I spent most of my July 4th Holiday over in Canada. Really what was behind it was the need to just get away for a change in scenery. So other than hanging with my family over there, I did do a couple of things on my own. The feature being my little wandering around the Woodbine Race Track. It's in Rexdale right by Lester B. Pearson International Airport and has been a fixture since the 50's.
This is what it cost to fill up My uncle's Nissan Maxima starting with a 1/4th tank. Mind you I filled my up car with 1/4 of a tank for $60 in the US of A.
If you Can't be a real good golfer, at least look like one...
For the most part the track is largely under utilized as there are 5 levels. The frist floor is the Casino and most of the horse betting activity is on levels 2 and 3. I went up to 4 and 5 somehow through using the stairs and I felt like a kid exploring into places that I should not have been ;-)
Vincent's Journal
My Podcast Link
07/06/2008 23:16 #44883
Woodbine Race Track06/26/2008 21:52 #44795
stocks & loveCategory: potpouri
What an ass kicking day on Wall St. Although, in all I had the best day I ever had owning individual stocks. So for the most part when the Red arrows are all over the place, I'm happy and if Gold & silver counters by going green, then I'm ecstatic. This shit is only to get worse, not better. My advise is to get just buy precious metal stocks/mutual funds if that is something you can do.
_________________________________________________________
On another note I just discovered
He's not a bad guy at all and is totally misunderstood, but unfortunately he does not have the balance to counter his shortcomings. If you are going to be a socially oblivious guy that comes off as a prick you need to be more of a bad influence "the kind of JERK that women love" or be a total man wuss to be successful in relationships that you are seeking. Being a socially oblivious prick or at least appearing so does not get you any sympathy from any woman. The decades of him not being with anyone just drive this home.
I have to hand it to Showtime for just being the kind of premium cable for shows these days. It will be a show that I will be watching regularly to make sure that I extinguish the shit that I have in common with the guy, because honest I do see some of my self in him and it FREAKING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!!!
_________________________________________________________
On another note I just discovered
on Showtime tonight. All I can say is I DO NOT WANT TO END UP LIKE THAT GUY! Yea, I do see some similarites between Scott Baio's "Scott Baio is 45 and single," but WTF??? It makes me want to get married again just for the sake of getting married again, even though I realized that it was a horrible decision to make just to avoid being some weirdo like this Eric Schaeffer guy.I Can't Believe I'm Still Single
He's not a bad guy at all and is totally misunderstood, but unfortunately he does not have the balance to counter his shortcomings. If you are going to be a socially oblivious guy that comes off as a prick you need to be more of a bad influence "the kind of JERK that women love" or be a total man wuss to be successful in relationships that you are seeking. Being a socially oblivious prick or at least appearing so does not get you any sympathy from any woman. The decades of him not being with anyone just drive this home.
I have to hand it to Showtime for just being the kind of premium cable for shows these days. It will be a show that I will be watching regularly to make sure that I extinguish the shit that I have in common with the guy, because honest I do see some of my self in him and it FREAKING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!!!
06/24/2008 23:55 #44777
Economy RantCategory: money
This article kind of irked me today Basically we are all going to chip in to bail out people that are under water in their mortgages. Frankly I think it absolutely sucks. Let's reward people that took on irresponsible risk by saving their asses at your expense. Here I though this was Capitalism and for taking a chance at profiting you also accepted the possibility of losing. So as a guy that is just saving his money to maybe, "PUT DOWN A DOWNPAYMENT" I have to watch my tax money go to people that gambled and LOST. I mean if you're a Real Estate Developer and you lost you should not come to me to recoup your losses.
The sad part is that's it is criminal what say the Banks have done with people's deposits. Here is a Freaking Fine Example I seriously want to know what they were smoking when they though of that project. Here is my guess, (1. Real Estate only goes one direction, that is Up 2. We can always write this off 3. There will be some government bailout to help us out, so if the bank goes under FDIC Insurance will cover it.) Seriously the amount of money that is swishing around is just astounding.
Now we have people on people calling for serious restrictions on Commodity and Futures trading. This is the blame for the run up in Energy Prices. Look no one really cared for the last 7 years when Housing prices ran up. People were actually cheering when it was going on, "Flip that House, Flip that House, Flip that House" on A & E. There was never a cry for "Win fall Profits Tax" or the People that were banking the dough in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada were not going to SHARE THE PROFITS WITH YOU WHEN TIMES WERE GOOD! Then again, that's the coutry we live in now Privatize the profits & Socialize the Losses. It's OK to take a chance and lose money, but if you take a chance on a house it's not your fault. After all is it really too much to ask when you BORROWED MONEY & PROMISE TO PAY IT BACK? !?
