Yo.
Ok, so sorry this entry is going to be all like "I'm a girl and I'm a little dramatic".
So I'm 23 years old. I have been single for a while. This is for a variety of reasons, one of them mostly being that most of the men I surround myself with are gay or way too old for me or already married.
This is actually fine with me. I genuinely enjoy being single while I'm studying my butt off and basically I'd have to really really really want a particular person to consider letting them interrupt my life as is.
Whoops.
I haven't been genuinely and seriously interested in someone since this guy from college who lead me on and I won't get into the details but he lead me on for quite a while and said things and did things he had no business doing or saying and it messed me up for a little bit. He took advantage of the situation of two girls paying him lots of attention and basically screwed me over. Jerk. But now he's a hot mess living in NYC and apparently doing drugs? Advantage: Anne.
Anyway, since then I've been happily unattached, a few innocent hook up type dealies in college and a few HILARIOUS and terrible dates, but mostly not interested in a relationship.
Of course in the last few months I've started getting to know this guy and he's basically perfect. Well, perfect for me. He has his flaws of course but really he's damn near perfect for my purposes. He's smart, incredibly funny and witty, cute, great smile, tall enough and is really sweet and thoughtful.
Ok, 2 catches. First he's basically too young for me and he has a girlfriend. He actually has only mentioned the girlfriend in passing twice and his Facebook status says so. I thought this was no big deal, she lives far away and he basically never mentioned her. Not so much. They've been dating for at least three years. Time for a change, right? That's what I think anyway.
The age thing really isn't a big deal. It's not like he's 16. I always find myself interested in younger guys for some reason.
I just can't believe this. I thought this kind of crap wasn't supposed to happen after like college was over. You're not supposed to fall hard for someone like this. That's what I always thought would be the case. Shouldn't I have gotten some sense by now? Where has all the "I'm never going to fall like that again for someone" malarkey I've been building up? At least he's not a douchebag who's leading me on intentionally.
I honestly feel like I'm 16 when I think about him. Butterflies in the stomach like crazy.
I can guarantee you he has no idea. I've been avoiding talking to him so as to avoid being too in his face.
We just can talk so easily both face to face and even freakin' online. UGH.
I just can't believe I'm back in this place.
Haha the only difference between this situation and all others is that even though I know I'm not going to be winning any sexiest woman alive contests, I am definitely prettier than his girlfriend, hahaha she's kinda busted.
We're not at the "I need to tell him" point. I know that point and we're at least 2 or 3 more interactions before we even think about that point.
It just tough and surreal. You know what I mean about this feeling? Its just so exciting and smiley and hearts and puppies and confetti. I want to enjoy the happy warm fuzzies I feel but its hard to just let go and enjoy having a crush when the last time I did that it ended up breaking my heart kind of sort of.
Boys are frustrating creatures.
Anne's Journal
My Podcast Link
12/21/2008 02:42 #47123
Sorry in advance for being a cliche12/12/2008 03:42 #47037
Finally Finals = FinitoIts 3:30 am. I just finished my last real paper and "response" that was supposed to be due last week but I just kept putting it off.
I love when the basis of a paper is completely disagreeing with another writer's interpretation of a work of literature. Its especially enjoyable when that article was published in 1958. I'm pretty sure if the author is still kickin' she wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight.
Remember when you were in 6th grade and writing 350 words seemed like an insurmountable task? My blood pressure was hovering at normal when after my final this morning I had the task ahead of me of writing a 4 page paper (roughly 1500 words) I hadn't yet picked a topic for. If you combine all the time spread out from about 12:30pm-2:00am in which I ACTUALLY worked on the paper, it probably took me 2 hours. Well, 2 1/4 if you count the 15 minutes it took me to find a decent and short article to use. I didn't initially intend the paper to just be a vehicle to rip someone's writing apart, but it was a nice change of pace rather than spending 4 pages writing about the symbolism of the sound of a string breaking in Act 2 of The Cherry Orchard. Excuse me a second, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....
Anyway, I cannot WAIT for Saturday. I plan to sleep for about 2 days.
