I've been reading more fiction lately. A good book is like watching a movie in your head. It's always tricky turning a book into a movie, and I guess it's typical to say that a movie is never as good as the book. But I loved the Lord of the Rings books, and I thought the movies were good too, even though I completely knew the story ahead of time and they left out some good stuff.
I just watched Harry Potter Order of the Pheonix, and I am so glad I read the book first. This movie was awful! absolutely terrible. It was stupid, it made no sense. My wife went to bed cause she didn't know what was going on. It was so fast that it was totally clumsy and confusing.
I'm so glad I started with the book. It was so interesting that I read it within 2 weeks, and I only spent about 7-10 of those days actually reading it. Yea, it's the type of book you can read for 6 hours straight and go to bed at 2am.
I liked the story way better in my head, I almost want to reread the book just to put the thing back together again. The book is long, and there's some stuff that obviously didn't need to be in the movie, but really I could summarize the movie in about 3 paragraphs.
I saw the first Harry Potter movie and thought it was a lot of fun, so I watched the next 3 too and enjoyed them. I started reading more and after the 4th movie I thought that the story was about to get complicated, and I should read the book, the books are really popular so I might as well try reading one right? I'm glad I did, and from now on I'm reading the book first, I don't care how long it takes.
Ok, I'll just talk about one part. This evil wench comes to take control of the school, she's from the governing board of wizards, which is currently corrupt. She acts all nice to everyone's face, but really she hates students and just wants them to obey orders and take tests, rather than do anything practical, kind of like our system. Point is, she's a bitch and you totally hate her, really bad. So finally she gets some control over the school and the students revolt, they're creating chaos, magical fireworks and swamps in the hallways. She's a weaker wizard and has no idea how to handle this stuff. All the students seem to be competing for "troublemaker in chief", and you enjoy watching the wench lose control cause she totally deserves it, you spend the first half of the book learning that she is evil. Even the teachers don't care, cause she likes power so much, let her be in control of dealing with it the havoc she inspired. The movie totally ruins it, maybe it's impossible to recreate I don't know, maybe they don't want kids setting off fireworks in school, whatever, but when they got to the scene it was a total buzzkill, I was looking forward to the special effects and it was totally wrong. And Professor McGonagall is supposed to be the wench's opposite, a strong woman, who knows how to teach and how to keep children in line, but is willing to give you credit and can recognize an unfair situation. I think she had one scene and two appearances in the movie, lame.
Dammit, I'm writing too much again.
Anyway, the first couple movies are quite good, I'm sure the books are good too. But whatever you do, make sure you read the Order of the Phoenix,
I was going to mention some of the other good books I like, but I gotta go to bed. see ya.
Dcoffee's Journal
My Podcast Link
03/18/2009 00:19 #48095
Harry PotterCategory: books
03/15/2009 21:09 #48063
St Patricks Day PicturesCategory: life
Hey Everyone!!
Just wanted to show everybody some pictures from the Parade on Saturday. Yep Saturday, the one on the "Old Neighborhood" down in the valley, at South Park and Elk.
It was sooooooo fun! I had a ball, it was so authentic and comfortable, and there was a huge crowd, the parade went on for about an hour and a half. Then we went to the Valley Community Center afterword for some corned beef and potatoes. Plus live music and dancing. Did I mention it was a lot of fun? I was so satisfied I didn't even bother going to the parade on Delaware today.
I wanted to post these pics yesterday but my computer has been giving me a hard time, it keeps freezing. But it's happy now, so I better hurry up and post something!
This is how we started our day, 10:30 we're on the front porch and we see this festive pickup truck plating Irish music just 3 houses down the street from us. Molly says 'maybe there's a parade?' So we look it up online, shove some food in our face, fill a plastic bottle with red wine and hit the road.
These dudes are seriously riding motorized coolers! I gotta build one of these.
These kids were so cute, running around collecting candy in their little bags.
