I hope you guys are reading WNY Media, it is emerging as the best web based local News source. I understand that for programers and web designers like myself it can be painful because of the many flaws in the code. it's not nearly as slick as Buffalo Rising but the content is good. Also WNY Media is very open for people to join and add their own articles. I started working with them in May and have seen it transition into a dedicated news cooperative. some of the stories have quite a bit of investigative reporting behind them, many of the writers are intimately involved in the issues they cover.
They definitely need a programmer to poke around in their code for a while and fix the little flaws though. any volunteers?
Anyway I posted an article there recently about Judy Einach's press conferance, which talked about the casino and her letter to Gale Norton which was signed by a bunch of community and government leaders. the story was all but ignored by the mainstream media so I tried to do a decent job covering it on WNY Media. Usually when I write an article I post it here, but for this one I have to post a link, there's a bunch of formatting and stuff that goes with it, along with a terrible video I took at the event and a good picture. the full text of her letter and the speaches given at the press conference are there as well. take a look, I think it turned out very professional, except the video.
WNY Media article
Dcoffee's Journal
My Podcast Link
11/01/2005 22:32 #21687
My Newest ArticleCategory: politics
10/30/2005 22:33 #21686
Fall - Halloween picturesCategory: photos
I just updated my Flickr Blog, here are the highlights. Go to the Blog for more
We went for a walk this morning to savor the Fall
I was a Newspaper Reporter from the 70's and Molly was a Tree. we went to nietzsche's for the first time, then we went to Scotts House and spent the night.
New Kitty pictures, Revolution is getting really big.
We went for a walk this morning to savor the Fall
I was a Newspaper Reporter from the 70's and Molly was a Tree. we went to nietzsche's for the first time, then we went to Scotts House and spent the night.
New Kitty pictures, Revolution is getting really big.
10/28/2005 01:10 #21685
Mayoral Debate CommentsCategory: politics
I attended the Mayoral debate tonight, it was very interesting. From my perspective Judy did a realy fantastic job, and presented herself and her ideas very well. Brown and Helfer just made asses out of themselves by shamelessly attacking each other instead of fully answering the questions that were asked of them. they don't want to actually have a discussion with the citizens about that is wrong and how they are going to fix it because that's not their focus, their focus is on getting elected, not on helping the city overcome obstacles. so they will spend more time tearing down their 'opponent' than talking about issues.
Case in point, Helfers opening remarks were a rambling attack against Brown. you can watch the whole video on Channel 7 it's actually a really good debate. Brown made an ass out of himself by ignoring the casino question.. twice. the question was something like this "We know that you support the casino, but just so the public can be assured that you have thoroughly considered the matter, please tell us some of the major downfalls of a casino and how you plan to deal with it." I was absolutely enraged by his response and I literally almost shouted "answer the question!!!" before walking out or being escorted out. but I didn't, I listened as he listed off the reasons why he is FOR a casino, the same reasons he mentioned last week, didn't even come anywhere near a downside. but a panelist called him out and asked him again to answer the question, he said "there is a downside but..." that's it. What a fucking arrogant asshole.
Judy on the other hand did incredibly well, she was honest and blunt. she used strong language and you could tell that she meant what she said. she didn't waste time attacking the other candidates she simply spoke what she thought and her ideas were well thought out and very plausible. she lost her words a couple times but so did everyone else, so that doesn't stand out as much in the end as what she said.
Charlie Flyn was a joke, you can't take him seriously, and in fact people commonly chuckled after his responses as if he was some merry prankster. he raised some decent points and I was very happy to have him participate to get more perspectives on the table. I couldn't imagine if the debate was just between 'thing 1'and 'thing 2', it would be a hollow rhetorical sabotage fest devoid of issues.
Another thing that got on my nerves, Brown and helfer kept saying "my opponent" I wanted to scream "you have THREE opponents Asshole!!!!!" really, it's no wonder people feel like the political system is useless when nobody even acknowledges the third party candidates like Judy who actually have something interesting to say. I'm going to do some research on the Buffalo Snooze and see how much they have actually covered the third party candidates vs the coverage they give the two major parties. and I also want to see if the articles they do write about the mayoral election have anything to do with the issues. because every time I pick up that piece of crap it just talks about how much money they have raised or if race will be a factor, or some other frivolous bullshit. I did see one article on development that was terribly written and impossible to follow that compared Brown and Helfer on that issue.