So roughly every couple of months or so I develop a "lets find something to occupy my day dreams" crush on someone. I'd say 95% of the time this crush is based on nothing but someone I pass on campus every day or have a class with or someone who sells me coffee and there is no indication it will go anywhere past my head. Sometimes its more than that, but not frequently. However, I'm fresh out of candidates. The former love of my life, the aforementioned Canadian dreamboat hockey player named Jesse is a total bust. Not only is he a moron, he didn't even read the book we were supposed to read for a final presentation and his contribution reflected that. He never flat out said he didn't read it, but if he did read it, he has a funny way of showing it. He was really non communicative leading up to our presentation causing me more stress than was necessary. Boo. So the "imaginary Canadian dreamboat hockey playing English teacher Jesse" I created is way better than "real kind of dumb, doesn't contribute to projects or communicate with his partners Jesse" and now that I officially know that, its over. Sad times. Our imaginary break-up was very difficult for us both.
I love when the basis of a paper is completely disagreeing with another writer's interpretation of a work of literature. Its especially enjoyable when that article was published in 1958. I'm pretty sure if the author is still kickin' she wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight.
Remember when you were in 6th grade and writing 350 words seemed like an insurmountable task? My blood pressure was hovering at normal when after my final this morning I had the task ahead of me of writing a 4 page paper (roughly 1500 words) I hadn't yet picked a topic for. If you combine all the time spread out from about 12:30pm-2:00am in which I ACTUALLY worked on the paper, it probably took me 2 hours. Well, 2 1/4 if you count the 15 minutes it took me to find a decent and short article to use. I didn't initially intend the paper to just be a vehicle to rip someone's writing apart, but it was a nice change of pace rather than spending 4 pages writing about the symbolism of the sound of a string breaking in Act 2 of The Cherry Orchard. Excuse me a second, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....
Anyway, I cannot WAIT for Saturday. I plan to sleep for about 2 days.
So roughly every couple of months or so I develop a "lets find something to occupy my day dreams" crush on someone. I'd say 95% of the time this crush is based on nothing but someone I pass on campus every day or have a class with or someone who sells me coffee and there is no indication it will go anywhere past my head. Sometimes its more than that, but not frequently. However, I'm fresh out of candidates. The former love of my life, the aforementioned Canadian dreamboat hockey player named Jesse is a total bust. Not only is he a moron, he didn't even read the book we were supposed to read for a final presentation and his contribution reflected that. He never flat out said he didn't read it, but if he did read it, he has a funny way of showing it. He was really non communicative leading up to our presentation causing me more stress than was necessary. Boo. So the "imaginary Canadian dreamboat hockey playing English teacher Jesse" I created is way better than "real kind of dumb, doesn't contribute to projects or communicate with his partners Jesse" and now that I officially know that, its over. Sad times. Our imaginary break-up was very difficult for us both.
11/23/2008 18:20 #46813
Yay Bills!54-31 Bills over Chiefs.
Ahhhhhhhhhh.... that was just what I neeed to end this "OMG BUFFALO SPORTS TEAMS SUCK" slide of sadness.
WOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Trent Edwards was AMAZING!!! Such good times.
6-5. Keep it rollin'!!!!
Ahhhhhhhhhh.... that was just what I neeed to end this "OMG BUFFALO SPORTS TEAMS SUCK" slide of sadness.
WOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Trent Edwards was AMAZING!!! Such good times.
6-5. Keep it rollin'!!!!
metalpeter - 11/24/08 19:12
I'm glad for the win. It being the Chiefs doesn't make the win less. They have a high Powered offense and Thigpen looks pretty good they just turned the ball over to much. They have talent but are Young team. That reminds me the Mighty Taco on french had a funny sign up On there Message Board out side I think it said "lets win one" then lets go Sabres. It really was pretty funny to see that on the way to Burger King.
I'm glad for the win. It being the Chiefs doesn't make the win less. They have a high Powered offense and Thigpen looks pretty good they just turned the ball over to much. They have talent but are Young team. That reminds me the Mighty Taco on french had a funny sign up On there Message Board out side I think it said "lets win one" then lets go Sabres. It really was pretty funny to see that on the way to Burger King.
gardenmama - 11/23/08 20:47
I'm in a pool at work that I never win - at least the Bills did though. It would be nice to see them keep going.
Your avatar is super cute and looks a lot like my dog - see (e:gardenmama,46025)
I'm in a pool at work that I never win - at least the Bills did though. It would be nice to see them keep going.
