Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Scott's Journal

scott
My Podcast Link

07/03/2010 12:44 #52086

I wish Apple took my privacy seriously
Category: iphone
he iPhone's a pretty neat device. Sure, it's not the best at being a “phone”, but it is a very handy device to have in your pocket. As advertised, there really is an “app” for just about anything you can imagine. Sure, most of those apps are silly crap, but in truth, most of what people can imagine is silly, in fact, crap.

Over the past year or so, my little black iPhone has become an integral device in my daily life. I use it for e-mail. I surf the web on it. I use it to find restaurants, look up directions, answer random trivia, it's my camera, about 90% of my tweets and Facebook posts come from my iPhone. It's also my music player of choice. (Nothing yet designed tops the design of the iPod.)

So, what could be so wrong with the iPhone that I am considering ditching it? SMS popups. They are unstoppable.

image
That's right, iPhone's SMS Popup can't be stopped!

When a user receives an SMS on the iPhone, it pops up. By default, this “feature” will display the message on your screen, no matter what you are doing. The iPhone will light up, even if it's locked and asleep to show that text. So, by default, your text message is shown to whomever is looking at the screen at that time.

You can imagine the obvious implications of this. In fact, there are people who've run into nightmare-like problems because of it. All you need is the wrong text coming in at the wrong time and you could lose a job, a girlfriend, or ruin someone's birthday. (Thanks iPhone!)

Apple's solution: Users can shut of the “preview” mode for texts. This setting, which is buried in the phone's settings menus, will prevent the iPhone from displaying the message in the popups. However, the popups themselves appear to be unstoppable.

So, this setting removes the content of the message. The name (or number) of the sender will still show on the screen. So, if you don't want someone you're with to know who else is might be texting you, you're shit out of luck with the iPhone.

Apple's die-hard kool-aid drinkers will tell you “Just flip the phone over and you've got no problem”. I could not agree less. I should not have to worry about which side is facing up to keep my privacy intact.

Other iPhone-o-philes will say “Just download X app and it'll handle SMS differently...” Well, I have two retorts to that. Number one: I shouldn't have to buy some third party app to properly handle a core feature (SMS) on a phone. That's just stupid. Number two: None of those apps truly handle SMS. They handle e-mail, which is not SMS. So, using those apps, you cannot receive SMS from short-code based services. Therefore they are really all just shitty email clients. (Again, why the hell would I want to buy a feature that my crappy old BlackBerry could handle??)

If this were a new problem, I'd have more patience, but this has been a problem with iPhones since their initial release. How does Apple not see this as a privacy problem?

Oh wait, it gets worse. This can also become a power/battery issue.

Consider my situation: I receive SMS messages from a server. I get a text every time a process runs, and every time it finishes to let me know that things are working OK. This process runs about a hundred times a day, sometimes more. Needless to say, this adds up to a lot of texts. Hundreds per day. With my iPhone, this means that the display lights up every time a text comes in, sucking my battery dry for no good reason. On top of that, typing an e-mail, playing a game, tweeting, or doing just about anything is constantly interrupted by popups. (Very annoying.) All I want to do is shut the popup off. Doesn't sound too earth-shattering, but it appears that the “genius” designers at Apple are dumbfounded.

In general, I'm a fan of Apple's products. My Macbook is the best laptop I've ever owned. My iPhone is, in general, the best handheld device I own. However, this one flaw may very well be unbearable. How can Apple, who spend so much on design, let this slip by? How could they have not noticed this when beta testing SMS on their devices? Worse yet, they've had several years to correct this problem and, despite a vocal outcry, have utterly ignored this obvious flaw in their otherwise well designed device.

Sure, a year or two ago, there was nothing that compared to the iPhone. However, the worm has turned. Google's Android phones have caught up in features and useful applications. This small annoyance may very well be the tipping point that drives me to Android.

scott - 07/03/10 19:58
I still like my MacBook, but then again I use it for a home recording studio, which Linux just can't do at this time. (well not anywhere near as well as Logic or GarageBand can)

It's just this one feature I really can't stand. Aside from that, I have no complaints.
paul - 07/03/10 19:44
As a former iPhone owner (2g, 3g, 3gs) I am now much happier with android. Now as happy as I was dropping osx for linux but happier nonetheless. Usually, ease of use with apple means less options. Of course having less options appears easy.
metalpeter - 07/03/10 17:50
I don't have a cellphone but if I did this would drive me insane. I agree with you 100%. The Problem I have with apple is it seems there is this attitude of we are different and better and that they are linked. With this attitude you can't fix mistakes cause you don't think they are, and you think that people who dislike this function aren't in The know, and don't know what they are talking about. What is tough for me to believe is that it pops up over what you are doing, and you are correct about the privacy thing......

