Yea, We knew this shit was going to happen eventually We saw it happen in September of '07
To be honest I hope people wake up & yank their money out of troubled banks & bring them to their knees. Savers have been practically shit on for the last 30 years. Just ask anyone that for whatever stupid reason, "believed in the system" & had more than $100,000 in Indymac Bank. They may have kept their money safe for the last 10 years, avoided the .com bubble in March '00, never got sucked into low interest, no documentation loan orgy over the last 5 years and now are going to get a haircut on their accounts over 100 K, basically 50 cents on the $.
The only way someone got even that is a saver with Indymac is to have loaded up on those 4.3% CD rates that they were offering. F**K, Fed Funds currently is 2% and that's the rate institutions borrow money. It really was a huge moral hazard, Let's offer rates DOUBLE the market rate to get enough Capital to keep going & if shit blows up in our face, THE TAXPAYERS OF THE USA WILL HOLD THE BAG!!!! Pretty smart, although a bit morally shady.
In a way we are all going to be holding the bag for the whole mess we are going to go through in regards to the Socialism for the Rich. There was no fear in making any loan to anyone with a pulse. While at the same time the whole thought of being prudent and conservative just went by the wayside. With what 70% home ownership in this country and with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac passing the joint around of the homeownership fetish in this country there was just too much froth for the whole thing. You look at the subsidies for Freddie and Fannie, The tax breaks for home ownership and the low interest rates below inflation for so long, people just had a no fear of anything. Just borrow, borrow and borrow like this tool; Do you really need $200 Jeans and BMW? We just can't have home ownership for home ownership sake to perpetuate the "American Dream" and keep prices rising year after year while having solvent institutions that have reserve capital to back up what they are lending. At some point you have to say, "Dude you're horrible with your money and you don't have anything to put Down on this purchase to offset this institution's risk, FLAT OUT NO!" The mission for Fannie & Freddie was at best schizophrenic. You can't make owning for everyone at all costs fit into the framework of being prudent, solvent and responsible for your balance sheet, it just doesn't happen, we can't all be winners.
We are all going to be homeowners as the U.S. Government is going to end up buying Fannie & Freddie. So I guess it makes the Government your benefactor landlord. So is this mess what the ownership society was all about? So instead of one big apartment bloc of flats owned and operated by the government as they did in the Eastern Bloc, we are going to have Uncle Sam own our Patio Home Condo's? Then again that's another thing with the people the invested in Freddie & Fannie, the GSE's that provided a nice stream of income, your shareholder equity at the end of this, ZERO. Do you think that in say 10 years if the "investment" for these Government Sponsored Enterprises pans out that they will return the gain to the taxpayers in the form of tax cuts?
At the end of the day we have to realize that Capitalism is a ZERO SUM GAME. You can't have success without failure. We compete every day for Jobs, Mates and parking spaces. This whole, let's help everyone out and bail them out is just plain bullshit. At the end of the day we are all going to fit the bill. If they tighten in the Easy money, people won't to be able to buy those McMansion's due to no institution willing to lend them money. How many people can lay down $40,000 Cold Hard Cash for a $400,000 house? They used to do it 30 + years ago & the payment could only be as high as 25% of your NET Income, since they wanted to make sure you could may your Bill every month.
We can either have responsible lending or easy money to let Real Estate prices keep their upward trajectory forever. You do that by making it affordable for people with the money they have, or give people more money to spend. The second option has been the policy for the country for the last 20 years and obviously that hasn't worked.
What I figure they are going to do since there is just took much at stake to let the economy inflate to Wilhelm Republic levels. All of us are going to be on the hook for bailing out all of the wreckless financial institutions. It's kind of like living in a Dorm and some drunken frat boys trashed the bathrooms. Well no one is going to fess up and everyone on the floor is going to get assessed a bill for the repairs.
At this point just keep on shorting the financials & buy Gold.
Vincent's Journal
My Podcast Link
07/14/2008 23:54 #45021
Good Old Fashioned Bank Run RantCategory: money
07/07/2008 23:06 #44900
July 4th PartyCategory: summer party
After I came home from Canada on Saturday I ended up stopping by this party that I have been going to for a few years now. It's out in Wilson and at night you could see the Toronto skyline clearly. The funny part of the whole evening was I ran into (e:kookcity2000) there! He was friends with one of the brother's that host this event.