Anyway, watch the debate, overall I thought it was really good. and if you live in Buffalo vote for Judy, tell our corrupt system to go fuck itself and vote for someone who is determined to change it. Judy's website is really good too, check it out
Case in point, Helfers opening remarks were a rambling attack against Brown. you can watch the whole video on Channel 7 it's actually a really good debate. Brown made an ass out of himself by ignoring the casino question.. twice. the question was something like this "We know that you support the casino, but just so the public can be assured that you have thoroughly considered the matter, please tell us some of the major downfalls of a casino and how you plan to deal with it." I was absolutely enraged by his response and I literally almost shouted "answer the question!!!" before walking out or being escorted out. but I didn't, I listened as he listed off the reasons why he is FOR a casino, the same reasons he mentioned last week, didn't even come anywhere near a downside. but a panelist called him out and asked him again to answer the question, he said "there is a downside but..." that's it. What a fucking arrogant asshole.
Judy on the other hand did incredibly well, she was honest and blunt. she used strong language and you could tell that she meant what she said. she didn't waste time attacking the other candidates she simply spoke what she thought and her ideas were well thought out and very plausible. she lost her words a couple times but so did everyone else, so that doesn't stand out as much in the end as what she said.
Charlie Flyn was a joke, you can't take him seriously, and in fact people commonly chuckled after his responses as if he was some merry prankster. he raised some decent points and I was very happy to have him participate to get more perspectives on the table. I couldn't imagine if the debate was just between 'thing 1'and 'thing 2', it would be a hollow rhetorical sabotage fest devoid of issues.
Another thing that got on my nerves, Brown and helfer kept saying "my opponent" I wanted to scream "you have THREE opponents Asshole!!!!!" really, it's no wonder people feel like the political system is useless when nobody even acknowledges the third party candidates like Judy who actually have something interesting to say. I'm going to do some research on the Buffalo Snooze and see how much they have actually covered the third party candidates vs the coverage they give the two major parties. and I also want to see if the articles they do write about the mayoral election have anything to do with the issues. because every time I pick up that piece of crap it just talks about how much money they have raised or if race will be a factor, or some other frivolous bullshit. I did see one article on development that was terribly written and impossible to follow that compared Brown and Helfer on that issue.
Anyway, watch the debate, overall I thought it was really good. and if you live in Buffalo vote for Judy, tell our corrupt system to go fuck itself and vote for someone who is determined to change it. Judy's website is really good too, check it out
dcoffee - 10/28/05 09:44
Helfer did ok, but I was left with the impression that he was saying whatever he thought people wanted to hear. making grandiose promises and championing issues with wide appeal, but often using vague enough terms to remain uncommitted. He definitely had some good ideas, and he mentioned a lot more issues than Brown. I was really turned off by his opening statement though, I was shocked last week when Brown didn't answer the question about the one thing that was most important to the city, but using your opening statement to attack your 'opponent' is kind of low brow.
Helfer did ok, but I was left with the impression that he was saying whatever he thought people wanted to hear. making grandiose promises and championing issues with wide appeal, but often using vague enough terms to remain uncommitted. He definitely had some good ideas, and he mentioned a lot more issues than Brown. I was really turned off by his opening statement though, I was shocked last week when Brown didn't answer the question about the one thing that was most important to the city, but using your opening statement to attack your 'opponent' is kind of low brow.
buffalopundit - 10/28/05 06:06
Good analysis. I was also quite unimpressed by Brown. He talks a lot, but says little. I'm curious what you thought of Helfer. You don't mention him much.
Good analysis. I was also quite unimpressed by Brown. He talks a lot, but says little. I'm curious what you thought of Helfer. You don't mention him much.
10/26/2005 23:25 #21684
Iraq Constitution = Civil WarMy Brief Article is below. I spend most of my time looking at local News, but yesterday I happened to notice that Iraq voted on their constitution, the results were disputed and there was a 10 day recount which cast the results into doubt. Sunni Leaders said things like "The people were shocked to find out that their vote is worthless because of the major fraud that takes place in Iraq," and called the election a "farce". Sunnis are the main force behind the insurgency, and the group who was in power untill the US invasion. In the last election in January they boycotted the vote because they didn't trust the system, this time they voted overwelmingly against the constitution and it passed anyway. leaving them with the impression that their vote doesen't matter (kind of like us in America, but they're not desensitized and jaded yet so it realy pisses them off and makes them want to overthrow the government by force).