Your avatar is super cute and looks a lot like my dog - see (e:gardenmama,46025)
drew - 11/23/08 19:16
I hope you are right, but remember, these were the chiefs. I'm not getting my hopes up.
I hope you are right, but remember, these were the chiefs. I'm not getting my hopes up.
11/19/2008 13:58 #46755
Back to BlackYo why do I keep wanting to write about music? Maybe its because I just got a new (old) iPod and I'm so happy to have music to listen to that isn't one of my 3 CDs I currently own. Getting your hard drive wiped and then iPod stolen is NOT sweet.
I currently need a regular part time job. I work at HSBC Arena but that's only like a few times a month. Of course after the 10 or 15 applications I've filled out, the only one that responds is another job that seems even less consistent than the Arena. Its teaching SAT prep to students. Good for the resume as I'm working towards teaching high school English. Bad because I only got a 540 on math when I took the test in, uhhh, 2002? And my math skills have seriously plummeted since then. Hopefully they're only looking for someone to teach the language arts category and someone else can cover math.
My "oh lord, please don't talk, because when you talk I see how stupid you are" crush, Jesse, WAS in class yesterday but, alas, we were unable to discuss our future together because 1. we did not meet to discuss our presentation and 2. we have no future together.
I like literature (duh), I like talking about it, I enjoy teaching it, I enjoy seeing how different people from different lives react personally to the same text. Even if you have 20 white jewish girls from the 'burbs reading the same book, they have different reactions. In spite of their similar superficial background, they're all different. However, at some point personal reaction can go too far.
In my Contemporary Lit class we're reading a graphic novel called Persepolis by Iranian born writer Marjane Satrapi. I HIGHLY recommend this book, its a super easy read and really gives great insight while striking a balance between "life in Iran" and "life as a woman". There's not a lot of plot to unpack, its straight up, but really interesting.
ANYWAY, the book centers around the Islamic revolution and the instituting of veils and fundamental principles on Iran. Therefore, religion is a strong and powerful overriding theme in the book, its unavoidable and a natural jumping off point for discussion of the book.
This guy in my class who's kind of a toolshed immediately drew a parallel between Islamic fundamentalists and Evangelical Christians. In the United States, the closest thing we have to the dominating outspoken radical religious thinking of Islamic Fundamentalists is Evangelical Christianity. I understand there are others, but at this moment in our history, they're pretty much in our faces all the time. Them and Mormons.
So the toolshed with 2 nose piercings, a really awful lisp and an overall vibe of "I haven't showered lately" starts talking about Evangelical Christianity and basically gets about 2 words out before the girl sitting next to him goes on the attack about how she's an Evangelical Christian and she doesn't like the comparison and basically told him to stop talking about it. The only other time this girl talked in class was to talk about how she voted for McCain and she wanted us to all know that not EVERYONE there voted for Obama. No one assumed that was the truth, btw, but, for the recordm the majority of the class, including the professor, was pro-Obama.
The reason I bring this up is, should the guy have stopped? Was it appropriate for her to ask him to stop because she felt that he was going to generalize? The guy honestly didn't get a whole sentence out, he said basically "In this country, the Evangelical Christians are-" before she cut him off. Should he have continued his comparison? He stopped on his own, the professor did not intervene. Was the girl within her rights to cut him off? Was she being too sensitive? I feel she should've waited to hear what he had to say before just freaking out at those first few words that said nothing of substance about her religion.
What do y'all think. Should she have cut him off the way she did? Was it her right? Should he not have made the connection?
I currently need a regular part time job. I work at HSBC Arena but that's only like a few times a month. Of course after the 10 or 15 applications I've filled out, the only one that responds is another job that seems even less consistent than the Arena. Its teaching SAT prep to students. Good for the resume as I'm working towards teaching high school English. Bad because I only got a 540 on math when I took the test in, uhhh, 2002? And my math skills have seriously plummeted since then. Hopefully they're only looking for someone to teach the language arts category and someone else can cover math.
My "oh lord, please don't talk, because when you talk I see how stupid you are" crush, Jesse, WAS in class yesterday but, alas, we were unable to discuss our future together because 1. we did not meet to discuss our presentation and 2. we have no future together.