It's a gathering of people all across the country. Everyone for the most part highly intelligent and pretty well off, so it was quite the refreshing environment. The highlight was talking to this one Hipster guy Josh who totally embraced our contribution to the party of Old Milwaukee and Mickey's Fine Malt Liquor. I have never seen Labatt Blue sit in a cooler so long untouched. That was quite a shocker to be honest. On a personal note there was this guy from Baltimore there who wore a "National Bohemian Beer" shirt that is of the Pabst family product line, but unavailable here.
Unlike past years the Dad of the family finally constructed himself a "Man Cave" and for the later part of the evening I watched UFC 86. Needless to say it was interesting to kick back watching the bloodsport while listening to old school progressive rock at the same time as the soundtrack for this party.
Needless to say here are some scenic pics of Lake Ontario and some fireworks in action.
It's a gathering of people all across the country. Everyone for the most part highly intelligent and pretty well off, so it was quite the refreshing environment. The highlight was talking to this one Hipster guy Josh who totally embraced our contribution to the party of Old Milwaukee and Mickey's Fine Malt Liquor. I have never seen Labatt Blue sit in a cooler so long untouched. That was quite a shocker to be honest. On a personal note there was this guy from Baltimore there who wore a "National Bohemian Beer" shirt that is of the Pabst family product line, but unavailable here.
Unlike past years the Dad of the family finally constructed himself a "Man Cave" and for the later part of the evening I watched UFC 86. Needless to say it was interesting to kick back watching the bloodsport while listening to old school progressive rock at the same time as the soundtrack for this party.
Needless to say here are some scenic pics of Lake Ontario and some fireworks in action.
kookcity2000 - 07/10/08 21:00
that was a really fun party. I only see most of those people once or twice a year.
Estrip is becoming like that now.
I'm such a bum, I should be at more estrip parties.
that was a really fun party. I only see most of those people once or twice a year.
Estrip is becoming like that now.
I'm such a bum, I should be at more estrip parties.
metalpeter - 07/08/08 18:03
Nice pictures, and I'm glad to see that (e:kookcity2000) doesn't have a pan of his own drink on his head, HA or if he did then I'm sad there is no picture of it, Double HA. I'm a causal watcher of MMA so I forgot the PPV was on. I think UFC is on free well if you have Spiketv, at least. I did read about the PPV and seeing that Forrest Griffen fight where he won the tittle would have been cool, glad you had a good time.
Nice pictures, and I'm glad to see that (e:kookcity2000) doesn't have a pan of his own drink on his head, HA or if he did then I'm sad there is no picture of it, Double HA. I'm a causal watcher of MMA so I forgot the PPV was on. I think UFC is on free well if you have Spiketv, at least. I did read about the PPV and seeing that Forrest Griffen fight where he won the tittle would have been cool, glad you had a good time.
07/06/2008 23:16 #44883
Woodbine Race TrackI spent most of my July 4th Holiday over in Canada. Really what was behind it was the need to just get away for a change in scenery. So other than hanging with my family over there, I did do a couple of things on my own. The feature being my little wandering around the Woodbine Race Track. It's in Rexdale right by Lester B. Pearson International Airport and has been a fixture since the 50's.
This is what it cost to fill up My uncle's Nissan Maxima starting with a 1/4th tank. Mind you I filled my up car with 1/4 of a tank for $60 in the US of A.
If you Can't be a real good golfer, at least look like one...
For the most part the track is largely under utilized as there are 5 levels. The frist floor is the Casino and most of the horse betting activity is on levels 2 and 3. I went up to 4 and 5 somehow through using the stairs and I felt like a kid exploring into places that I should not have been ;-)
This is what it cost to fill up My uncle's Nissan Maxima starting with a 1/4th tank. Mind you I filled my up car with 1/4 of a tank for $60 in the US of A.
If you Can't be a real good golfer, at least look like one...
For the most part the track is largely under utilized as there are 5 levels. The frist floor is the Casino and most of the horse betting activity is on levels 2 and 3. I went up to 4 and 5 somehow through using the stairs and I felt like a kid exploring into places that I should not have been ;-)
06/26/2008 21:52 #44795
stocks & loveCategory: potpouri
What an ass kicking day on Wall St. Although, in all I had the best day I ever had owning individual stocks. So for the most part when the Red arrows are all over the place, I'm happy and if Gold & silver counters by going green, then I'm ecstatic. This shit is only to get worse, not better. My advise is to get just buy precious metal stocks/mutual funds if that is something you can do.
