Journaling on estrip is easy and free. sign up here

Gardenmama's Journal

gardenmama
My Podcast Link

11/06/2008 23:18 #46579

Quite an event
I went tonight to the Literacy Volunteers annual Coffee & Chocolate fundraiser. I brought my daughter and her best friend to work serving food/appetizers so they could earn some community service credit for school, and just because it’s good for them in general to do that kind of thing. They did a great job and actually said they had a good time and enjoyed being part of the event - imagine!

Anyway, the evening had a few things going on like a theme basket raffle, silent auction, big basket of booze raffle, and a Willie Wonka-style raffle to win a diamond ring. They were having a “special deal” at the door that got you your admission and some tickets for all of the raffles. The package was $10 less than if you purchased all of the tickets separately. So, I went for the deal, and got the bunch of tickets for all the crap basically because it is for a good cause and even if you don’t win it’s fun to try (knowing of course that I NEVER win anything at these things).

Well, the ring they were raffling was really pretty with chocolate and white diamonds in either a platinum or white gold (not sure which) setting. The jewelers who donated the ring to the event were there and said the ring was valued at $1,000 and that they were only selling off 100 candy bars (ala a 1 in 100 chance of winning-not bad odds). Well, if you bought the package when you came in, it included 3 chances at the ring - cool, chances just increased. After walking around for a little while, I went back to the ring table to see if people could buy extra chances (I’m still not sure what possessed me to do this). They said yes, but only until the 100 bars were all sold out. For some unknown reason, I decided to buy more tickets. The cost was $10 for one or $20 for 3. I only had a $20 on me and figured what the hell. I bought the 3 chances.

At 7:15 pm, everyone was told to open their candy bars to find out who the winner was - see pix below - they don’t do justice to my new ring, but they give you a little bit of an idea anyway. I can’t wait to show it off tomorrow at work!

image
image

Oh yeah, the coffee and chocolate were really good too.
tinypliny - 11/07/08 18:14
KEWL! Talk about landing the jackpot! You are the first person I know (even if only virtually) who's won a big prize like this!

@(e:paul): What are you doing here? You look smoking HOT in a moustache and love jewelery? You are like 70% Indian.
paul - 11/07/08 11:05
Wow, that is so awesome. I freakin love jewlery but don't realy have much. It must be so exciting to just win it.
theecarey - 11/07/08 10:43
how fun! congrats on your win!

although, I would have been tossing in extra tickets for the basket of booze instead, haha

Seems like it was an exciting night. Nice that your daughter had such a great experience.yay!
pmrk - 11/07/08 09:51
Congrats. What a pretty ring!
hodown - 11/07/08 09:28
Congrats!! The ring is beautiful :)

11/05/2008 22:20 #46566

A few of my favorite things...
...Coffee, Chocolate, friends...

Just a reminder in case anyone is interested, tomorrow is Literacy Volunteers' annual Coffee & Chocolate fundraiser - 5:30 - 8:00 p.m. at the Shea's Smith Theatre & Intermission Lounge. A $20 donation gets you an evening of goodies from Fowler's Chocolates, coffee from Starbucks and appetizers from some local dining establishments. There's also entertainment, basket raffel & silent auction.

Ummm - I love coffee and chocolate.. almost as good as... whatever! hahaha
tinypliny - 11/05/08 22:25
(e:Gardenmama), I love coffee as well. I also love tea.

I like an occasional BITTER BITTER chocolate. :D

11/05/2008 01:13 #46542

Gracious
While I hated the negativity of this long, arduous campaign, and the campaign b.s. and rhetoric definitely made me lose some respect for both of the candidates, I must, nonetheless, say that they were both very gracious in their speeches this evening. During his speech, McCain once again seemed the man I might have considered voting for 8 years ago had he, rather than Bush, been on the ticket. But who knows, maybe a hard run at the White House back then would have changed him into whomever it was that came out in this campaign. Anyway, I thought Obama’s speech was great too. Nice to see both of them speaking of working together and healing the nation...

YEA! It’s over - tonight - I can finally sleep!

Happy Election to All, and to All a Good Night.

gardenmama - 11/05/08 20:06
I too voted for Gore in 2000, and though I don't regret it, I wasn't thrilled either. And had it been McCain running against him, I'm really not sure which way I would have gone but I think I would have given him some real consideration. dragonlady7, I too wish I could believe the theory of throwing the election on purpose - it would serve the R's right after what they did to him. I guess that's part of what surprised me with the campaign, he seemed to be trying a little too hard to please them. I understand there's a whole purse stings thing attached to the kowtowing stuff but it irks me nonetheless. And of the 2012 campaign, MrMike, maybe they'll give us at least until after inauguration day before they start up with that crap - haha.
joshua - 11/05/08 12:35
I voted for Gore, and it was the only vote I've ever regretted! At the time I didn't regret it too much... I was the guy passing around Noam Chomsky in class, to give you some perspective.