I like literature (duh), I like talking about it, I enjoy teaching it, I enjoy seeing how different people from different lives react personally to the same text. Even if you have 20 white jewish girls from the 'burbs reading the same book, they have different reactions. In spite of their similar superficial background, they're all different. However, at some point personal reaction can go too far.
In my Contemporary Lit class we're reading a graphic novel called Persepolis by Iranian born writer Marjane Satrapi. I HIGHLY recommend this book, its a super easy read and really gives great insight while striking a balance between "life in Iran" and "life as a woman". There's not a lot of plot to unpack, its straight up, but really interesting.
ANYWAY, the book centers around the Islamic revolution and the instituting of veils and fundamental principles on Iran. Therefore, religion is a strong and powerful overriding theme in the book, its unavoidable and a natural jumping off point for discussion of the book.
This guy in my class who's kind of a toolshed immediately drew a parallel between Islamic fundamentalists and Evangelical Christians. In the United States, the closest thing we have to the dominating outspoken radical religious thinking of Islamic Fundamentalists is Evangelical Christianity. I understand there are others, but at this moment in our history, they're pretty much in our faces all the time. Them and Mormons.
So the toolshed with 2 nose piercings, a really awful lisp and an overall vibe of "I haven't showered lately" starts talking about Evangelical Christianity and basically gets about 2 words out before the girl sitting next to him goes on the attack about how she's an Evangelical Christian and she doesn't like the comparison and basically told him to stop talking about it. The only other time this girl talked in class was to talk about how she voted for McCain and she wanted us to all know that not EVERYONE there voted for Obama. No one assumed that was the truth, btw, but, for the recordm the majority of the class, including the professor, was pro-Obama.
The reason I bring this up is, should the guy have stopped? Was it appropriate for her to ask him to stop because she felt that he was going to generalize? The guy honestly didn't get a whole sentence out, he said basically "In this country, the Evangelical Christians are-" before she cut him off. Should he have continued his comparison? He stopped on his own, the professor did not intervene. Was the girl within her rights to cut him off? Was she being too sensitive? I feel she should've waited to hear what he had to say before just freaking out at those first few words that said nothing of substance about her religion.
What do y'all think. Should she have cut him off the way she did? Was it her right? Should he not have made the connection?
metalpeter - 11/19/08 18:01
I notice that people seem to think that what he was going to say was wrong, we can't assume that it would be wrong. What if the next thing he was going to say "they get very upset if you say anything about them, and they like to cut people off before the finish there point." He would have been correct. It is also possible that what he was going to say was based on ones that he knows. What she did was stupid. She assumed it was going to be negative and all she did was cause other people to have a sterotype about her. What she should have done is kept her mouth shut since no one was talking to her let him finish and listen to every word. Then chime in with well I'm one and then go into the parts that he got wrong and the parts he got right about some of them. He shouldn't have stopped. What he should have said was I'm sorry if this offends you but this is based on the ones that I have known.
In terms of the graphic novel, in case you didn't know it was turned into a Animated Movie, and it is supposed to be pretty good, and I've heard it has some pretty good tunes in it.
I notice that people seem to think that what he was going to say was wrong, we can't assume that it would be wrong. What if the next thing he was going to say "they get very upset if you say anything about them, and they like to cut people off before the finish there point." He would have been correct. It is also possible that what he was going to say was based on ones that he knows. What she did was stupid. She assumed it was going to be negative and all she did was cause other people to have a sterotype about her. What she should have done is kept her mouth shut since no one was talking to her let him finish and listen to every word. Then chime in with well I'm one and then go into the parts that he got wrong and the parts he got right about some of them. He shouldn't have stopped. What he should have said was I'm sorry if this offends you but this is based on the ones that I have known.
In terms of the graphic novel, in case you didn't know it was turned into a Animated Movie, and it is supposed to be pretty good, and I've heard it has some pretty good tunes in it.
jason - 11/19/08 16:48
A liberal professor....go figure!! Hahaha.
