Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Tinypliny's Journal

tinypliny
My Podcast Link

06/03/2011 09:42 #54409

Aunt Jemima Waffles: Take 2
Category: eating out
Turns out that the ingredient list and the nutrient profile I posted for Aunt Jemima Blueberry waffles in my last journal were from some older versions of their waffles. They were the ones available online on the Aunt Jemima website. I should have proof-read them more carefully. I vaguely remember thinking that this was not what I saw on the box as I posted the waffle battle journal. But I put that thought on hold because I went back to some number-crunching and r-coding before I dropped into unconsciousness at my desk.

I was surprised when (e:Paul) pointed out the tertiary-Butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) in the list. Because I distinctly remember the box saying "no preservatives". So here are the real photos of the Aunt Jemima Blueberry Waffles box I bought yesterday.
image
image
Check: No preservatives.
image

And 10 calories less that what I posted. They really changed the recipé.
image
paul - 06/03/11 10:00
Those ingredients seem much better.

06/02/2011 22:05 #54408

Aunt Jemima Vs. Eggo: Waffle Battle
Category: eating out
I dreamt about waffles for 3 days in a row till it got out of hand today morning. I could smell them while I was eating apples. I examined hormonal and physiological reasons behind the craving hoping to expose the irrationality of it all. I even considered my new anti-allergy buddy Claritin as one of the culprits behind the craving.

But in the end, I am sorry to say, the waffle craving totally won out. I trotted straight from work to Pricerite to get frozen waffles. I was then faced with CHOICES!

image

I thought Eggo was the only one who made waffles. But no. There were Aunt Jemima waffles battling for my attention as well. Regardless of the majority vote in this thread: I chose Aunt Jemima. The nutritional profiles were pretty similar.

Eggo Blueberry Waffles Nutrition data:
image
Aunt Jemima Blueberry Waffles Nutrition data:
image

The ingredient list was also rather similar

Aunt Jemima waffles ingredients:
INGREDIENTS: ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMIN MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), WATER, PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN OIL, ARTIFICIALLY FLAVORED BLUEBERRY BITS (SUGAR, DEXTROSE, SOYBEAN OIL WITH TBHQ, SOY PROTEIN, SALT, CITRIC ACID, CELLULOSE GUM, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR, MALIC ACID, RED 40 LAKE, BLUE 2 LAKE), SUGAR, WHEY. CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: LEAVENING (SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, SODIUM BICARBONATE [SOY LECITHIN]), WHOLE EGGS, CALCIUM CARBONATE, CALCIUM CHLORIDE, SALT, CORN SYRUP SOLIDS, CORN STARCH, COLORED WITH (YELLOW 5, YELLOW 6), FORITIFIED WITH (REDUCED IRON, NIACINAMIDE, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE [VITAMIN B6], RIBOFLAVIN [VITAMIN B2] , THIAMINE MONONITRATE [VITAMIN B1], CYANOCOBALAMIN [VITAMIN B12]), NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR (DEXTROSE, CORN STARCH, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS), SOY LECITHIN. CONTAINS: SOY, EGGS, MILK, WHEAT

But somehow, I chose Aunt Jemima because the phrase "Aunt Jemima" invoked a friendly image of some homely aunt making a fresh batch of waffles in the morning. Aunt Jemima won the battle on psychological grounds.
tinypliny - 06/04/11 18:52
We have an "Amma" brand of snacks in India and Mother's pickles. Both are built on the grounds that mums make awesome food. They are branded to make the customer psychologically choose that brand over other generic named ones. I thought this might be similar... but apparently the race connotations are still there, going by what you wrote.
tinypliny - 06/04/11 18:48
You really think about slaves and what nots when you see the Aunt Jemima brand!? Wow. That comes as a revelation to me. I thought the brand was just about "homeliness" as a construct - like the waffles were made by family and not by some nameless company. But apparently that's not the connotation for Americans. It blows my mind.
metalpeter - 06/04/11 17:54
Great Link (e:heidi)

The thing with product and spokes people is they all have a certain feel.. That brand to me has been that you have this servant and sometimes a slave who raises you kids and takes care of those kids and even though they are loved (maybe abused that was ok back then when women or kids or wife stepped out of line) as a family member they are still not thought of as an equal (think about how you love a dog or cat or some family animal some people refer to them as kids and if you out live it there is lots of pain but even if it shares your bed and goes everywhere with you it isn't your equal).. In the past there where Families where the help sees the kids more then the parents do... Now in some families still today you have some one who you call aunt or uncle who really isn't...... That is how I think of that brand same thing with Ms. Butterworths.... When I was in high School I heard this same type of Character was why Tom and Jerry was taken off the air.... Granted in the few I say you never saw all of her just like the broom up....
tinypliny - 06/03/11 14:22
I swear no one can enjoy a simple box of waffles just because they are tasty without all the race drama being dragged all over some icon on the food box. I feel a rant coming on... but I need to put that on hold till I am done with my workload for today and probably the whole weekend.