This little guy was so excited about the loot he collected, but I really just wanted to take his picture cause he has a green mohawk :)
Old neighborhood parade
This is where the festivities ended, classic Irish party at the Valley Community Center. Lots of kids, live Irish music, corned beef, potatoes, $2 beers. Molly got a sweet hoodie for $10. I talked to some local politicians and block club people.
I'm even more proud to be from South Buffalo now. What a fun crowd. You guys should go next year. Sure there's parties all over the city, but this just has a unique charm. and it's a great excuse to drink beer at noon :)
Just wanted to show everybody some pictures from the Parade on Saturday. Yep Saturday, the one on the "Old Neighborhood" down in the valley, at South Park and Elk.
It was sooooooo fun! I had a ball, it was so authentic and comfortable, and there was a huge crowd, the parade went on for about an hour and a half. Then we went to the Valley Community Center afterword for some corned beef and potatoes. Plus live music and dancing. Did I mention it was a lot of fun? I was so satisfied I didn't even bother going to the parade on Delaware today.
I wanted to post these pics yesterday but my computer has been giving me a hard time, it keeps freezing. But it's happy now, so I better hurry up and post something!
This is how we started our day, 10:30 we're on the front porch and we see this festive pickup truck plating Irish music just 3 houses down the street from us. Molly says 'maybe there's a parade?' So we look it up online, shove some food in our face, fill a plastic bottle with red wine and hit the road.
These dudes are seriously riding motorized coolers! I gotta build one of these.
These kids were so cute, running around collecting candy in their little bags.
This little guy was so excited about the loot he collected, but I really just wanted to take his picture cause he has a green mohawk :)
Old neighborhood parade
This is where the festivities ended, classic Irish party at the Valley Community Center. Lots of kids, live Irish music, corned beef, potatoes, $2 beers. Molly got a sweet hoodie for $10. I talked to some local politicians and block club people.
I'm even more proud to be from South Buffalo now. What a fun crowd. You guys should go next year. Sure there's parties all over the city, but this just has a unique charm. and it's a great excuse to drink beer at noon :)
metalpeter - 03/16/09 18:09
Great Pictures thanks for posting them.
Great Pictures thanks for posting them.
dcoffee - 03/16/09 10:47
I wouldn't say that Lauren, I think these are just more seasoned drunks, they don't go just for the thrill of getting drunk in broad daylight, they go to enjoy each other's company. Seems more like of a celebration of spring and community, rather than a celebration of drinking. I didn't see a single puke puddle or bear case hat. They may have been drunk, but they weren't sloppy, just friendly.
Jenks, when I have kids I'm totally signing them up for that!! There are boy dancers too.
Mike, next year you gotta go to this one, and bring the kids too! you won't regret it.
I wouldn't say that Lauren, I think these are just more seasoned drunks, they don't go just for the thrill of getting drunk in broad daylight, they go to enjoy each other's company. Seems more like of a celebration of spring and community, rather than a celebration of drinking. I didn't see a single puke puddle or bear case hat. They may have been drunk, but they weren't sloppy, just friendly.
Jenks, when I have kids I'm totally signing them up for that!! There are boy dancers too.
Mike, next year you gotta go to this one, and bring the kids too! you won't regret it.
lauren - 03/16/09 09:35
Looks like a lot of the same stuff...less drunk people though?
Looks like a lot of the same stuff...less drunk people though?
jenks - 03/16/09 08:44
I love those Rince na Tiarna girls. :)
I love those Rince na Tiarna girls. :)
mrmike - 03/15/09 21:38
Looks great. This irishman skipped Delaware ave once more. Just doesn't do it for me.
Looks great. This irishman skipped Delaware ave once more. Just doesn't do it for me.
03/12/2009 15:20 #48031
Who Wants Healthcare??Category: healthcare
Just about everyone is ready for a better healthcare system. And they think the government can do a better job than private companies.