_________________________________________________________
On another note I just discovered
He's not a bad guy at all and is totally misunderstood, but unfortunately he does not have the balance to counter his shortcomings. If you are going to be a socially oblivious guy that comes off as a prick you need to be more of a bad influence "the kind of JERK that women love" or be a total man wuss to be successful in relationships that you are seeking. Being a socially oblivious prick or at least appearing so does not get you any sympathy from any woman. The decades of him not being with anyone just drive this home.
I have to hand it to Showtime for just being the kind of premium cable for shows these days. It will be a show that I will be watching regularly to make sure that I extinguish the shit that I have in common with the guy, because honest I do see some of my self in him and it FREAKING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!!!
_________________________________________________________
On another note I just discovered
on Showtime tonight. All I can say is I DO NOT WANT TO END UP LIKE THAT GUY! Yea, I do see some similarites between Scott Baio's "Scott Baio is 45 and single," but WTF??? It makes me want to get married again just for the sake of getting married again, even though I realized that it was a horrible decision to make just to avoid being some weirdo like this Eric Schaeffer guy.I Can't Believe I'm Still Single
He's not a bad guy at all and is totally misunderstood, but unfortunately he does not have the balance to counter his shortcomings. If you are going to be a socially oblivious guy that comes off as a prick you need to be more of a bad influence "the kind of JERK that women love" or be a total man wuss to be successful in relationships that you are seeking. Being a socially oblivious prick or at least appearing so does not get you any sympathy from any woman. The decades of him not being with anyone just drive this home.
I have to hand it to Showtime for just being the kind of premium cable for shows these days. It will be a show that I will be watching regularly to make sure that I extinguish the shit that I have in common with the guy, because honest I do see some of my self in him and it FREAKING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!!!
metalpeter - 07/07/08 17:48
I got to see this shows 1st and 2nd episode and it is interesting, the girl with the tattoos, to me seems very hot but she also seems like I know her. I know I don't but I wonder if she was featured on some other show or special about sex. I do have to give credit to the guy that is does things that most would find odd like being but fucked and sucking on a fake cock but then he doesn't want to do it on camera, that is a lot of honesty it really is. Hey I'm not saying there is anything wrong with ass play and being beat up. I'm saying that it is gutsy to admit that on camera. The thing I wonder is who does the editing him or showtime or the people who make the show. hey you gotta love showtime.
I got to see this shows 1st and 2nd episode and it is interesting, the girl with the tattoos, to me seems very hot but she also seems like I know her. I know I don't but I wonder if she was featured on some other show or special about sex. I do have to give credit to the guy that is does things that most would find odd like being but fucked and sucking on a fake cock but then he doesn't want to do it on camera, that is a lot of honesty it really is. Hey I'm not saying there is anything wrong with ass play and being beat up. I'm saying that it is gutsy to admit that on camera. The thing I wonder is who does the editing him or showtime or the people who make the show. hey you gotta love showtime.
metalpeter - 06/27/08 10:15
I have not seen this show yet I missed when it first came on but maybe I'll get to catch it, it looks good and sounds good.
I have not seen this show yet I missed when it first came on but maybe I'll get to catch it, it looks good and sounds good.
tinypliny - 06/26/08 23:00
I don't know. I think you should be yourself. Maybe people who don't like you for who you are don't deserve you. The very fact that you feel you are identifying with this person on TV indicates that you are really not like him because unlike him you see where your apparent "weaknesses" are. I put that in quotes because sometimes what you perceive as your "weaknesses" maybe your inherent traits that attract people to you. The mere fact that it didn't work for some other person doesn't really mean they wouldn't work for you. Its not one trait or the other. Its an interaction of several traits and your own expression and interpretation of those traits that make you who you are, for better or worse.
I don't know. I think you should be yourself. Maybe people who don't like you for who you are don't deserve you. The very fact that you feel you are identifying with this person on TV indicates that you are really not like him because unlike him you see where your apparent "weaknesses" are. I put that in quotes because sometimes what you perceive as your "weaknesses" maybe your inherent traits that attract people to you. The mere fact that it didn't work for some other person doesn't really mean they wouldn't work for you. Its not one trait or the other. Its an interaction of several traits and your own expression and interpretation of those traits that make you who you are, for better or worse.