Honestly, I think her reaction wasn't the best. Of course, nobody can help their feelings. What she SHOULD have done was let him speak his mind, and then just use his poor logic and lack of common sense against him afterwards. It's called giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
No, I don't think the guy should have stopped. Stifling someone's speech, no matter who it is, isn't our way. I mean he has the right to think and believe what he wants. He has the right to speak and he should have asserted that right. She does not have the right to not be offended. If you hear something that is ludicrous, you fight bad ideas with good ones and check your emotions.
A liberal professor....go figure!! Hahaha.
Honestly, I think her reaction wasn't the best. Of course, nobody can help their feelings. What she SHOULD have done was let him speak his mind, and then just use his poor logic and lack of common sense against him afterwards. It's called giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
No, I don't think the guy should have stopped. Stifling someone's speech, no matter who it is, isn't our way. I mean he has the right to think and believe what he wants. He has the right to speak and he should have asserted that right. She does not have the right to not be offended. If you hear something that is ludicrous, you fight bad ideas with good ones and check your emotions.
drew - 11/19/08 16:06
As an evangelical Christian, I think she should have kept her mouth shut--by silencing him BEFORE he spoke, she lived into the generalization.
The guy, on the other hand was correct to stop, because he WAS making a generalization, and one that (increasingly) doesn't hold up. Evangelical Christians do not speak with one voice. Sure, progressives like me are in the minority, but we haven't stopped being Evangelical Christians because we stopped being tools of the Republican party.
As an evangelical Christian, I think she should have kept her mouth shut--by silencing him BEFORE he spoke, she lived into the generalization.
The guy, on the other hand was correct to stop, because he WAS making a generalization, and one that (increasingly) doesn't hold up. Evangelical Christians do not speak with one voice. Sure, progressives like me are in the minority, but we haven't stopped being Evangelical Christians because we stopped being tools of the Republican party.
11/18/2008 09:40 #46734
My iPod is a sad placeOk, so its not a sad place as in its depressing, its a sad place in that the music on it is awful. I have awful taste in music. This morning I've had an awesome rotation of Mariah, the pussycat dolls, the beatles and Lady Gaga.
I just don't put very much stock in the quality of the music I listen to. If its fun, I listen to it, if its not, I don't. Simple as that. That's why it drives me crazy when I meet people who are like music snobs and only listen to independent label artists who perform on "found" instruments from the war-torn regions of the Gaza strip.
One of my favorite bands of the moment is a pop group from Denmark called Alphabeat. The fact that I like such a random band is completely foreign to me. I'm used to being such a Top 40 lover, that actually liking a band that isn't regularly featured on Kiss 98.5 is weird for me. I think this delving into other music phase comes from the fact that my car stereo doesn't work very well and I really can only listen to 103.3, 97 rock and 92.9 and sometimes 102.5 and 104.1. Whoopdedoo.
I also tend to listen to songs they play at the Arena a lot, like City of Blinding Lights by U2 and I Don't Wanna Be in Love by Good Charlotte. I might be the only person in the world who thinks of Jason Pominville taking shots on net when I hear Joel Madden sing "If you've got nothing left, say I don't wanna be in love..."
Anyway, hopefully Jesse, the new love of my life will be in my next class and I can inappropriately ogle him while my professor talks about Young Adult Literature and I name our beautiful future half-Canadian children.
I just don't put very much stock in the quality of the music I listen to. If its fun, I listen to it, if its not, I don't. Simple as that. That's why it drives me crazy when I meet people who are like music snobs and only listen to independent label artists who perform on "found" instruments from the war-torn regions of the Gaza strip.
One of my favorite bands of the moment is a pop group from Denmark called Alphabeat. The fact that I like such a random band is completely foreign to me. I'm used to being such a Top 40 lover, that actually liking a band that isn't regularly featured on Kiss 98.5 is weird for me. I think this delving into other music phase comes from the fact that my car stereo doesn't work very well and I really can only listen to 103.3, 97 rock and 92.9 and sometimes 102.5 and 104.1. Whoopdedoo.
I also tend to listen to songs they play at the Arena a lot, like City of Blinding Lights by U2 and I Don't Wanna Be in Love by Good Charlotte. I might be the only person in the world who thinks of Jason Pominville taking shots on net when I hear Joel Madden sing "If you've got nothing left, say I don't wanna be in love..."