Just think now in a couple of years as the 'Burbs unwind the Slumlords that have been sitting on property in the City for decades are going to be rewarded now that people won't be able to afford the white picket fence. Are they going to spread the money around as they start to say Cha-Ching after they can actually sell their stuff to people that are actually going to live there instead of flipping them to some "investor" on Craigslist that just can't pass up a bargin of a $25,000 house? I don't think so. We're just going to throw money down a hole on declining McMansions in the suburbs & exSuburbs as they turn into say Red Cross Offices as the Mansions on Delaware Ave did decades ago as the cost of keeping up those structures up just became too burdensome.
The sad part is that's it is criminal what say the Banks have done with people's deposits. Here is a Freaking Fine Example I seriously want to know what they were smoking when they though of that project. Here is my guess, (1. Real Estate only goes one direction, that is Up 2. We can always write this off 3. There will be some government bailout to help us out, so if the bank goes under FDIC Insurance will cover it.) Seriously the amount of money that is swishing around is just astounding.
Now we have people on people calling for serious restrictions on Commodity and Futures trading. This is the blame for the run up in Energy Prices. Look no one really cared for the last 7 years when Housing prices ran up. People were actually cheering when it was going on, "Flip that House, Flip that House, Flip that House" on A & E. There was never a cry for "Win fall Profits Tax" or the People that were banking the dough in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada were not going to SHARE THE PROFITS WITH YOU WHEN TIMES WERE GOOD! Then again, that's the coutry we live in now Privatize the profits & Socialize the Losses. It's OK to take a chance and lose money, but if you take a chance on a house it's not your fault. After all is it really too much to ask when you BORROWED MONEY & PROMISE TO PAY IT BACK? !?
Just think now in a couple of years as the 'Burbs unwind the Slumlords that have been sitting on property in the City for decades are going to be rewarded now that people won't be able to afford the white picket fence. Are they going to spread the money around as they start to say Cha-Ching after they can actually sell their stuff to people that are actually going to live there instead of flipping them to some "investor" on Craigslist that just can't pass up a bargin of a $25,000 house? I don't think so. We're just going to throw money down a hole on declining McMansions in the suburbs & exSuburbs as they turn into say Red Cross Offices as the Mansions on Delaware Ave did decades ago as the cost of keeping up those structures up just became too burdensome.
heidi - 06/27/08 12:29
On the surface it seems easy to place the blame with consumers who took out loans that were too big, but we have to understand that Countrywide, for example, was intentionally giving out loans without regard for people's ability to pay them back -
The complaint in the case agains Countrywide execs: link:http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1582_draft_cwide_complaint2.pdf
"Defendants' deceptive scheme had one primary goal -- to supply the secondary market with as many loans as possible, ideally loans that would earn the highest premiums. Over a period of several years, Defendants constantly expanded Countrywide's share of the consumer market for mortgage loans through a wide variety of deceptive practices, undertaken with the direction, authorization, and ratification of defendants Sambol and Mozilo, in order to maximize its profits from the sale of those loan to the secondary market...
In addition, Countrywide directly and indirectly motivated its branch managers, loan officers and brokers to market the loans that would earn the highest premiums on the secondary market without regard to borrower ability to repay. "
I've been through three mortgage processes - As an informed and proactive consumer, there's no way I would have ended up with a subprime loan or one too big for me, but I can certainly see how easy it would be for someone to be talked into this. Most people do not have the skills to analyze loan amortizations. Hell, way too many people do not have the skills to set up an accurate and useful household budget with clear financial goals, so they wouldn't be able to tell what's too big or exploitative.
On the surface it seems easy to place the blame with consumers who took out loans that were too big, but we have to understand that Countrywide, for example, was intentionally giving out loans without regard for people's ability to pay them back -
The complaint in the case agains Countrywide execs: link:http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/press/pdfs/n1582_draft_cwide_complaint2.pdf
"Defendants' deceptive scheme had one primary goal -- to supply the secondary market with as many loans as possible, ideally loans that would earn the highest premiums. Over a period of several years, Defendants constantly expanded Countrywide's share of the consumer market for mortgage loans through a wide variety of deceptive practices, undertaken with the direction, authorization, and ratification of defendants Sambol and Mozilo, in order to maximize its profits from the sale of those loan to the secondary market...