06/24/2008 23:55 #44777
Economy RantCategory: money
This article kind of irked me today Basically we are all going to chip in to bail out people that are under water in their mortgages. Frankly I think it absolutely sucks. Let's reward people that took on irresponsible risk by saving their asses at your expense. Here I though this was Capitalism and for taking a chance at profiting you also accepted the possibility of losing. So as a guy that is just saving his money to maybe, "PUT DOWN A DOWNPAYMENT" I have to watch my tax money go to people that gambled and LOST. I mean if you're a Real Estate Developer and you lost you should not come to me to recoup your losses.
The sad part is that's it is criminal what say the Banks have done with people's deposits. Here is a Freaking Fine Example I seriously want to know what they were smoking when they though of that project. Here is my guess, (1. Real Estate only goes one direction, that is Up 2. We can always write this off 3. There will be some government bailout to help us out, so if the bank goes under FDIC Insurance will cover it.) Seriously the amount of money that is swishing around is just astounding.
Now we have people on people calling for serious restrictions on Commodity and Futures trading. This is the blame for the run up in Energy Prices. Look no one really cared for the last 7 years when Housing prices ran up. People were actually cheering when it was going on, "Flip that House, Flip that House, Flip that House" on A & E. There was never a cry for "Win fall Profits Tax" or the People that were banking the dough in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada were not going to SHARE THE PROFITS WITH YOU WHEN TIMES WERE GOOD! Then again, that's the coutry we live in now Privatize the profits & Socialize the Losses. It's OK to take a chance and lose money, but if you take a chance on a house it's not your fault. After all is it really too much to ask when you BORROWED MONEY & PROMISE TO PAY IT BACK? !?
Just think now in a couple of years as the 'Burbs unwind the Slumlords that have been sitting on property in the City for decades are going to be rewarded now that people won't be able to afford the white picket fence. Are they going to spread the money around as they start to say Cha-Ching after they can actually sell their stuff to people that are actually going to live there instead of flipping them to some "investor" on Craigslist that just can't pass up a bargin of a $25,000 house? I don't think so. We're just going to throw money down a hole on declining McMansions in the suburbs & exSuburbs as they turn into say Red Cross Offices as the Mansions on Delaware Ave did decades ago as the cost of keeping up those structures up just became too burdensome.
The sad part is that's it is criminal what say the Banks have done with people's deposits. Here is a Freaking Fine Example I seriously want to know what they were smoking when they though of that project. Here is my guess, (1. Real Estate only goes one direction, that is Up 2. We can always write this off 3. There will be some government bailout to help us out, so if the bank goes under FDIC Insurance will cover it.) Seriously the amount of money that is swishing around is just astounding.
Now we have people on people calling for serious restrictions on Commodity and Futures trading. This is the blame for the run up in Energy Prices. Look no one really cared for the last 7 years when Housing prices ran up. People were actually cheering when it was going on, "Flip that House, Flip that House, Flip that House" on A & E. There was never a cry for "Win fall Profits Tax" or the People that were banking the dough in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada were not going to SHARE THE PROFITS WITH YOU WHEN TIMES WERE GOOD! Then again, that's the coutry we live in now Privatize the profits & Socialize the Losses. It's OK to take a chance and lose money, but if you take a chance on a house it's not your fault. After all is it really too much to ask when you BORROWED MONEY & PROMISE TO PAY IT BACK? !?
Just think now in a couple of years as the 'Burbs unwind the Slumlords that have been sitting on property in the City for decades are going to be rewarded now that people won't be able to afford the white picket fence. Are they going to spread the money around as they start to say Cha-Ching after they can actually sell their stuff to people that are actually going to live there instead of flipping them to some "investor" on Craigslist that just can't pass up a bargin of a $25,000 house? I don't think so. We're just going to throw money down a hole on declining McMansions in the suburbs & exSuburbs as they turn into say Red Cross Offices as the Mansions on Delaware Ave did decades ago as the cost of keeping up those structures up just became too burdensome.
heidi - 06/27/08 12:29
On the surface it seems easy to place the blame with consumers who took out loans that were too big, but we have to understand that Countrywide, for example, was intentionally giving out loans without regard for people's ability to pay them back -
The complaint in the case agains Countrywide execs: link:http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1582_draft_cwide_complaint2.pdf
"Defendants' deceptive scheme had one primary goal -- to supply the secondary market with as many loans as possible, ideally loans that would earn the highest premiums. Over a period of several years, Defendants constantly expanded Countrywide's share of the consumer market for mortgage loans through a wide variety of deceptive practices, undertaken with the direction, authorization, and ratification of defendants Sambol and Mozilo, in order to maximize its profits from the sale of those loan to the secondary market...
