney made an unusual personal appeal to Republican senators this week to exempt the CIA from a proposed ban on torturing terror suspects in U.S. custody, according to participants in the closed-door session.

Cheney told his audience the United States doesn't engage in torture, these participants said, even though he said the administration needed an exemption from any legislation banning "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment in case the president decided such treatment was necessary to prevent a terrorist attack.

The vice president made his comments at a regular weekly private meeting of Senate Republicans, according to several lawmakers who attended. Cheney often attends the meetings, a chance for the rank-and-file to discuss legislative strategy, but he rarely speaks.

In this case, the room was cleared of aides before the vice president began his remarks, which one senator said included a reference to classified material.

The officials who disclosed the events spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the confidential nature of the discussion.

"The vice president's office doesn't have any comment on a private meeting with members of the Senate," said Steve Schmidt, a Cheney spokesman.

During the session, Cheney drew support from at least one lawmaker, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, while Sen. John McCain of Arizona dissented, officials said.

McCain, who was tortured while he was a prisoner during the Vietnam War, is the chief Senate sponsor of an anti-torture provision that has twice cleared the Senate and triggered veto threats from the White House.

Cheney's decision to speak at the meeting underscored both his role as White House point man on the contentious issue and the importance the administration attaches to it.

The vice president made his appeal as Congress is struggling with the torture issue in light of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq and allegations of mistreatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the United States houses about 500 detainees at a naval base, many of them captured in Afghanistan.

In addition, human rights organizations contend the United States turns detainees over to other countries that it knows will use torture to extract intelligence information.

Cheney's appeal came on Tuesday, two days before a former senior State Department official claimed in an interview with National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" that he had traced memos back to Cheney's office that he believes led to U.S. troops abusing prisoners in Iraq.

Lawrence Wilkerson, former Secretary of State Colin Powell's chief of staff in the first Bush administration, said Thursday that Cheney's views were put in "carefully couched" terms in memos but that to a soldier in the field it meant sometimes using interrogation techniques that "were not in accordance with the spirit of the Geneva Conventions and the law of war" to extract better intelligence.

The Senate recently approved a provision banning the "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of detainees in U.S. custody. The vote was 90-9, and an identical provision was added to a second measure on a voice vote Friday.

Comparable House legislation does not include the provision, and it is not clear whether anti-torture language will be included in either of two large defense measures Congress hopes to send to Bush's desk later this year.

The White House initially tried to kill the anti-torture provision while it was pending in the Senate, then switched course to lobby for an exemption in cases of "clandestine counterterrorism operations conducted abroad, with respect to terrorists who are not citizens of the United States."



dcoffee - 11/07/05 23:24
thanks Jason, I know we disagree on some things, and this pertucular issue would be better discussed in person, but I always appreciate your perspective.
jason - 11/07/05 10:32
"for anyone on the fence about using torture, you don't get credible or useful information from someone by beating them up, you must befriend them and make them trust you. convince them that you are not an enemy and help them open up to you."

Shocking (no pun intended), grievous waste of time. It is this kind of National Security stance that is slowly rendering the Democrats irrelevant, and is proving to be the downfall of Europe. Yes, get the Islamo-fascists to be our friends and trust us. Give them coffee and donuts and ask them "Pweeze Mr. Terrorist where is the bomb?" Do you not know that the Al Qaeda "manual" instructs jihadists to lie and deceive? Interrogation has been honed and perfected for many centuries - if the method you subscribe to were in any way effective, of course they would do it!

Now don't get me wrong. I'm not for torture. Then again anything and everything passes as "torture" nowadays. Yes, scare the daylights out of them, kick the shit out of them, threaten their life, have the german shepherds bark at them. Don't dismember them, electrocute them, or anything truly sadistic but force the information out of them.