Iraq Constitution is a sign of Civil War, not Democracy
The problem is this: the Sunni Arabs (who are the major force behind the insurgency) actually voted this time… and it didn’t work. Despite all of our promises about democracy and freedom, they tried doing it Our Way, and it backfired. If you can’t trust democracy to achieve change, what do you have left? Violence.
Sunnis fear they are being excluded, and left on land that has no oil and no wealth. The new constitution paves the way for a semi-autonomous Kurdish Region in the north and a Shiite region in the south, both of which have large supplies of oil. The Sunnis are becoming an impoverished and desperate minority in the country. This is not a good formula for peace.
Unfortunately the US doesn’t care. As long as the two tribes that do have all the oil are our buddies we make out just fine. We can give them weapons to repress the desperate minority and they can give us oil. It’s a win-win situation, unless you’re concerned about justice. Don’t believe me? Our government isn’t as modern as we might hope, they see the world in terms of survival of the fittest. This is all very practical geopolitical, ‘realist’, state centered strategy.
News Excerpts Below
Reuters - Iraq voters approve constitution
10-25-2005
By Claudia Parsons and Andrew Quinn
“BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi voters ratified a new U.S.-backed constitution despite bitter opposition in Sunni Arab areas where insurgents are battling to topple the Baghdad government, results showed on Tuesday.
Iraq's Electoral Commission, giving final results from the October 15 referendum, said 79 percent of voters backed the constitution against 21 percent opposed in a poll split largely along Iraq's sectarian and ethnic lines.
Several Shi'ite and Kurdish regions voted between 95 and 99 percent "Yes"; in rebellious, Sunni Anbar 97 percent said "No".
Prominent Sunni Arab leaders rejected the referendum as a fraud, warning it could fuel militant violence and discourage Sunnis from participating in future elections.”
AP - Iraq's Constitution Ratified by Voters
10-25-2005
By MARIAM FAM, Associated Press Writer
“The strong negative vote by Sunni Arabs, however, raised questions whether the charter would succeed in luring Sunnis away from the insurgency. Many Sunni Arabs fear the constitution will create virtually autonomous and oil-rich mini-states of Kurds in the north and Shiites in the south, leaving Sunnis isolated in poor central and western regions with a weak central government in Baghdad.
Saleh al-Mutlaq, a Sunni Arab member of the committee that drafted the constitution, called the referendum "a farce" and accused the Shiite and Kurdish-dominated government of stealing ballot boxes to reduce the percentage of "no" votes in several provinces.
"The people were shocked to find out that their vote is worthless because of the major fraud that takes place in Iraq," he said on Al-Arabiya television.
Much will depend on whether Sunni Arabs vote in large numbers in the Dec. 15 elections. A Sunni boycott of the Jan. 30 balloting enabled Shiites and Kurds to dominate parliament and take the lead role in drafting the constitution.”
Iraq Constitution is a sign of Civil War, not Democracy
The problem is this: the Sunni Arabs (who are the major force behind the insurgency) actually voted this time… and it didn’t work. Despite all of our promises about democracy and freedom, they tried doing it Our Way, and it backfired. If you can’t trust democracy to achieve change, what do you have left? Violence.
Sunnis fear they are being excluded, and left on land that has no oil and no wealth. The new constitution paves the way for a semi-autonomous Kurdish Region in the north and a Shiite region in the south, both of which have large supplies of oil. The Sunnis are becoming an impoverished and desperate minority in the country. This is not a good formula for peace.
Unfortunately the US doesn’t care. As long as the two tribes that do have all the oil are our buddies we make out just fine. We can give them weapons to repress the desperate minority and they can give us oil. It’s a win-win situation, unless you’re concerned about justice. Don’t believe me? Our government isn’t as modern as we might hope, they see the world in terms of survival of the fittest. This is all very practical geopolitical, ‘realist’, state centered strategy.
News Excerpts Below
Reuters - Iraq voters approve constitution
10-25-2005
By Claudia Parsons and Andrew Quinn
“BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi voters ratified a new U.S.-backed constitution despite bitter opposition in Sunni Arab areas where insurgents are battling to topple the Baghdad government, results showed on Tuesday.
Iraq's Electoral Commission, giving final results from the October 15 referendum, said 79 percent of voters backed the constitution against 21 percent opposed in a poll split largely along Iraq's sectarian and ethnic lines.