New survey numbers out, this is a poll conducted by Lake Research Partners on behalf of Health Care for America Now
Interesting numbers from the poll:
62% of voters believe a public health insurance plan will spend less on profits and administration and force private insurers to compete Compared with Only 28% of voters believe that a public health insurance plan would be a "big, government bureaucracy".
73% of voters want a choice of a private or public health insurance plan, including 63% of Republicans
61% think a public health insurance plan will be better able to control health care costs by using its purchasing power to drive competition.
66% agree that a public health insurance plan will provide choices including a wide choice of doctors.
Doctors everywhere want a National system too, I think it's just about unanimous
Small Business people are becoming more Democratic too, because of Republican opposition to healthcare. We used to worry about taxes because we pay more taxes than employees. BUT Healthcare is now a much more important issue for small and large businesses alike, and at least one Republican is worried about it. David Frum
WalMart.... also likes a national Healthcare system, so do AT&T, General Mills and a bunch more.
the health insurance companies better start playing catch-up, if they want to keep profiting off of our misery. Seems like the country is ready to try anything.
Politicians better get on board soon, or get thrown out of office. I don't think you can fool us or scare us anymore. People realize that we're smart enough, and resourceful enough as a country to come up with a better system than this. Call it Socialized, or Nationalized or whatever you want, whatever it is, it's better than this.
These guys are my new favorite Pro-Healthcare group
News Junkies, read more pro-healthcare opinion here
New survey numbers out, this is a poll conducted by Lake Research Partners on behalf of Health Care for America Now
Interesting numbers from the poll:
62% of voters believe a public health insurance plan will spend less on profits and administration and force private insurers to compete Compared with Only 28% of voters believe that a public health insurance plan would be a "big, government bureaucracy".
73% of voters want a choice of a private or public health insurance plan, including 63% of Republicans
61% think a public health insurance plan will be better able to control health care costs by using its purchasing power to drive competition.
66% agree that a public health insurance plan will provide choices including a wide choice of doctors.
Doctors everywhere want a National system too, I think it's just about unanimous
Small Business people are becoming more Democratic too, because of Republican opposition to healthcare. We used to worry about taxes because we pay more taxes than employees. BUT Healthcare is now a much more important issue for small and large businesses alike, and at least one Republican is worried about it. David Frum
WalMart.... also likes a national Healthcare system, so do AT&T, General Mills and a bunch more.
the health insurance companies better start playing catch-up, if they want to keep profiting off of our misery. Seems like the country is ready to try anything.
Politicians better get on board soon, or get thrown out of office. I don't think you can fool us or scare us anymore. People realize that we're smart enough, and resourceful enough as a country to come up with a better system than this. Call it Socialized, or Nationalized or whatever you want, whatever it is, it's better than this.
These guys are my new favorite Pro-Healthcare group
News Junkies, read more pro-healthcare opinion here
03/09/2009 15:24 #47998
Wow, things that make you go hmmm..Category: politics
Religious Right ditching the Republicans? Some prominent leaders apparently ready for something. Watch this video, it might brighten your day.
I'm starting to wonder about the Shrinking Republican party. If more moderate Republicans continue to leave the party and become Independents, who's left in the Republican Party? Fanatics, Extremists, Ideologues.. right? So that means that those are the people will be deciding who the Republican candidates are in the primary elections. Most states have closed primaries where only registered Republicans can vote in primary elections. So... following these numbers, as the Republican party shrinks, the remaining members will be fanatic Rush Limbaugh dittoheads, and other like minded far right folks, right? Seems like the Republican candidates are going to get more extreme and more partisan, and more polarizing because of the people who select them during the primary. Which ends up pushing the party further out of the mainstream, and onto the fringe. Freaky.
Schumer on the Economy...
On the other hand, I watched Lindsy Grahm (R-SC) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Meet the Press Yesterday. These two guys seem smart, and they look like they can have an open discussion and agree on some issues. It was refreshing. click on the "netcast" link to watch the whole thing.
Earmarks...
