

I was surprised by the article regarding the convicted offender who struck again. Not because he struck again, but because historically, an offender from the suburb serves time in prison and is then released to the city into a halfway shelter or some treatment program that suburbs refuse to allow to exist in their towns. So the city ends up with more than its fair share of convicted sex offenders and sex offenders have the highest recidivism rates of all.
The suburbs should be forced to keep their sex offenders and provide treatment for them instead of dumping them in the city.
But now the cities are fighting back and enacting laws making it stricter for sex offenders to live in the city, so they're now going underground in the suburbs. Interesting.
And so what? How do your statistics relate to the fact that suburbs dump their sex offenders into our city?
:::link:::