In addition, Countrywide directly and indirectly motivated its branch managers, loan officers and brokers to market the loans that would earn the highest premiums on the secondary market without regard to borrower ability to repay. "
I've been through three mortgage processes - As an informed and proactive consumer, there's no way I would have ended up with a subprime loan or one too big for me, but I can certainly see how easy it would be for someone to be talked into this. Most people do not have the skills to analyze loan amortizations. Hell, way too many people do not have the skills to set up an accurate and useful household budget with clear financial goals, so they wouldn't be able to tell what's too big or exploitative.
joshua - 06/25/08 09:53
I'm sort of in the middle. I don't feel badly at all for people who bought more house than they could realistically afford, but on the other hand I think lenders' collective dishonesty is just as much a part of it as buyers' collective irresponsibility. Also, keep in mind that millions of these people are also honest people that probably do need some sort of relief due to market tinkering. I think it will be vetoed anyway, but like any kind of large government bailout, people are bickering about where the money is going to go in petty and greedy ways. That should be a familiar procedure to any local person following our waterfront development and the bridge that will never be built!
With respect to oil, for the first time in my life I think stricter regulations on commodities trading are necessary. As you know I'm no socialist. Specifically I'm talking about buying oil futures on margin, but I suppose you could extend it to corn these days as well. Currently the initial margin requirements for crude oil futures are FAR less strenuous than those required for investment in stock futures. Considering how stagnant the market has been in comparison to oil prices the past few years, it almost seems like a brainless bet - the investment looks more promising and its actually a "cheaper" gamble to make. In this case the rules are allowing speculators to affect artificial increases in the prices of crude irrespective of supply and demand. We all know that market movements like this are based on speculation and to be honest, largely fear. Global supply and demand does not explain how we went from $60 a barrel to $140 in a matter of a year or two.
In my view anyway, right now the rules are allowing large investors to tinker with the system in ways that affect the general populace in too drastic of a manner. Speculators aren't the only problem (weak dollar doesn't help) but at the very least trading futures in the commodities market should be just as expensive as it is in the stock market.
I'm sort of in the middle. I don't feel badly at all for people who bought more house than they could realistically afford, but on the other hand I think lenders' collective dishonesty is just as much a part of it as buyers' collective irresponsibility. Also, keep in mind that millions of these people are also honest people that probably do need some sort of relief due to market tinkering. I think it will be vetoed anyway, but like any kind of large government bailout, people are bickering about where the money is going to go in petty and greedy ways. That should be a familiar procedure to any local person following our waterfront development and the bridge that will never be built!
With respect to oil, for the first time in my life I think stricter regulations on commodities trading are necessary. As you know I'm no socialist. Specifically I'm talking about buying oil futures on margin, but I suppose you could extend it to corn these days as well. Currently the initial margin requirements for crude oil futures are FAR less strenuous than those required for investment in stock futures. Considering how stagnant the market has been in comparison to oil prices the past few years, it almost seems like a brainless bet - the investment looks more promising and its actually a "cheaper" gamble to make. In this case the rules are allowing speculators to affect artificial increases in the prices of crude irrespective of supply and demand. We all know that market movements like this are based on speculation and to be honest, largely fear. Global supply and demand does not explain how we went from $60 a barrel to $140 in a matter of a year or two.
In my view anyway, right now the rules are allowing large investors to tinker with the system in ways that affect the general populace in too drastic of a manner. Speculators aren't the only problem (weak dollar doesn't help) but at the very least trading futures in the commodities market should be just as expensive as it is in the stock market.
jason - 06/25/08 08:11
Well done.
Well done.
06/19/2008 00:23 #44713
No Descent Women in BuffaloCategory: relationships
(e:jason) I think we may have found our answer to that problem...
;-)
;-)
metalpeter - 06/19/08 17:44
Well not that I'm a gamer but Sega was much better then Nintendo it is just that Duck Hunt and Mario where more popular but if you go back and look at the Game Play and Graffix Sega was better. I knew they made those "real Dolls" at about $5000. But see I don't know how much this robot could do it is only 15 inches tall, hey maybe soon those two things will get combined.