There's more transparency in the process now, you can look at every earmark and see who suggested it online. And there's about one fifth of the earmarks that there were last year. Plus, these things do create jobs in most cases, so I'm not categorically against "earmarks" so long as people are willing to put their name on them, and make it public.
Nationalize the Banks...
I guess we are waiting for the "Stress Tests" to be complete before we decide what to do with what banks. Schumer says there is no "one size fits all" solution here, and I think that's practical. Let's say CitiGroup is bankrupt, you can let them fail, but that means you'll have to pay out all the FDIC insurance on deposits up to $250,000, that's gotta be expensive. Or you can buy their bad assets, and take shareholder stake in their company, also expensive. Or Nationalization, still not completely sure what this means, something about firing the board of directors, getting rid of the shareholders, and taking the assets into a government trust untill they fix the accounting and find out how much the bank is actually worth. Then they sell it back to the private market. I'm still reading this Stiglitz article about Nationalization
Employee Free Choice Act is Awesome...
We definitely would be a stronger nation with this.
One More... The GOP strategy must be broader than this Make the Democrats less popular... How about fixing your own party sometime too.
Oh, and can I get a Hell Yea for National Healthcare?
I'm starting to wonder about the Shrinking Republican party. If more moderate Republicans continue to leave the party and become Independents, who's left in the Republican Party? Fanatics, Extremists, Ideologues.. right? So that means that those are the people will be deciding who the Republican candidates are in the primary elections. Most states have closed primaries where only registered Republicans can vote in primary elections. So... following these numbers, as the Republican party shrinks, the remaining members will be fanatic Rush Limbaugh dittoheads, and other like minded far right folks, right? Seems like the Republican candidates are going to get more extreme and more partisan, and more polarizing because of the people who select them during the primary. Which ends up pushing the party further out of the mainstream, and onto the fringe. Freaky.
Schumer on the Economy...
On the other hand, I watched Lindsy Grahm (R-SC) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Meet the Press Yesterday. These two guys seem smart, and they look like they can have an open discussion and agree on some issues. It was refreshing. click on the "netcast" link to watch the whole thing.
Earmarks...
There's more transparency in the process now, you can look at every earmark and see who suggested it online. And there's about one fifth of the earmarks that there were last year. Plus, these things do create jobs in most cases, so I'm not categorically against "earmarks" so long as people are willing to put their name on them, and make it public.
Nationalize the Banks...
I guess we are waiting for the "Stress Tests" to be complete before we decide what to do with what banks. Schumer says there is no "one size fits all" solution here, and I think that's practical. Let's say CitiGroup is bankrupt, you can let them fail, but that means you'll have to pay out all the FDIC insurance on deposits up to $250,000, that's gotta be expensive. Or you can buy their bad assets, and take shareholder stake in their company, also expensive. Or Nationalization, still not completely sure what this means, something about firing the board of directors, getting rid of the shareholders, and taking the assets into a government trust untill they fix the accounting and find out how much the bank is actually worth. Then they sell it back to the private market. I'm still reading this Stiglitz article about Nationalization
Employee Free Choice Act is Awesome...
We definitely would be a stronger nation with this.
One More... The GOP strategy must be broader than this Make the Democrats less popular... How about fixing your own party sometime too.
Oh, and can I get a Hell Yea for National Healthcare?
03/08/2009 13:19 #47985
Wondering about the RepublicansCategory: politics
I pride myself on being able to see things from another person's point of view. Understanding Republicans or Libertarians, or WTO protesters, or Jehovah Witnesses, or other countries, or people who resort to violence, at one point I even tried to understand Limbaugh's perspective...
I feel that most people are rational. If people are honest with you, you can usually understand their perspective when you look at their life experience and values. And you can have a rational discussion.
Right now I don't understand the Republicans, and it's kind of bothering me.
Last week, they actually called for a spending freeze. They wanted the federal government to call some kind of time-out and not spend any money until October.