Several Shi'ite and Kurdish regions voted between 95 and 99 percent "Yes"; in rebellious, Sunni Anbar 97 percent said "No".
Prominent Sunni Arab leaders rejected the referendum as a fraud, warning it could fuel militant violence and discourage Sunnis from participating in future elections.”
AP - Iraq's Constitution Ratified by Voters
10-25-2005
By MARIAM FAM, Associated Press Writer
“The strong negative vote by Sunni Arabs, however, raised questions whether the charter would succeed in luring Sunnis away from the insurgency. Many Sunni Arabs fear the constitution will create virtually autonomous and oil-rich mini-states of Kurds in the north and Shiites in the south, leaving Sunnis isolated in poor central and western regions with a weak central government in Baghdad.
Saleh al-Mutlaq, a Sunni Arab member of the committee that drafted the constitution, called the referendum "a farce" and accused the Shiite and Kurdish-dominated government of stealing ballot boxes to reduce the percentage of "no" votes in several provinces.
"The people were shocked to find out that their vote is worthless because of the major fraud that takes place in Iraq," he said on Al-Arabiya television.
Much will depend on whether Sunni Arabs vote in large numbers in the Dec. 15 elections. A Sunni boycott of the Jan. 30 balloting enabled Shiites and Kurds to dominate parliament and take the lead role in drafting the constitution.”
10/18/2005 20:21 #21683
The Casino is UndemocraticCategory: casino
the casino in Buffalo... there's a lot to the issue, but one thing about it is really offending me right now... NOBODY ASKED US! The governor woke up one morning and said "I know how I'm going to close the gap in our budget, I'm take a piece of Buffalo and give it away to a sovereign nation. They can take the land right off of the tax rolls and make $150 million off of it each year from a casino." And he didn't even ask the State government, nor the Erie County or Buffalo government. And he sure as hell didn't use a referendum to ask us, the people who live here. I'm offended, in fact it really pisses me off.
Especially since Buffalo is not doing bad right now, there's actually a lot of old architectural gems being renovated and turned into mixed use apartments and commercial buildings. And new buildings are even starting to fill in the parking lots. The nice areas of the city are actually growing, as more people are moving into the downtown neighborhoods. Main St is improving from the theatre district past the medical campus and all the way up to the Artspace lofts project near Summer St. There's also the interesting Health Now building right behind City Hall and all kinds of stuff is happening. All we need is for the government not to screw up real bad. You can read about it at Buffalo Rising's City page . Now is not the time to be giving pieces of downtown real estate away to a sovereign nation.
The jobs argument is bullshit, look at other cities that have tried this, like Atlantic city, Detroit, or Niagara Falls, yes even in Niagara Falls at least two hotels and a restaurant have closed, and they actually have tourists! By contrast 80% of the money that the casino makes in Buffalo is going to come from us, the local economy, and it's not staying here, it's going to the Senecas.
The casino will also be nicely situated at the center of all the bus routes, Downtown, where people who can't afford cars can easily get to. Not so with the Niagara Falls or Salamanca casinos. The poor in Buffalo are going to get poorer. I live in an inexpensive Allentown apartment, most of my neighbors in this building are poor, both white and black, I thought about them. Who would go, would they spend more money than they could afford, and what would they do to try and get that money back? What would happen to our neighborhood because of their poverty? I don't like what I see, really.. more theft, more drugs, more broken car windows and missing stereos, more people outside bothering you for change, or asking you to buy their crap, electronics and fake drugs. It won't be as nice of a neighborhood. This is one of the most pedestrian friendly and architecturally beautiful sections of the city, but people will enjoy it less, and less often, because they will be harassed and confronted by the struggling poor.
It's not good, I mean seriously if you want numbers here's some stuff from Donn Esmonde's recent article :
The casino will make $150 million a year
About 80 percent of the people who will gamble at a Buffalo casino live within 50 miles of Buffalo,
The casino brings about 1,000 jobs (although at a cost of some existing jobs), with those workers taking home about $25 million a year.
The state gets about $30 million of the annual casino profits,
With the City and County splitting about $7 million.
But $25 million in take-home pay and a $7 million local cut doesn't balance the nearly $150 million we'll pay for it.
"The number one casino spinoff business is a gas station," Thompson said. "Maybe a restaurant within walking distance . . . Most people going to the casino won't do a single thing in Buffalo other than gamble."