06/15/2010 14:50 #51894

Beware of Shamens!
Category: onion
Love the Onion...


05/24/2010 16:05 #51722

Watched 6 seasons of Lost...
Category: tv
... and all I got was a crumby rehash of Jacob's Ladder.

(If you haven't seen Jacob's Ladder, you should b/c it's bloody brilliant.)


scott - 06/15/10 15:19
Jacob's Ladder = A film starring Tim Robbins as a Vietnam Vet experiencing psychological issues that may or may not be real. (Just rent it, it's a good film that I refuse to spoil...)

Lost = 6 seasons of a TV show that ends in a rip off of the above mentioned Jacob's Ladder.
tinypliny - 06/15/10 15:01
Hmm - I don't intend seeing both. Could you please post a 1-2 line summary for the ADD-afflicted on (e:strip)?

06/30/2010 14:07 #52065

Pretty sure Vampires don't "sparkle" in sunlight
Category: movies
I used to love vampire movies. Even the corniest of vampire movies had my attention (Fright Night, anyone?).

Vampires used to be the best bad guys. Evil, cunning villains who you could survive by following a few simple rules that everyone knows. (Garlic, sunlight, wooden stakes, etc.)

I can list off classic vampire flicks by the dozen. Everything from the classic Nosferatu, the animated gem "Vampire Hunter D", to Tarrantino's piece of shit slasher film (From Dusk 'Til Dawn), to the uber-exploitive classic, Blacula. Heck, I'll even chalk up the Lost Boys as a movie I still will watch whenever I catch it on cable. (Who doesn't love the "DEATH BY STEREO!" scene?)

Anne Rice decided to make vampires extra sexy, and Hollywood did a good job transitioning that in Interview with the Vampire. Hardly an Oscar worthy flick, but the vampires were at least kinda bad guys and it was a watchable movie.

For the most part, all vampire movies are somewhat terrible films. The stories are pretty predictable. The special effects are usually pretty lame. By Oscar standards, they're all junk, but they're fun flicks and they keep a tradition of sorts alive.

Then along came Buffy... Joss Whedon used the vampire genre as a springboard for clever writing and a fantistic TV series. (Again, cheesy, but fun.) Not all of his vampires were bad guys, but then again, it was (for the most part) a lighthearted show about dead stuff. Joss Whedon's show redefined the genre a bit and while Buffy (and Angel) were brilliant shows, their influence seems to have killed the vampire as a bad guy.

HBO's latest offering (True Blood) seems to want to be a "more serious" version of Buffy. It's OK for a TV show. I'll watch it because I like the genre. (Special girl falls for "good" vampire with a sordid past... has a bunch of friends who help her thwart evil... same fucking show, without the snappy writing of Joss Whedon.)

What do today's kids get? Twilight. WTF. I'm sorry kids. You're getting cheated. The story just sucks. The characters all suck, yet none of them suck blood. One-dimensional, boring characters who have nothing to offer. The female lead is a helpless damsel in distress who can't make up her mind on whether she wants to fuck a dog or a dead guy. (Niether of which have the balls to actually kill anything.)

This isn't a horror film, or an action film. It appears to be a live action version of "Bunnicula" crossed with an awkwardly written teen-aged masturbatory fantasy. It's completely devoid of anything spooky, scary, or even suspenseful.

My case in point: They swapped out vampires, the most bad-ass of all things-that-go-bump-in-the-night for goddamn fucking faeries that sparkle (yes, sparkle) in sunlight. No, that's not a joke. The vampires in the Twilight Saga sparkle when the sun hits them.

Unfortuantely, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg. Up next, they're going to start making "friendly" wereworlf movies. (Aww fuck... I guess Teen Wolf kinda shit in that pool already.)\

Can't wait to see Hollywood try and make zombies into a cute-n-cuddly monster. It's coming, I'm sure.
metalpeter - 07/02/10 16:57
Just had to say I fucked up I said the wrong Will Smith movie with i in. In terms of Irobot it is really more of a here is an idea that has been in anime movies and lets make it a live action movie.
scott - 06/30/10 23:28
Oh almost forgot... I Robot is a shitty action movie bastardization of the book by Isaac Asimov, not a zombie movie.

Fido, however, is definitely the "cute & friendly" zombie flick, however, it is more of an indie movie than a Hollywood studio film. (it's also really a good movie. Very campy and Billy connolly is great in it. )
scott - 06/30/10 23:23
I did leave out a ton of vampire movies... Salem's Lot, for example, is a great (and spooky) one. I also left out Bram Stoker's Dracula, as I have long tried to block out Wynona Rider and Keanu Reeves doing horrid English accents. The Hugh Jackman movie (Van Helsing?) is really a comic book movie adaptation, but I thought it was entertaining.