Anyway, hopefully Jesse, the new love of my life will be in my next class and I can inappropriately ogle him while my professor talks about Young Adult Literature and I name our beautiful future half-Canadian children.
jason - 11/19/08 15:00
I have to hold onto the things I have good taste in, becuase there are so many things I have terrible taste in, women for example. Ask anyone. Music and Beer, baby!
I have to hold onto the things I have good taste in, becuase there are so many things I have terrible taste in, women for example. Ask anyone. Music and Beer, baby!
anne - 11/19/08 13:39
Lauren - your last comment= true story "like what you like and don't let the haters get you down :) the same goes for boys ;)" TRUTH. I hate when someone rips on someone else's taste in a person more than I hate when people rip on someone's taste in music
Jason - Lady Gaga is completely snobby, I agree. She has some good songs, but none of them are revolutionary, that's what makes them mainstream palatable.
Um Barbie Girl is the definition of "so bad its good"
MK - AHHHHHHH!! I will fight you
Jesse - What do you mean you're not in my class or Canadian? Then who the hell have I been ogling all semester?!
Peter - yeah, the Edge used to be a really "elitist" (in a way) radio station and for a while that was totally in, I don't think the "in" thing anymore is that kind of music. I personally only listen to the Edge for Shredd and Ragan,
Lauren - your last comment= true story "like what you like and don't let the haters get you down :) the same goes for boys ;)" TRUTH. I hate when someone rips on someone else's taste in a person more than I hate when people rip on someone's taste in music
Jason - Lady Gaga is completely snobby, I agree. She has some good songs, but none of them are revolutionary, that's what makes them mainstream palatable.
Um Barbie Girl is the definition of "so bad its good"
MK - AHHHHHHH!! I will fight you
Jesse - What do you mean you're not in my class or Canadian? Then who the hell have I been ogling all semester?!
Peter - yeah, the Edge used to be a really "elitist" (in a way) radio station and for a while that was totally in, I don't think the "in" thing anymore is that kind of music. I personally only listen to the Edge for Shredd and Ragan,
vincent - 11/18/08 23:13
What I would stress is that being a "music snob" is kind of the thing to be right now. To me being a music snob is an offshoot of being a hipster. Right now it's their time in the sun. It's not that EVERYONE is X during Y time period, but it can be very hard to avoid if it's extremely trendy.
In the early 70's it was being a hippie; late 70's/early 80's an Arena Rocker or a Punk if you were in that subculture. Mid to Late 80's a "Grub" or glam metal person. Early 90's a Grunge Alternarocker. Late 90's a Raver. And early 00's someone into Hip Hop or Rap
It's just what dominates the culture at the particular time. It does kind of dictate which bars people go to for adventure to hook up with someone of that scene.
I don't know that's just my take on it. To me music seems to be just another fashion accessory to a comprehensive product line.
What I would stress is that being a "music snob" is kind of the thing to be right now. To me being a music snob is an offshoot of being a hipster. Right now it's their time in the sun. It's not that EVERYONE is X during Y time period, but it can be very hard to avoid if it's extremely trendy.
In the early 70's it was being a hippie; late 70's/early 80's an Arena Rocker or a Punk if you were in that subculture. Mid to Late 80's a "Grub" or glam metal person. Early 90's a Grunge Alternarocker. Late 90's a Raver. And early 00's someone into Hip Hop or Rap
It's just what dominates the culture at the particular time. It does kind of dictate which bars people go to for adventure to hook up with someone of that scene.
I don't know that's just my take on it. To me music seems to be just another fashion accessory to a comprehensive product line.
tinypliny - 11/18/08 23:13
"found" instruments from the war-torn regions of the Gaza strip."
Hahaha.
I am not particularly selective about what music I listen to but I do draw the line at pop music. I have to argue that being a "snob" is not a choice (at least in my case). I can't think with pop music on. The tunes stick very quickly. You can't do anything productive with catchy little ditties going round and round your hollow head.
So I prefer heavy metal and classical and well.. MarÃa Dolores Pradera!!!! and Milva!!!!!!
"found" instruments from the war-torn regions of the Gaza strip."
Hahaha.
I am not particularly selective about what music I listen to but I do draw the line at pop music. I have to argue that being a "snob" is not a choice (at least in my case). I can't think with pop music on. The tunes stick very quickly. You can't do anything productive with catchy little ditties going round and round your hollow head.
