I know I will get a bunch of slack for this but print makers are notoriously bad web designers in my opinion. There have been a few exceptional cases that I have met, but generally, when a print design company tries to go web design, it usually looks like wrong. They almost always have a really beautiful giant splash graphic and thats where the magic ends. It's no longer just a picture that you put on the web, it's a living interactive interface.
Right now I am working on Ride for Roswell at work. You can look at last year's website to get an idea of where it is going

It is designed by Flynn and Friend's, a company in buffalo

. I decided to look up their firm on the net after seeing the CD I am supposed to work with had their name on it. The paradigm is so old, i received some photoshop pictures and it is supposed to become a web site.
If you look at the non-web media design portfolio on their website, it looks pretty nice. But the web deisgn stuff looks

really mediocre, borderline lame. I guess the

was interersting.
I think it is the result of print based web designers relying too heavily on photoshop. It's all still a throwback to when the web was all slice up tables based layout. My question is how much do they get paid for the web site design, when I am doing the coding here at Roswell and someone else enters in the data.
Ohh! are those the breaded kind? those are my favorite, the only place i know where you can get them are at fuddruckers.