Look, McCain has always been this guy. All politicians (the Messiaobama included) have done things in their past they aren't too proud of in order to advance their careers. Neither Obama or McCain are "bad guys" - reasonable people know that.
dragonlady7 - 11/05/08 12:10
I wanted McCain in 2000 too!! I wanted him more than Gore!! I was SO ANGRY when Bush got the nomination, I was almost madder about that than him actually winning. McCain is a hawk but he would have buttoned up Afghanistan before going after Iraq. People keep saying "Oh you can't blame W for all that's wrong now" but that's bull, it was his personal batshitness that put so much pressure on us to go after Saddam personally.

Ugh.
But yes. McCain's speech was the way I remember him being, back when I liked him. It was disconcerting, because I had this odd warm-fuzzy feeling. Is it just that he's defeated, that I like him again? No, the things he said were actually nice, and sensible.

I read a theory that he threw the election on purpose because he wanted to screw the Republicans who'd screwed him.
I like that theory, weirdly.
dcoffee - 11/05/08 11:44
I think the real McCain showed up last night. He was a class act. He was great on SNL last weekend too. Maybe with the campaign over now he can go back to being himself.
mrmike - 11/05/08 09:41
Had McCain been that guy all along he might not have had to stuggle so. He spent so much time wanting the country off his front lawn in recent months, it was difficult to tell what he for.

Great speeches and now it is finally over and we can concern ourselves with something else until the 2012 campaign begins next month.

11/03/2008 18:32 #46498

ELECTION WOEs
I find with the closer tomorrow gets, the more apprehensive I become. I know that Obama is ahead in the polls but, 8 years ago, so was Gore (I believe it was by 8 points pre-election day) - we all know how that turned out. Part of my concern is that frequently the polls make teetering, would-be voters stay home if their candidate of choice is the one who is ahead; or makes voters come out if their candidate is behind. A combination of these two things causes really bad things to happen, ala 8 years ago. Thank god I’m off work tomorrow because I just don’t think I’ll be getting much sleep tonight.

On the brighter side, after tomorrow, come what may, it will all be over. No more phone calls, no more flyers, no more dreadful negative TV ads, and on and on and on... that in itself deserves some celebrating.
metalpeter - 11/03/08 18:50
Yes it being over is a good thing. Being ahead in polls doesn't mean shit. First of all people don't allways tell the truth in them. Not everyone votes. Not to mention the polls are not given to everyone and I'm sure there selection process could be biased based on who is doing the poll. But see there is another factor that I don't think the polls cover what states will be won. For example you might 10% lead in the polls and even in the election but you win the states you win by a large number of people then you can win the popular vote but if those states don't have enough points then you can still lose.

11/01/2008 23:36 #46470

Heating system
Does anyone have one of these infrared heaters, or has anyone heard anything about them? I was speaking to someone recently who heard good things about them, but I would appreciate some additional opinions. They’re supposed to help save money and be safer than regular space heaters. I keep my heat pretty low and the back of my house tends to be colder than the front- it’s pretty chilly. Also, heating costs are supposed to go up this winter and frankly, I prefer not to have to pay outrageous gas bills. Of course, I don’t want to pay outrageous electric bills either.

Science is not necessarily my strongest knowledge area so maybe if someone can even tell me if the whole premise of the infrared heater as an energy saver makes sense?

Thanks.

http://greenisbetter.org/
tinypliny - 11/02/08 00:37
Basically, these heaters are an all-heat-very little/minor-light-emitting versions of those crazy energy wasting incandescent bulbs - which are now being replaced by CFL spirals.

While a bulb's primary job is to provide light (which it does terribly inefficiently by converting only 5% of the energy to light and the rest to unnecessary heat), the infrared heater's primary job is to provide heat. 95% of the energy that is converted to heat in an incandescent bulb filament is also converted to heat in an infrared heater. In a heater's context, however, this energy efficieny is pretty good. That, and the fact that the heater filament gives out very little light as compared to a regular incandescent bulb filament - thus upping the 95% energy-heat conversion rate (<5% is converted to a very dull glow)

But apparently all this is not enough for efficiency ->http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1137854/infrared_heaters_vs_conventional_heaters.html?cat=15

So the bottomline is I am confused as well...