I realize that writers will put their own mark on the genre. That's fine. I just happen to think that Twilight is really, really bad. Embarassingly bad, in fact. The main vampire doesn't drink blood, sparkles in the sun, and drives a fucking Volvo. Need I say more?
tinypliny - 06/30/10 20:43
And come on! Mr. Pegg's friend-zombie-who-ends-up-living-in-the-shed does fit the cute and cuddly description.
tinypliny - 06/30/10 20:41
True, but zombies have to stay in character or in other words, they need to kill some folks or eat some brains within 30 minutes of appearing on-screen (check the zombie guide if you don't believe me!). Otherwise they wouldn't be zombies!

And you forgot the Hugh Jackman vampire movie! (I forget its name...)
metalpeter - 06/30/10 20:04
Not sure if you are talking about the Twilight series or the newest movie, it doesn't matter really. As with Zombie Movies you have different kinds of movies with in that same type. Twilight (with out seeing the 3rd). Is more a movie about love and High School and the people in it are Vampires. This is the reason why I couldn't get into the Vampire Diaries (not bashing 90210) but that was like that but the people in it were vampires. Now the sparkling I like, I think it might be a kin to those internet pictures with sparkles, think about the picture comments on Fubar or MySpace. I never saw The Lost Boys but didn't they run on the idea that if you wear Sunglasses it protects all of you from the sun? That is both a cool idea and stupid at the same time. I haven't really followed Zombie movies but the same thing is true of them as well. Some movies have zombies that move slow, then you have runners, then in films where some bug takes over they can climb or shoot guns. Everyone has a different take on Vampires. Lets be honest if everyone followed the same rules then all the same vampire movies and TV shows would all be the same and be very dull. I also think twilight is aimed at teens and girls. That being said to talk about True Blood, The Vampire Diaries and Twilight to be honest isn't fair with out also reading what they where based on. I have read none of them. So I can't say if the film versions differ from the books, if they don't then the bashing isn't really fair. I would love to see a more old school Vampire style movie that is really good, but I doubt it will happen for some time. Oh I think the zombie thing Happened Wasn't Irobot considered a zombie flick and those robots where cute......
scott - 06/30/10 19:32
Awww shit. You're right about Fido. However, Fido does kill people as I recall. ;)
tinypliny - 06/30/10 19:04
Hahaha - did you miss Fido? Zombies are already cute and cuddly. :)

05/22/2010 11:57 #51705

some mp3's and a muppet movie
Category: music
Wow. I'd kinda forgotten I had this journal page. Oh well, maybe I'll start using it again as the "Facebook" thing is getting old. (An iphone app for e-strip would probably make me use this site more, as I'm lazy like that.)

Anyhow, at the request of Chris ((e:Ruleofblue)), I've finally posted some of the songs I've been recording on ReverbNation.com. (Feel free to pop over and download some free mp3's if you want.)

It's really just a mixture of tracks I've recorded @ home. No real theme or style. I recoeded everything myself, but I think some of these came out OK. No band to speak of and I'll not be bugging anyone to come see any live shows.

Anyhow, there's 4 songs up there now and I'll be adding a few more when I finish mixing them.

The first track I posted is a ska song. I decided it needed a video and that video needed muppets. (In my opinion, everything is better when muppets are added.)



Watching the video now, I totally should have included the scene where I get the muppets drunk... perhaps I'll do a "director's cut" next...

scott - 05/22/10 12:29
I figured as much. The android app looks very convenient.

I know apple's been a bit prickish with the app store, but just wondered if a port of the android app was forthcoming. It can't hurt to ask. :)

I get a new phone every year (I work for a mobile messaging company, so I gotta test the latest thing.) I might consider switching to an android phone someday, but right now, I prefer the iphone as I use the ipod function so damned much. (The mp3 players in the android phones never seem as well designed as the ipod interface.)
paul - 05/22/10 12:12
There is very little chance of an iphone app happening unless (e:jim) builds it. You can't make iphone apps from systems other than mac, and I don't have a mac since I switched to linux. Also you have to pay $100 to be an iphone developer and there is no guarantee your app makes it into the store. That is one of the main reasons I switched to android.

However, I have set it up so you can post to estrip from iphone using email which is how (e:jim), (e:matthew), (e:terry) and (e:james) post pics. You can set it up in your mobile email preferences :::link::: and then just select pictures from your iphone gallery and email them to estrip.

You can also multi-select images in the gallery and choose send via email.

If anyone is interested in building apps for other platforms I can give the the details of what you app needs to send to post.