Anyway, the short form of the rant is that I contest dear Prof. M.M. Manring's assertion that "Her continued appeal in the late twentieth century is a more complex and disturbing phenomenon we may never fully understand." It maybe disturbing but it's not so complex to understand the charm and attraction that processed food holds for the population and definitely not for the reasons that Prof. Manning seems to think. To dig out racism where it doesn't exist is really atrocious trouble-making.
heidi - 06/03/11 11:57
A little history on "Aunt Jemima" :::link:::
:::link:::
tinypliny - 06/03/11 11:48
I asked because one of my brother's colleague had a fuse meltdown because of his wafflemaker. I have had a few fuse-meltdowns because of my tea kettle. It's 1500 W - more than some small microwaves. It boils water in around a minute or even less but that kind of efficiency comes at a cost.
tinypliny - 06/03/11 11:46
It's so strange. The Aunt Jemima waffle website has this nutrition information right after their front page proclaims that everything is made with love and not preservatives. Maybe love = TBHQ these days... :::link:::
heidi - 06/03/11 11:46
toaster-level? No, I don't know. I think it's living in my storage unit in PA right now.
tinypliny - 06/03/11 11:45
Very cute! :) Just out of curiousity, do you know what the wattage is?
heidi - 06/03/11 11:35
It's kinda like this, but a much older model. :::link:::
tinypliny - 06/03/11 08:46
Heart-shaped waffles? How cool is that?!! Is it cast iron?
tinypliny - 06/03/11 08:45
Oh man, I totally posted the wrong (and older) ingredients yesterday. They revised the Aunt Jemima waffles to go "almost natural" and now the ingredient list is not so scary. That is partly why I got it (in addition to the crazy cravings). New post with actual photos of the box coming up. :)
heidi - 06/03/11 01:55
I also like the Eggo minis and the little toast-shaped ones. I like to dip them in maple syrup instead of pouring the syrup on them. yum!
heidi - 06/03/11 01:54
Yeah, about 6:

2 cups all-purpose flour
4 teaspoons baking powder
1/4 teaspoon salt
1 1/2 cups milk
6 tablespoons vegetable oil
2 eggs, separated
:::link:::

I have the cutest heart-shaped waffle maker that I bought at my neighbor's yardsale. It makes me smile :-) The recipe we've used is for buttermilk waffles. I must have the recipe somewhere. So yummy, esp with real maple syrup (best if you know which trees it's from).
paul - 06/03/11 01:22
That ingredient list is so gross. I would never eat that. Shouldn't waffles have like 4 ingredients. Whats up with frozen things being so gross they also need preservatives like TBHQ.

06/02/2011 14:41 #54403

Guercio and Sons, Buffalo, NY
Category: grocery
Now have a website!!! You know you want to click through:
image

They have most of their formerly mysterious wholesale catalogue online: I know for a fact it's not for restaurants alone. You can get fresh cases of salads and chocolate or whatever you like from them if you can consume that much. I have, in the past, eaten their mesclun salads with every meal for a whole month till I finished the case. :-)

And they carry the whole range of Ecce Panis Artisan breads: Now, if only they would take online orders and allow me to pay with credit, I don't have to trek all the way to Grant Street for my Guercio fix. :)

tinypliny - 06/03/11 10:16
Stress is eating away at my life... I think that is the secret reason for all my allergies because I don't think I have ever been allergic to a single thing all these decades I have been in various places and countries.
tinypliny - 06/03/11 10:07
I agree. I actually loved going to Guercio's before Pricerite came to town. Then I saw how much more time I saved that I could spend cooking or doing other things so my visits to Guercio's reduced drastically. It's really quite awesome to trek all the way back and forth and carry tasty stuff back when the weather is nice and you don't have pressing commitments but it's entirely different story when you are stressed out and treks seem like a waste of time. :/
paul - 06/03/11 01:31
Isn't treking somewhere to get something you want part of the whole experience? I mean I love shopping online but there is something exiting and tangible about a visit to a store you love.

06/01/2011 19:14 #54399

Pots and Pans: nth iteration
Category: eating in
I have been learning a lot about stainless steel cookware these past few days. The best guide to pots and pans on the whole internet is arguably this page:

Apparently, when you are buying stainless steel pots and pans, it better to get tri-ply construction for the entire pan (bottom as well as walls) instead of an encapsulated bottom alone. Food is more likely to burn or cook non-uniformly where the encapsulation ends.

According to most cooking pan guides I read through, a complete copper tri-ply with stainless steel is the best type of cooking pan construction but is quite impractical for people on a budget. It is almost like buying a pan made fully out of one of the "precious" metals. The next best thing is aluminium tri-ply construction.

Riveted handles are better. So are pots and pans made of 18/10 (Chromium/Nickel) stainless steel.

Looks like satisfies pretty much all of those criteria... and doesn't break the budget.
tinypliny - 06/01/11 19:47
Oh man, there is always a catch! Back in the day they cooked in stone pots over the fire and their food turned out delicious. Maybe I can get one of those rocks from the Niagara Gorge and have people who are frustrated whack sundry stuff over it till it gets to a shape of a pot? I can then just attach a crowbar as a handle and et voilà! $450 fry pan!
libertad - 06/01/11 19:39
I wouldn't get it cause of the handle, otherwise it looks pretty good. It looks so awkward to handle because it has no grip, I confirmed it after reading this review:

"This is a good quality pan and is heavy and sturdy. My only complaint is that the silicone sleeve isn't long enough over the handle. My hand has to hold the metal part also, to balance the heavy pan, and it is not comfortable at all. The handle is very thin and rough to the touch. Otherwise, the pan cooks food very quickly and cleans up well."

It might be worth spending some extra money if you can find something similar with a handle of more substance.

06/01/2011 16:43 #54397

e:matthew, did you see this?
Category: the odes
You would like "Young Victoria" very much. :-)
image
I agree with all the praise heaped on that poster. And I love that royal purple. An awesome colour, in general.
tinypliny - 06/07/11 16:10
Did you ever see North & South (e:matthew)? It is another of my favourites. Fantastic adaptation of Gaskell's novella.
tinypliny - 06/06/11 14:46
This is rather new, yes. Around 2009. but I LOVED the music and the cinematography. It was quite and utterly gorgeous, just as the poster says.
matthew - 06/06/11 13:36
I think I saw this. I've seen so many period dramas that they all blur together. Lol. This is a rather new one, right?