Wow, I just received payment for my Sync Magazine (http://www.syncmagazine.com) article about Sociolotron (http://www.sociolotron.com). Sync is supposed to be like "Maxim meets Wired" which is kind of, well, not really necessarily my thing (although I'm more into macho tech than cars, sports, or exercise). But my editor is real nice, and they want some clever game coverage, and it's a print magazine with 200K subscribers in North America (distro in EU, South America, and SE Asia/Australia, too). You might actually see it on the mag rack (but apparently Wegman's doesn't carry it, so I'm not sure if I'll ever see it myself... hehe)
I should get off my butt and go to Talking Leaves to look for it. Does anyone know if they carry Sync? They carry 2600 (http://www.2600.com)... that's enough to get me there...
Anyway, since I've been at UB I've slacked on my writing. I've written only a few articles for GF! and almost no school papers at all. I've written a couple papers about projects I've done and stuff, and I do consider my interactive stuff (http://www.shawnrider.com/onlineWork.php) "writing." But, wow, there's something about putting finger to keys in a particular way to create an article or story. I've written a LOT in the past -- I think I've published something like 200 reviews on GamesFirst ! (http://www.gamesfirst.com) But I've never written for a mainstream mag like this. It was really educational. It really brings home the freedom that we have with GF! And not just me, but my writers. I don't mean to imply that I was treated poorly. I was treated very, very well, and I hope to write for Sync or Ziff Davis more in the future. But the corporate world is something I might enjoy much more on an occasional, freelance, kind of engagement.
I <3 teaching.
and I <3 t e h Interwebs.
So is this just one big advertisement to get you to look for my stuff in the April/May issue of Sync Magazine available on your local cool guy mag rack? I dunno...
Oh, and Ajay -- just for clarification [inlink]ajay,318[/inlink]
I wasn't talking about personal websites. I mean homepages as in a customizable web portals -- like My Yahoo!, which is what I set to my homepage for easy access to lots of info, a handy calendar, local movie listings, daily comics, etc.
Actually, maybe you're a good person to ask: Know of a good, free, customizable personal webportal package? Something that would be easier than writing it myself in PHP and just aggregating feeds, etc? (I already use Vacoom! to gather some web comics for myself -- )
Shawnr's Journal
My Podcast Link
04/07/2005 12:27 #34158
buy my writing!04/07/2005 01:17 #34157
Some thoughts on Google Video Blogs(e:Paul) said he thought it was pointless to duplicate Google's planned video blog features (http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=1236), and I can understand not wanting to "compete" with Google -- I'm a Google lover of sorts. I mean, I use Yahoo for my home page, but... (and that's another thing -- why can't I do the basic homepage things with Google that I can do with Yahoo!? Shouldn't that rank higher priority than getting videos online? Whatever; Yahoo! works well...)
Anyway, I think pretty much everything I get at (e:strip) is available all over the place. I could build it myself (not as well as Paul has) or I could just use any number of open source or free solutions to pretty much get the same features as (e:strip). In fact, I used to participate more heavily in a blogger blog. But (e:strip) has pulled me away? Why? Because I read (e:strip). This site is a different place. It's not the whole world. It's a village, becoming a town, and one day it might grow into a full-fledged city, but it will never be the whole world (I hope not, at least). It will always (hopefully) be a cool little corner, a place where I can niche.
So who cares what Google is doing? Whether or not video is "right" for (e:strip) is an issue on its own, and definitely not one to be taken lightly (all kinds of concerns on that one -- space, bandwidth, tech issues, etc.). I am not really arguing for or against that here. All I'm saying is that we got something Google ain't got, no matter what.
Anyway, I think pretty much everything I get at (e:strip) is available all over the place. I could build it myself (not as well as Paul has) or I could just use any number of open source or free solutions to pretty much get the same features as (e:strip). In fact, I used to participate more heavily in a blogger blog. But (e:strip) has pulled me away? Why? Because I read (e:strip). This site is a different place. It's not the whole world. It's a village, becoming a town, and one day it might grow into a full-fledged city, but it will never be the whole world (I hope not, at least). It will always (hopefully) be a cool little corner, a place where I can niche.
So who cares what Google is doing? Whether or not video is "right" for (e:strip) is an issue on its own, and definitely not one to be taken lightly (all kinds of concerns on that one -- space, bandwidth, tech issues, etc.). I am not really arguing for or against that here. All I'm saying is that we got something Google ain't got, no matter what.
04/05/2005 21:24 #34156
Blow Me Sky High When I DieWow, I'm not the biggest Hunter S. Thompson geek, but I'm all for people digging him and his stuff. I just found this through BoingBoing that talks about his wife's commitment to fulfill his wishes to have his ashes shot from a giant cannon. The cannon will be a part of a giant sculpture in the form of his fist/knife "Gonzo" logo. The logo is cool, and the illustration on BoingBoing features one of his great quotes, which seems really suitable for a headstone, "it never got weird enough for me."
What a cool idea. I applaud Anita Thompson for having such devotion. What a cool wife. I hope my wife blows some shit up (in a fun way, not a scary way) when I die...
What a cool idea. I applaud Anita Thompson for having such devotion. What a cool wife. I hope my wife blows some shit up (in a fun way, not a scary way) when I die...
04/01/2005 23:43 #34154
Animation b4d@$$ Dave LoganMy friend Dave Logan (http://www.dave-logan.com/blog) made this rad video for They Might Be Giants' song, Bloodmobile. Here's the link . It's a great animation. He has been teaching himself Maya in his senior year of high school. You might remember Dave's work from the thoroughly excellent Futurology video he made for DJ Funken Wagnalls feat. Cottonmouth MC, which is linked from our new site at FunkMouth.com (http://www.funkmouth.com/).
Have fun!
Have fun!
04/05/2005 11:11 #34155
Toothing HoaxI just came across this, via the ultiBlog, BoingBoing (www.boingboing.net).
It looks like awhile back there was a flare-up of the blogosphere regarding a topic called "Toothing." Toothing is(was?ever?) the practice of broadcasting bluetooth "hook-up" messages to everyone around you, and eventually, the idea was, somebody would take you up on your offer after receiving your message via their bluetooth enabled mobile phone.
The story trades on the hysteria surrounding blue-jacking, which is a real phenomenon (http://www.bluejackq.com/), but not nearly as dangerous or threatening as one might think.
It looks like the creators of this MEME have come clean about it -- it was all a hoax. They set up a fictional forum and filled it with fictional posts. Once they felt like they had a good history of a budding internet phenomenon represented, they submitted it to Gizmodo (http://www.gizmodo.com). Then it took off. Real people joined the fictional forum. People set up toothing forums for their own areas. It was mayhem.
Now, one of the original creators of Toothing has posted an article discussing it here:
worth a read...
It looks like awhile back there was a flare-up of the blogosphere regarding a topic called "Toothing." Toothing is(was?ever?) the practice of broadcasting bluetooth "hook-up" messages to everyone around you, and eventually, the idea was, somebody would take you up on your offer after receiving your message via their bluetooth enabled mobile phone.
The story trades on the hysteria surrounding blue-jacking, which is a real phenomenon (http://www.bluejackq.com/), but not nearly as dangerous or threatening as one might think.
It looks like the creators of this MEME have come clean about it -- it was all a hoax. They set up a fictional forum and filled it with fictional posts. Once they felt like they had a good history of a budding internet phenomenon represented, they submitted it to Gizmodo (http://www.gizmodo.com). Then it took off. Real people joined the fictional forum. People set up toothing forums for their own areas. It was mayhem.
Now, one of the original creators of Toothing has posted an article discussing it here:
worth a read...