Honestly, if we followed that idea it would be an instant death blow to our economy. All the employees that would be laid off from state local and federal jobs? Probably around a million, at least. All the construction projects around the country that would come to a halt. Government programs like medicare that would dry up and leave us without a safety net. It really would be like the Great Depression all over again. No safety net, no jobs, no money, tent cities, food riots, the whole miserable package.
And this wasn't some talking point floating around on cable news, they introduced a Bill in the House of Representatives and voted on the crazy thing. AND every Republican voted FOR it, along with 8 Democrats in the house. I'm serious.
Can you find a single economist who thinks that is a good idea? Even at the Heritage Foundation or PNAC? It's completely Insane.
Some Republicans do not agree with this kind of... policy?
David Brooks calls it "Insane" David Frum, says the party should fight for independent voters minorities and women, instead of worrying about Rush Limbaugh and his audience of True Believers.
These Republicans make more sense to me, I can follow their train of thought, even if I don't agree. They are not liberal, they're definitely 'invisible hand of the market' types, but I just think they're critical thinkers, they're logical, so I can understand them.
Sometimes You gotta Change Your Mind
You have to govern based on the facts you have available, and the situation that's in front of you. I think some Party Loyalists are just married to their talking points, they've worked so hard over the years to burn their slogans into our brains. "Big government = Bad" "Tax Cuts = Good" "Big Business = Efficient" "Government = Wasteful"
Those slogans are Old, they originated based on circumstances that no longer exist. You Must adjust to the facts, and address the current situations.
You know Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican. If he ran today, he'd have Grover Norquist and Karl Rove chasing him out of the country and calling him an anti-American Socialist, who would bring an end to America as we know it.
That reminds me, knock it off with the Socialism please. We were not socialist under Clinton, and we are not a 4.6% tax increase away from becoming Cuba. Ditch the slogans and talking points, get your heads out of the box, and look at the information that's in front of you.
Maybe...
Maybe Nationalizing the Banks is smarter than letting them fail and cheaper than pumping out a few trillion to resurrect them.
Maybe GM wouldn't need a bailout, and neither would anyone else if we abandoned the Employer Based Healthcare system that is bankrupting our companies.
Maybe "Free Trade" never really benefited America, and we should try manufacturing things in our own country again.
Maybe lowering taxes on the rich doesn't create the most jobs. And maybe some government programs are actually useful and should be expanded.
Maybe, just maybe, sometimes you have to try something else. because the facts and the circumstances have changed.
"Ronald Reagan was a great leader and a great president because he addressed the problems of his time. But we have very different problems-and we need very different answers...." We need real solutions.
I feel that most people are rational. If people are honest with you, you can usually understand their perspective when you look at their life experience and values. And you can have a rational discussion.
Right now I don't understand the Republicans, and it's kind of bothering me.
Last week, they actually called for a spending freeze. They wanted the federal government to call some kind of time-out and not spend any money until October.
Honestly, if we followed that idea it would be an instant death blow to our economy. All the employees that would be laid off from state local and federal jobs? Probably around a million, at least. All the construction projects around the country that would come to a halt. Government programs like medicare that would dry up and leave us without a safety net. It really would be like the Great Depression all over again. No safety net, no jobs, no money, tent cities, food riots, the whole miserable package.
And this wasn't some talking point floating around on cable news, they introduced a Bill in the House of Representatives and voted on the crazy thing. AND every Republican voted FOR it, along with 8 Democrats in the house. I'm serious.
Can you find a single economist who thinks that is a good idea? Even at the Heritage Foundation or PNAC? It's completely Insane.
Some Republicans do not agree with this kind of... policy?
David Brooks calls it "Insane" David Frum, says the party should fight for independent voters minorities and women, instead of worrying about Rush Limbaugh and his audience of True Believers.
These Republicans make more sense to me, I can follow their train of thought, even if I don't agree. They are not liberal, they're definitely 'invisible hand of the market' types, but I just think they're critical thinkers, they're logical, so I can understand them.