Well not that I'm a gamer but Sega was much better then Nintendo it is just that Duck Hunt and Mario where more popular but if you go back and look at the Game Play and Graffix Sega was better. I knew they made those "real Dolls" at about $5000. But see I don't know how much this robot could do it is only 15 inches tall, hey maybe soon those two things will get combined.
mrmike - 06/19/08 08:50
But Sega makes it/her. That can't bode well
But Sega makes it/her. That can't bode well
06/22/2008 23:49 #44755
Erie, PA & Presque Isle RacinoI just had a really start to what should have been a lazy Sunday. So what I ended up doing was just taking a Sunday drive of which I could just get away for a few hours & still come home at a reasonable hour. So I thought, heck why not drive down the 90 to check out the newest casino or in this case Racino (racetrack & casino) Presque Isle Downs Erie, PA.
Well I only lasted there 1/2 hour. The place was absolutely packed as the parking lot was just full. Once inside my friend got ID by security who then proceeded to ask questions about Seneca Niagara, since he has a room booked there next week or so. We basically told him that it was nice & if he wanted to try something different he could go to the bars on Third St. But Yea, The place was wall to wall people. You could not find a machine that was not occupied. The one aspect of the place that made me run was the smoke. Being so progressive in Canada and New York State it just drove me bonkers. I really wanted to check out the thoroughbred racing, but I just couldn't wait until then. So all in all we spend about 1/2 hour in the place. Although I have a few pics to prove it.
One more thing. How the stock of the parent company Moutaineer MNTG is only $5 I just don't understand. This place is going to be a goldmine. On the stupid shuttle bus I heard some slot players comment that the place was not this jammed packed when it had it's grand opening. Casinos in Pennsylvania are just going to be "CHA-CHING!" Yea, Mountaineer is going to some some people from Pittsburgh that are going to play at the Meadows & Wheeling Island, but all I can see for Presque Isle is Expansion. The people that mobbed this place today came from somewhere.
So other than just seeing this place, we went shopping at some mall in Erie & ate dinner at Quaker Steak & Lube. For the most part I just had to check the place out before they open up on Transit Road where Don Pablo's once stood in front of the Regal/Imax. I just had the wings with the cheese/bacon/scallions fries & it was pretty descent.
Well I only lasted there 1/2 hour. The place was absolutely packed as the parking lot was just full. Once inside my friend got ID by security who then proceeded to ask questions about Seneca Niagara, since he has a room booked there next week or so. We basically told him that it was nice & if he wanted to try something different he could go to the bars on Third St. But Yea, The place was wall to wall people. You could not find a machine that was not occupied. The one aspect of the place that made me run was the smoke. Being so progressive in Canada and New York State it just drove me bonkers. I really wanted to check out the thoroughbred racing, but I just couldn't wait until then. So all in all we spend about 1/2 hour in the place. Although I have a few pics to prove it.
One more thing. How the stock of the parent company Moutaineer MNTG is only $5 I just don't understand. This place is going to be a goldmine. On the stupid shuttle bus I heard some slot players comment that the place was not this jammed packed when it had it's grand opening. Casinos in Pennsylvania are just going to be "CHA-CHING!" Yea, Mountaineer is going to some some people from Pittsburgh that are going to play at the Meadows & Wheeling Island, but all I can see for Presque Isle is Expansion. The people that mobbed this place today came from somewhere.
So other than just seeing this place, we went shopping at some mall in Erie & ate dinner at Quaker Steak & Lube. For the most part I just had to check the place out before they open up on Transit Road where Don Pablo's once stood in front of the Regal/Imax. I just had the wings with the cheese/bacon/scallions fries & it was pretty descent.
I got to see this shows 1st and 2nd episode and it is interesting, the girl with the tattoos, to me seems very hot but she also seems like I know her. I know I don't but I wonder if she was featured on some other show or special about sex. I do have to give credit to the guy that is does things that most would find odd like being but fucked and sucking on a fake cock but then he doesn't want to do it on camera, that is a lot of honesty it really is. Hey I'm not saying there is anything wrong with ass play and being beat up. I'm saying that it is gutsy to admit that on camera. The thing I wonder is who does the editing him or showtime or the people who make the show. hey you gotta love showtime.
I have not seen this show yet I missed when it first came on but maybe I'll get to catch it, it looks good and sounds good.
I don't know. I think you should be yourself. Maybe people who don't like you for who you are don't deserve you. The very fact that you feel you are identifying with this person on TV indicates that you are really not like him because unlike him you see where your apparent "weaknesses" are. I put that in quotes because sometimes what you perceive as your "weaknesses" maybe your inherent traits that attract people to you. The mere fact that it didn't work for some other person doesn't really mean they wouldn't work for you. Its not one trait or the other. Its an interaction of several traits and your own expression and interpretation of those traits that make you who you are, for better or worse.