If you read this whole thing you definitely care enough to call some representatives and say that if a casino is proposed the public should have a say,
tell them to introduce a bill to their legislature so that they have to address the issue and hear from their constituents about it.
Or encourage them to sponsor a referendum for the people to vote on. This process is going way too fast, it needs to be properly deliberated. We are handing over a chunk of our city.
You may have read in my last post that there is a public comment period from now until November 7th, you have to fax (FAX# 202-208-6950) or e-mail (webteam@ios.doi.gov) Gale Norton, the Interior Secretary, she's the one who approves land transfers. I encouraged my representatives to send her a fax as well.
You can find your city reps here:
County reps here:
State reps here:
dcoffee - 10/19/05 08:27
peter, I'd rather get the results from Niagara Falls Casino before rushing to get one completed here. particularly because this is a perminent change, it's not just any developer, we can't get the land back easily.
Uncut, I know what you mean, trusting the masses can let you down, especially when the news media doesen't do its homework before parroting the mayor's sunny predictions. but a lot of people I talk to are unsure of the idea, if they do accept it and try to look on the bright side it's usually because they think it's a done deal and there's nothing anybody can do. if people understood that it was their decision and that the legeslatures have to vote on it we will have some serious descussion. and I will be out there working my ass off to get information out.
peter, I'd rather get the results from Niagara Falls Casino before rushing to get one completed here. particularly because this is a perminent change, it's not just any developer, we can't get the land back easily.
Uncut, I know what you mean, trusting the masses can let you down, especially when the news media doesen't do its homework before parroting the mayor's sunny predictions. but a lot of people I talk to are unsure of the idea, if they do accept it and try to look on the bright side it's usually because they think it's a done deal and there's nothing anybody can do. if people understood that it was their decision and that the legeslatures have to vote on it we will have some serious descussion. and I will be out there working my ass off to get information out.
uncutsaniflush - 10/18/05 23:36
A referendum is a good idea to see what Buffaloians think about the casino. But one of the bugbears of democracy is that majority rules.
If one has a group of three and two of them vote to kill the third person, that is true democracy in action.
I'm not at all certain that a referendum would vote down the casino
A referendum is a good idea to see what Buffaloians think about the casino. But one of the bugbears of democracy is that majority rules.
If one has a group of three and two of them vote to kill the third person, that is true democracy in action.
I'm not at all certain that a referendum would vote down the casino
metalpeter - 10/18/05 21:35
First of all I'm glad that you are speaking up for what you belive in. My view is a differant then yours But i think it is important for people to get invovled who arn't in government no matter what side they represent. I do agree that it is wrong that the people really had no say in it. But that being said I can't belive I'm supporting the crooks. I think the politians don't want what is going on with the peace bridge to go on with a casino. A good portion of us on (e:strip) might be dead before a bridge is finished or even before a decision is made. To be honest the citizens don't have much of a say in what goes on. We elect officals and they do what they want, or what there consituants want so they can get reelected. We don't really have a direct government verry often anymore. Some times there will be some proposal that is on the ballot on election day, but that isn't to often. I think there should be more votes on things be the citizens and not just be registerd voters. It wouldn't be perfect but you could have a vote by mail system. Everyone in the city gets a ballot by mail and they fill out social securtiy numbers and all that information then when done with the vote put it in the mail box. Give a certain window maybe two weeks to send out all the ballots and have them returned. But that will never happen because it takes the power away from the politians and gives it to the people.
First of all I'm glad that you are speaking up for what you belive in. My view is a differant then yours But i think it is important for people to get invovled who arn't in government no matter what side they represent. I do agree that it is wrong that the people really had no say in it. But that being said I can't belive I'm supporting the crooks. I think the politians don't want what is going on with the peace bridge to go on with a casino. A good portion of us on (e:strip) might be dead before a bridge is finished or even before a decision is made. To be honest the citizens don't have much of a say in what goes on. We elect officals and they do what they want, or what there consituants want so they can get reelected. We don't really have a direct government verry often anymore. Some times there will be some proposal that is on the ballot on election day, but that isn't to often. I think there should be more votes on things be the citizens and not just be registerd voters. It wouldn't be perfect but you could have a vote by mail system. Everyone in the city gets a ballot by mail and they fill out social securtiy numbers and all that information then when done with the vote put it in the mail box. Give a certain window maybe two weeks to send out all the ballots and have them returned. But that will never happen because it takes the power away from the politians and gives it to the people.
Gorgeous fall picture there!