Happy Birthday (e:Diana)!!! I hope you have a great day, and enjoy tasting alcohol for the first time.

[inlink]ajay,115[/inlink]

By Reagan Small Government wing, I mean exactly that. Unfortunately, as you point out - the Reagan Small Government wing isn't exactly for small government. What I mean by this babbling is that the Republican party is now run by social conservatives who are opposed, on principle alone, to government social programs, and support, on principle alone, increasing spending on the military. If I still am not making sense/ you disagree with me, let me know and I will try to be more clear.

As a point of information in response to "The Whitehouse's attempts to fudge the numbers are just plain pathetic," I worked at the Office of Management and Budget's Communications Office this summer, whose responsibility it is to explain the administration's position on the budget deficit. So I was one of the pathetic ones. :-p Just to cover my ass, none of the views that I express and have expressed in my journals are in any way related to my former position or the official position of OMB.

[inlink]rachel,119[/inlink]

In Response to the Garrison Keillor Commentary.
He does bring up some good points in how the Republican Party has moved away from the moderation of the 1960s. The Progressive wing in the Republican Party has greatly diminished, and the moderates are currently on the path to slowly go the way of the dinosaur. One has to look no further than our own backyard to seen this. It is speculated that Rep. Quinn resigned from office because he didn't care for a lot of the strong arm tactics that the House leadership has undertaken. A signal that the Republican House leaders and Quinn were not on good terms can be seen in the fact that when he announced his resignation, he did not tell the House leadership anything untiul he called them 5 minutes before the press conference. This was a big fuck you to the House Republican leadership and caught them with their pants down. To show how unhappy with the way Quinn handled it, it is reported that calls were made to several interest groups that Quinn had been talking to about a job after he was out of office, and the groups were told that if they hired Quinn, their relationship with the COngressional leadership would become quite rocky.

The Reagan small government wing of the Republicans has squashed most of the East Coast Republicans. And he does make some good points about that.

My problem with this article is in its some of his hypocracies, exagerations and misrepresentations. One of the most glaring examples is the fact that he portrays Republicans as all a bunch of crazies (Reread the third paragraph if you doubt this statement), but he then criticizes the Republicans for portraying Democrats as "embittered academics, dessicated Unitarians, whacked-out hippies and cummunards, people who talk to telephone poles, the party of Deadheads." He is doing the same thing he is criticizing the Republicans for. I am not saying you can't call people names or exaggerate, nor am I saying that you can't criticize people for calling people names and exaggerating. I am saying that you can't call people names and exaggerate and then go on and criticize them for doing the same thing.

There are good and bad republicans and democrats, who act honorably or dishonorably. Though he has called attenion to some of the dishonorable things about the Republican party, he has done it in a dishonorable way. Two wrongs don't make a right and in wrting this article he only furthers this progression of rhetoric and attack in politics that he so despises in the Republican party.

And for the record, I am a Nixon Republican (I read his 1,000+ page memoir RN, thought it was great and highly reccommend it). Nixon once spoke of his philosophy on government size as being that his goal is not to make government smaller, but leaner. I have no problem with the government providing social programs or any programs for that matter. I just want those programs to be effective and actually do the job they are supposed to. I would go so far to say that I am not opposed to socialized medicine on principle. Healthcare is a huge problem in America and if the government can do the best job at providing it then they should. I am just concerned with the government's competence at handling things.

A great quote I came across in the CAGW blog

"If you're listening to a rock star in order to get your information on who to vote for, you're a bigger moron than they are. Why are we rock stars? Because we're morons. We sleep all day, we play music at night and very rarely do we sit around reading the Washington Journal."

-Alice Cooper

Make up your own mind people. Don't be a sheep to any party or rock star, whether it is the Republicans or Democrats, Ted Nugent or Dave.

On to other Rock the Vote News, I did find amusing the fact that the Kerry daughters and the Bush daughters were both booed at the MTV VMAs. MTV's rock the vote coverage is so moronic. If people aren't motivated enough to find out real background on the candidates and choose to rely on MTV's hackneyed coverage, maybe they should not be voting.

P.S. I think it is heresy for a polisci major to say that oh well

[inlink]emilyjane,3[/inlink]

try idealist.org. www.idealist.org It is all nonprofits- jobs internships etc.