So I prefer heavy metal and classical and well.. MarÃa Dolores Pradera!!!! and Milva!!!!!!
metalpeter - 11/18/08 19:34
What a great post, I admit I'm a little bit confused I since you say you like crappy music but I kinda get what you mean. That Good Charlotte song is pretty good, yeah I've seen them and am a fan (don't know much of there new stuff other then that). I kinda remember when only The Edge would play them, that used to happen a lot in Buffalo some band would only get played on The Edge they would catch out side of the Alternative scene and then KISS would play them. Then The EDGE drops that band eventually when if they get big enough. I would have no idea who to suggest who to listen to cause I would have no idea who you would like. Hey if pop is your thing go for it. I myself like edgy stuff but it all can't be Angry Music. I think a lot of the Music Snob stuff comes from seeing bands change there music style and then exploding or from not liking the Industry side of it. I just thought Of a Crappy Band that I like Sum 41, and there alter egos Pain For Pleasure they can play guitar pretty good when they want to. Hey you have to like a band who calls them selves a shity Candian Punk band on stage.
What a great post, I admit I'm a little bit confused I since you say you like crappy music but I kinda get what you mean. That Good Charlotte song is pretty good, yeah I've seen them and am a fan (don't know much of there new stuff other then that). I kinda remember when only The Edge would play them, that used to happen a lot in Buffalo some band would only get played on The Edge they would catch out side of the Alternative scene and then KISS would play them. Then The EDGE drops that band eventually when if they get big enough. I would have no idea who to suggest who to listen to cause I would have no idea who you would like. Hey if pop is your thing go for it. I myself like edgy stuff but it all can't be Angry Music. I think a lot of the Music Snob stuff comes from seeing bands change there music style and then exploding or from not liking the Industry side of it. I just thought Of a Crappy Band that I like Sum 41, and there alter egos Pain For Pleasure they can play guitar pretty good when they want to. Hey you have to like a band who calls them selves a shity Candian Punk band on stage.
jessbob - 11/18/08 19:24
Hate to break it to you anne, I'm not in your class and I'm not canadian.
Hate to break it to you anne, I'm not in your class and I'm not canadian.
jason - 11/18/08 18:30
Oh my God, you guys are so wrong!! But I do have my guilty pleasures too as I said, and I ain't gonna name 'em. ;)
Oh my God, you guys are so wrong!! But I do have my guilty pleasures too as I said, and I ain't gonna name 'em. ;)
mk - 11/18/08 18:04
AND A BAG FOR MY DOG
AND A BAG FOR MY DOG
heidi - 11/18/08 15:22
I tend toward music snobbishness, but Barbie Girl is brilliant!
I tend toward music snobbishness, but Barbie Girl is brilliant!
mike - 11/18/08 13:39
i just want to say Barbie Girl is most likely the best song of this generation! come on barbie, lets go party
i just want to say Barbie Girl is most likely the best song of this generation! come on barbie, lets go party
jason - 11/18/08 11:05
I feel like I have to defend music snobs here in some way because there is such a thing as bad music. For example that Barbie Girl track from back when - I think everyone has to admit it is crap.
As a music snob I wouldn't tell someone to not listen to something if they enjoy it. That's what music is for. I have plenty of guilty pleasures. Live and let live. I guess that's where I diverge from the people at Pitchfork Media and honestly I question their shit judgment all the time too.
The thing about Lady Gaga is that she is snobby as hell too, talking about how pop will never be lowbrow, referencing Andy Warhol, and the whole time she's rocking outfits that look like they were repo'd from Earth, Wind and Fire's closet, and playing music that is as base, formulaic and without merit as it gets, even in the pop world.
She's a performer - it's about the performance with her, the sex appeal, the style, things I don't have much use for if the music doesn't match the rest of the effort (although, I'm sure it's a very polished and interesting performance). I don't think it's total bunk, but you know what I like more than that? Country. And that's fucking sad because pop music used to be the Beatles, used to be the Jackson 5.
I guess everything has its context. People don't get excited and dance to Sufjan Stevens. I think that's the happy middle ground that I've found. Why not try to find some middle ground too now that you've dipped your toe in the pool? There is some really awesome, interesting stuff out there that you may love just as much as top 40.