Sometimes You gotta Change Your Mind
You have to govern based on the facts you have available, and the situation that's in front of you. I think some Party Loyalists are just married to their talking points, they've worked so hard over the years to burn their slogans into our brains. "Big government = Bad" "Tax Cuts = Good" "Big Business = Efficient" "Government = Wasteful"
Those slogans are Old, they originated based on circumstances that no longer exist. You Must adjust to the facts, and address the current situations.
You know Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican. If he ran today, he'd have Grover Norquist and Karl Rove chasing him out of the country and calling him an anti-American Socialist, who would bring an end to America as we know it.
That reminds me, knock it off with the Socialism please. We were not socialist under Clinton, and we are not a 4.6% tax increase away from becoming Cuba. Ditch the slogans and talking points, get your heads out of the box, and look at the information that's in front of you.
Maybe...
Maybe Nationalizing the Banks is smarter than letting them fail and cheaper than pumping out a few trillion to resurrect them.
Maybe GM wouldn't need a bailout, and neither would anyone else if we abandoned the Employer Based Healthcare system that is bankrupting our companies.
Maybe "Free Trade" never really benefited America, and we should try manufacturing things in our own country again.
Maybe lowering taxes on the rich doesn't create the most jobs. And maybe some government programs are actually useful and should be expanded.
Maybe, just maybe, sometimes you have to try something else. because the facts and the circumstances have changed.
"Ronald Reagan was a great leader and a great president because he addressed the problems of his time. But we have very different problems-and we need very different answers...." We need real solutions.
(e:Theecarey) said something that made me think about something else. This isn't true all the time but sometimes things get changed around in the movies because of Marketing or Even so there is a Hollywood ending. I didn't read the Golden Compass but some I know who read it, got mad at the movie because there where some things changed around. I saw Wicked and thought it was really good, and wished I saw it years ago. Someone I know who saw it I talked to them and they explained things that where different in the book. I'm guessing that sometimes for an audience who is going to view something editing things makes it better for that media.
Agreed! Reading the book prior to watching the film allows freedom to use the imagination and to understand the original intent of the story. While movies can be really good, in comparison, there is often too much lost from what we get from the book.
JK Rowling wanted the transfer to film to be as accurate as possible, which occurred in the first three (and pretty well with the fourth). Rowling insisted on having characters (and story) that closely depicted what the reader had experienced with the books. I have to wonder how much of this was effected by the changing of directors & producers?
Chris Columbus- #1&2
Alfonso Cuaron(& C.Columbus)-#3
Mike Newell- #4
David Yates- #5,6 (coming soon) and both parts of #7 (will be two movies, filmed at same time)
As the movies progress, the format transitions from being faithful to the original story to promoting a more stylized presentation. Fun, but readers sense the loss, as you did with the Order of the Phoenix. Good movie, but it missed on some of that special stuff. By the way, The Order of the Phoenix was the shortest film and the longest story of the series, respectively. More could have been incorporated, in my opinion- especially as you mentioned, with McGonagall.
If you go back and read the first few books, you will likely find that they are a very quick read. The story is appropriately less complex, and becomes more so as the story and characters evolve.
All in all, both the books and the movies have been a welcome nugget of entertainment. I highly look forward to the Half Blood Prince to finally be released into the theater.
Not really a potter fan. But that being said you can't compare a book to a movie. The Media isn't even close to the same. Think about the book you read then think about the movie. Think about all the stuff that was in the book and if they used all of that how long the movie would be. Besides again they are different Media. Or think of it this way, think about a movie you really like or at least a good one. If you took that story and expanded it and added stuff to the story and plot and added scenes how would it be as a book, guessing not so good. But there is another factor, that is true with music, and sports and might be true here. How ever you first see it you enjoy more. For example sports and music are different live and on a CD or on TV. Often you hear a band live and they sound great get the CD and it is like who is the band and sometimes it is the other way around. With Lacrosse I watched it in person and it looks really fast, but then when I saw a game on TV it looked slow. I think that what form you view something in first effects how you see the other one.