No Stickboy, it isn't obvious[inlink]stickboy,115[/inlink]. Women don't want to smother guys, especially in the beginning. So they give them space. And if he calls, then she thinks he likes her. If you're not interested, don't call. Why bother talking to someone if you're not interested? It doesn't make sense to us. When you say "I'm busy," we understand that to mean you're busy. And women are hard to read?
Rachel's Journal
My Podcast Link
07/22/2004 10:20 #33045
Boys and Girls07/21/2004 11:49 #33044
For PaulI don't know if you're still having email issues. I have some evaluation software and data for you that my company is getting rid of.
07/19/2004 10:18 #33043
Wedding FunE-Paul and I had a great time at the wedding. In addition to my blood relatives, my "family" also consists of three unrelated families that spend a lot of time together. As with any Brancato-Hill-Starr function, the party rocked. My nuclear family tends to dance all night at these kinds of events, and I discovered that my 2 year old nephew is no exception. Also typical at my family weddings - the groom's band sat in for a few songs.
According to e-paul, he doesn't know how to dance. I find this interesting since he used to go to raves every weekend.
According to e-paul, he doesn't know how to dance. I find this interesting since he used to go to raves every weekend.
07/14/2004 17:03 #33042
About The Gay Marriage ThingIf I actually had the opportunity to speak to an opponent of gay marriage in an open discussion, I'd have these comments and questions.
The notion of marriage as only a heterosexual union is presumably based on the tenet that heterosexuality is more "natural." In other words, heterosexual relationships can produce offspring while homosexual unions cannot. So if the only marriages that are valid are those that are based on the possibility of procreation (in an overpopulated world), are marriages without children valid? What about men and women that have a physical ailment that does not allow them to procreate? Or those that are too old to procreate? Should their marriage be dissolved? In fact, aren't we just saying that the point of marriage is to have sex?
If anyone has insight, please comment.
The notion of marriage as only a heterosexual union is presumably based on the tenet that heterosexuality is more "natural." In other words, heterosexual relationships can produce offspring while homosexual unions cannot. So if the only marriages that are valid are those that are based on the possibility of procreation (in an overpopulated world), are marriages without children valid? What about men and women that have a physical ailment that does not allow them to procreate? Or those that are too old to procreate? Should their marriage be dissolved? In fact, aren't we just saying that the point of marriage is to have sex?
If anyone has insight, please comment.
07/14/2004 10:40 #33041
Book ClubAnyone interested in joining a book club? We're going to focus on classic literature and leftist writings.
Email me if you want to join.
Email me if you want to join.