This electoral cycle is seeming ceaseless.
It's funny, because in 2000, I might have voted for John McCain. He made sense, he ran his own world and maverick wasn't a word that Sarah Palin can't spell. Eight years later, the politics of fear is stinking up everything. He did make one statement recently that I couldn't help but respect. He opened up and said that Sen. Obama "was an honorable man with whom I have some profound policy differences."
Political discourse should have that tenor. If he could have kept to that tone, we might have had some meaningful exchanges and some honest issue based discussions. I read a column by William Crystal in the New York Times who mentioned that McCain ought to fire his campaign. That's a little drastic, but he did point out that McCain is top heavy with lobbyists in his campaign heirarchy. I don't really care one way or another, lobbyists are part of the process, but they do in general terms, suck at running campaigns.
They've got him crowing on about William Ayers while the left is trumpeting about Palin's association with an Alaskan secessionist. Too many years of Cheneyesque answers of "vote for us or an attack...." has pervaded everything. Obama should be clear, while Palin is in denial about abuse of power charges? I'm not even amused at this point, just weary.
The debates to me are unwatchable. All the candidates are giving canned versions of their stump speeches. McCain rallies have energized the wacko portion of the GOP base with screams of "Arab" (???) and "Kill him." My personal "favorite" was the sheriff in full uniform who used Obama's full name to inspire a little more ill-begotten fear.
Given the economy is in a bi-partisian free fall (Please George, the more you hide, the better the market does), the ill-advised war continues, food isn't getting cheaper, you'd think a straight talker would pick times to do just that.
I want candidates to tell me why I should vote for them. It's laughable to see an ad for Dale Volker saying he'll fix what's wrong in Albany. Dude has been in Albany for 36 years, long enough to realize that he is part of what is broken. McCain has been in Washington for 26 years and isn't speaking to what people in general care about. A friend of mine from the Pittsburgh area went to a speech and emailed me that when he got off the fear-mongering, he started talking about local industry and life in a steel town, conveniently forgetting that we haven't been a steel town in almost 20 years.
Government shouldn't be about that. There should be hope. Events of the past month show that whoever wins just got their agenda strangled considerably. Tell me what's good about you, not what you dislike about the other guy.
People want to have some hope, not be yelled at to get off the grass by the grumpy old codger in the neighborhood, even if you can see Russia from his hot neighbor's taxpayer subsidized front yard.
I'm tired, tired of Karl Rove like smear campaigns, tired of candidates being asked a question and giving a rehearsed answer to SOME OTHER question, tired of the name calling, tired of everybody screaming about "That One," when nothing could matter less.
Quit worrying about connotation, Senator, revive my interest and talk about what you would do.
The platitudes denuded Tom Brokaw in the last debate. While Obama has basically kept on his message, McCain/Palin are all over the place. I hate sports analogies, but the Obama campagin has a large lead in the fourth quarter, with three minutes left and is just running up the middle, while the McCain campaign is trying to get the ball back.
Let's just fucking vote already.
Mrmike's Journal
My Podcast Link
10/14/2008 10:28 #46106
I'm tired...let's just vote already.10/11/2008 12:57 #46058
Gratuitous Post for the 25KPoor Old Man
An old man is sitting on a park bench crying. A young man is walking by and asks him why he's crying. The old man says, "I'm retired and I have lots of money, a huge luxury apartment, a beautiful 25 year old wife who loves me and has sex with me twice a day"
The young man says, "Well then why the hell are you crying!?"
The old man replies, "I can't remember where I live!"
metalpeter - 10/11/08 17:22
Good one
Good one
10/10/2008 13:35 #46043
Purchasing some ABBA & other stangenessCategory: random
My Dad turns a youthful 72 on the 14th, but my Mom is throwing a little thing on Sunday afternoon. He's tough to buy for because he isn't wanting for much. A semi-retired computer systems consultant type, he pretty much has all the gizmos covered. He even took to a chomby for the home office. Given these lovely economic times, the family is reitering on cutting back on gift purchasing. He's always been a big classical music fan, but has little use for much of anything post 1900. He would periodically appear at my bedroom door when I was in high school studying to Yes or Emerson, Lake, and Palmer, but the Clash would send him on his way. That's why I couldn't help but laugh when he mentioned he'd like an ABBA cd. One of my wisenheimer daughters was teasing him a little about Dancing Queen coming out of his Ipod, when he responded with an almost scholarly take on "the classical structure in some of their music." Might very well be true, but sounded silly nonetheless. So, Dad, here comes ABBA's greatest hits for your big day.
And how was your week?