In addition, Countrywide directly and indirectly motivated its branch managers, loan officers and brokers to market the loans that would earn the highest premiums on the secondary market without regard to borrower ability to repay. "
I've been through three mortgage processes - As an informed and proactive consumer, there's no way I would have ended up with a subprime loan or one too big for me, but I can certainly see how easy it would be for someone to be talked into this. Most people do not have the skills to analyze loan amortizations. Hell, way too many people do not have the skills to set up an accurate and useful household budget with clear financial goals, so they wouldn't be able to tell what's too big or exploitative.
On the surface it seems easy to place the blame with consumers who took out loans that were too big, but we have to understand that Countrywide, for example, was intentionally giving out loans without regard for people's ability to pay them back -
The complaint in the case agains Countrywide execs: link:http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1582_draft_cwide_complaint2.pdf
"Defendants' deceptive scheme had one primary goal -- to supply the secondary market with as many loans as possible, ideally loans that would earn the highest premiums. Over a period of several years, Defendants constantly expanded Countrywide's share of the consumer market for mortgage loans through a wide variety of deceptive practices, undertaken with the direction, authorization, and ratification of defendants Sambol and Mozilo, in order to maximize its profits from the sale of those loan to the secondary market...
In addition, Countrywide directly and indirectly motivated its branch managers, loan officers and brokers to market the loans that would earn the highest premiums on the secondary market without regard to borrower ability to repay. "
I've been through three mortgage processes - As an informed and proactive consumer, there's no way I would have ended up with a subprime loan or one too big for me, but I can certainly see how easy it would be for someone to be talked into this. Most people do not have the skills to analyze loan amortizations. Hell, way too many people do not have the skills to set up an accurate and useful household budget with clear financial goals, so they wouldn't be able to tell what's too big or exploitative.
joshua - 06/25/08 09:53
I'm sort of in the middle. I don't feel badly at all for people who bought more house than they could realistically afford, but on the other hand I think lenders' collective dishonesty is just as much a part of it as buyers' collective irresponsibility. Also, keep in mind that millions of these people are also honest people that probably do need some sort of relief due to market tinkering. I think it will be vetoed anyway, but like any kind of large government bailout, people are bickering about where the money is going to go in petty and greedy ways. That should be a familiar procedure to any local person following our waterfront development and the bridge that will never be built!
With respect to oil, for the first time in my life I think stricter regulations on commodities trading are necessary. As you know I'm no socialist. Specifically I'm talking about buying oil futures on margin, but I suppose you could extend it to corn these days as well. Currently the initial margin requirements for crude oil futures are FAR less strenuous than those required for investment in stock futures. Considering how stagnant the market has been in comparison to oil prices the past few years, it almost seems like a brainless bet - the investment looks more promising and its actually a "cheaper" gamble to make. In this case the rules are allowing speculators to affect artificial increases in the prices of crude irrespective of supply and demand. We all know that market movements like this are based on speculation and to be honest, largely fear. Global supply and demand does not explain how we went from $60 a barrel to $140 in a matter of a year or two.
In my view anyway, right now the rules are allowing large investors to tinker with the system in ways that affect the general populace in too drastic of a manner. Speculators aren't the only problem (weak dollar doesn't help) but at the very least trading futures in the commodities market should be just as expensive as it is in the stock market.
I'm sort of in the middle. I don't feel badly at all for people who bought more house than they could realistically afford, but on the other hand I think lenders' collective dishonesty is just as much a part of it as buyers' collective irresponsibility. Also, keep in mind that millions of these people are also honest people that probably do need some sort of relief due to market tinkering. I think it will be vetoed anyway, but like any kind of large government bailout, people are bickering about where the money is going to go in petty and greedy ways. That should be a familiar procedure to any local person following our waterfront development and the bridge that will never be built!