I feel like I have to defend music snobs here in some way because there is such a thing as bad music. For example that Barbie Girl track from back when - I think everyone has to admit it is crap.
As a music snob I wouldn't tell someone to not listen to something if they enjoy it. That's what music is for. I have plenty of guilty pleasures. Live and let live. I guess that's where I diverge from the people at Pitchfork Media and honestly I question their shit judgment all the time too.
The thing about Lady Gaga is that she is snobby as hell too, talking about how pop will never be lowbrow, referencing Andy Warhol, and the whole time she's rocking outfits that look like they were repo'd from Earth, Wind and Fire's closet, and playing music that is as base, formulaic and without merit as it gets, even in the pop world.
She's a performer - it's about the performance with her, the sex appeal, the style, things I don't have much use for if the music doesn't match the rest of the effort (although, I'm sure it's a very polished and interesting performance). I don't think it's total bunk, but you know what I like more than that? Country. And that's fucking sad because pop music used to be the Beatles, used to be the Jackson 5.
I guess everything has its context. People don't get excited and dance to Sufjan Stevens. I think that's the happy middle ground that I've found. Why not try to find some middle ground too now that you've dipped your toe in the pool? There is some really awesome, interesting stuff out there that you may love just as much as top 40.
lauren - 11/18/08 09:57
ug. i hate music snobs too! i think the power of pop music speaks for itself... but, i guess i don't listen to pop music blindly...i know what it does to people and how brain washing it can be. and i listen to a lot of stuff that isn't popular and that would never get played on the radio. i say, like what you like and don't let the haters get you down :) the same goes for boys ;)
ug. i hate music snobs too! i think the power of pop music speaks for itself... but, i guess i don't listen to pop music blindly...i know what it does to people and how brain washing it can be. and i listen to a lot of stuff that isn't popular and that would never get played on the radio. i say, like what you like and don't let the haters get you down :) the same goes for boys ;)
Anne, don't be surprised by having this feeling come along when you're 23. Remember at that point we've practically just hatched - in my case I never fell really hard for someone until 23.
Besides, life would be boring if our senses just stopped when we're in our early 20's. This past summer I had just turned 30, and at the Taste of Buffalo we ran into some girls we knew. One of them just looked amazing. I remember the dress she wore, how her hair was, what she said to me, where she was standing, where the sun was coming from..it's like a photo burned into memory (I don't think I've ever spoken of this to anyone).
Even if nothing happens with said guy, at the least it can be a good reminder that yeah, you're still standing and a bad experience, while difficult to get over, isn't the end of the world. If you can take a kick to the crotch and survive it, you're doing really, really well.
Anne,
Hopefully I didn't come off a being judgemental or bitter. It was not my intention.
In what way did I imply that I was planning on moving in on him? I was talking about just having a crush (e:metalpeter) is the one telling me to try to break up someone's relationship. I have absolutely no intention of doing that.
Not to be a downer, but I kind of feel a bit creeped out that you're hatching a plan to move in a guy that already has a girlfriend. You have your opinions and it's your life, so I'm not going to say anything other than my perspective/rant as a guy.
[Sometimes I swear that if I wanted to get another girlfriend I would get one so that women would find me attractive. It seems that the only time anyone paid attention to me or went out of their way for me was when I was "In a Relationship." When you're a single guy no one gives you the time of day. And you wonder why we Cheat!/RANT]
;-)
I'm going to give you some advice, I'm not an expert so you might want to do what ever is opposite of what I say. I say go for it. Hey based on your former user picture you look cute so again go for it. In terms of him being younger as long as he is legal go for it. Him having a girl friend all ready, if she lived in the same city then no. Well I guess the distance is the real thing. If he goes and sees her like say some place further then an hour or out of state and she doesn't come here then I say go for it. Yes I'm saying cheating is ok, well not really cause you aren't the one that is cheating he would be. But really what is wrong with having a GF or BF in different cities as long as you still spend the same amount of time with that person. Well maybe I have watched the Real World on MTV way to much. At least you should maybe let the guy know that your feelings are stronger then friends and then see what happens, he could have those same feelings but doesn't want to act on them because of the GF or she could be made up, some times us guys do, do that. Just be careful and say things in a good way so he gets what you mean.