And how was your week?
10/06/2008 09:43 #45955
The "Debate"Category: politics
Just in case you haven't seen it yet...
10/06/2008 13:51 #45962
The foolishness of Ch. 4 and Time WarnerCategory: work
Every once in awhile, I miss my compadres at Adelphia, but this weekend was not one of them. The slapfight between Lin Broadcasting (Ch. 4's owner) and Time Warner assured that the people who do the real work would be taking the brunt of the frustration from the people caught in the middle...us customers. This might sound like apologizing or ass kissin, but it isn't. Lord knows both can be greedy pigs, but Time Warner is in the right this time. From my former life, I can tell you that the local stations in a area have agreements with the cable, satellite, and Fios guys for carriage. There is actually a lawsuit waged by local tv stations to get on a given system. Now Lin TV wants paid, for something they really aren't entitled to. My experience with this is when Fox 29 was at the end of its deal with Dish Network and ran on screen crawls encouraging everybody to go get cable. Every station is a little fickle. You dance with who you have at a given moment.
Lin TV owns 12 stations in markets mostly around the great lakes. When Fox 29 came to the end of their agreement almost two years ago, they let TW keep showing them while the negotiations kept going. 29's parents had a lot at stake. The same firm owns NBC in LA.
Lin decided to cut off Buffalo, but the local station that shows the Packers to Green Bay (that had to be ugly) as well as their other markets. If I am an advertiser (like I am now), I'm pissed because they just took over 330,000 out of the loop because they felt like it. If I'm a paying cable customer (like I am now), I'm miffed because there are two channels doing nothing, yet I'm stuck paying for them.
While they talk, it would behoove Lin to put the channels back up. Both sides are going to take a beating for their stances, but Lin has a chance to actively be a "good guy" and place their signals back on.
I guess my point is that moving to Dish, Verizon, etc doesn't insulate you from such foolishness as they have to work with broadcasters under similar agreements. I'm not saying that because I used to be there or that my former Amherst office had a thousand people waiting for antenna on Saturday, but in the battle of overstuffed corporate entities, Lin is the one who could lose this time and throw the switch to put their signal on.
I can appreciate taking a stand, but perhaps there was a better way of digging in their heels.
Lin TV owns 12 stations in markets mostly around the great lakes. When Fox 29 came to the end of their agreement almost two years ago, they let TW keep showing them while the negotiations kept going. 29's parents had a lot at stake. The same firm owns NBC in LA.
Lin decided to cut off Buffalo, but the local station that shows the Packers to Green Bay (that had to be ugly) as well as their other markets. If I am an advertiser (like I am now), I'm pissed because they just took over 330,000 out of the loop because they felt like it. If I'm a paying cable customer (like I am now), I'm miffed because there are two channels doing nothing, yet I'm stuck paying for them.
While they talk, it would behoove Lin to put the channels back up. Both sides are going to take a beating for their stances, but Lin has a chance to actively be a "good guy" and place their signals back on.
I guess my point is that moving to Dish, Verizon, etc doesn't insulate you from such foolishness as they have to work with broadcasters under similar agreements. I'm not saying that because I used to be there or that my former Amherst office had a thousand people waiting for antenna on Saturday, but in the battle of overstuffed corporate entities, Lin is the one who could lose this time and throw the switch to put their signal on.
I can appreciate taking a stand, but perhaps there was a better way of digging in their heels.
metalpeter - 10/07/08 20:07
Thanks for the good explaining hope something gets worked out soon.
Thanks for the good explaining hope something gets worked out soon.
mrmike - 10/06/08 19:59
Hey Peter,
The reason why the channels aren't ala carte is the decreasing numbers of owners. The talk about that is mostly a case of somebody wanted ESPNs but not the Disneys. That don't fly because they share the same owner and want to squeeze as much as is possible about the market. It's more cost effective for Time Warner to sell chunks or blocks of channels than trying to itemize. They can itemize channels but they don't want to as they make more ad dollars from them, which would disappear if we could pick and choose.
There is a non-duplication agreement that affect what else you were asking about. I remember back in the day, if a show got preempted, you could often find it on canadian tv. That's why when you sit down to watch the Office on NBC, there is often a dark screen or infomercials on the CBC. Time Warner tried to get around that for the sake of the football game. It's more of an understanding than a law, but LIN TV yelled foul when Time Warner tried to bring in the feed from the Rochester CBS affiliate. So, the FCC sided with LIN TV and said no.