With respect to oil, for the first time in my life I think stricter regulations on commodities trading are necessary. As you know I'm no socialist. Specifically I'm talking about buying oil futures on margin, but I suppose you could extend it to corn these days as well. Currently the initial margin requirements for crude oil futures are FAR less strenuous than those required for investment in stock futures. Considering how stagnant the market has been in comparison to oil prices the past few years, it almost seems like a brainless bet - the investment looks more promising and its actually a "cheaper" gamble to make. In this case the rules are allowing speculators to affect artificial increases in the prices of crude irrespective of supply and demand. We all know that market movements like this are based on speculation and to be honest, largely fear. Global supply and demand does not explain how we went from $60 a barrel to $140 in a matter of a year or two.
In my view anyway, right now the rules are allowing large investors to tinker with the system in ways that affect the general populace in too drastic of a manner. Speculators aren't the only problem (weak dollar doesn't help) but at the very least trading futures in the commodities market should be just as expensive as it is in the stock market.
jason - 06/25/08 08:11
Well done.
Well done.
No more naked shorts!
Anyway, you are absolutely right. Very well put. What I am worried about mostly in the short term is inflationary pressure. The Feds will certainly raise interest rates and that is going to cause another set of problems. The truth is exactly what you have said - we Americans are going to hold the bag for the bad lenders, bad banks and those who bit off more house than they could chew. It ain't gonna be pretty either. Millions and millions of us are going to be living much simpler lives the next few years and maybe that is good for our culture in the long run.
Yes the banks are to blame for giving people loans they can't pay. However it isn't only them. It is also the bank workers. If someone comes in and wants a home loan the worker does the math and even if the bank says this person can have the loan, that worker should say something about having the people figure out a budget and how much they can really pay and have them also figure in some things going up. I think both the bank and the person working there has that responsiblity. But they are not the only ones to blame. You have to put some blame on the government, I don't mean they should have a tighter leash on the banks that is a different argument and maybe they should. The federal Government from when I have been alive has all ways had a defficit so if they are barowing more money then they can pay back then that sends a bad example to the people, the same with the state and cities. To get money Now, and do things now instead of waiting is what is more important and the government sends that message to the people. Next people to blame are the credit card companies. There was a time that when you went to sears or where ever you shopped there was store credit you bought something and then you got your check and you paid it back. If you knew someone with an American Express Card they where rich and exclusive. The way it worked is you charged stuff and then in a months time you had to pay it all back. It wasn't like how all these cards are now where you can spend $2000 and by the time you pay in back with interest and minimum payments it is like paying back $3500. Back in the old days you went to Disney World you saved and paid in cash or check or some form you didn't charge everything. It that "I want it and I need it now". I blame retailers like Target and others, what happened to lay a way, bad for kids clothes. You put money down then pay on it each week and then when it is all paid you get it now. I think except K-mart if you ask about lay a way I would hate to know the reaction you get. I blame us the US Citizen who has to keep up with the Nieghbor and have the coolest phone, the nicest house, the big car and the boat, brand new Jordan's for there kids (but school supplies they come in second) so their kid can be fly and sometimes the kid can't even fucking walk. Hey if we aren't careful we will all have shot guns and our money in floor safes. I'm not saying I'm not part of the problem I used to Christmas Shop with a credit card. When I was at Canisius I would buy books on them, I would go to the Bookstore and buy food there with them. If you like to get philsopical ask the question who really won the could war? Then if things keep going the way they look like there going in our lovely country ask that question again (assuming we don't attack Korea and Iran and get blown to hell) in 20 years? Yes greed can spawn some great stuff sometimes but it can also be what will cause the 2nd great depression.
That is a sad state of the financial policy here. I didn't even have a credit card back home. They are becoming popular, however. Like chronic diseases are on the rise, so are financial irresponsibility and thoughtless spending. :/
I really am not savy enough (nor risk-taking enough) to short anything or buy commodities.
So basically, I am going to get screwed like most everybody else.
Except I live responsibly. We put down 20% when we bought our house (and we bought in super-cheap buffalo). We drive used, paid for in cash cars, and we spend less on going out in a month than many people do in a night.
Hopefully, this market will turn around sometime before I retire. I know it is supposed to, that this is supposed to be cyclical--it just doesn't feel that way.
Things have gotten way too screwed up in the past few years. I hope we can recover.
That second last paragraphs says it all.