And you're right, for the local stations with satelite, you either have to get antenna from them or another smaller dish. None of which protects you from the shenanigans like we've been seeing from Time Warner and Lin TV this week
Hey Peter,
The reason why the channels aren't ala carte is the decreasing numbers of owners. The talk about that is mostly a case of somebody wanted ESPNs but not the Disneys. That don't fly because they share the same owner and want to squeeze as much as is possible about the market. It's more cost effective for Time Warner to sell chunks or blocks of channels than trying to itemize. They can itemize channels but they don't want to as they make more ad dollars from them, which would disappear if we could pick and choose.
There is a non-duplication agreement that affect what else you were asking about. I remember back in the day, if a show got preempted, you could often find it on canadian tv. That's why when you sit down to watch the Office on NBC, there is often a dark screen or infomercials on the CBC. Time Warner tried to get around that for the sake of the football game. It's more of an understanding than a law, but LIN TV yelled foul when Time Warner tried to bring in the feed from the Rochester CBS affiliate. So, the FCC sided with LIN TV and said no.
And you're right, for the local stations with satelite, you either have to get antenna from them or another smaller dish. None of which protects you from the shenanigans like we've been seeing from Time Warner and Lin TV this week
metalpeter - 10/06/08 19:00
Hey Mike thanks for posting about this from your point of view but I have a question. Back before I had cable there where some companies that gave you the locals and they you paid based by what stations you got. It wasn't like it is now where there are all these giant blocks (maybe I'm miss remembering since I didn't have cable). I know congress wants to make cable go to the al le carte system and Cable (as an industry) doesn't want to do it. What I don't understand is two things. Since CBS carries a lot of sports and that is important why can't cable go with a CBS station say out of Rochester and ERIE PA. My other question is why not give customers the Option to Pay for CBS and have it added to there Bill and offer that as an option. I understand that time warner says that they don't want to make cable cost more because of one station, but most people are paying for stations they don't watch anyways. For example when I got IFC and Sundance Channel as a block it came with some other stations I have no idea what they where and I never watched them On a side note I find it interesting that on the WIVB ads they metntion Dish Network and not Direct TV, I thought that was Odd, maybe I'm wrong but I thought with Direct TV you got two Dishes one for the national stations and one for Local but I could be wrong. But if that is correct why not mention Direct TV. I think and this is just me here that they know they get there power from people watching football and if people go to Direct they might get the NFL network and not watch WIVB at all but that is just me.
Hey Mike thanks for posting about this from your point of view but I have a question. Back before I had cable there where some companies that gave you the locals and they you paid based by what stations you got. It wasn't like it is now where there are all these giant blocks (maybe I'm miss remembering since I didn't have cable). I know congress wants to make cable go to the al le carte system and Cable (as an industry) doesn't want to do it. What I don't understand is two things. Since CBS carries a lot of sports and that is important why can't cable go with a CBS station say out of Rochester and ERIE PA. My other question is why not give customers the Option to Pay for CBS and have it added to there Bill and offer that as an option. I understand that time warner says that they don't want to make cable cost more because of one station, but most people are paying for stations they don't watch anyways. For example when I got IFC and Sundance Channel as a block it came with some other stations I have no idea what they where and I never watched them On a side note I find it interesting that on the WIVB ads they metntion Dish Network and not Direct TV, I thought that was Odd, maybe I'm wrong but I thought with Direct TV you got two Dishes one for the national stations and one for Local but I could be wrong. But if that is correct why not mention Direct TV. I think and this is just me here that they know they get there power from people watching football and if people go to Direct they might get the NFL network and not watch WIVB at all but that is just me.
I remember general elections in India a while back and this cross-smearing craziness is exactly what they carried out. It was revolting and depressing at the same time. :(
Well to use the sports thing (e:MrMike) I think McCain is going to get the ball back and kick the last second field Goal to win the game as the clock exspires, or to use another one he is going to line up to kick it Barrack calls a time out it is missed and on the 2nd attempt it is good (yes that really did happen in football this weekend).
what can i say; it's pretty cool to not have tv AND not live in the country :)
20 days countdown..
I had hoped for a more illustrious and intelligent campaign on both sides. What a circus.
AMEN! to that. I'm sick of both of them, and all of their bullshit. The negativity is just exhausting. It would be so incredibly refreshing to have them both actually stand up and say:
I'm not getting sucked into the finger-pointing, name calling, truth-stretching crap about the other guy's campaign - I'm just here to tell you what I plan to do...
Unfortunately, not likely.
pulease, i am growing older by the second. like a whore staring at the ceiling, can't ya'll just get it done?
hell ya.
Even for junkies this is getting to be one long, bad bender.